Classification of Motor Imagery EEG Signals Based on Data Augmentation and Convolutional Neural Networks

Deep learning networks based decision fusion model of EEG and fNIRS for classification of cognitive tasks

The detection of the cognitive tasks performed by a subject during data acquisition of a neuroimaging method has a wide range of applications: functioning of brain-computer interface (BCI), detection of neuronal disorders, neurorehabilitation for disabled patients, and many others. Recent studies show that the combination or fusion of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) demonstrates improved classification and detection performance compared to sole-EEG and sole-fNIRS. Deep learning (DL) networks are suitable for the classification of large volume time-series data like EEG and fNIRS. This study performs the decision fusion of EEG and fNIRS. The classification of EEG, fNIRS, and decision-fused EEG-fNIRSinto cognitive task labels is performed by DL networks. Two different open-source datasets of simultaneously recorded EEG and fNIRS are examined in this study. Dataset 01 is comprised of 26 subjects performing 3 cognitive tasks: n-back, discrimination or selection response (DSR), and word generation (WG). After data acquisition, fNIRS is converted to oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HbR) in Dataset 01. Dataset 02 is comprised of 29 subjects who performed 2 tasks: motor imagery and mental arithmetic. The classification procedure of EEG and fNIRS (or HbO2, HbR) are carried out by 7 DL classifiers: convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory network (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, LSTM-GRU, and CNN-LSTM-GRU. After the classification of single modalities, their prediction scores or decisions are combined to obtain the decision-fused modality. The classification performance is measured by overall accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC). The highest accuracy and AUC recorded in Dataset 01 are 96% and 100% respectively; both by the decision fusion modality using CNN-LSTM-GRU. For Dataset 02, the highest accuracy and AUC are 82.76% and 90.44% respectively; both by the decision fusion modality using CNN-LSTM. The experimental result shows that decision-fused EEG-HbO2-HbR and EEG-fNIRSdeliver higher performances compared to their constituent unimodalities in most cases. For DL classifiers, CNN-LSTM-GRU in Dataset 01 and CNN-LSTM in Dataset 02 yield the highest performance.

Effect of the period of EEG signals on the decoding of motor information

Decoding movement information from electroencephalogram to construct brain-computer interface has promising applications. The EEG data during the entire motor imagery (MI) period or movement execution (ME) period is generally decoded, and calculation of numerous information and massive dataset is time-consuming. In order to improve decoding efficiency, the joint topographic maps of the brain activation state of 15 subjects were studied during different periods. The results showed that the activation intensity of the preparation period in the motor imagery experiment was higher than during the exercise period, while during the exercise period, the activation intensity was higher than in the preparation period in the movement execution experiment. Hence, the wavelet neural network was used to decode the six-class movements including elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination and hand open/close in periods of MI/ME. The experimental results show that the accuracy obtained in the preparation period is the highest in the motor imagery experiment, which is 80.77%. On the other hand, the highest accuracy obtained in the exercise period of the movement execution experiment is 79.26%. It further proves that the optimized period is a key decoding factor to reduce the cost of calculation, and this new decoding method is effective to build a more intelligent brain-computer interface system.

State-of-the-Art on Brain-Computer Interface Technology

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art in brain-computer interfaces (BCI). It begins by providing an introduction to BCIs, describing their main operation principles and most widely used platforms. The paper then examines the various components of a BCI system, such as hardware, software, and signal processing algorithms. Finally, it looks at current trends in research related to BCI use for medical, educational, and other purposes, as well as potential future applications of this technology. The paper concludes by highlighting some key challenges that still need to be addressed before widespread adoption can occur. By presenting an up-to-date assessment of the state-of-the-art in BCI technology, this paper will provide valuable insight into where this field is heading in terms of progress and innovation.