How Does Heterogeneity Affect Freeway Safety? A Simulation-Based Exploration Considering Sustainable Intelligent Connected Vehicles

Exploring driving behavioral characteristics in pre-, in-, and post-conflict stages based on car-following trajectory data

This study investigates driving behaviour in different stages of rear-end conflicts using vehicle trajectory data. Three conflict stages (pre-, in-, and post-conflict) are defined based on time-to-collision (TTC) indicator. Four indexes are selected to capture within-group and between-group characteristics of the stages. Besides, this study also examines the prediction performance of conflict stage identification using specific driving behaviour characteristics associated with each stage. Results reveal variations in dominant driving characteristics and predictive importance across stages. Heterogeneity exists within stages, with differences among clusters. Drivers slow down during in-conflict, with decreasing speed reduction as stages progress. Reaction time increases in post-conflict. Insufficient space gaps contribute to rear-end conflicts in the in-conflict stage. Furthermore, the prediction performance of conflict stage identification, based on the specific driving behaviour characteristics associated with each stage, is commendable. This study enhances understanding and prediction of conflict stage identification in rear-end conflicts.Practitioner summary: This study explores driving behaviour in rear-end conflict stages using trajectory data. It identifies pre-, in-, and post-conflict stages via time-to-collision indicator and assesses within-group and between-group characteristics. Besides, prediction performance for conflict stage identification based on these characteristics is commendable. This research enhances understanding and prediction of rear-end conflicts.

Network-wide safety impacts of dedicated lanes for connected and autonomous vehicles

Cooperative, Connected and Automated Mobility (CCAM) enabled by Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) has potential to change future transport systems. The findings from previous studies suggest that these technologies will improve traffic flow, reduce travel time and delays. Furthermore, these CAVs will be safer compared to existing vehicles. As these vehicles may have the ability to travel at a higher speed and with shorter headways, it has been argued that infrastructure-based measures are required to optimise traffic flow and road user comfort. One of these measures is the use of a dedicated lane for CAVs on urban highways and arterials and constitutes the focus of this research. As the potential impact on safety is unclear, the present study aims to evaluate the safety impacts of dedicated lanes for CAVs. A calibrated and validated microsimulation model developed in AIMSUN was used to simulate and produce safety results. These results were analysed with the help of the Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM). The model includes human-driven vehicles (HDVs), 1st generation and 2nd generation autonomous vehicles (AVs) with different sets of parameters leading to different movement behaviour. The model uses a variety of cases in which a dedicated lane is provided at different type of lanes (inner and outer) of highways to understand the safety effects. The model also tries to understand the minimum required market penetration rate (MPR) of CAVs for a better movement of traffic on dedicated lanes. It was observed in the models that although at low penetration rates of CAVs (around 20%) dedicated lanes might not be advantageous, a reduction of 53% to 58% in traffic conflicts is achieved with the introduction of dedicated lanes in high CAV MPRs. In addition, traffic crashes estimated from traffic conflicts are reduced up to 48% with the CAVs. The simulation results revealed that with dedicated lane, the combination of 40-40-20 (i.e., 40% human-driven - 40% 1st generation AVs- 20% 2nd generation AVs) could be the optimum MPR for CAVs to achieve the best safety benefits. The findings in this study provide useful insight into the safety impacts of dedicated lanes for CAVs and could be used to develop a policy support tool for local authorities and practitioners.

Developing dynamic speed limit strategies for mixed traffic flow to reduce collision risks at freeway bottlenecks

Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) have the great potential to improve traffic flow because of their particular characteristics of connectivity and automation. This study aims to develop CAV control strategies based on car-following speed balance, which are defined as dynamic speed limit (DSL) strategies, and examine their performances on reducing freeway collision risks via microscopic simulations. The core idea of DSL strategy is to command the CAVs to slow down actively before reaching the bottlenecks, and form moving barriers to guide the following human driven vehicles to passively decelerate. Three DSL strategies are first developed for CAVs based on vehicle dynamics principles, and the influences of various position distribution patterns of CAVs on three strategies are compared in the one-lane scenario. Then, the DSL strategy with the best performance is selected based on simulation experiments, and a conventional variable speed limit control is used to compare the performance of our proposed methods. Finally, the DSL strategy based on Min control is tested in the two-lane, three-lane and four-lane scenarios to verify the effectiveness. Simulation results indicate that: (1) three DSL strategies based on CAVs can significantlyreduce collision risks when CAVs reach a certain proportion; (2) the uniform distribution of CAVs can maximize the effect of the moving barriers; (3) DSL strategy based on Min control is negatively affected by lane-changing behaviors, but still works well in the multi-lane scenario.

Collective Driving to Mitigate Climate Change: Collective-Adaptive Cruise Control

The transportation sector is the largest producer of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States. Energy-optimal algorithms are proposed to reduce the transportation sector’s fuel consumption and emissions. These algorithms optimize vehicles’ speed to lower energy consumption and emissions. However, recent studies argued that these algorithms could negatively impact traffic flow, create traffic congestions, and increase fuel consumption on the network-level. To overcome this problem, we propose a collective-energy-optimal adaptive cruise control (collective-ACC). Collective-ACC reduces fuel consumption and emissions by directly optimizing vehicles’ trajectories and indirectly by improving traffic flow. Collective-ACC is a bi-objective non-linear integer optimization. This optimization was solved by the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II). Collective-ACC was compared with manual driving and self-centered adaptive cruise control (i.e., conventional energy-optimal adaptive cruise controls (self-centered-ACC)) in a traffic simulation. We found that collective-ACC reduced fuel consumption by up to 49% and 42% compared with manual driving and self-centered-ACC, respectively. Collective-ACC also lowered CO2, CO, NOX, and PMX by up to 54%, 70%, 58%, and 64% from manual driving, respectively. Game theory analyses were conducted to investigate how adopting collective-ACC could impact automakers, consumers, and government agencies. We propose policy and business recommendations to accelerate adopting collective-ACC and maximize its environmental benefits.