1
|
Matheson A, Wehipeihana N, Gray R, Walton M, Uia T, Lindberg K, Shanthakumar M, Lopez MI, Reidy J, Firestone R, Ellison-Loschmann L. Building a systems-thinking community workforce to scale action on determinants of health in New Zealand. Health Place 2024; 87:103255. [PMID: 38710122 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
This article describes findings from the evaluation of Healthy Families NZ (HFNZ), an equity-driven, place-based community health initiative. Implemented in nine diverse communities across New Zealand, HFNZ aims to strengthen the systems that can improve health and well-being. Findings highlight local needs and priorities including the social mechanisms important for reorienting health and policy systems towards place-based communities. Lessons encompass the importance of local lived experience in putting evidence into practice; the strength of acting with systems in mind; the need for relational, learning, intentional, and well-resourced community organisation; examples of how to foster place-based 'community-up' leadership; and how to enable responsiveness between communities and local and national policy systems. A reconceptualisation of scaling in the context of complexity and systems change is offered, which recognises that relationships and agency are key to making progress on the determinants of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Matheson
- School of Health, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn 6012, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | - Nan Wehipeihana
- Weaving Insights, PO Box 147, Levin 5540, Horowhenua, New Zealand
| | - Rebecca Gray
- School of Health, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn 6012, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Mat Walton
- Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR), Kenepuru Science Centre: 34 Kenepuru Drive, Kenepuru, Porirua 5022, PO Box 50348, Porirua 5240, New Zealand
| | - Tali Uia
- School of Health, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn 6012, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Kirstin Lindberg
- Environmental Health Intelligence New Zealand, Massey University, Wallace Street, Mount Cook, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
| | - Mathu Shanthakumar
- Environmental Health Intelligence New Zealand, Massey University, Wallace Street, Mount Cook, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
| | - Maite Irurzun Lopez
- Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn 6012, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Johanna Reidy
- School of Health, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn 6012, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Riz Firestone
- Centre for Hauora and Health, Massey University, Wallace Street, Mount Cook, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hagenaars LL, Schmidt LA, Groeniger JO, Bekker MPM, Ter Ellen F, de Leeuw E, van Lenthe FJ, Oude Hengel KM, Stronks K. Why we struggle to make progress in obesity prevention and how we might overcome policy inertia: Lessons from the complexity and political sciences. Obes Rev 2024; 25:e13705. [PMID: 38424004 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Despite evidence for the effectiveness of policies that target obesogenic environments, their adoption remains deficient. Using methods and concepts from complexity and political science (Stock-and-Flow analysis and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory) and a qualitative literature review, we developed system maps to identify feedback loops that hinder policymaking on mitigating obesogenic environments and feedback loops that could trigger and sustain policy change. We found numerous self-reinforcing feedback loops that buttress the assumption that obesity is an individual problem, strengthening the biomedical and commercial weight-loss sectors' claim to "ownership" over solutions. That is, improvements in therapies for individuals with obesity reinforces policymakers' reluctance to target obesogenic environments. Random events that focus attention on obesity (e.g., celebrities dismissing soda) could disrupt this cycle, when actors from outside the medical and weight-loss sector (e.g., anti-weight stigma activists) successfully reframe obesity as a societal problem, which requires robust and politically relevant engagement with affected communities prior to such events taking place. Sustained prioritization of policies targeting obesogenic environments requires shared problem ownership of affected communities and nonhealth government sectors, by emphasizing cobenefits of policies that target obesogenic environments (e.g., ultraprocessed food taxation for raising revenue) and solutions that are meaningful for affected communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc L Hagenaars
- Department of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Laura A Schmidt
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Joost Oude Groeniger
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen P M Bekker
- Health and Society Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur Ter Ellen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyne de Leeuw
- Urban Health and Policy, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- École de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Frank J van Lenthe
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karen M Oude Hengel
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Work Health Technology, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Karien Stronks
- Department of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davies C, Pescud M, Maury S, Sullivan D. A new perspective to an old problem - Mobilizing research into policy and practice using an arts and health case study. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1392146. [PMID: 38694989 PMCID: PMC11061409 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1392146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Davies
- Centre for Arts, Mental Health and Wellbeing WA, School of Allied Health and School of Humanties, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Melanie Pescud
- Centre for Arts, Mental Health and Wellbeing WA, School of Allied Health and School of Humanties, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Susan Maury
- Policy, Strategy, and Impact Group, VicHealth, Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, West Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Denise Sullivan
- Chronic Disease Prevention Directorate, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, WA Department of Health, East Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang A, Cooke SM, Garsden C, Behne C, Borkoles E. Transitioning to sustainable, climate-resilient healthcare: insights from a health service staff survey in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:475. [PMID: 38627700 PMCID: PMC11022411 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10882-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 80 countries, including Australia, have made commitments to deliver climate-resilient and low carbon healthcare. Understanding how healthcare workers view their own and their organization's efforts to achieve sustainable and climate-resilient healthcare practice is vital to inform strategies to accelerate that transition. METHODS We conducted an online staff survey in a large state government hospital-and-health-service organisation in Queensland, Australia, to ascertain attitudes and practices towards environmentally sustainable, climate-resilient healthcare, and views about the organizational support necessary to achieve these goals in their workplace. RESULTS From 301 participants showed staff strongly support implementing sustainable and climate-resilient healthcare but require significantly more organizational support. Participants identified three categories of organizational support as necessary for the transition to environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient health services and systems: (1) practical support to make sustainability easier in the workplace (e.g. waste, energy, water, procurement, food, transport etc.); (2) training and education to equip them for 21st century planetary health challenges; and (3) embedding sustainability as 'business as usual' in healthcare culture and systems. CONCLUSIONS The research provides new insight into health workforce views on how organizations should support them to realize climate and sustainability goals. This research has implications for those planning, managing, implementing, and educating for, the transition to environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient health services and systems in Queensland, Australia, and in similar health systems internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christine Garsden
- Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| | | | - Erika Borkoles
- Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heenan M, Chung A, Howse E, Signy H, Rychetnik L. Combining public health evidence, policy experience and communications expertise to inform preventive health: reflections on a novel method of knowledge synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:112. [PMID: 37907940 PMCID: PMC10617064 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01062-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Knowledge synthesis methods help summarize evidence and utilize content expertise to draw out key messages to aid knowledge mobilization and translation. Systems thinking and coproduction can support this by facilitating a multiperspective view and ensuring that knowledge is mobilized and translated in a useful and meaningful way for policy-makers and practitioners. In this paper, we describe the development of a knowledge synthesis approach that utilizes coproduction with policy-makers to combine the findings of a programme of research with policy knowledge to support decision-makers working in chronic disease prevention. The process developed by The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre combined the expertise of research, policy and science communications experts. We reflect on how we used coproduction processes to embed policy-makers as partners in the evidence synthesis process via research-policy dialogues, and embedded science communication into the development and presentation of the findings. This differs from a more common approach of researchers generating evidence for policy with limited input from policy-makers themselves. By collaborating with policy-makers and using coproduction, we can better inform policy-relevant research and generate policy-relevant knowledge. We describe the development of our knowledge synthesis approach using two case studies: the first drawing on a body of work in public health law, and the second on a body of work focused on the first 2000 days of life. We consider how these case studies demonstrate the value of working with policy partners as part of a knowledge synthesis process, and discuss how this process could be adapted and used in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maddie Heenan
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia.
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Alexandra Chung
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elly Howse
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Helen Signy
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lucie Rychetnik
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li B, Alharbi M, Allender S, Swinburn B, Peters R, Foster C. Comprehensive application of a systems approach to obesity prevention: a scoping review of empirical evidence. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1015492. [PMID: 37614454 PMCID: PMC10442543 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1015492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
A systems approach to obesity prevention is increasingly urged. However, confusion exists on what a systems approach entails in practice, and the empirical evidence on this new approach is unclear. This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesise studies/programmes that have comprehensively applied a systems approach to obesity prevention in intervention development, delivery/implementation, and evaluation. By searching international databases and grey literature, only three studies (10 publications) met inclusion criteria, which might be explained partially by suboptimal reporting. No conclusion on the effectiveness of this approach can be drawn yet due to the limited evidence base. We identified common features shared by the included studies, such as measuring ongoing changes, in addition to endpoint outcomes, and supporting capacity building. Some facilitators and barriers to applying a comprehensive systems approach in practice were identified. More well-designed and reported studies are needed, especially from low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bai Li
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammed Alharbi
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Allender
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Boyd Swinburn
- School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Remco Peters
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Charlie Foster
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allender S, Munira SL, Bourke S, Lancsar E. Participatory systems science for enhancing health and wellbeing in the Indian Ocean territories. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1013869. [PMID: 37397744 PMCID: PMC10310353 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1013869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Co-creation of diabetes and obesity prevention with remote communities allows local contextual factors to be included in the design, delivery, and evaluation of disease prevention efforts. The Indian Ocean Territories (IOT) comprise the Christmas (CI) and Cocos Keeling Islands (CKI) and are remote Australian external territories located northwest of the mainland. We present results of a co-design process conducted with residents of IOT using realist inquiry and system mapping. Methods Interviews with 33 community members (17 CI, 14 CKI, 2 off Islands) on causes and outcomes of diabetes (2020/21) comprising community representatives, health services staff, dietitians, school principals and government administrators. Interviews were used to create causal loop diagrams representing the causes of diabetes in the IOT. These diagrams were used in a participatory process to identify existing actions to address diabetes, identify areas where more effort would be valuable in preventing diabetes, and to described and prioritize actions based on feasibility and likely impact. Findings Interviews identified 31 separate variables categorized into four themes (structural, food, knowledge, physical activity). Using causa loop diagrams, community members developed 32 intervention ideas that included strengthening healthy behaviors like physical activity, improving access to healthy and culturally appropriate foods, and overcoming the significant cost and availability limitations imposed by remoteness and freight costs. Interventions included relatively unique Island issues (e.g., freight costs, limited delivery timing), barriers to healthy food (e.g., limited fresh food availability), physical activity (e.g., transient workforce) and knowledge (e.g., multiple cultural backgrounds and language barriers, intergenerational knowledge).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Allender
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Syarifah Liza Munira
- Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Siobhan Bourke
- Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Emily Lancsar
- Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Riley T, Hopkins L, Gomez M, Davidson S, Jacob J. System Action Learning: Reorientating Practice for System Change in Preventive Health. SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH 2023:1-16. [PMID: 37359404 PMCID: PMC10060912 DOI: 10.1007/s11213-023-09638-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
It is now widely accepted that many of the problems we face in public health are complex, from chronic disease to COVID-19. To grapple with such complexity, researchers have turned to both complexity science and systems thinking to better understand the problems and their context. Less work, however, has focused on the nature of complex solutions, or intervention design, when tackling complex problems. This paper explores the nature of system intervention design through case illustrations of system action learning from a large systems level chronic disease prevention study in Australia. The research team worked with community partners in the design and implementation of a process of system action learning designed to reflect on existing initiatives and to reorient practice towards responses informed by system level insights and action. We were able to observe and document changes in the mental models and actions of practitioners and in doing so shine a light on what may be possible once we turn our attention to the nature and practice of system interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Riley
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Liza Hopkins
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Maria Gomez
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Seanna Davidson
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baugh Littlejohns L, Near E, McKee G, Rasali D, Naiman D, Faulkner G. A scoping review of complex systems methods used in population physical activity research: do they align with attributes of a whole system approach? Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:18. [PMID: 36864409 PMCID: PMC9979563 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00961-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex systems approaches are increasingly used in health promotion and noncommunicable disease prevention research, policy and practice. Questions emerge as to the best ways to take a complex systems approach, specifically with respect to population physical activity (PA). Using an Attributes Model is one way to understand complex systems. We aimed to examine the types of complex systems methods used in current PA research and identify what methods align with a whole system approach as reflected by an Attributes Model. METHODS A scoping review was conducted and two databases were searched. Twenty-five articles were selected and data analysis was based upon the following: the complex systems research methods used, research aims, if participatory methods were used and evidence of discussion regarding attributes of systems. RESULTS There were three groups of methods used: system mapping, simulation modelling and network analysis. System mapping methods appeared to align best with a whole system approach to PA promotion because they largely aimed to understand complex systems, examined interactions and feedback among variables, and used participatory methods. Most of these articles focused on PA (as opposed to integrated studies). Simulation modelling methods were largely focused on examining complex problems and identifying interventions. These methods did not generally focus on PA or use participatory methods. While network analysis articles focused on examining complex systems and identifying interventions, they did not focus on PA nor use participatory methods. All attributes were discussed in some way in the articles. Attributes were explicitly reported on in terms of findings or were part of discussion and conclusion sections. System mapping methods appear to be well aligned with a whole system approach because these methods addressed all attributes in some way. We did not find this pattern with other methods. CONCLUSIONS Future research using complex systems methods may benefit from applying the Attributes Model in conjunction with system mapping methods. Simulation modelling and network analysis methods are seen as complementary and could be used when system mapping methods identify priorities for further investigation (e.g. what interventions to implement or how densely connected relationships are in systems).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Baugh Littlejohns
- BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4 Canada
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, 210-6081 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1 Canada
| | - Erin Near
- Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Stewart Building, Building #45, Rm 2509, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada
| | - Geoff McKee
- BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4 Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Drona Rasali
- BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4 Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Daniel Naiman
- BC Ministry of Health, Stn Prov Govt, PO Box 9646, Victoria, BC V8W 9P1 Canada
| | - Guy Faulkner
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, 210-6081 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aadahl M, Vardinghus-Nielsen H, Bloch P, Jørgensen TS, Pisinger C, Tørslev MK, Klinker CD, Birch SD, Bøggild H, Toft U. Our Healthy Community Conceptual Framework and Intervention Model for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Municipalities. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3901. [PMID: 36900911 PMCID: PMC10001904 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
This paper introduces the conceptual framework and intervention model of Our Healthy Community (OHC), a new, coordinated, and integrated approach towards health promotion and disease prevention in municipalities. The model is inspired by systems-based approaches and employs a supersetting approach for engaging stakeholders across sectors in the development and implementation of interventions to increase health and well-being among citizens. The conceptual model includes a combination of a bottom-up approach emphasizing involvement of citizens and other community-based stakeholders combined with a top-down approach emphasizing political, legal, administrative, and technical support from a variety of councils and departments in local municipality government. The model operates bidirectionally: (1) by pushing political and administrative processes to promote the establishment of conducive structural environments for making healthy choices, and (2) by involving citizens and professional stakeholders at all levels in co-creating processes of shaping their own community and municipality. An operational intervention model was further developed by the OHC project while working with the OHC in two Danish municipalities. The operational intervention model of OHC comprises three main phases and key actions to be implemented at the levels of local government and community: (1) Local government: Situational analysis, dialogue, and political priorities; (2) Community: Thematic co-creation among professional stakeholders; and (3) Target area: Intervention development and implementation. The OHC model will provide municipalities with new tools to improve the citizens' health and well-being with available resources. Health promotion and disease prevention interventions are developed, implemented, and anchored in the local community by citizens and local stakeholders at municipal and local community levels using collaboration and partnerships as leverage points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Aadahl
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Vardinghus-Nielsen
- Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, 9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark
| | - Paul Bloch
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Health Promotion Research, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 83, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Thea Suldrup Jørgensen
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Charlotta Pisinger
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Kirstine Tørslev
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Health Promotion Research, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 83, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Demant Klinker
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Health Promotion Research, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 83, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Signe Damsbo Birch
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Henrik Bøggild
- Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, 9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark
| | - Ulla Toft
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cervantes G, Pérez-Ferrer C, Thow AM, Villarreal E, Durán-Arenas L. The Way Forward on Nutrition in Food Systems Transformation: A Response to the Recent Commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:3155-3156. [PMID: 37579352 PMCID: PMC10105171 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Cervantes
- Master´s and Doctorate Program in Medical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Carolina Pérez-Ferrer
- Center for Research in Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico City, Mexico
- National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Anne-Marie Thow
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eduardo Villarreal
- Public Administration Division, Center for Research and Teaching in Economics, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis Durán-Arenas
- Public Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pescud M, Rychetnik L, Allender S, Irving MJ, Howse E, Rutter H, Ison R, Riley T, Friel S, Finegood DT. Leadership for systems change: Researcher practices for enhancing research impact in the prevention of chronic disease. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1045001. [PMID: 36561852 PMCID: PMC9767460 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1045001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Strengthening systems for chronic disease prevention is essential. Leadership for systems change is an important key to strengthening systems. Leadership in prevention research for supporting systems change remains a relatively abstract concept and there is limited empirical information about the leadership practices of prevention research teams when viewed through a complexity lens. In this paper we examine and describe some systems leadership practices for creating change through prevention research, as identified in a series of six case studies. Methods A qualitative approach incorporating semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document review was used to facilitate an in-depth investigation of the research topic. Results Several researcher practices for enhancing research impact in the prevention of chronic disease were distilled from the data pertaining to how they sought to create change. These included persuasive communication, compassion and deep listening, reflective practice, and embedding themselves within the systems they sought to change. Discussion The findings provide insights that may assist prevention researchers and other practitioners dedicated to creating change in chronic disease prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Pescud
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Glebe, NSW, Australia
| | - Lucie Rychetnik
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Glebe, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Steven Allender
- School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Michelle J. Irving
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Glebe, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Evidence and Implementation, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Eloise Howse
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Glebe, NSW, Australia
| | - Harry Rutter
- Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Ray Ison
- School of Engineering and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
| | - Therese Riley
- Therese Riley Consulting, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Mitchell Institute, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sharon Friel
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Diane T. Finegood
- Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nau T, Bauman A, Smith BJ, Bellew W. A scoping review of systems approaches for increasing physical activity in populations. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:104. [PMID: 36175916 PMCID: PMC9524093 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00906-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The past decade has increasingly seen systems approaches as a featured theme in public health studies and policy documents. This trend is evident in the area of physical activity, which is a significant global health risk factor that is addressed in WHO's Global Action Plan on Physical Activity. We undertook a comprehensive scoping review to characterize the application of systems approaches to physical activity, to develop a typology of the objectives, themes and methods of research papers that purported to apply systems thinking to this issue. METHODS We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO) for studies published during the period 2010-2021 that explicitly applied systems approaches or methods to investigate and/or address population physical activity. A framework using systems-based methodological approaches was adapted to classify physical activity studies according to their predominant approach, covering basic descriptive, complex analytical and advanced forms of practice. We selected case studies from retained studies to depict the current "state of the art". RESULTS We included 155 articles in our narrative account. Literature reporting the application of systems approaches to physical activity is skewed towards basic methods and frameworks, with most attention devoted to conceptual framing and predictive modelling. There are few well-described examples of physical activity interventions which have been planned, implemented and evaluated using a systems perspective. There is some evidence of "retrofitted" complex system framing to describe programmes and interventions which were not designed as such. DISCUSSION We propose a classification of systems-based approaches to physical activity promotion together with an explanation of the strategies encompassed. The classification is designed to stimulate debate amongst policy-makers, practitioners and researchers to inform the further implementation and evaluation of systems approaches to physical activity. CONCLUSION The use of systems approaches within the field of physical activity is at an early stage of development, with a preponderance of descriptive approaches and a dearth of more complex analyses. We need to see movement towards a more sophisticated research agenda spanning the development, implementation and evaluation of systems-level interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Nau
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Adrian Bauman
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ben J Smith
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - William Bellew
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Crane M, Nathan N, McKay H, Lee K, Wiggers J, Bauman A. Understanding the sustainment of population health programmes from a whole-of-system approach. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:37. [PMID: 35392913 PMCID: PMC8988542 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00843-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population health prevention programmes are needed to reduce the prevalence of chronic diseases. Nevertheless, sustaining programmes at a population level is challenging. Population health is highly influenced by social, economic and political environments and is vulnerable to these system-level changes. The aim of this research was to examine the factors and mechanisms contributing to the sustainment of population prevention programmes taking a systems thinking approach. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study through interviews with population health experts working within Australian government and non-government agencies experienced in sustaining public health programs at the local, state or national level (n = 13). We used a deductive thematic approach, grounded in systems thinking to analyse data. RESULTS We identified four key barriers affecting program sustainment: 1) short term political and funding cycles; 2) competing interests; 3) silo thinking within health service delivery; and 4) the fit of a program to population needs. To overcome these barriers various approaches have centred on the importance of long-range planning and resourcing, flexible program design and management, leadership and partnerships, evidence generation, and system support structures. CONCLUSION This study provides key insights for overcoming challenges to the sustainment of population health programmes amidst complex system-wide changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Crane
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
- Sydney School of Public Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Nicole Nathan
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science (NCOIS), The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather McKay
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 123, Canada
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Centre, 2635 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V57 1M9, Canada
| | - Karen Lee
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science (NCOIS), The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Adrian Bauman
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science (NCOIS), The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|