1
|
Greenwood HE, Barber AR, Edwards RS, Tyrrell WE, George ME, Dos Santos SN, Baark F, Tanc M, Khalil E, Falzone A, Ward NP, DeBlasi JM, Torrente L, Soni PN, Pearce DR, Firth G, Smith LM, Vilhelmsson Timmermand O, Huebner A, Swanton C, Hynds RE, DeNicola GM, Witney TH. Imaging NRF2 activation in non-small cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography. Nat Commun 2024; 15:10484. [PMID: 39690148 PMCID: PMC11652680 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54852-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Mutations in the NRF2-KEAP1 pathway are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer broad-spectrum therapeutic resistance, leading to poor outcomes. Currently, there is no means to non-invasively identify NRF2 activation in living subjects. Here, we show that positron emission tomography imaging with the system xc- radiotracer, [18F]FSPG, provides a sensitive and specific marker of NRF2 activation in orthotopic, patient-derived, and genetically engineered mouse models of NSCLC. We found a NRF2-related gene expression signature in a large cohort of NSCLC patients, suggesting an opportunity to preselect patients prior to [18F]FSPG imaging. Furthermore, we reveal that system xc- is a metabolic vulnerability that can be therapeutically targeted with an antibody-drug conjugate for sustained tumour growth suppression. Overall, our results establish [18F]FSPG as a predictive marker of therapy resistance in NSCLC and provide the basis for the clinical evaluation of both imaging and therapeutic agents that target this important antioxidant pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E Greenwood
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Abigail R Barber
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Richard S Edwards
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Will E Tyrrell
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Madeleine E George
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sofia N Dos Santos
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Friedrich Baark
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Muhammet Tanc
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Eman Khalil
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Aimee Falzone
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nathan P Ward
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Janine M DeBlasi
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Laura Torrente
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Pritin N Soni
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David R Pearce
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - George Firth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lydia M Smith
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Ariana Huebner
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Charles Swanton
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Robert E Hynds
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Gina M DeNicola
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Timothy H Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sambasivan K, Tyrrell WE, Farooq R, Mynerich J, Edwards RS, Tanc M, Urbano TG, Witney TH. [ 18F]FSPG-PET provides an early marker of radiotherapy response in head and neck squamous cell cancer. NPJ IMAGING 2024; 2:28. [PMID: 39132311 PMCID: PMC11315666 DOI: 10.1038/s44303-024-00038-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
The ability to image early treatment response to radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) will enable the identification of radioresistant tumor volumes suitable for treatment intensification. Here, we propose the system xc - radiotracer (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate ([18F]FSPG) as a non-invasive method to monitor radiation response in HNSCC. We assessed temporal changes in cell death, antioxidant status, and [18F]FSPG retention following a single dose of 10 Gy irradiation in FaDU HNSCC cells. Next, using a fractionated course of radiotherapy, we assessed tumor volume changes and performed [18F]FSPG-PET imaging in FaDU-bearing mouse xenografts, followed by ex vivo response assessment. In cells, 10 Gy irradiation reduced [18F]FSPG retention, coinciding with the induction of apoptosis and the production of reactive oxygen species. In vivo, [18F]FSPG tumor retention was halved seven days after the start of treatment, which preceded radiotherapy-induced tumor shrinkage, thereby confirming [18F]FSPG-PET as an early and sensitive marker of radiation response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khrishanthne Sambasivan
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Will E. Tyrrell
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rizwan Farooq
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jenasee Mynerich
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Richard S. Edwards
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Muhammet Tanc
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Teresa Guerrero Urbano
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences and School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Timothy H. Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pantel AR, Bae SW, Li EJ, O'Brien SR, Manning HC. PET Imaging of Metabolism, Perfusion, and Hypoxia: FDG and Beyond. Cancer J 2024; 30:159-169. [PMID: 38753750 PMCID: PMC11101148 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Imaging glucose metabolism with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography has transformed the diagnostic and treatment algorithms of numerous malignancies in clinical practice. The cancer phenotype, though, extends beyond dysregulation of this single pathway. Reprogramming of other pathways of metabolism, as well as altered perfusion and hypoxia, also typifies malignancy. These features provide other opportunities for imaging that have been developed and advanced into humans. In this review, we discuss imaging metabolism, perfusion, and hypoxia in cancer, focusing on the underlying biology to provide context. We conclude by highlighting the ability to image multiple facets of biology to better characterize cancer and guide targeted treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin R Pantel
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Seong-Woo Bae
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth J Li
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sophia R O'Brien
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - H Charles Manning
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharkey AR, Koglin N, Mittra ES, Han S, Cook GJR, Witney TH. Clinical [ 18F]FSPG Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Reveals Heterogeneity in Tumor-Associated System x c- Activity. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1437. [PMID: 38611114 PMCID: PMC11011143 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid ([18F]FSPG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) provides a readout of system xc- transport activity and has been used for cancer detection in clinical studies of different cancer types. As system xc- provides the rate-limiting precursor for glutathione biosynthesis, an abundant antioxidant, [18F]FSPG imaging may additionally provide important prognostic information. Here, we performed an analysis of [18F]FSPG radiotracer distribution between primary tumors, metastases, and normal organs from cancer patients. We further assessed the heterogeneity of [18F]FSPG retention between cancer types, and between and within individuals. METHODS This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data compared [18F]FSPG PET/CT in subjects with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC, n = 5) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 10), scanned at different institutions. Using semi-automated regions of interest drawn around tumors and metastases, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, SUV standard deviation and SUVpeak were measured. [18F]FSPG time-activity curves (TACs) for normal organs, primary tumors and metastases were subsequently compared to 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT at 60 min post injection (p.i.). RESULTS The mean administered activity of [18F]FSPG was 309.3 ± 9.1 MBq in subjects with NSCLC and 285.1 ± 11.3 MBq in those with HNSCC. The biodistribution of [18F]FSPG in both cohorts showed similar TACs in healthy organs from cancer patients. There was no statistically significant overall difference in the average SUVmax of tumor lesions at 60 min p.i. for NSCLC (8.1 ± 7.1) compared to HNSCC (6.0 ± 4.1; p = 0.29) for [18F]FSPG. However, there was heterogeneous retention between and within cancer types; the SUVmax at 60 min p.i. ranged from 1.4 to 23.7 in NSCLC and 3.1-12.1 in HNSCC. CONCLUSION [18F]FSPG PET/CT imaging from both NSCLC and HNSCC cohorts showed the same normal-tissue biodistribution, but marked tumor heterogeneity across subjects and between lesions. Despite rapid elimination through the urinary tract and low normal-background tissue retention, the diagnostic potential of [18F]FSPG was limited by variability in tumor retention. As [18F]FSPG retention is mediated by the tumor's antioxidant capacity and response to oxidative stress, this heterogeneity may provide important insights into an individual tumor's response or resistance to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R. Sharkey
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (A.R.S.); (G.J.R.C.)
| | | | - Erik S. Mittra
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA;
| | - Sangwon Han
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea;
| | - Gary J. R. Cook
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (A.R.S.); (G.J.R.C.)
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St. Thomas’ PET Center, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Timothy H. Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (A.R.S.); (G.J.R.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Greenwood HE, Edwards RS, Tyrrell WE, Barber AR, Baark F, Tanc M, Khalil E, Falzone A, Ward NP, DeBlasi JM, Torrente L, Pearce DR, Firth G, Smith LM, Timmermand OV, Huebner A, George ME, Swanton C, Hynds RE, DeNicola GM, Witney TH. Imaging the master regulator of the antioxidant response in non-small cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.12.16.572007. [PMID: 38168428 PMCID: PMC10760199 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.16.572007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Mutations in the NRF2-KEAP1 pathway are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer broad-spectrum therapeutic resistance, leading to poor outcomes. The cystine/glutamate antiporter, system xc-, is one of the >200 cytoprotective proteins controlled by NRF2, which can be non-invasively imaged by (S)-4-(3-18F-fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate ([18F]FSPG) positron emission tomography (PET). Through genetic and pharmacologic manipulation, we show that [18F]FSPG provides a sensitive and specific marker of NRF2 activation in advanced preclinical models of NSCLC. We validate imaging readouts with metabolomic measurements of system xc- activity and their coupling to intracellular glutathione concentration. A redox gene signature was measured in patients from the TRACERx 421 cohort, suggesting an opportunity for patient stratification prior to imaging. Furthermore, we reveal that system xc- is a metabolic vulnerability that can be therapeutically targeted for sustained tumour growth suppression in aggressive NSCLC. Our results establish [18F]FSPG as predictive marker of therapy resistance in NSCLC and provide the basis for the clinical evaluation of both imaging and therapeutic agents that target this important antioxidant pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E. Greenwood
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Richard S. Edwards
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Will E. Tyrrell
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Abigail R. Barber
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Friedrich Baark
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Muhammet Tanc
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Eman Khalil
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Aimee Falzone
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Nathan P. Ward
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Janine M. DeBlasi
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Laura Torrente
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - David R. Pearce
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - George Firth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Lydia M. Smith
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Oskar Vilhelmsson Timmermand
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Ariana Huebner
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Madeleine E. George
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Charles Swanton
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Robert E. Hynds
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, WC1E 6DD, UK
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Gina M. DeNicola
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Timothy H. Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith LM, Greenwood HE, Tyrrell WE, Edwards RS, de Santis V, Baark F, Firth G, Tanc M, Terry SYA, Herrmann A, Southworth R, Witney TH. The chicken chorioallantoic membrane as a low-cost, high-throughput model for cancer imaging. NPJ IMAGING 2023; 1:1. [PMID: 38239706 PMCID: PMC7615542 DOI: 10.1038/s44303-023-00001-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Mouse models are invaluable tools for radiotracer development and validation. They are, however, expensive, low throughput, and are constrained by animal welfare considerations. Here, we assessed the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as an alternative to mice for preclinical cancer imaging studies. NCI-H460 FLuc cells grown in Matrigel on the CAM formed vascularized tumors of reproducible size without compromising embryo viability. By designing a simple method for vessel cannulation it was possible to perform dynamic PET imaging in ovo, producing high tumor-to-background signal for both 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) and (4S)-4-(3-18F-fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (18F-FSPG). The pattern of 18F-FDG tumor uptake were similar in ovo and in vivo, although tumor-associated radioactivity was higher in the CAM-grown tumors over the 60 min imaging time course. Additionally, 18F-FSPG provided an early marker of both treatment response to external beam radiotherapy and target inhibition in ovo. Overall, the CAM provided a low-cost alternative to tumor xenograft mouse models which may broaden access to PET and SPECT imaging and have utility across multiple applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia M. Smith
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Hannah E. Greenwood
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Will E. Tyrrell
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Richard S. Edwards
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Vittorio de Santis
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Friedrich Baark
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - George Firth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Muhammet Tanc
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Samantha Y. A. Terry
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Anne Herrmann
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Richard Southworth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Timothy H. Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sharkey AR, Witney TH, Cook GJR. Is System x c- a Suitable Target for Tumour Detection and Response Assessment with Imaging? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5573. [PMID: 38067277 PMCID: PMC10705217 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
System xc- is upregulated in cancer cells and can be imaged using novel radiotracers, most commonly with (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamic acid (18F-FSPG). The aim of this review was to summarise the use of 18F-FSPG in humans, explore the benefits and limitations of 18F-FSPG, and assess the potential for further use of 18F-FSPG in cancer patients. To date, ten papers have described the use of 18F-FSPG in human cancers. These studies involved small numbers of patients (range 1-26) and assessed the use of 18F-FSPG as a general oncological diagnostic agent across different cancer types. These clinical trials were contrasting in their findings, limiting the scope of 18F-FSPG PET/CT as a purely diagnostic agent, primarily due to heterogeneity of 18F-FSPG retention both between cancer types and patients. Despite these limitations, a potential further application for 18F-FSPG is in the assessment of early treatment response and prediction of treatment resistance. Animal models of cancer have shown that changes in 18F-FSPG retention following effective therapy precede glycolytic changes, as indicated by 18F-FDG, and changes in tumour volume, as measured by CT. If these results could be replicated in human clinical trials, imaging with 18F-FSPG PET/CT would offer an exciting route towards addressing the currently unmet clinical needs of treatment resistance prediction and early imaging assessment of therapy response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R. Sharkey
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Timothy H. Witney
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Gary J. R. Cook
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
- King’s College London and Guy’s and St. Thomas’ PET Centre, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang H. The National Cancer Institute's Co-Clinical Quantitative Imaging Research Resources for Precision Medicine in Preclinical and Clinical Settings. Tomography 2023; 9:931-941. [PMID: 37218936 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9030076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) and patient-derived xenograft mouse models (PDXs) can recapitulate important biological features of cancer. They are often part of precision medicine studies in a co-clinical setting, in which therapeutic investigations are conducted in patients and in parallel (or sequentially) in cohorts of GEMMs or PDXs. Employing radiology-based quantitative imaging in these studies allows in vivo assessment of disease response in real time, providing an important opportunity to bridge precision medicine from the bench to the bedside. The Co-Clinical Imaging Research Resource Program (CIRP) of the National Cancer Institute focuses on the optimization of quantitative imaging methods to improve co-clinical trials. The CIRP supports 10 different co-clinical trial projects, spanning diverse tumor types, therapeutic interventions, and imaging modalities. Each CIRP project is tasked to deliver a unique web resource to support the cancer community with the necessary methods and tools to conduct co-clinical quantitative imaging studies. This review provides an update of the CIRP web resources, network consensus, technology advances, and a perspective on the future of the CIRP. The presentations in this special issue of Tomography were contributed by the CIRP working groups, teams, and associate members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiming Zhang
- Cancer Imaging Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|