Antinociceptive Actions of Botulinum Toxin A1 on Immunogenic Hypersensitivity in Temporomandibular Joint of Rats

Botulinum toxin type A is a potential therapeutic drug for chronic orofacial pain

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A), produced by the gram-positive anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum, acts by cleaving synaptosome-associated protein-25 (SNAP-25), an essential component of the presynaptic neuronal membrane that is necessary for fusion with the membrane proteins of neurotransmitter-containing vesicles. Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of BTX-A in treating chronic pain conditions, including lower back pain, chronic neck pain, neuropathic pain, and trigeminal neuralgia, particularly when patients are unresponsive to traditional painkillers. This review focuses on the analgesic effects of BTX-A in various chronic pain conditions, with a particular emphasis on the orofacial region.

HIGHLIGHT

This review focuses on the mechanisms by which BTX-A induces analgesia in patients with inflammatory and temporomandibular joint pain. This review also highlights the fact that BTX-A can effectively manage neuropathic pain and trigeminal neuralgia, which are difficult-to-treat chronic pain conditions. Herein, we present a comprehensive assessment of the central analgesic effects of BTX-A and a discussion of its various applications in clinical dental practice.

CONCLUSION

BTX-A is an approved treatment option for various chronic pain conditions. Although there is evidence of axonal transport of BTX-A from peripheral to central endings in motor neurons, the precise mechanism underlying its pain-modulating effects remains unclear. This review discusses the evidence supporting the effectiveness of BTX-A in controlling chronic pain conditions in the orofacial region. BTX-A is a promising therapeutic agent for treating pain conditions that do not respond to conventional analgesics.

Embracing the Versatility of Botulinum Neurotoxins in Conventional and New Therapeutic Applications

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have been used for almost half a century in the treatment of excessive muscle contractility. BoNTs are routinely used to treat movement disorders such as cervical dystonia, spastic conditions, blepharospasm, and hyperhidrosis, as well as for cosmetic purposes. In addition to the conventional indications, the use of BoNTs to reduce pain has gained increased recognition, giving rise to an increasing number of indications in disorders associated with chronic pain. Furthermore, BoNT-derived formulations are benefiting a much wider range of patients suffering from overactive bladder, erectile dysfunction, arthropathy, neuropathic pain, and cancer. BoNTs are categorised into seven toxinotypes, two of which are in clinical use, and each toxinotype is divided into multiple subtypes. With the development of bioinformatic tools, new BoNT-like toxins have been identified in non-Clostridial organisms. In addition to the expanding indications of existing formulations, the rich variety of toxinotypes or subtypes in the wild-type BoNTs associated with new BoNT-like toxins expand the BoNT superfamily, forming the basis on which to develop new BoNT-based therapeutics as well as research tools. An overview of the diversity of the BoNT family along with their conventional therapeutic uses is presented in this review followed by the engineering and formulation opportunities opening avenues in therapy.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the analgesic effects of botulinum neurotoxin: A literature review

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), derived from Clostridium botulinum, have been employed to treat a range of central and peripheral neurological disease. Some studies indicate that BoNT may be beneficial for pain conditions as well. It has been hypothesized that BoNTs may exert their analgesic effects by preventing the release of pain-related neurotransmitters and neuroinflammatory agents from sensory nerve endings, suppressing glial activation, and inhibiting the transmission of pain-related receptors to the neuronal cell membrane. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that the central analgesic effects of BoNTs are mediated through their retrograde axonal transport. The purpose of this review is to summarize the experimental evidence of the analgesic functions of BoNTs and discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which they can act on pain conditions. Most of the studies reviewed in this article were conducted using BoNT/A. The PubMed database was searched from 1995 to December 2022 to identify relevant literature.

Botulinum toxin type a antinociceptive activity in trigeminal regions involves central transcytosis

OBJECTIVE

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) provides lasting pain relief in patients with craniofacial pain conditions but the mechanisms of its antinociceptive activity remain unclear. Preclinical research revealed toxin axonal transport to the central afferent terminals, but it is unknown if its central effects involve transsynaptic traffic to the higher-order synapses. To answer this, we examined the contribution of central BoNT-A transcytosis to its action in experimental orofacial pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Male Wistar rats, 3-4 months old, were injected with BoNT-A (7 U/kg) unilaterally into the vibrissal pad. To investigate the possible contribution of toxin's transcytosis, BoNT-A-neutralizing antiserum (5 IU) was applied intracisternally. Antinocicepive BoNT-A action was assessed by duration of nocifensive behaviors and c-Fos activation in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) following bilateral or unilateral formalin (2.5%) application into the vibrissal pad. Additionally, cleaved synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (cl-SNAP-25) immunoreactivity was analyzed in the bilateral TNC.

RESULTS

Unilaterally injected BoNT-A reduced the nocifensive behaviors and bilateral c-Fos activation induced by formalin, which was accompanied by the toxin's enzymatic activity on both sides of the TNC. BoNT-A antinociceptive or enzymatic activities were prevented by the specific neutralizing antitoxin. BoNT-A contralateral action occurred independently from ipsilateral side nociception or contralateral trigeminal nerve-mediated axonal traffic.

CONCLUSION

Herein, we demonstrate that antinociceptive action of pericranially administered BoNT-A involves transsynaptic transport to second order synapses and contralateral trigeminal nociceptive nuclei. These results reveal more complex central toxin activity, necessary to explain its clinical effectiveness in the trigeminal region-related pain states.

The analgesic effects of botulinum neurotoxin by modulating pain-related receptors; A literature review

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), produced by Clostridium botulinum, have been used for the treatment of various central and peripheral neurological conditions. Recent studies have suggested that BoNTs may also have a beneficial effect on pain conditions. It has been hypothesized that one of the mechanisms underlying BoNTs' analgesic effects is the inhibition of pain-related receptors' transmission to the neuronal cell membrane. BoNT application disrupts the integration of synaptic vesicles with the cellular membrane, which is responsible for transporting various receptors, including pain receptors such as TRP channels, calcium channels, sodium channels, purinergic receptors, neurokinin-1 receptors, and glutamate receptors. BoNT also modulates the opioidergic system and the GABAergic system, both of which are involved in the pain process. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these effects can provide valuable insights for the development of novel therapeutic approaches for pain management. This review aims to summarize the experimental evidence of the analgesic functions of BoNTs and discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which they can act on pain conditions by inhibiting the transmission of pain-related receptors.

Introduction to the Toxins Special Issue on Botulinum Toxins: New Uses in the Treatment of Diseases

Studies on animals and humans have amply demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) in many pathologies [...].

The safety of botulinum neurotoxin type A's intraarticular application in experimental animals

In vivo studies of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) enabled characterization of its activity in the nociceptive sensory system separate from its preferred action in motor and autonomic nerve terminals. However, in the recent rodent studies of arthritic pain which employed high intra-articular (i.a.) doses (expressed as a total number of units (U) per animal or U/kg), possible systemic effects have not been conclusively excluded. Herein we assessed the effect of two pharmaceutical preparations, abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A, 10, 20, and 40 U/kg corresponding to 0.05, 0.11, and 0.22 ng/kg neurotoxin) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A, 10 and 20 U/kg corresponding to 0.09 and 0.18 ng/kg, respectively) injected into the rat knee, on safety-relevant readouts: digit abduction, motor performance and weight gain during 14 days post-treatment. The i. a. toxin produced dose-dependent impairment of the toe spreading reflex and rotarod performance, which was moderate and transient after 10 U/kg onaBoNT-A and ≤20 U/kg aboBoNT-A doses, and severe and long-lasting (examined up to 14 days) after ≥20 U/kg of onaBoNT-A and 40 U/kg aboBoNT-A. In addition, lower toxin doses prevented the normal weight gain compared to controls, while higher doses induced marked weight loss (≥20 U/kg of onaBoNT-A and 40 U/kg aboBoNT-A). Commonly employed BoNT-A formulations, depending on the doses, cause local relaxation of the surrounding muscles and systemic adverse effects in rats. Thus, to evade possible toxin unwanted local or systemic spread, careful dosing and motor testing should be mandatory in preclinical behavioral studies, irrespective of the sites and doses of toxin application.

Pain Management and Rehabilitation for Central Sensitization in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Comprehensive Review

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a group of musculoskeletal diseases affecting masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints (TMJ). In this context, the chronic TMD could be considered as a condition with chronic primary orofacial pain, presenting as myofascial TMD pain or TMJ arthralgia. In this context, myogenous TMD may present overlapping features with other disorders, such as fibromyalgia and primary headaches, characterized by chronic primary pain related to dysfunction of the central nervous system (CNS), probably through the central sensitization. This phenomenon could be defined as an amplified response of the CNS to sensory stimuli and peripheral nociceptive, characterized by hyperexcitability in the dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cord, which ascend through the spinothalamic tract. The main objectives of the management of TMD patients are: decreasing pain, increasing TMJ function, and reducing the reflex masticatory muscle spasm/pain. The first-line treatments are physical therapy, pharmacological drugs, occlusal splints, laser therapy, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and oxygen-ozone therapy. Although all these therapeutic approaches were shown to have a positive impact on the central sensitization of TMD pain, there is still no agreement on this topic in the scientific literature. Thus, in this comprehensive review, we aimed at evaluating the evidence on pain management and rehabilitation for the central sensitization in TMD patients.