AbobotulinumtoxinA Doses in Upper and Lower Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Literature Review

Botulinum toxin A injection for post-stroke upper limb spasticity and rehabilitation practices from centers across Asian countries

Purpose

Describe real-life practice and outcomes in the management of post-stroke upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) in Asian settings.

Methods

Subgroup analysis of a prospective, observational study (NCT01020500) of adult patients (≥18 years) with post-stroke upper limb spasticity presenting for routine spasticity management, including treatment with BoNT-A. The primary outcome was goal attainment as assessed using goal-attainment scaling (GAS). Patients baseline clinical characteristics and BoNT-A injection parameters are also described.

Results

Overall, 51 patients from Asia were enrolled. Rates of comorbid cognitive and emotional problems were relatively low. Patients tended to have more severe distal limb spasticity and to prioritize active over passive function goals. Most (94.1%) patients in the subgroup were treated with abobotulinumtoxinA. For these patients, the median total dose was 500 units, and the most frequently injected muscles were the biceps brachii (83.3%), flexor carpi radialis (72.9%), and flexor digitorum profundus (66.7%). Overall, 74.5% achieved their primary goal and the mean GAS T score after one treatment cycle was 56.0 ± 13.0, with a change from baseline of 20.9 ± 14.3 (p < 0.001). The majority (96.1%) of Asian patients were rated as having improved.

Conclusion

In the Asian treatment setting, BoNT-A demonstrated a clinically significant effect on goal attainment for the real-life management of upper limb spasticity following stroke.

Real-world differences in dosing and clinical utilization of OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of upper limb spasticity

According to prescribing information, potency units are not interchangeable between botulinum toxin A products. This exploratory study compared real-world dosing and utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with upper limb spasticity. In this retrospective study, 101 clinicians provided chart data via online surveys for 215 US post-stroke patients treated for upper limb spasticity with ≥3 onabotulinumtoxinA or abobotulinumtoxinA doses (phase 1: 9/18/2020-12/10/2020; phase 2: 9/30/2021-12/7/2021). Most participating clinicians were physicians (70.3%) specializing in neurology (71.3%) or physiatry (20.8%). In the onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 107) and abobotulinumtoxinA (n = 108) groups, ∼75% of patients had moderate-to-severe spasticity. A range of onabotulinumtoxinA:abobotulinumtoxinA dose ratios (1:2.2 [95%CI: 1.8-2.6] to 1:4.1 [95%CI: 3.0-6.0]) was observed across muscles. For the most recent dose, mean number of muscles injected was greater for onabotulinumtoxinA (4.3) versus abobotulinumtoxinA (3.1; P = 0.0003). For onabotulinumtoxinA versus abobotulinumtoxinA, the proportion of injections was 81.3% versus 63.9% (P = 0.0067) in forearm muscles and 23.4% versus 3.7% (P = 0.0001) in hand muscles. Mean injection intervals were similar (onabotulinumtoxinA: 102.0 days; abobotulinumtoxinA: 99.1 days). Differences in real-world dosing and utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA for upper limb spasticity were observed. There was no standard dose-conversion ratio, consistent with each product's prescribing information.

Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Modified Scoping Review

This article aims to provide a concise overview of the best available evidence for managing post-stroke spasticity. A modified scoping review, conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), involved an intensive search on Medline and PubMed from 1 January 2000 to 31 August 2023. The focus was placed on high-quality (GRADE A) medical, rehabilitation, and surgical interventions. In total, 32 treatments for post-stroke spasticity were identified. Two independent reviewers rigorously assessed studies, extracting data, and evaluating bias using GRADE criteria. Only interventions with GRADE A evidence were considered. The data included the study type, number of trials, participant characteristics, interventions, parameters, controls, outcomes, and limitations. The results revealed eleven treatments supported by GRADE A evidence, comprising 14 studies. Thirteen were systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and one was randomized control trial. The GRADE A treatments included stretching exercises, static stretching with positional orthosis, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, peripheral magnetic stimulation, non-invasive brain stimulation, botulinum toxin A injection, dry needling, intrathecal baclofen, whole body vibration, and localized muscle vibration. In conclusion, this modified scoping review highlights the multimodal treatments supported by GRADE A evidence as being effective for improving functional recovery and quality of life in post-stroke spasticity. Further research and exploration of new therapeutic options are encouraged.

Transient Worsening of Dysphagia and Dysarthria after Treatment with Botulinum Toxin in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury

Although botulinum toxin is widely considered an effective and safe treatment for a variety of neurological conditions (such as disabling spasticity), local or systemic adverse effects have often been reported. This study describes three cases of patients with severe acquired brain injury who were receiving speech therapy for recovering dysphagia and dysarthria but showed worsening of these symptoms after receiving BoNT treatment for motor spasticity. To increase clinicians' knowledge of these adverse effects, we present our cases and explore their significance to avoid major complications such as aspiration pneumonia.

Systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of post-stroke spasticity with abobotulinumtoxinA compared to physiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Post-stroke spasticity (PSS) is a common complication in stroke survivors, causing severe burden to patients living with it. The aim of this review was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the treatment of post-stroke spasticity, in adults, with abobotulinumtoxinA compared to the best supportive care, based on results from a systematic literature review. Given that abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) is always accompanied by the best supportive care treatment, the CEA compared aboBoNT-A plus the best supportive care with the best supportive care alone.

METHODS

A systematic literature review in EMBASE (including Medline and PubMed), Scopus, and other sources (Google Scholar) was conducted. Articles of all types, providing information on the costs and/or effectiveness measures for the current treatments of PSS in adults were included. The synthesis of information from the review provided the parameters for the design of a cost-effectiveness analysis of the mentioned treatment of interest. The societal perspective was compared to a perspective where only direct costs were observed.

RESULTS

In total, 532 abstracts were screened. Full information was revised from 40 papers and 13 of these were selected as core papers for full data extraction. Data from the core publications formed the basis for the development of a cost-effectiveness model. In all the included papers physiotherapy was the best supportive care treatment (SoC). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that even in the most conservative scenario, assuming the worst case scenario, the probability of a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained below €40,000, for aboBoNT-A together with physiotherapy is above 0.8, and with certainty below €50,000/QALY when either a direct costs, or a societal perspective was taken. On average, the probabilistic model obtains a negative mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of around -15,000 €/QALY.

CONCLUSION

The cost-effectiveness analyses show that aboBoNT-A together with physiotherapy would be a cost-effective treatment compared with physiotherapy alone, independently of the perspective considered.

Systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of post-stroke spasticity with abobotulinumtoxinA compared to physiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Post-stroke spasticity is a common complication in stroke survivors, causing severe burden to patients living with it. The aim of this review was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the treatment of post-stroke spasticity, in adults, with abobotulinumtoxinA compared to the best supportive care, based on results from a systematic literature review. Given that abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) is always accompanied by the best supportive care treatment, the CEA compared aboBoNT-A plus the best supportive care with the best supportive care alone.

METHODS

A systematic literature review in EMBASE (including Medline and PubMed), Scopus, and other sources (Google Scholar) was conducted. Articles of all types, providing information on the costs and/or effectiveness measures for the current treatments of post-stroke spasticity in adults were included. The synthesis of information from the review provided the parameters for the design of a CEA of the mentioned treatment of interest. The societal perspective was compared to a perspective where only direct costs were observed.

RESULTS

In total, 532 abstracts were screened. Full information was revised from 40 papers and 13 of these were selected as core papers for full data extraction. Data from the core publications formed the basis for the development of a cost-effectiveness model. In all the included papers physiotherapy was the best supportive care treatment. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that even in the most conservative scenario, assuming the worst case scenario, the probability of a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained below €40,000, for aboBoNT-A together with physiotherapy is above 0.8, and with certainty below €50,000/QALY when either a direct costs, or a societal perspective was taken. On average, the probabilistic model obtains a negative mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of around -15,000 €/QALY.

CONCLUSION

The cost-effectiveness analyses show that aboBoNT-A together with physiotherapy would be a cost-effective treatment compared with physiotherapy alone, independently of the perspective considered.

[Experience of using rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation, extracorporeal shock wave therapy and botulinotherapy in individual motor recovery programs in patients with spastic paresis of the lower limb]

Walking disorder is one of the most frequent consequences of stroke and traumatic brain injury, occurring in 80% of cases. Spastic paresis of the muscles of the lower extremity is the cause formed in 20-40% of patients within a few weeks after brain damage. In this case, a complex of symptoms occurs: motor deficiency (muscle paresis), increased muscle tone (spasticity), biomechanical changes in muscles, joints and surrounding tissues, contractures. Recovery of walking is a difficult task due to the peculiarities of its organization in the norm. At the same time, changes occurring in the muscles of the lower limb after a stroke, their modular reorganization, the formation of various pathological patterns, violation of the regulation of movements by the central nervous system, rapidly occurring changes in muscles, ligaments, complicate this process. Improving walking is one of the most important priorities of rehabilitation. Already at the second (stationary) stage of rehabilitation, patients have a lack of proper support on the lower limb, which inevitably leads to excessive load on the second limb, a change in the body scheme, incorrect foot placement, violation of the mechanics of walking (moving from heel to toe) due to plantar flexion / turn of the foot, etc. All this makes patients dependent on outside help, and walking unsafe, increases the risk of falls and complications (arthropathy, contracture, etc.). In this regard, it is important to timely diagnose the totality of changes in the lower limb and create optimal comprehensive rehabilitation programs using highly effective treatment methods aimed at reducing the severity of the motor defect, reducing spasticity and preventing complications. The article discusses the place of rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation, extracorporeal shock wave therapy and botulinum therapy during rehabilitation in patients with spastic paresis of the lower limb after a stroke. The results of the protocol of clinical approbation «Complex rehabilitation of patients with lower limb spasticity after focal brain damage at the second stage of medical rehabilitation» are presented.