Molecular Mechanisms Governing "Hair-Trigger" Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophages

A prophage encoded ribosomal RNA methyltransferase regulates the virulence of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)

Shiga toxin (Stx) released by Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) causes life-threatening illness. Its production and release require induction of Stx-encoding prophage resident within the STEC genome. We identified two different STEC strains, PA2 and PA8, bearing Stx-encoding prophage whose sequences primarily differ by the position of an IS629 insertion element, yet differ in their abilities to kill eukaryotic cells and whose prophages differ in their spontaneous induction frequencies. The IS629 element in ϕPA2, disrupts an ORF predicted to encode a DNA adenine methyltransferase, whereas in ϕPA8, this element lies in an intergenic region. Introducing a plasmid expressing the methyltransferase gene product into ϕPA2 bearing-strains increases both the prophage spontaneous induction frequency and virulence to those exhibited by ϕPA8 bearing-strains. However, a plasmid bearing mutations predicted to disrupt the putative active site of the methyltransferase does not complement either of these defects. When complexed with a second protein, the methyltransferase holoenzyme preferentially uses 16S rRNA as a substrate. The second subunit is responsible for directing the preferential methylation of rRNA. Together these findings reveal a previously unrecognized role for rRNA methylation in regulating induction of Stx-encoding prophage.

Differences in the Shiga Toxin (Stx) 2a Phage Regulatory Switch Region Influence Stx2 Localization and Virulence of Stx-Producing Escherichia coli in Mice

Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a major cause of foodborne illness globally, and infection with serotype O157:H7 is associated with increased risk of hospitalization and death in the U.S. The Stxs are encoded on a temperate bacteriophage (stx-phage), and phage induction leads to Stx expression; subtype Stx2a in particular is associated with more severe disease. Our earlier studies showed significant levels of RecA-independent Stx2 production by STEC O157:H7 strain JH2010 (stx2astx2c), even though activated RecA is the canonical trigger for stx-phage induction. This study aimed to further compare and contrast RecA-independent toxin production in Stx2-producing clinical isolates. Deletion of recA in JH2010 resulted in higher in vitro supernatant cytotoxicity compared to that from JH2016ΔrecA, and the addition of the chelator ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and various metal cations to the growth medium exacerbated the difference in cytotoxicity exhibited by the two deletion strains. Both the wild-type and ΔrecA deletion strains exhibited differential cytotoxicity in the feces of infected, streptomycin (Str)-treated mice. Comparison of the stx2a-phage predicted protein sequences from JH2010 and JH2016 revealed low amino acid identity of key phage regulatory proteins that are involved in RecA-mediated stx-phage induction. Additionally, other STEC isolates containing JH2010-like and JH2016-like stx2a-phage sequences led to similar Stx2 localization, as demonstrated by JH2010ΔrecA and JH2016ΔrecA, respectively. Deletion of the stx2a-phage regulatory region in the wild-type strains prevented the differential localization of Stx2 into the culture supernatant, a finding that suggests that the stx2a-phage regulatory region is involved in the differential ΔrecA phenotypes exhibited by the two strains. We hypothesize that the amino acid differences between the JH2010 and JH2016 phage repressor proteins (CIs) lead to structural differences that are responsible for differential interaction with RecA. Overall, we discovered that non-homologous stx2a-phage regulatory proteins differentially influence RecA-independent, and possibly RecA-dependent, Stx2 production. These findings emphasize the importance of studying non-homologous regulatory elements among stx2-phages and their influence on Stx2 production and virulence of STEC isolates.

Intra-macrophage expression of ArtAB toxin gene in Salmonella

Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) definitive phage type 104 (DT104), S. Worthington, and S. bongori produce ArtAB toxin, which catalyses ADP-ribosylation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein. ArtAB gene (artAB) is encoded on a prophage in Salmonella, and prophage induction by SOS-inducing agents is associated with increases in ArtAB production in vitro. However, little is known about the expression of artAB in vivo. Here, we showed a significant increase in artAB transcription of DT104 within macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells. Intracellular expression of ArtAB was also observed by immunofluorescence staining. The induced expression of artAB in DT104 and S. bongori was enhanced by treatment of RAW264.7 cells with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), which stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS); however, such induction was not observed in S. Worthington. Upregulation of oxyR, a major regulator of oxidative stress, and cI, a repressor of prophage induction, was observed in S. Worthington within RAW264.7 cells treated with PMA but not in the DT104 strain. Although the expression of oxyR was increased, artAB was upregulated in S. bongori, which lacks the cI gene in the incomplete artAB-encoded prophage. Taken together, oxidative stress plays a role in the production of artAB toxins in macrophages, and high expression levels of oxyR and cI are responsible for the low expression of artAB. Therefore, strain variation in the level of artAB expression within macrophages could be explained by differences in the oxidative stress response of bacteria and might be reflected in its virulence.

Prophage Activation in the Intestine: Insights Into Functions and Possible Applications

Prophage activation in intestinal environments has been frequently reported to affect host adaptability, pathogen virulence, gut bacterial community composition, and intestinal health. Prophage activation is mostly caused by various stimulators, such as diet, antibiotics, some bacterial metabolites, gastrointestinal transit, inflammatory environment, oxidative stress, and quorum sensing. Moreover, with advancements in biotechnology and the deepening cognition of prophages, prophage activation regulation therapy is currently applied to the treatment of some bacterial intestinal diseases such as Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection. This review aims to make headway on prophage induction in the intestine, in order to make a better understanding of dynamic changes of prophages, effects of prophage activation on physiological characteristics of bacteria and intestinal health, and subsequently provide guidance on prophage activation regulation therapy.

Psychoactive Drugs Induce the SOS Response and Shiga Toxin Production in Escherichia coli

Several classes of non-antibiotic drugs, including psychoactive drugs, proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and others, appear to have strong antimicrobial properties. We considered whether psychoactive drugs induce the SOS response in E. coli bacteria and, consequently, induce Shiga toxins in Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC). We measured the induction of an SOS response using a recA-lacZ E. coli reporter strain, as RecA is an early, reliable, and quantifiable marker for activation of the SOS stress response pathway. We also measured the production and release of Shiga toxin 2 (Stx2) from a classic E. coli O157:H7 strain, derived from a food-borne outbreak due to spinach. Some, but not all, serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and antipsychotic drugs induced an SOS response. The use of SSRIs is widespread and increasing; thus, the use of these antidepressants could account for some cases of hemolytic-uremic syndrome due to STEC and is not attributable to antibiotic administration. SSRIs could have detrimental effects on the normal intestinal microbiome in humans. In addition, as SSRIs are resistant to environmental breakdown, they could have effects on microbial communities, including aquatic ecosystems, long after they have left the human body.

Insights into the genome architecture and evolution of Shiga toxin encoding bacteriophages of Escherichia coli

Background

A total of 179 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) complete genomes were analyzed in terms of serotypes, prophage coding regions, and stx gene variants and their distribution. We further examined the genetic diversity of Stx-converting phage genomes (Stx phages), focusing on the lysis-lysogeny decision and lytic cassettes.

Results

We show that most STEC isolates belong to non-O157 serotypes (73 %), regardless the sources and geographical regions. While the majority of STEC genomes contain a single stx gene (61 %), strains containing two (35 %), three (3 %) and four (1 %) stx genes were also found, being stx2 the most prevalent gene variant. Their location is exclusively found in intact prophage regions, indicating that they are phage-borne. We further demonstrate that Stx phages can be grouped into four clusters (A, B, C and D), three subclusters (A1, A2 and A3) and one singleton, based on their shared gene content. This cluster distribution is in good agreement with their predicted virion morphologies. Stx phage genomes are highly diverse with a vast number of 1,838 gene phamilies (phams) of related sequences (of which 677 are orphams i.e. unique genes) and, although having high mosaicism, they are generally organized into three major transcripts. While the mechanisms that guide lysis–lysogeny decision are complex, there is a strong selective pressure to maintain the stx genes location close to the lytic cassette composed of predicted SAR-endolysin and pin-holin lytic proteins. The evolution of STEC Stx phages seems to be strongly related to acquiring genetic material, probably from horizontal gene transfer events.

Conclusions

This work provides novel insights on the genetic structure of Stx phages, showing a high genetic diversity throughout the genomes, where the various lysis-lysogeny regulatory systems are in contrast with an uncommon, but conserved, lytic system always adjacent to stx genes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-021-07685-0.

O antigen restricts lysogenization of non-O157 Escherichia coli strains by Stx-converting bacteriophage phi24B

Acquisition of new prophages that are able to increase the bacterial fitness by the lysogenic conversion is believed to be an important strategy of bacterial adaptation to the changing environment. However, in contrast to the factors determining the range of bacteriophage lytic activity, little is known about the factors that define the lysogenization host range. Bacteriophage phi24B is the paradigmal model of Stx-converting phages, encoding the toxins of the Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC). This virus has been shown to lysogenize a wide range of E. coli strains that is much broader than the range of the strains supporting its lytic growth. Therefore, phages produced by the STEC population colonizing the small or large intestine are potentially able to lysogenize symbiotic E. coli in the hindgut, and these secondary lysogens may contribute to the overall patient toxic load and to lead to the emergence of new pathogenic STEC strains. We demonstrate, however, that O antigen effectively limit the lysogenization of the wild E. coli strains by phi24B phage. The lysogens are formed from the spontaneous rough mutants and therefore have increased sensitivity to other bacteriophages and to the bactericidal activity of the serum if compared to their respective parental strains.

Influence of SOS-inducing agents on the expression of ArtAB toxin gene in Salmonella enterica and Salmonella bongori

Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) definitive phage type 104 (DT104), S. enterica subspecies enterica serovar Worthington (S. Worthington) and S. bongori produce ArtA and ArtB (ArtAB) toxin homologues, which catalyse ADP-ribosylation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein. ArtAB gene (artAB) is encoded on prophage in DT104 and its expression is induced by mitomycin C (MTC) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) that trigger the bacterial SOS response. Although the genetic regulatory mechanism associated with artAB expression is not characterized, it is thought to be associated with prophage induction, which occurs when the RecA-mediated SOS response is triggered. Here we show that subinhibitory concentration of quinolone antibiotics that are SOS-inducing agents, also induce ArtAB production in these Salmonella strains. Both MTC and fluoroquinolone antibiotics such as enrofloxacin-induced artA and recA transcription and artAB-encoding prophage (ArtAB-prophage) in DT104 and S. Worthington. However, in S. bongori, which harbours artAB genes on incomplete prophage, artA transcription was induced by MTC and enrofloxacin, but prophage induction was not observed. Taken together, these results suggest that SOS response followed by induction of artAB transcription is essential for ArtAB production. H₂O₂-mediated induction of ArtAB prophage and efficient production of ArtAB was observed in DT104 but not in S. Worthington and S. bongori. Therefore, induction of artAB expression with H₂O₂ is strain-specific, and the mode of action of H₂O₂ as an SOS-inducing agent might be different from those of MTC and quinolone antibiotics.

Transcriptional and Translational Inhibitors Block SOS Response and Shiga Toxin Expression in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

Shiga toxins (Stx) induce the symptoms of the life-threatening hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and are the main virulence factors of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC). The bacterial SOS response is the essential signal for high level production and release of Stx1/2. To assess the potential effectiveness of different antibiotics in blocking SOS response and Stx1/2 production, we constructed a reporter gene based test system that allows for the time-resolved, simultaneous read-out of the SOS response (recAP-cfp) and Stx1 production (stx1::yfp) in EHEC O157:H7 EDL933. We find that cells exposed to inhibitory or subinhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin did induce the SOS response, but not when the cells were exposed to rifaximine, azithromycin, tetracycline, gentamicin or ampicillin. Cell lysis and the peak in Stx1 production were substantially delayed with respect to the peak of the SOS response. We used this feature to show that adding transcriptional or translational inhibitors can block Stx1 production even after the SOS response is fully induced. RT-qPCR based tests with other clinically relevant EHEC isolates showed similar results for both Stx1 and Stx2. These observations suggest that transcriptional and translational inhibitors may be of value in treating EHEC infections.

Bacterial 'Grounded' Prophages: Hotspots for Genetic Renovation and Innovation

Bacterial genomes are highly plastic allowing the generation of variants through mutations and acquisition of genetic information. The fittest variants are then selected by the econiche thereby allowing the bacterial adaptation and colonization of the habitat. Larger genomes, however, may impose metabolic burden and hence bacterial genomes are optimized by the loss of frivolous genetic information. The activity of temperate bacteriophages has acute consequences on the bacterial population as well as the bacterial genome through lytic and lysogenic cycles. Lysogeny is a selective advantage as the prophage provides immunity to the lysogen against secondary phage attack. Since the non-lysogens are eliminated by the lytic phages, lysogens multiply and colonize the habitat. Nevertheless, all lysogens have an imminent risk of lytic cycle activation and cell lysis. However, a mutation in the attachment sites or in the genes that encode the specific recombinase responsible for prophage excision could result in 'grounding' of the prophage. Since the lysogens with grounded prophage are immune to respective phage infection as well as dodge the induction of lytic cycle, we hypothesize that the selection of these mutant lysogens is favored relative to their normal lysogenic counterparts. These grounded prophages offer several advantages to the bacterial genome evolution through propensity for genetic variations including inversions, deletions, and insertions via horizontal gene transfer. We propose that the grounded prophages expedite bacterial genome evolution by acting as 'genetic buffer zones' thereby increasing the frequency as well as the diversity of variations on which natural selection favors the beneficial variants. The grounded prophages are also hotspots for horizontal gene transfer wherein several ecologically significant genes such as those involved in stress tolerance, antimicrobial resistance, and novel metabolic pathways, are integrated. Moreover, the high frequency of genetic changes within prophages also allows proportionate probability for the de novo genesis of genetic information. Through sequence analyses of well-characterized E. coli prophages we exemplify various roles of grounded prophages in E. coli ecology and evolution. Therefore, the temperate prophages are one of the most significant drivers of bacterial genome evolution and sites of biogenesis of genetic information.