1
|
Leveringhaus E, Poljakovic R, Herrmann G, Roman-Sosa G, Becher P, Postel A. Porcine low-density lipoprotein receptor plays an important role in classical swine fever virus infection. Emerg Microbes Infect 2024; 13:2327385. [PMID: 38514916 PMCID: PMC10962300 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2327385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Several cellular factors have been reported to be required for replication of classical swine fever virus (CSFV), a member of the genus Pestivirus within the family Flaviviridae. However, many steps of its replication cycle are still poorly understood. The low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is involved in cell entry and post-entry processes of different viruses including other members of the Flaviviridae. In this study, the relevance of LDLR in replication of CSFV and another porcine pestivirus, Bungowannah pestivirus (BuPV), was investigated by antibody-mediated blocking of LDLR and genetically engineered porcine cell lines providing altered LDLR expression levels. An LDLR-specific antibody largely blocked infection with CSFV, but had only a minor impact on BuPV. Infections of the genetically modified cells confirmed an LDLR-dependent replication of CSFV. Compared to wild type cells, lower and higher expression of LDLR resulted in a 3.5-fold decrease or increase in viral titers already 20 h post infection. Viral titers were 25-fold increased in LDLR-overexpressing cells compared to cells with reduced LDLR expression at 72 h post infection. The varying LDLR expression levels had no clear effect on permissivity to BuPV. A decoy receptor assay using recombinant soluble LDLR provided no evidence that LDLR may function as a receptor for CSFV or BuPV. Differences in their dependency on LDLR suggest that CSFV and BuPV likely use different mechanisms to interact with their host cells. Moreover, this study reveals similarities in the replication cycles of CSFV and other members of the family Flaviviridae that are dependent on LDLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Leveringhaus
- Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Robin Poljakovic
- Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gina Herrmann
- Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gleyder Roman-Sosa
- Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Paul Becher
- Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alexander Postel
- Institute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li X, Song Y, Wang X, Fu C, Zhao F, Zou L, Wu K, Chen W, Li Z, Fan J, Li Y, Li B, Zeng S, Liu X, Zhao M, Yi L, Chen J, Fan S. The regulation of cell homeostasis and antiviral innate immunity by autophagy during classical swine fever virus infection. Emerg Microbes Infect 2023; 12:2164217. [PMID: 36583373 PMCID: PMC9848339 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2164217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
CSFV (classical swine fever virus) is currently endemic in developing countries in Asia and has recently re-emerged in Japan. Under the pressure of natural selection pressure, CSFV keeps evolving to maintain its ecological niche in nature. CSFV has evolved mechanisms that induce immune depression, but its pathogenic mechanism is still unclear. In this study, using transcriptomics and metabolomics methods, we found that CSFV infection alters innate host immunity by activating the interferon pathway, inhibiting host inflammation, apoptosis, and remodelling host metabolism in porcine alveolar macrophages. Moreover, we revealed that autophagy could alter innate immunity and metabolism induced by CSFV infection. Enhanced autophagy further inhibited CSFV-induced RIG-I-IRF3 signal transduction axis and JAK-STAT signalling pathway and blocked type I interferon production while reducing autophagy inhibition of the NF-κB signalling pathway and apoptosis in CSFV infection cells. Furthermore, the level of CSFV infection-induced glycolysis and the content of lactate and pyruvate, as well as 3-phosphoglyceraldehyde, a derivative of glycolysis converted to serine, was altered by autophagy. We also found that silencing HK2 (hexokinase 2), the rate-limiting enzyme of glycolytic metabolism, could induce autophagy but reduce the interferon signalling pathway, NF-κB signalling pathway, and inhibition of apoptosis induced by CSFV infection. In addition, inhibited cellular autophagy by silencing ATG5 or using 3-Methyladenine, could backfill the inhibitory effect of silencing HK2 on the cellular interferon signalling pathway, NF-κB signalling pathway, and apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaowen Li
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yiwan Song
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xinyan Wang
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Cheng Fu
- College of Animal Science & Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering
| | - Feifan Zhao
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Linke Zou
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Keke Wu
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenxian Chen
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhaoyao Li
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jindai Fan
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuwan Li
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bingke Li
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sen Zeng
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaodi Liu
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mingqiu Zhao
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lin Yi
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jinding Chen
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuangqi Fan
- College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China, Shuangqi Fan College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510630, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zou X, Yang Y, Lin F, Chen J, Zhang H, Li L, Ouyang H, Pang D, Ren L, Tang X. Lactate facilitates classical swine fever virus replication by enhancing cholesterol biosynthesis. iScience 2022; 25:105353. [PMID: 36339254 PMCID: PMC9626675 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
An emerging topic in virology is that viral replication is closely linked with the metabolic reprogramming of host cells. Understanding the effects of reprogramming host cell metabolism due to classical swine fever virus (CSFV) infection and the underling mechanisms would facilitate controlling the spread of classical swine fever (CSF). In the current study, we found that CSFV infection enhanced aerobic glycolysis in PK-15 cells. Blocking glycolysis with 2-deoxy-d-glycose or disrupting the enzymes PFKL and LDHA decreased CSFV replication. Lactate was identified as an important molecule in CSFV replication, independent of the pentose phosphate pathway and tricarboxylic acid cycle. Further analysis demonstrated that the accumulated lactate in cells promoted cholesterol biosynthesis, which facilitated CSFV replication and disrupted the type I interferon response during CSFV replication, and the disruption of cholesterol synthesis abolished the lactate effects on CSFV replication. The results provided more insights into the complex pathological mechanisms of CSFV. Aerobic glycolysis plays an important role in CSFV replication Intracellular lactate maintains CSFV replication as an effector of glycolysis Lactate promotes cholesterol biosynthesis to maintain CSFV replication Enhanced cholesterol biosynthesis inhibited the response of IFNs during CSFV replication
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodong Zou
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yang Yang
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Feng Lin
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jiahuan Chen
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Huanyu Zhang
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Linquan Li
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hongsheng Ouyang
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Chongqing Research Institute of Jilin University, Chongqing, China
| | - Daxin Pang
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Chongqing Research Institute of Jilin University, Chongqing, China
| | - Linzhu Ren
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Corresponding author
| | - Xiaochun Tang
- College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Chongqing Research Institute of Jilin University, Chongqing, China
- Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|