LAG-3 Contribution to T Cell Downmodulation during Acute Respiratory Viral Infections

Unlocking therapeutic potential: Targeting lymphocyte activation Gene-3 (LAG-3) with fibrinogen-like protein 1 (FGL1) in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represents an autoimmune disorder that affects multiple systems. In the treatment of this condition, the focus primarily revolves around inflammation suppression and immunosuppression. Consequently, targeted therapy has emerged as a prevailing approach. Currently, the quest for highly sensitive and specifically effective targets has gained significant momentum in the context of SLE treatment. Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) stands out as a crucial inhibitory receptor that binds to pMHC-II, thereby effectively dampening autoimmune responses. Fibrinogen-like protein 1 (FGL1) serves as the principal immunosuppressive ligand for LAG-3, and their combined action demonstrates a potent immunosuppressive effect. This intricate mechanism paves the way for potential SLE treatment by targeting LAG-3 with FGL1. This work provides a comprehensive summary of LAG-3's role in the pathogenesis of SLE and elucidates the feasibility of leveraging FGL1 as a therapeutic approach for SLE management. It introduces a novel therapeutic target and opens up new avenues of therapeutic consideration in the clinical context of SLE treatment.

Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) as a promising immune checkpoint in cancer immunotherapy: From biology to the clinic

In recent years, there have been notable advancements in the field of cancer immunotherapy, namely in the area of immune checkpoint inhibition. The Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) has garnered attention as a potentially valuable focus of study in this particular field. The present study examines the biological aspects of LAG-3, its clinical consequences, and the potential therapeutic opportunities associated with its modulation. LAG-3, similar to CD4, has a regulatory role in modulating the immune system. The upregulation of this protein inside the neoplastic milieu hampers the immune system's ability to mount an effective response, hence enabling the evasion of cancer cells from immune surveillance. The LAG-3 protein interacts with ligands, inhibiting cytotoxic immune cells such as CD8+ T cells and NK cells. The potential of LAG-3 inhibitors presents intriguing prospects. Integrating these medicines with established treatments like PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 inhibitors can broaden the range of available therapy choices and address resistance issues. The advent of personalized therapy is imminent, as evidenced by the utilization of predictive biomarkers such as LAG-3 expression to inform individualized therapeutic approaches. Additionally, inhibitors of LAG-3 exhibit promise in addressing immunological depletion and resistance by revitalizing T cells and producing durable immune responses. The realization of LAG-3's promise necessitates global collaboration and equal access. Multinational trials are expected to ascertain the efficacy of the intervention in various patient groups.

Unravelling the cellular response to the SARS-COV-2 vaccine in inflammatory bowel disease patients on biologic drugs

Suboptimal vaccine response is a significant concern in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) receiving biologic drugs. This single-center observational study involved 754 patients with IBD. In Phase I (October 2020-April 2021), 754 IBD participants who had not previously received the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, underwent blood extraction to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and IBD-related factors. Phase II (May 2021-October 2021) included a subgroup of 52 IBD participants with confirmed previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, who were studied for humoral and cellular response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In Phase I, treatment with anti-TNF was associated with lower rates of seroconversion (aOR 0.25 95% CI [0.10-0.61]). In Phase II, a significant increase in post-vaccination IgG levels was observed regardless of biologic treatment. However, patients treated with anti-TNF exhibited significantly lower IgG levels compared to those without IBD therapy (5.32 ± 2.47 vs. 7.99 ± 2.59 U/ml, p = 0.042). Following vaccination, a lymphocyte, monocyte, and NK cell activation pattern was observed, with no significant differences between patients receiving biologic drugs and those without IBD treatment. Despite lower seroprevalence and humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients treated with anti-TNF, the cellular response to the vaccine did not differ significantly from that patients without IBD therapy.