Binding Specificities of the Telomere Phage ϕKO2 Prophage Repressor CB and Lytic Repressor Cro

Repression of Acinetobacter baumannii DNA damage response requires DdrR-assisted binding of UmuDAb dimers to atypical SOS box

The DNA damage response of the multi-drug-resistant nosocomial pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii possesses multiple features that distinguish it from the commonly used LexA repression system. These include the absence of LexA in this genus, the evolution of a UmuD polymerase manager into the UmuDAb repressor of error-prone polymerases, the use of a corepressor unique to Acinetobacter (DdrR), and an unusually large UmuDAb binding site. We defined cis- and trans-acting factors required for UmuDAb DNA binding and gene repression, and tested whether DdrR directly enhances its DNA binding. We used DNA binding assays to characterize UmuDAb's binding to its proposed operator present upstream of the six co-repressed umuDC or umuC genes. UmuDAb bound tightly and cooperatively to this site with ~10-fold less affinity than LexA. DdrR enhanced the binding of both native and dimerization-deficient UmuDAb forms, but only in greater than equimolar ratios relative to UmuDAb. UmuDAb mutants unable to dimerize or effect gene repression showed impaired DNA binding, and a strain expressing the G124D dimerization mutant could not repress transcription of the UmuDAb-DdrR regulon. Competition electrophoretic mobility shift assays conducted with mutated operator probes showed that, unlike typical SOS boxes, the UmuDAb operator possessed a five-base pair central core whose sequence was more crucial for binding than the flanking palindrome. The presence of only one of the two flanking arms of the palindrome was necessary for UmuDAb binding. Overall, the data supported a model of an operator with two UmuDAb binding sites. The distinct characteristics of UmuDAb and its regulated promoters differ from the typical LexA repression model, demonstrating a novel method of repression.IMPORTANCEAcinetobacter baumannii is a gram-negative bacterium responsible for hospital-acquired infections. Its unique DNA damage response can activate multiple error-prone polymerase genes, allowing it to gain mutations that can increase its virulence and antibiotic resistance. The emergence of infectious strains carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including carbapenem resistance, lends urgency to discovering and developing ways to combat infections resistant to treatment with known antibiotics. Deciphering how the regulators UmuDAb and DdrR repress the error-prone polymerases could lead to developing complementary treatments to halt this mechanism of generating resistance.

The loopometer: a quantitative in vivo assay for DNA-looping proteins

Proteins that can bring together separate DNA sites, either on the same or on different DNA molecules, are critical for a variety of DNA-based processes. However, there are no general and technically simple assays to detect proteins capable of DNA looping in vivo nor to quantitate their in vivo looping efficiency. Here, we develop a quantitative in vivo assay for DNA-looping proteins in Escherichia coli that requires only basic DNA cloning techniques and a LacZ assay. The assay is based on loop assistance, where two binding sites for the candidate looping protein are inserted internally to a pair of operators for the E. coli LacI repressor. DNA looping between the sites shortens the effective distance between the lac operators, increasing LacI looping and strengthening its repression of a lacZ reporter gene. Analysis based on a general model for loop assistance enables quantitation of the strength of looping conferred by the protein and its binding sites. We use this ‘loopometer’ assay to measure DNA looping for a variety of bacterial and phage proteins.

The Burkholderia thailandensis Phages ΦE058 and ΦE067 Represent Distinct Prototypes of a New Subgroup of Temperate Burkholderia Myoviruses

Burkholderia mallei and B. pseudomallei are highly pathogenic species which are closely related, but diverse regarding their prophage content. While temperate phages have not yet been isolated from B. mallei, several phages of B. pseudomallei, and its non-pathogenic relative B. thailandensis have been described. In this study we isolated two phages from B. pseudomallei and three phages from B. thailandensis and determined their morphology, host range, and relationship. All five phages belong to the family Myoviridae, but some of them revealed different host specificities. DNA-DNA hybridization experiments indicated that the phages belong to two groups. One group, composed of ΦE058 (44,121 bp) and ΦE067 (43,649 bp), represents a new subgroup of Burkholderia myoviruses that is not related to known phages. The genomes of ΦE058 and ΦE067 are similar but also show some striking differences. Repressor proteins differ clearly allowing the phages to form plaques on hosts containing the respective other phage. The tail fiber proteins exhibited some minor deviations in the C-terminal region, which may account for the ability of ΦE058, but not ΦE067, to lyse B. mallei, B. pseudomallei, and B. thailandensis. In addition, the integrases and attachment sites of the phages are not related. While ΦE058 integrates into the Burkholderia chromosome within an intergenic region, the ΦE067 prophage resides in the selC tRNA gene for selenocysteine. Experiments on the structure of phage DNA isolated from particles suggest that the ΦE058 and ΦE067 genomes have a circular conformation.

Extreme divergence between one-to-one orthologs: the structure of N15 Cro bound to operator DNA and its relationship to the λ Cro complex

The gene cro promotes lytic growth of phages through binding of Cro protein dimers to regulatory DNA sites. Most Cro proteins are one-to-one orthologs, yet their sequence, structure and binding site sequences are quite divergent across lambdoid phages. We report the cocrystal structure of bacteriophage N15 Cro with a symmetric consensus site. We contrast this complex with an orthologous structure from phage λ, which has a dissimilar binding site sequence and a Cro protein that is highly divergent in sequence, dimerization interface and protein fold. The N15 Cro complex has less DNA bending and smaller DNA-induced changes in protein structure. N15 Cro makes fewer direct contacts and hydrogen bonds to bases, relying mostly on water-mediated and Van der Waals contacts to recognize the sequence. The recognition helices of N15 Cro and λ Cro make mostly nonhomologous and nonanalogous contacts. Interface alignment scores show that half-site binding geometries of N15 Cro and λ Cro are less similar to each other than to distantly related CI repressors. Despite this divergence, the Cro family shows several code-like protein–DNA sequence covariations. In some cases, orthologous genes can achieve a similar biological function using very different specific molecular interactions.