Vaccine-Related Errors in Reconstitution in South Korea: A National Physicians' and Nurses' Survey

Vaccine preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference of prefilled syringes versus RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution: randomized, time and motion study

AIM

The current study compared preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference for a prefilled syringe (PFS) versus two RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution (VRR1 and VRR2) in a randomized, single-blinded time and motion study.

METHODS

Pharmacists, nurses, and pharmacy technicians were randomized to a preparation sequence of the three vaccines. Participants read instructions, then consecutively prepared the three vaccines with a 3-5-min washout period in between. Preparations were video recorded and reviewed by a trained pharmacist for preparation time and errors using predefined, vaccine-specific checklists. Participant demographics, satisfaction with vaccine preparation, and vaccine preference were recorded. Within-subjects analysis of variance was used to compare preparation time. Mixed-effects Poisson and ordered logistic regression models were used to compare the number of preparation errors and satisfaction scores, respectively.

RESULTS

Sixty-three pharmacists (60%), nurses (35%), and pharmacy technicians (5%) participated at four sites in the United States. The least squares mean preparation time per dose for PFS was 141.8 s (95% CI = 156.8-126.7; p <.0001) faster than for VRR1, 103.6 s (95% CI = 118.7-88.5; p <.0001) faster than for VRR2, and 122.7 s (95% CI = 134.2-111.2; p <.0001) faster than the pooled VRRs. Overall satisfaction (combined "Very" and "Extremely") was 87.3% for PFS, 28.6% for VRR1, and 47.6% for VRR2. Most participants (81.0%) preferred the PFS vaccine.

LIMITATIONS

The study is limited by the inability to completely blind observers. To minimize the effects of order, we utilized a 3-sequence block design; however, the order in which the vaccines were prepared may have affected outcomes. Participants were assessed once, whereas if repeated preparations were performed there may have been trained efficiencies gained for each vaccine.

CONCLUSION

PFS vaccines can greatly simplify the vaccine preparation process, allowing administrators to prepare almost four times more doses per hour than with vial and syringe systems.

Estimating the Total Societal Cost of a Hexavalent Vaccine versus a Pentavalent Vaccine with Hepatitis B in South Korea

In South Korea, the ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine (against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B) is not listed despite its facility of no need to reconstitute. It, therefore, has the potential to augment the efficiency of prevention against the six infectious diseases, and it may reduce vaccine-related errors of reconstitution when compared with the currently used vaccination scheme of the pentavalent vaccine with the additional shots against hepatitis B. Given the assumed clinical equivalence between the two vaccination schemes, a cost-minimization analysis has been performed from a societal perspective including all the medical and non-medical direct and indirect costs when vaccinating one birth cohort. The results indicate that the ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine induces a cost reduction of KRW 47,155 (USD36.22) per infant or 12,026 million Korean Won ($9,236,417) in total for the whole birth cohort with 260,500 children. Using the ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine causes a lower infection rate, has fewer vaccination sessions, and may save much time as compared with the current vaccination scheme in place. The ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine may, therefore, benefit the National Immunization Program by reducing the total societal costs of vaccination while improving convenience of infants, parents, and medical care professionals.

DTaP-IPV-HB-Hib vaccine (Hexaxim): an update 10 years after first licensure

INTRODUCTION

Hexaxim® is fully liquid, hexavalent, combination vaccine that provides immunization against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio, hepatitis B, and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b. Combination vaccines such as Hexaxim reduce the number of injections needed, improving both vaccination compliance and operational efficiency.

AREAS COVERED

Safety and immunogenicity data were reviewed from >25 clinical trials involving approximately 7200 infants/toddlers, identified using PubMed searches to April 2023. These trials have evaluated a diverse range of primary series and booster schedules, including antibody persistence, co-administration of Hexaxim with other routine pediatric vaccines, and specific populations (born to Tdap-vaccinated women, preterm, and immunocompromised infants). Lastly, post-marketing surveillance and real-world effectiveness data were assessed.

EXPERT OPINION

An extensive program of clinical development prior to licensure demonstrated favorable vaccine safety and good immunogenicity of each antigen, and Hexaxim was first approved for use in 2012. In the 10 years since licensure, Hexaxim has been adopted widely, with more than 180 million doses distributed worldwide. The widespread use of this hexavalent vaccine is a crucial tool in the ongoing and future control of six pediatric infectious diseases globally.

Microarray patches: scratching the surface of vaccine delivery

INTRODUCTION

Microneedles are emerging as a promising technology for vaccine delivery, with numerous advantages over traditional needle and syringe methods. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of MAPs in inducing robust immune responses over traditional needle and syringe methods, with extensive studies using vaccines targeted against different pathogens in various animal models. Critically, the clinical trials have demonstrated safety, immunogenicity, and patient acceptance for MAP-based vaccines against influenza, measles, rubella, and SARS-CoV-2.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the different types of microarray patches (MAPs) and analyses of their applications in preclinical and clinical vaccine delivery settings. This review also covers additional considerations for microneedle-based vaccination, including adjuvants that are compatible with MAPs, patient safety and factors for global vaccination campaigns.

EXPERT OPINION

MAP vaccine delivery can potentially be a game-changer for vaccine distribution and coverage in both high-income and low- and middle-income countries. For MAPs to reach this full potential, many critical hurdles must be overcome, such as large-scale production, regulatory compliance, and adoption by global health authorities. However, given the considerable strides made in recent years by MAP developers, it may be possible to see the first MAP-based vaccines in use within the next 5 years.

A review of the DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T Hexavalent vaccine in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Hexaxim is a hexavalent vaccine approved as primary and booster vaccination in infants 6 weeks and older, protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b.

AREAS COVERED

To evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity (safety) of Hexaxim (Hexyon, Hexacima) in primary and booster vaccine schedules; long-term antibody persistence; concomitant use with other childhood vaccines and use in immunocompromised infants. Hexaxim was found to be noninferior to other licensed hexavalent vaccines, being highly immunogenic for all toxoids/antigens and with an acceptable safety profile. It can be administered concomitantly with other childhood vaccines. Hexaxim can be given as a booster for infants primed with Infanrix Hexa and given in a pentavalent-hexavalent-pentavalent series. Hexaxim elicits a similar immune response and safety profile in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive infants. It has the benefit of being a ready-to-use liquid formulation, minimizing dosage errors and preparation time.

EXPERT OPINION

Hexaxim has an acceptable safety profile and provides immunity against all six targeted diseases. It is an acceptable alternative to other hexavalent vaccines on the market. Further studies are required on the use of immunocompromised patients as well as the antibody persistence of each of the vaccine components.

Organização do processo de trabalho através de conhecimento, atitudes e práticas para administração segura de vacinas em crianças

Objetivo: mapear a organização do processo de trabalho através de conhecimento, atitudes e práticas para administração segura de vacinas em crianças. Método: realizou-se uma revisão de literatura com o método Scoping Review, de acordo com as recomendações do guia internacional PRISMA-ScR, e o método do Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. A busca eletrônica dos estudos foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, COCHRANE, LILACS e PsycINFO e na literatura cinzenta, entre os anos 2000 e 2021. Foram incluídos artigos, revisões, teses, dissertações e manuais disponibilizados na íntegra que estivessem em consonância com o objetivo deste estudo, tendo sido contemplando os idiomas inglês, português, italiano, espanhol e francês. Foram excluídos da revisão estudos não gratuitos pela plataforma CAFe, duplicados, que não tivessem relação com a temática pesquisada e não tivessem sua metodologia bem definida. Resultados: a revisão englobou 19 estudos publicados. O Brasil foi o país com maior número de estudos. Os principais achados propiciaram a construção das categorias conceituais. As sete primeiras se referem às principais características dos estudos incluídos nesta revisão de escopo; as outras três categorias objetivaram responder à questão norteadora e foram compostas por indicadores presentes na organização do processo de trabalho antes, durante e após a administração segura de uma vacina na criança. Conclusão: conclui-se que os objetivos desta pesquisa foram alcançados mediante mapeamento da organização do processo de trabalho através de conhecimento, atitudes e práticas para administração segura de vacinas em crianças. Como limitação deste estudo, evidencia-se a escassez de pesquisas que norteiam os cuidados pós-vacinação e sugere-se que novas pesquisas sejam realizadas.

Vaccine events raising public concern and associated immunization program policy and practice changes, China, 2005-2021

INTRODUCTION

Several vaccine events causing public concern have occurred in China that were investigated and responded to by the central government. We describe causes, influences, and policy or practice changes associated with vaccine events that occurred between 2005 and 2021. We make recommendations to foster resilience in China's Expanded Program of Immunization (EPI) system and vaccination enterprises and to sustain vaccine and program confidence.

METHODS

Our study included all vaccine events since 2005 that were investigated and responded to by the central government of China. We verified mainstream and social media visibility of the events through Internet search. We extracted event times, causes, investigation processes, results, actions, and policy or practice regulation changes from official reports of government meetings and from official websites with media briefings.

RESULTS

Seven vaccine events were identified, each of which caused more than 100,000 mainstream or social media reports nationally or nationally and internationally. The events ranged in magnitude from 145 children receiving out-of-date oral poliovirus vaccine to a measles supplementary immunization activity involving 103 million children. Few, if any, children were directly harmed by vaccines in the events. Government responded to each event with program or policy changes, and in one case, with legislation. Responses affected the conduct of campaigns and supplementary immunization activities, use of schools as vaccination venues, financial incentives for vaccinating with non-program vaccines, vaccine procurement and distribution, and program policy making. The most fundamental response was enacting the country's first vaccine law, the 2019 Vaccine Administration Law, which guides virtually all aspects of vaccination work, from vaccine development through regulation, program implementation, and safety and impact monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

All seven events generated substantial national and international mainstream and social media criticism and discussion, most commonly expressed through concerns of vaccine safety or vaccine effectiveness. Most had temporally associated temporary declines in vaccine confidence and coverage, jeopardizing decades of vaccination effort. The central government responded to each event by attempting to address root causes. Faithful implementation of the Vaccine Administration Law is fundamental to program strengthening and sustaining confidence of families, stakeholders, and government in vaccines and immunization in China.