1
|
Royston L, Neofytos D. Reexploring cytomegalovirus serology in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2024; 37:264-269. [PMID: 38861267 PMCID: PMC11213497 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000001025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Discuss the recent evidence on cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology in allogeneic hematopoeic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. RECENT FINDINGS Whereas the role CMV-specific cellular mediated immunity has recently emerged as an important factor of CMV DNAemia posttransplant, the value of CMV serology has remained unchanged through decades, associated with donor selection and posttransplant prophylactic and monitoring strategies. In this review, we describe and discuss the emerging reports on the association between the magnitude of pretransplant CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer and the posttransplant incidence of CMV DNAemia, as CMV IgG titer could become an additional tool in CMV risk assessment in the future. SUMMARY Pretransplant recipient CMV serology may have significant implications in posttransplant CMV reactivation in allogeneic HCT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léna Royston
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tan CA, Palen L, Su Y, Li Y, Gennarelli RL, Perales MA, Cohen N, Papanicolaou GA, Shah GL, Seo SK. Impact of Primary Letermovir Prophylaxis Versus Preemptive Antiviral Therapy for Cytomegalovirus on Economic and Clinical Outcomes after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:792.e1-792.e12. [PMID: 38838781 PMCID: PMC11296905 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Preemptive therapy (PET) historically has been the primary strategy to reduce early-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) but is associated with antiviral-associated toxicities and increases in healthcare resource utilization and cost. Despite its high cost, letermovir (LTV) prophylaxis has largely supplanted PET due to its effectiveness and tolerability. Direct comparisons between LTV and PET approaches on economic and clinical outcomes after allogeneic HCT remain limited. Objective: To compare total cost of care (inpatient and outpatient) between LTV prophylaxis and PET through day+180 after allogeneic HCT. Adult allogeneic CMV seropositive (R+) HCT recipients who initiated LTV <30 days after HCT between 01/01/18 and 12/31/18 were matched 1:1 to allogeneic CMV R+ HCT recipients between 01/01/15 and 12/31/17 (PET cohort). Patients were grouped into high-risk (HR) or standard-risk (SR) for CMV to compare the LTV and PET cohorts. Direct costs for each patient's index HCT admission and all subsequent inpatient and outpatient care through day+180 after HCT were determined and converted into 2021 US dollars and then to Medicare proportional dollars (MPD). A secondary analysis using 2019 average wholesale price was conducted to specifically evaluate anti-CMV medication costs. There were a total of 176 patients with 54 HR CMV pairs and 34 SR CMV pairs. No differences in survival between LTV and PET for both HR and SR CMV groups were observed. The rate of clinically significant CMV infection decreased for both HR CMV (11/54, 20.4% versus 38/54, 70.4%, P < .001) and SR CMV (1/34, 2.9% versus 12/34, 35.3%, P < .001) patients who were given LTV prophylaxis with corresponding reductions in val(ganciclovir) and foscarnet (HR CMV only) use. Among HR CMV patients, LTV prophylaxis was associated with reductions in CMV-related readmissions (3/54, 5.6% versus 18/54, 33.3%, P < .001) and outpatient visits within the first 100 days after HCT (20 versus 25, P = .002), and a decreased median total cost of care ($36,018 versus $75,525, P < .001) in MPD was observed. For SR CMV patients on LTV, a significant reduction in the median inpatient cost ($15,668 versus $27,818, P < .001) was found, but this finding was offset by a higher median outpatient cost ($26,145 versus $20,307, P = .030) that was not CMV-driven. LTV prophylaxis is highly effective in reducing clinically significant CMV reactivations for both HR and SR HCT recipients. In this study, LTV prophylaxis was associated with a decreased total cost of care for HR CMV patients through day+180. Specifically, reductions in CMV-related readmissions, exposure to CMV-directed antiviral agents, and outpatient visits in the first 100 days after HCT were observed. SR CMV patients receiving LTV prophylaxis benefited by having a reduced inpatient cost of care due to lowered room and pharmacy costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie A Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Lauren Palen
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yiqi Su
- Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yuxuan Li
- Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Miguel-Angel Perales
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Nina Cohen
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Genovefa A Papanicolaou
- Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Gunjan L Shah
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Susan K Seo
- Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Royston L, Papanicolaou GA, Neofytos D. Refractory/Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplant Recipients: An Update. Viruses 2024; 16:1085. [PMID: 39066247 PMCID: PMC11281367 DOI: 10.3390/v16071085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the significant progress made, CMV infection is one of the most frequent infectious complications in transplant recipients. CMV infections that become refractory or resistant (R/R) to the available antiviral drugs constitute a clinical challenge and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Novel anti-CMV therapies have been recently developed and introduced in clinical practice, which may improve the treatment of these infections. In this review, we summarize the treatment options for R/R CMV infections in adult hematopoietic cell transplant and solid organ transplant recipients, with a special focus on newly available antiviral agents with anti-CMV activity, including maribavir and letermovir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léna Royston
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Genovefa A. Papanicolaou
- Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Dionysios Neofytos
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Portillo V, Masouridi-Levrat S, Royston L, Yerly S, Schibler M, Mappoura M, Morin S, Giannotti F, Mamez AC, van Delden C, Chalandon Y, Neofytos D. Revisiting Cytomegalovirus Serology in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:423-429. [PMID: 37713176 PMCID: PMC10874258 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (allo-HCTRs) with positive cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology may have false-positive results due to blood product transfusion-associated passive immunity. METHODS This single-center cohort study included allo-HCTRs with negative baseline (at malignancy diagnosis) CMV serology and indeterminate/low-positive (CMV IgG titer, ≥0.6-<50 U/mL) pretransplant CMV serology with negative pretransplant plasma CMV DNAemia. The CMV status of those patients was reclassified from R+ to R- (CMVR- reclassification group). We compared those patients to allo-HCTRs with negative (CMV IgG titer <0.6 U/mL) pretransplant CMV IgG (CMVR- group). We describe the number and type of patients whose pretransplant CMV status was reclassified from indeterminate/positive to negative. We reviewed all plasma CMV DNAemia tests performed during the first 6 months posttransplant in both groups to assess the safety of this approach. RESULTS Among 246 (84.5%) of 291 transplanted patients identified as CMVR+ pretransplant, 60 (24.4%) were reclassified from CMV serology indeterminate (N:10)/low-positive (N:50) to R-. Only 1 of 60 patients (1.67%) in the CMVR- reclassification group versus 3 of 44 (6.8%; P = .30) in the CMVR- group developed CMV DNAemia during the follow-up period. There were no significant differences in the number of CMV DNAemia tests performed, CMV DNAemia range, and time posttransplant between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS One of 4 allo-HCT CMVR+ may be falsely flagged as R+, with significant impact on donor selection and prophylaxis administration. A 2-step approach including CMV serology testing at hematologic malignancy diagnosis in allo-HCT candidates and careful review of pretransplant CMV IgG titers may help correctly classify CMV serology status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Portillo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stavroula Masouridi-Levrat
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Léna Royston
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Yerly
- Laboratory of Virology, Laboratory Medicine Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Schibler
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Virology, Laboratory Medicine Division, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Mappoura
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Morin
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Federica Giannotti
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anne-Claire Mamez
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian van Delden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Yves Chalandon
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dionysios Neofytos
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pang I, Chen P, Trinh GV, Remberger M, Novitzky-Basso I, Gerbitz A, Kim DD, Kumar R, Lam W, Law AD, Lipton JH, Viswabandya A, Pasic I, Mattsson J, Michelis FV. Letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus reactivation in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: Single center Canadian data. Eur J Haematol 2024; 112:301-309. [PMID: 37830403 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Letermovir is a novel antiviral agent that prevents CMV reactivation in alloHCT patients, with limited data regarding influence on post-alloHCT outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively examined 273 alloHCT recipients, 158 in the non-letermovir cohort (NLC), and 115 in the cohort using letermovir prophylaxis (LC). Patients that received letermovir were CMV-seropositive and met criteria for high risk of CMV reactivation. RESULTS Median start of letermovir was 21 days post-alloHCT, median duration of prophylaxis was 86 days. Letermovir prophylaxis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in first CMV reactivation (at 200 days post 63.9% in the NLC vs. 35.7% in the LC; p < .001). On univariate analysis at 1 year, overall survival (OS) for NLC was 79.6% and 79.5% for LC (p = .54). Non relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year for NLC was 12% and 12.3% for LC (p = .69). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 1 year was 13.9% for NLC versus 17.1 for the LC (p = .27). On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts for OS, NRM, and CIR. CONCLUSIONS Letermovir prophylaxis started at day +21 post-alloHCT reduced CMV reactivation, with no impact on posttransplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Pang
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peggy Chen
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gertrude V Trinh
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mats Remberger
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University and KFUE, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Igor Novitzky-Basso
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Armin Gerbitz
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dennis D Kim
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rajat Kumar
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wilson Lam
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun D Law
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeffrey H Lipton
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Auro Viswabandya
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ivan Pasic
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jonas Mattsson
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fotios V Michelis
- Hans Messner Allogeneic Transplant Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brusosa M, Ruiz S, Monge I, Solano MT, Rosiñol L, Esteve J, Carreras E, Marcos MÁ, Riu G, Carcelero E, Martinez C, Fernández-Avilés F, Rovira M, Suárez-Lledó M, Salas MQ. Impact of letermovir prophylaxis in CMV reactivation and disease after allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a real-world, observational study. Ann Hematol 2024; 103:609-621. [PMID: 37957371 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05542-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Letermovir for CMV prevention in CMV-seropositive adults undergoing allo-HCT was implemented at our program in 2021. This study investigates the results from the use of letermovir. The study includes all the 140 CMV-seropositive patients who underwent an allo-HCT during the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 at our institution. Thirty-eight (27.4%) of these patients received letermovir, administered from day + 7 to day + 100 and restarted if patients were on treatment with steroids. The day + 180 and 1-year cumulative incidences of CMV reactivation were 5.3% and 12.1% for patients who received letermovir and 52.9% and 53.9% for those who did not (P < 0.001) (HR 0.19, P < 0.001). Four (10.5%) of these thirty-eight patients had a CMV reactivation, but only 2 (5.3%) cases occurred during the administration of letermovir. During the first year after allo-HCT, 13 (9.2%) patients had CMV disease; the day + 180 and 1-year cumulative incidences were 2.6% and 6.0% for patients who received letermovir and 9.9% and 12.3% for those who did not (P = 0.254) (HR 1.01, P = 0.458). Two (4.2%) of the patients included in the letermovir group had CMV disease, but both of them after letermovir discontinuation. Letermovir induced a protective effect on CMV reactivation risk, but its use was not associated with a significant reduction of CMV disease. The fact that the CMV disease in patients who received letermovir occurred after the discontinuation of the drug, questions whether CMV prophylaxis should be used in patients with high risk for CMV reactivation or disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonia Ruiz
- Pharmacy Clinic Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Inés Monge
- Pharmacy Clinic Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Teresa Solano
- Hematology Department, Clinical Institute of Hematology and Oncology (ICMHO), Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 190, 08036, Barcelona, CP, Spain
| | - Laura Rosiñol
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Hematology Department, Clinical Institute of Hematology and Oncology (ICMHO), Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 190, 08036, Barcelona, CP, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Esteve
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Hematology Department, Clinical Institute of Hematology and Oncology (ICMHO), Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 190, 08036, Barcelona, CP, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enric Carreras
- Fundació I Institut de Recerca Josep Carreras Contra La Leucèmia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Ángeles Marcos
- Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic-ISGlobal, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gisela Riu
- Pharmacy Clinic Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Carcelero
- Pharmacy Clinic Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Martinez
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Hematology Department, Clinical Institute of Hematology and Oncology (ICMHO), Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 190, 08036, Barcelona, CP, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Fernández-Avilés
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Hematology Department, Clinical Institute of Hematology and Oncology (ICMHO), Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 190, 08036, Barcelona, CP, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rovira
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Hematology Department, Clinical Institute of Hematology and Oncology (ICMHO), Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 190, 08036, Barcelona, CP, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Suárez-Lledó
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Hematology Department, Clinical Institute of Hematology and Oncology (ICMHO), Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 190, 08036, Barcelona, CP, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Queralt Salas
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Hematology Department, Clinical Institute of Hematology and Oncology (ICMHO), Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 190, 08036, Barcelona, CP, Spain.
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li WW, Zhang YM, Shen MZ, Mo XD. Efficacy and safety of letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. BLOOD SCIENCE 2024; 6:e00178. [PMID: 38213825 PMCID: PMC10781138 DOI: 10.1097/bs9.0000000000000178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Letermovir is a specific inhibitor of cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase complex. Several studies have reported that letermovir can effectively prevent CMV activation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We aimed to identify the efficacy and safety of letermovir prophylaxis for CMV infection after allo-HSCT with a systemic review and meta-analysis. A literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. PubMed and Embase databases were searched. A total of 28 studies were included. The incidence of CMV activation at 14 weeks after HSCT was 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.18), which was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.04-0.21) and 0% in adult and children (2 studies were included and both of them were 0%). In addition, the incidence of CMV activation at 14 weeks after allo-HSCT was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06-0.21) and 0.07 (only 1 study included), respectively, in retrospective and prospective studies. The incidence of CMV activation at 100 and 200 days after HSCT was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.16-0.33) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.67), respectively. The incidence of CMV disease at 14 weeks and at 6 months after HSCT was 0.01 (95% CI, 0.01-0.02) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.09), respectively. Thus, our systemic review and meta-analysis suggested that letermovir prophylaxis was safe and effective for CMV activation after allo-HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Wen Li
- Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- Department of Hematology, Qingdao Women and Children’s Hospital, Qingdao, China
| | - Yong-Mei Zhang
- Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- Department of Hematology, Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Meng-Zhu Shen
- Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Mo
- Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
- Research Unit of Key Technique for Diagnosis and Treatments of Hematologic Malignancies (2019RU029), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Takenaka K, Fuji S, Matsukawa T, Uchida N, Kobayashi T, Tanaka M, Ara T, Ikegame K, Ozawa Y, Kanda Y, Sawa M, Maruyama Y, Fukuda T, Nakamae H, Kimura T, Ogata M, Seo S, Atsuta Y, Matsuo K, Nakasone H. Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation under letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection. Ann Hematol 2024; 103:285-296. [PMID: 37947825 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05474-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major infectious complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis dramatically reduces the incidence of early clinically significant CMV (csCMV) infection, it remains unclear whether it has a beneficial effect on nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). Herein, we evaluated the impact of LMV prophylaxis on posttransplant outcomes using the registry database of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Adult patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed (n = 6004). LMV prophylaxis was administered to 1640 patients (LMV group) and it significantly reduced the incidence of csCMV infection compared with those not administered LMV prophylaxis (15.4% vs 54.1%; p < 0.01). However, it did not improve the 1-year NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.40) and OS (HR, 0.96; p = 0.49). In the LMV group, 74 patients had breakthrough csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 3.44; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.93; p = 0.02) compared with those without infection. After completing LMV prophylaxis, 252 patients had late csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 1.83; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.58; p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that managing breakthrough and late csCMV infections is important for improving long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuto Takenaka
- Department of Hematology, Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan.
| | - Shigeo Fuji
- Department of Hematology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Uchida
- Department of Hematology, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kobayashi
- Hematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Tanaka
- Department of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takahide Ara
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Ikegame
- Department of Hematology, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Yukiyasu Ozawa
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Kanda
- Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masashi Sawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - Yumiko Maruyama
- Department of Hematology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Takahiro Fukuda
- Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirohisa Nakamae
- Department of Hematology, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takafumi Kimura
- Preparation Department, Japanese Red Cross Kinki Block Blood Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masao Ogata
- Department of Hematology, Oita University Hospital, Oita, Japan
| | - Sachiko Seo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Atsuta
- Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagakute, Japan
- Department of Registry Science for Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Aichi Medical University, School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hideki Nakasone
- Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moore WJ, Boutin CA, Tanna S. A new direction for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis among transplant recipients: Benefits and nonviral outcomes of letermovir use as primary CMV prophylaxis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2023; 36:514-521. [PMID: 37773928 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Letermovir has changed the game of primary prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and more recently, solid organ transplant recipients. This is largely due to letermovir's similar efficacy in protecting against CMV reactivation and disease, along with its superior safety profile, notably reduced myelotoxicity, and lack of renal dose adjustment compared to standard agents like valganciclovir. This review will describe the potential benefits and clinical considerations of letermovir as prophylaxis among transplant recipients, with a focus on recent evidence describing nonviral outcomes of CMV. RECENT FINDINGS Recent evidence has demonstrated improved safety (e.g., less myelosuppression) and tolerability with no difference in rates of CMV infection or disease in kidney transplant recipients given letermovir compared to valganciclovir. Real-world studies and meta-analyses in HSCT populations have explored various nonviral outcomes with letermovir use. Letermovir prophylaxis was associated with reduced mortality, lower rates of graft versus host disease, delayed CMV immune reconstitution, improved tolerability with extended durations, and decreased healthcare utilization. SUMMARY Letermovir is an effective antiviral agent for CMV prevention and has demonstrated enhanced safety, which may allow for extended durations of primary prophylaxis among transplant recipients along with other improved clinical outcomes by mitigating the indirect effects of CMV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Justin Moore
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Catherine-Audrey Boutin
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sajal Tanna
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Inova Medical Group, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kampouri E, Zamora D, Kiem ES, Liu W, Ibrahimi S, Blazevic RL, Lovas EA, Kimball LE, Huang ML, Jerome KR, Ueda Oshima M, Mielcarek M, Zerr DM, Boeckh MJ, Krantz EM, Hill JA. Human herpesvirus-6 reactivation and disease after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in the era of letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023; 29:1450.e1-1450.e7. [PMID: 37532126 PMCID: PMC10828110 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Letermovir for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients has decreased anti-CMV therapy use. Contrary to letermovir, anti-CMV antivirals are also active against human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6). We assessed changes in HHV-6 epidemiology in the post-letermovir era. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of CMV-seropositive allogeneic HCT recipients comparing time periods before and after routine use of prophylactic letermovir. HHV-6 testing was at the discretion of clinicians. We computed the cumulative incidence of broad-spectrum antiviral initiation (foscarnet, (val)ganciclovir, and/or cidofovir), HHV-6 testing, and HHV-6 detection in blood and cerebrospinal fluid within 100 days after HCT. We used Cox proportional-hazards models with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights to compare outcomes between cohorts balanced for baseline factors. RESULTS We analysed 738 patients, 376 in the pre-letermovir and 362 in the post-letermovir cohort. Broad-spectrum antiviral initiation incidence decreased from 65% (95% CI, 60-70%) pre-letermovir to 21% (95% CI, 17-25%) post-letermovir. The cumulative incidence of HHV-6 testing (17% [95% CI, 13-21%] pre-letermovir versus 13% [95% CI, 10-16%] post-letermovir), detection (3% [95% CI, 1-5%] in both cohorts), and HHV-6 encephalitis (0.5% [95% CI, 0.1-1.8%] pre-letermovir and 0.6% [95% CI, 0.1-1.9%] post-letermovir) were similar between cohorts. First HHV-6 detection occurred at a median of 37 days (interquartile range, 18-58) in the pre-letermovir cohort and 27 (interquartile range, 25-34) in the post-letermovir cohort. In a weighted model, there was no association between the pre-versus post-letermovir cohort and HHV-6 detection (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.44-2.62). DISCUSSION Despite a large decrease in broad-spectrum antivirals after the introduction of letermovir prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive allogeneic HCT recipients, there was no evidence for increased clinically detected HHV-6 reactivation and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleftheria Kampouri
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danniel Zamora
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Erika S Kiem
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Winnie Liu
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah Ibrahimi
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rachel L Blazevic
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Erika A Lovas
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Louise E Kimball
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Meei-Li Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Keith R Jerome
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Masumi Ueda Oshima
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marco Mielcarek
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danielle M Zerr
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael J Boeckh
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Krantz
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joshua A Hill
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sepassi A, Saunders IM, Bounthavong M, Taplitz RA, Logan C, Watanabe JH. Effectiveness of letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A global systematic review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:1138-1149. [PMID: 37207713 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) Letermovir (LET), a novel antiviral, has largely supplanted more traditional preemptive therapy (PET) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) patients. Use of LET demonstrated efficacy against placebo in phase III randomized controlled trials, but is considerably more expensive than PET. This review aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of LET in preventing clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) for allo-HCT recipients and related outcomes. DESIGN A systematic literature review was performed using an a priori protocol using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2010 to October 2021. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Studies were included if they met the following criteria: LET compared with PET, CMV-related outcomes, patients aged 18 years or older, and English language-only articles. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study characteristics and outcomes. OUTCOME MEASURES CMV viremia, csCMVi, CMV end-organ disease, graft-versus-host-disease, all-cause mortality. RESULTS A total of 233 abstracts were screened, with 30 included in this review. Randomized trials demonstrated efficacy of LET prophylaxis in preventing csCMVi. Observational studies demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness of LET prophylaxis compared with use of PET alone. All studies with a comparator group resulted in lower rates of csCMVi for patients using LET. Included studies varied widely by CMV viral load threshold cutoff and CMV test units, limiting synthesis of results owing to high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION LET reduces risk of csCMVi, but lack of standardized clinical definitions on how to evaluate csCMVi and related outcomes largely prevent synthesis of results. Clinicians must consider this limitation in the context of evaluating the effectiveness of LET to other antiviral therapies, especially for patients at risk of late-onset CMV. Future studies should focus on prospective data collection through registries and concordance of diagnostic definitions to mitigate study heterogeneity.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zanella MC, Vu DL, Hosszu-Fellous K, Neofytos D, Van Delden C, Turin L, Poncet A, Simonetta F, Masouridi-Levrat S, Chalandon Y, Cordey S, Kaiser L. Longitudinal Detection of Twenty DNA and RNA Viruses in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Plasma. Viruses 2023; 15:v15040928. [PMID: 37112908 PMCID: PMC10142697 DOI: 10.3390/v15040928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Metagenomics revealed novel and routinely overlooked viruses, representing sources of unrecognized infections after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We aim to describe DNA and RNA virus prevalence and kinetics in allo-HSCT recipients' plasma for one year post HSCT. We included 109 adult patients with first allo-HSCT from 1 March 2017 to 31 January 2019 in this observational cohort study. Seventeen DNA and three RNA viral species were screened with qualitative and/or quantitative r(RT)-PCR assays using plasma samples collected at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post HSCT. TTV infected 97% of patients, followed by HPgV-1 (prevalence: 26-36%). TTV (median 3.29 × 105 copies/mL) and HPgV-1 (median 1.18 × 106 copies/mL) viral loads peaked at month 3. At least one Polyomaviridae virus (BKPyV, JCPyV, MCPyV, HPyV6/7) was detected in >10% of patients. HPyV6 and HPyV7 prevalence reached 27% and 12% at month 3; CMV prevalence reached 27%. HSV, VZV, EBV, HHV-7, HAdV and B19V prevalence remained <5%. HPyV9, TSPyV, HBoV, EV and HPg-V2 were never detected. At month 3, 72% of patients had co-infections. TTV and HPgV-1 infections were highly prevalent. BKPyV, MCPyV and HPyV6/7 were frequently detected relative to classical culprits. Further investigation is needed into associations between these viral infections and immune reconstitution or clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Céline Zanella
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Virology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Diem-Lan Vu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Virology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Krisztina Hosszu-Fellous
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Centre for Emerging Viral Diseases, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dionysios Neofytos
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Chistian Van Delden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lara Turin
- Laboratory of Virology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Antoine Poncet
- Center for Clinical Research, Department of Health and Community Medicine, University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Health and Community Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Federico Simonetta
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stavroula Masouridi-Levrat
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Yves Chalandon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Hematology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Samuel Cordey
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Virology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Kaiser
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Virology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Centre for Emerging Viral Diseases, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Saullo JL, Miller RA. Cytomegalovirus Therapy: Role of Letermovir in Prophylaxis and Treatment in Transplant Recipients. Annu Rev Med 2023; 74:89-105. [PMID: 36332639 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-042921-124739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common viral pathogen in the transplant population and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. CMV prevention is paramount; however, selecting the best preventive strategy depends on many factors including donor-recipient CMV serostatus, transplant-specific risks, antiviral toxicities and cost. Novel CMV therapeutics such as letermovir (LTV) are desperately needed to optimize CMV management. Uniquely among CMV antiviral therapies, LTV inhibits the viral terminase complex in the CMV DNA synthesis pathway and disrupts viral genome packaging. Further, it lacks side effects frequently associated with other CMV antiviral therapies and evades common mechanisms of resistance. LTV is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for CMV prevention in adult CMV-seropositive hematopoietic cell transplant recipients but is increasingly applied off-label for prophylaxis and treatment. This review summarizes important concepts of CMV management in transplantation, with a specific focus on LTV pharmacology and clinical experience to date alongside future prospects for its application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Saullo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA; ,
| | - Rachel A Miller
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Royston L, Isnard S, Berini CA, Bu S, Lakatos PL, Bessissow T, Chomont N, Klein M, Lebouché B, de Pokomandy A, Kronfli N, Costiniuk CT, Thomas R, Tremblay C, Boivin G, Routy JP. Influence of letermovir treatment on gut inflammation in people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy: protocol of the open-label controlled randomised CIAO study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067640. [PMID: 36690406 PMCID: PMC9872486 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is very frequent in people living with HIV (PLWH). High anti-CMV IgG titres, which may be linked to transient CMV replication, have been associated with earlier mortality, CD8 T-cell expansion, lower CD4/CD8 ratio and increased T-cell senescence. We previously showed that anti-CMV IgG titres correlated with gut permeability in PLWH on antiretroviral therapy (ART), which was associated with microbial translocation, systemic inflammation and non-infectious/non-AIDS comorbidities. Letermovir, a novel anti-CMV drug with a good safety profile, was recently approved for anti-CMV prophylaxis in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. A drastic and selective reduction of both low-grade replication and clinically significant CMV infections, combined with an improved immune reconstitution have been reported. In vitro, letermovir prevented CMV-induced epithelial disruption in intestinal tissues. Based on these findings, we aim to assess whether letermovir could inhibit CMV subclinical replication in CMV-seropositive PLWH receiving ART and, in turn, decrease CMV-associated gut damage and inflammation. METHOD AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a multi-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled clinical trial, including a total of 60 CMV-seropositive ART-treated PLWH for at least 3 years, with a viral load <50 copies/mL and CD4+ count >400 cells/µL. Forty participants will be randomised to receive letermovir for 14 weeks and 20 participants will receive standard of care (ART) alone. Plasma, pheripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and stool samples will be collected. Colon biopsies will be collected in an optional substudy. We will assess the effect of letermovir on gut damage, microbial translocation, inflammation and HIV reservoir size. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by Health Canada and the Research Ethics Boards of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC-REB, protocol number: MP37-2022-8295). Results will be made available through publications in open access peer-reviewed journals and through the CIHR/CTN website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05362916.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léna Royston
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Isnard
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Carolina A Berini
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Retrovirus y SIDA (INBIRS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Simeng Bu
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicolas Chomont
- Department de Microbiologie, Maladies Infectieuses et Immunologie, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marina Klein
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bertrand Lebouché
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexandra de Pokomandy
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nadine Kronfli
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Cecilia T Costiniuk
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Cécile Tremblay
- Department de Microbiologie, Maladies Infectieuses et Immunologie, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Guy Boivin
- Division of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec city, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Routy
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Hematology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
New trends in the management of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a survey of the Infectious Diseases Working Pary of EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2023; 58:203-208. [PMID: 36396949 PMCID: PMC9672643 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01863-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was assessed with a survey performed in 2020 by the Infectious Diseases Working Party of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). One-hundred-eighty of the 579 EBMT centres (31%) responded. CMV monitoring with quantitative PCR for CMV-DNAemia was used by 97% of centres while the duration of monitoring was variable according to the patient immune recovery and the ongoing immunosuppressive therapy. CMV prophylaxis for high-risk patients was used in 101 (56%) of centres: letermovir in 62 centres (61%), aciclovir/valaciclovir in 19 centres (19%), ganciclovir/valganciclovir in 17 centres (17%), foscarnet in 3 (3%). The most used trigger for pre-emptive therapy was a threshold of >103 copies/ml or >103 IU/ml. Ganciclovir/valganciclovir confirmed the preferred first line treatment both for pre-emptive and CMV disease therapy. CMV-cytotoxic T-cells were used mainly in the setting of relapsing/refractory CMV disease. Forty-eight centres reported CMV refractory/resistant infection due to mutated CMV strain.This survey showed that letermovir prophylaxis is adopted by more than half of centres using a prophylaxis approach for CMV infection. How letermovir prophylaxis will modify other important pillars of daily CMV management, such as frequency of CMV-DNAemia monitoring and preemptive therapy, remain a matter of investigation.
Collapse
|
16
|
Khawaja F, Spallone A, Kotton CN, Chemaly RF. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients: newly approved additions to our armamentarium. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023; 29:44-50. [PMID: 35843567 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden that cytomegalovirus (CMV) portends for haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients cannot be understated. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir have successfully been used for prevention and treatment of CMV infections, although with serious side effects such as leucopenia and some development of resistance. Until recently, available therapies for ganciclovir-resistant CMV have significant toxicities. Although advances have been made in the field, the unmet medical needs for effective and well-tolerated therapies are significant. OBJECTIVES This review aims to summarise the current and emerging CMV antiviral drugs and discusses future perspectives in the field. SOURCES We searched for relevant articles with pertinent keywords: "Cytomegalovirus OR CMV", "Transplant" and "Antiviral". Articles published after 2019 were given preference. Articles were reviewed by the authors for relevance and impact to the subject of interest. CONTENT We outline in this review current advances in prophylaxis of CMV infection with letermovir, breakthrough CMV infections while on or after prophylaxis, the development of resistant and refractory CMV infections, and the newly approved anti-CMV agent, maribavir, in haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients. IMPLICATIONS Prevention of CMV infections after transplant has improved greatly over the past few years. Despite major advancements, breakthrough CMV infections and development of refractory and resistant CMV infections remain major complications post transplantation. We highlight emerging therapeutics that tolerably and effectively prevent and treat CMV infections, especially refractory and resistant cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fareed Khawaja
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Spallone
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Transplant Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roy F Chemaly
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vyas A, Raval AD, Kamat S, LaPlante K, Tang Y, Chemaly RF. Real-World Outcomes Associated With Letermovir Use for Cytomegalovirus Primary Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 10:ofac687. [PMID: 36726548 PMCID: PMC9879759 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world observational studies was conducted to summarize the impact of letermovir cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary prophylaxis (PP) among adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. Methods Systematic searches in Medline/PubMed, Embase, and conferences (from database inception to October 2021) were conducted to identify studies for inclusion. Random-effects models were used to derive pooled estimates on the relative effectiveness of letermovir PP compared to controls. Results Forty-eight unique studies (N = 7104 patients) were included, most of which were comparative, single-center, and conducted in the United States. Letermovir PP was associated with statistically significant reduction in odds of CMV reactivation (pooled odds ratio [pOR], 0.13 and 0.24; P < .05), clinically significant CMV infection (pOR, 0.09 and 0.19; P < .05), and CMV disease (pOR, 0.31 and 0.35; P < .05) by day +100 and day +200 after allo-HCT, respectively. Letermovir PP was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause (pOR, 0.73; P < .01) and nonrelapse mortality (pOR, 0.65; P = .01) beyond day 200 after allo-HCT. Conclusions Letermovir for CMV PP was effective in reducing the risk of CMV-related complications overall and mortality beyond day 200 among adult allo-HCT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami Vyas
- Correspondence: Ami Vyas, PhD, MS, MBA, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA ()
| | - Amit D Raval
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Shweta Kamat
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Kerry LaPlante
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Yuexin Tang
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mizuno K, Sakurai M, Kato J, Yamaguchi K, Abe R, Koda Y, Kataoka K, Mori T. Risk factor analysis for cytomegalovirus reactivation under prophylaxis with letermovir after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2022; 24:e13904. [PMID: 35870130 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Letermovir has been approved as a novel cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylactic agent after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there are still insufficient data to properly evaluate the real-world role of letermovir, and the risk factors for CMV reactivation under letermovir prophylaxis have not been clarified. METHODS We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients under prophylaxis with or without letermovir who underwent allogeneic HSCT between March 2012 and December 2019. In August 2018, letermovir was added to the clinical practice at our institution for the prophylaxis of CMV reactivation in allogeneic HSCT recipients. Patients who underwent HSCT without prophylactic letermovir from March 2012 until September 2018 served as a historical control. RESULTS The cumulative incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) was significantly lower in the letermovir group than in the historical control group not receiving letermovir (30.2% vs. 71.6%, p < .05, at 100 days). In addition, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at day 500 was significantly lower in the letermovir group (4.7% vs. 19.8%, p < .05). We then performed a risk factor analysis for developing CS-CMVi in the letermovir group. The only significant factor identified by this multivariable analysis was transplantation from a CMV seronegative donor to a seropositive recipient (Hazard ratio = 2.76, 95% confidence interval 1.14-6.68, p < .05). CONCLUSION Our study showed that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of CS-CMVi and NRM in a real-world setting and that the CMV serostatus of the donor remained as a risk factor for CS-CMVi even under letermovir prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kota Mizuno
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Sakurai
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Kato
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yamaguchi
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryohei Abe
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuya Koda
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kataoka
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takehiko Mori
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Hematology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Orally Administered Letermovir Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022; 66:e0065722. [PMID: 35876579 PMCID: PMC9380536 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00657-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
With balanced safety-efficacy profile, letermovir anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is used in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCTR). We assessed feasibility and usefulness of letermovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in HSCTR. We performed a prospective observational study on letermovir-TDM including 40 consecutive adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic-HSCTR who received orally (PO) administered letermovir. Minimal blood concentrations of letermovir (Ctrough) were measured on days 3 and 7 postletermovir initiation and weekly thereafter. Letermovir-Ctrough remained stable during the first 70 days post-HSCT at a median of 286 μg/L (interquartile range, 131 to 591 μg/L), with large interpatient/intrapatient variability. No associations between breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection or detectable CMV DNAemia and letermovir-Ctrough were observed. Patients with letermovir-associated adverse events had higher letermovir-Ctrough than patients without (400 versus 266 μg/L, P = 0.02). Letermovir-Ctrough was similar in patients with or without gastrointestinal symptoms (280 versus 300 μg/L, P = 0.49). Acute grade ≥2 GvHD was associated with higher letermovir-Ctrough (479 versus 248 μg/L, P = 0.001), including gastrointestinal GvHD (499 versus 263 μg/L, P = 0.004). Concomitantly administered posaconazole and cyclosporine were associated with higher letermovir-Ctrough (707 versus 259 μg/L, P < 0.001 and 437 versus 248 μg/L, P = 0.01, respectively). In multivariable analysis, both posaconazole (odds ratio [OR], 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4 to 9.7; P < 0.0001) and cyclosporine-adjusted letermovir dose at 240 mg daily (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 9.0; P = 0.01) were independently associated with higher letermovir-Ctrough. In conclusion, administration of PO letermovir led to measurable and relatively stable letermovir-Ctrough, without noticeable associations with clinical efficacy. Letermovir exposure was not affected by gastrointestinal symptoms, but with posaconazole and cyclosporine administration. Associations between letermovir and concomitantly administered agents and adverse events warrant additional clinical studies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Royston L, Isnard S, Lin J, Routy JP. Cytomegalovirus as an Uninvited Guest in the Response to Vaccines in People Living with HIV. Viruses 2021; 13:v13071266. [PMID: 34209711 PMCID: PMC8309982 DOI: 10.3390/v13071266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In stark contrast to the rapid development of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), an effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine is still lacking. Furthermore, despite virologic suppression and CD4 T-cell count normalization with antiretroviral therapy (ART), people living with HIV (PLWH) still exhibit increased morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. Such differences in health outcomes are related to higher risk behaviors, but also to HIV-related immune activation and viral coinfections. Among these coinfections, cytomegalovirus (CMV) latent infection is a well-known inducer of long-term immune dysregulation. Cytomegalovirus contributes to the persistent immune activation in PLWH receiving ART by directly skewing immune response toward itself, and by increasing immune activation through modification of the gut microbiota and microbial translocation. In addition, through induction of immunosenescence, CMV has been associated with a decreased response to infections and vaccines. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the influence of CMV on the immune system, the mechanisms underlying a reduced response to vaccines, and discuss new therapeutic advances targeting CMV that could be used to improve vaccine response in PLWH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léna Royston
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; (L.R.); (S.I.); (J.L.)
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Stéphane Isnard
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; (L.R.); (S.I.); (J.L.)
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - John Lin
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; (L.R.); (S.I.); (J.L.)
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Routy
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; (L.R.); (S.I.); (J.L.)
- Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Division of Hematology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Royston L, Royston E, Masouridi-Levrat S, Chalandon Y, Van Delden C, Neofytos D. Predictors of breakthrough clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection during letermovir prophylaxis in high-risk hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE 2021; 9:771-776. [PMID: 33949798 PMCID: PMC8342239 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Letermovir prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients significantly reduces the incidence of clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection. However, breakthrough infections still occur despite adequate prophylaxis. In the present retrospective cohort study, we identified clinically relevant predictive factors for clinically significant CMV breakthrough infection during letermovir prophylaxis. Low‐grade CMV replication (21–149 IU/ml), both at the time of letermovir initiation or during prophylaxis, was a significant risk factor for breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection. In addition, development of acute gastrointestinal graft‐versus‐host disease was significantly associated with breakthrough infection. Altogether these findings could call clinicians' attention to closer CMV monitoring and allow for prompt preemptive treatment initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léna Royston
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eva Royston
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Yves Chalandon
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Van Delden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dionysios Neofytos
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|