A Cutoff Determination of Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) for End-Point Detection of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Meat

Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy

The aim of this study was to develop an accurate, easy-to-use, and cost-effective method for the detection of chicken adulteration based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and lateral flow strip (LFS). We compared six DNA extraction methods, namely the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, salt method, urea method, SDS method, guanidine isothiocyanate method, and commercial kit method. The chicken cytb gene was used as a target to design specific primers. The specificity and sensitivity of the PCR-LFS system were tested using a self-assembled lateral flow measurement sensor. The results showed that the DNA concentration obtained by salt methods is up to 533 ± 84 ng µL⁻¹, is a suitable replacement for commercial kits. The PCR-LFS method exhibits high specificity at an annealing temperature of 62 °C and does not cross-react with other animal sources. This strategy is also highly sensitive, being able to detect 0.1% of chicken in artificial adulterated meat. The results of the test strips can be observed with the naked eye within 5 min, and this result is consistent with the electrophoresis result, demonstrating its high accuracy. Moreover, the detection system has already been successfully used to detect chicken in commercial samples. Hence, this PCR-LFS strategy provides a potential tool to verify the authenticity of chicken.

Progression of LAMP as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Is PCR Finally Rivaled?

Reflecting on the past three years and the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, varying global tactics offer insights into the most effective public-health responses. In the US, specifically, rapid and widespread testing was quickly prioritized to lower restrictions sooner. Essentially, only two types of COVID-19 diagnostic tests were publicly employed during the peak pandemic: the rapid antigen test and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). However, neither test ideally suited the situation, as rapid antigen tests are far too inaccurate, and RT-PCR tests require skilled personnel and sophisticated equipment, leading to long wait times. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is another exceptionally accurate nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) that offers far quicker time to results. However, RT-LAMP COVID-19 tests have not been embraced as extensively as rapid antigen tests or RT-PCR. This review will investigate the performance of current RT-LAMP-based COVID-19 tests and summarize the reasons behind the hesitancy to embrace RT-LAMP instead of RT-PCR. We will also look at other LAMP platforms to explore possible improvements in the accuracy and portability of LAMP, which could be applied to COVID-19 diagnostics and future public-health outbreaks.