1
|
Impacts of Tile Drainage on Phosphorus Losses from Edge-of-Field Plots in the Lake Champlain Basin of New York. WATER 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/w12020328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Quantifying the influence of tile drainage on phosphorus (P) transport risk is important where eutrophication is a concern. The objective of this study was to compare P exports from tile-drained (TD) and undrained (UD) edge-of-field plots in northern New York. Four plots (46 by 23 m) were established with tile drainage and surface runoff collection during 2012–2013. Grass sod was terminated in fall 2013 and corn (Zea mays L.) for silage was grown in 2014 and 2015. Runoff, total phosphorus (TP), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), and total suspended solids (TSS) exports were measured from April 2014 through June 2015. Mean total runoff was 396% greater for TD, however, surface runoff for TD was reduced by 84% compared to UD. There was no difference in mean cumulative TP export, while SRP and TSS exports were 55% and 158% greater for UD, respectively. A three day rain/snowmelt event resulted in 61% and 84% of cumulative SRP exports for TD and UD, respectively, with over 100% greater TP, SRP and TSS exports for UD. Results indicate that tile drainage substantially reduced surface runoff, TSS and SRP exports while having no impact on TP exports, suggesting tile drains may not increase the overall P export risk.
Collapse
|
2
|
Easton ZM, Kleinman PJA, Buda AR, Goering D, Emberston N, Reed S, Drohan PJ, Walter MT, Guinan P, Lory JA, Sommerlot AR, Sharpley A. Short-term Forecasting Tools for Agricultural Nutrient Management. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 2017; 46:1257-1269. [PMID: 29293860 DOI: 10.2134/jeq2016.09.0377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The advent of real-time, short-term farm management tools is motivated by the need to protect water quality above and beyond the general guidance offered by existing nutrient management plans. Advances in high-performance computing and hydrologic or climate modeling have enabled rapid dissemination of real-time information that can assist landowners and conservation personnel with short-term management planning. This paper reviews short-term decision support tools for agriculture that are under various stages of development and implementation in the United States: (i) Wisconsin's Runoff Risk Advisory Forecast (RRAF) System, (ii) New York's Hydrologically Sensitive Area Prediction Tool, (iii) Virginia's Saturated Area Forecast Model, (iv) Pennsylvania's Fertilizer Forecaster, (v) Washington's Application Risk Management (ARM) System, and (vi) Missouri's Design Storm Notification System. Although these decision support tools differ in their underlying model structure, the resolution at which they are applied, and the hydroclimates to which they are relevant, all provide forecasts (range 24-120 h) of runoff risk or soil moisture saturation derived from National Weather Service Forecast models. Although this review highlights the need for further development of robust and well-supported short-term nutrient management tools, their potential for adoption and ultimate utility requires an understanding of the appropriate context of application, the strategic and operational needs of managers, access to weather forecasts, scales of application (e.g., regional vs. field level), data requirements, and outreach communication structure.
Collapse
|
3
|
Thomas IA, Jordan P, Mellander PE, Fenton O, Shine O, Ó hUallacháin D, Creamer R, McDonald NT, Dunlop P, Murphy PNC. Improving the identification of hydrologically sensitive areas using LiDAR DEMs for the delineation and mitigation of critical source areas of diffuse pollution. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2016; 556:276-290. [PMID: 26974575 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Revised: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Identifying critical source areas (CSAs) of diffuse pollution in agricultural catchments requires the accurate identification of hydrologically sensitive areas (HSAs) at highest propensity for generating surface runoff and transporting pollutants. A new GIS-based HSA Index is presented that improves the identification of HSAs at the sub-field scale by accounting for microtopographic controls. The Index is based on high resolution LiDAR data and a soil topographic index (STI) and also considers the hydrological disconnection of overland flow via topographic impediment from flow sinks. The HSA Index was applied to four intensive agricultural catchments (~7.5-12km(2)) with contrasting topography and soil types, and validated using rainfall-quickflow measurements during saturated winter storm events in 2009-2014. Total flow sink volume capacities ranged from 8298 to 59,584m(3) and caused 8.5-24.2% of overland-flow-generating-areas and 16.8-33.4% of catchment areas to become hydrologically disconnected from the open drainage channel network. HSA maps identified 'breakthrough points' and 'delivery points' along surface runoff pathways as vulnerable points where diffuse pollutants could be transported between fields or delivered to the open drainage network, respectively. Using these as proposed locations for targeting mitigation measures such as riparian buffer strips reduced potential costs compared to blanket implementation within an example agri-environment scheme by 66% and 91% over 1 and 5years respectively, which included LiDAR DEM acquisition costs. The HSA Index can be used as a hydrologically realistic transport component within a fully evolved sub-field scale CSA model, and can also be used to guide the implementation of 'treatment-train' mitigation strategies concurrent with sustainable agricultural intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I A Thomas
- Agricultural Catchments Programme, Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co., Wexford, Ireland; School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
| | - P Jordan
- Agricultural Catchments Programme, Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co., Wexford, Ireland; School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
| | - P-E Mellander
- Agricultural Catchments Programme, Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co., Wexford, Ireland.
| | - O Fenton
- Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co., Wexford, Ireland.
| | - O Shine
- Agricultural Catchments Programme, Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co., Wexford, Ireland.
| | - D Ó hUallacháin
- Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co., Wexford, Ireland.
| | - R Creamer
- Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co., Wexford, Ireland.
| | - N T McDonald
- Agricultural Catchments Programme, Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co., Wexford, Ireland.
| | - P Dunlop
- School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
| | - P N C Murphy
- Environment and Sustainable Resource Management Section, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|