Evaluation of a Seton Procedure Combined With Infliximab Therapy (Early vs. Late) in Perianal Fistula With Crohn Disease

The use of core descriptors from the ENiGMA code study in recent literature: a systematic review

AIM

The heterogeneity in data quality presented in studies regarding Crohn's anal fistula (CAF) limit extrapolation into clinical practice. The ENiGMA collaborators established a core descriptor set to standardize reporting of CAF. The aim of this work was to quantify the use of these descriptors in recent literature.

METHOD

We completed a systematic review of PubMed and the Cochrane Library, extracting publications from the past 10 years specific to the clinical interventions and outcomes of CAF, and reported in line with PRISMA guidance. Each article was assessed for inclusion of ENiGMA descriptors. The median number of descriptors per publication was evaluated along with the overall frequency of each individual descriptor. Use of ENiGMA descriptors was compared between medical and procedural publications.

RESULTS

Ninety publications were included. The median number of descriptors was 15 of 37; 16 descriptors were used in over half of the publications while 17 were used in fewer than a third. Descriptors were more frequently used in procedural (n = 16) than medical publications (n = 14) (p = 0.031). In procedural publications, eight descriptors were more frequently used including Faecal incontinence, Number of previous fistula interventions, Presence and severity of anorectal stenosis and Current proctitis. Medical publications were more likely to include Previous response to biological therapy and Duration and type of current course of biological therapy.

CONCLUSION

With many descriptors being used infrequently and variations between medical and procedural literature, the colorectal community should assess the need for all 37 descriptors.

[Clinical characteristics and prognosis of children with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease]

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of children with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the children, aged 6-17 years, who were diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) from April 2015 to April 2023. According to the presence or absence of perianal fistulizing lesions, they were divided into two groups: pfCD (n=60) and non-pfCD (n=82). The two groups were compared in terms of clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis.

RESULTS

The incidence of pfCD was 42.3% (60/142). The proportion of males in the pfCD group was higher than that in the non-pfCD group. Compared with the non-pfCD group, the pfCD group had a significantly higher proportion of children with involvement of the colon and small intestine or those with upper gastrointestinal lesions (P<0.05). Compared with the non-pfCD group, the pfCD group had a significantly higher rate of use of infliximab during both induction and maintenance treatment (P<0.05). In the pfCD group, the children with complex anal fistula accounted for 62% (37/60), among whom the children receiving non-cutting suspended line drainage accounted for 62% (23/37), which was significantly higher than the proportion among the children with simple anal fistula patients (4%, 1/23) (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mucosal healing rate and clinical remission rate at week 54 of treatment (P>0.05). The pfCD group achieved a fistula healing rate of 57% (34/60) at week 54, and the children with simple anal fistula had a significantly higher rate than those with complex anal fistula (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high incidence rate of pfCD in children with CD, and among the children with pfCD, there is a high proportion of children with the use of biological agents. There is a high proportion of children receiving non-cutting suspended line drainage among the children with complex anal fistula. The occurrence of pfCD should be closely monitored during the follow-up in children with CD.

Management of Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease

Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) represents a severe phenotype of CD that is associated with significant morbidity and reduction in quality of life. Perianal fistulizing CD is caused by a complex interplay of genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, gut dysbiosis, and various unknown physiological and mechanical factors. A multidisciplinary approach is hence required for optimal management . A detailed anatomical description and classification of perianal fistula, including comprehensive clinical, endoscopic, and radiological diagnostic workup, is an important prerequisite to treatment. For simple perianal fistulas, use of antibiotics and immunomodulators, with or without fistulotomy, are appropriate measures. The medical management of complex perianal fistula, on the other hand, requires adequate control of infection before initiation of therapy with immunomodulators. In active complex perianal fistula, anti-tumor necrosis factors remain the most accepted therapy, with concomitant use of antibiotics or immunomodulators enhancing the efficacy. For patients refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factors, treatment with anti-integrins, anti-interleukins, and small molecules is being evaluated. Mesenchymal stem cells, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and exclusive enteral nutrition have also been investigated as adjunct therapies. Despite the expansion of the medical armamentarium, a large proportion of the patients require surgical interventions. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and medical management of perianal fistulizing CD. A brief overview of the surgical management of perianal fistulizing CD is also provided.

The Optimal Management of Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease: Evidence beyond Randomized Clinical Trials

Fistulizing Crohn’s disease (FCD) remains the most challenging aspect of treating patients with CD. FCD can occur in up to 30% of patients with CD and may lead to significant disability and impaired quality of life. The optimal treatment strategies for FCD require a multidisciplinary approach, including a combined medical and surgical approach. The therapeutic options for FCD are limited due to sparse evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The current recommendations are mainly based on post hoc analysis from RCTs, real-world clinical studies and expert opinion. There is variation in everyday clinical practice amongst gastroenterologists and surgeons. The evidence for anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy is the strongest in the treatment of FCD. However, long-term fistula healing can be achieved in only 30–50% of patients. In recent years, emerging data in the advent of therapeutic modalities, including the use of new biologic agents, therapeutic drug monitoring, novel surgical methods and mesenchymal stem cell therapy, have been shown to improve outcomes in achieving fistula healing. This review summarizes the existing literature on current and emerging therapies to provide guidance beyond RCTs in managing FCD.

Approach to medical therapy in perianal Crohn's disease

Perianal Crohn's disease remains a challenging condition to treat and can have a substantial negative impact on quality of life. It often requires combined surgical and medical interventions. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, including infliximab and adalimumab, remain preferred medical therapies for perianal Crohn's disease. Infliximab has been shown to be efficacious in improving fistula closure rates in randomized controlled trials. Clinicians can be faced with a number of questions relating to the optimal use of anti-TNF therapy in perianal Crohn's disease. Specific issues include evaluation for the presence of perianal sepsis, the treatment target of therapy, the ideal time to commence treatment, whether additional medical therapy should be used in conjunction with anti-TNF therapy, and the duration of treatment. This article will discuss key studies which can assist clinicians in addressing these matters when they are considering or have already commenced anti-TNF therapy for the treatment of perianal Crohn's disease. It will also discuss current evidence regarding the use of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in patients who are failing to achieve a response to anti-TNF therapy for perianal Crohn's disease. Lastly, new therapies such as local injection of mesenchymal stem cell therapy will be discussed.

Multidisciplinary management of perianal Crohn's disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple new medications with novel mechanisms of action are now available to treat Crohn's disease (CD). However, they have varying effectiveness in the management of perianal CD. Identifying the most appropriate therapy and optimizing it is essential to maximize effectiveness of therapy. Additionally, the management of perianal CD requires imaging of the perianal area to identify the fistula anatomy and local complications such as abscesses that require surgical drainage. Initial surgical assessment is key to drain abscesses and allow fistula healing with medical therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNFs) remain the most effective medications to treat perianal CD, real-world data suggests that ustekinumab may be a 2nd-line option in patients nonresponsive to an anti-TNF or having contraindications. Mesenchymal stem cells are an emerging therapeutic approach that is currently in Phase 3 trials in the United States and poised to play a major role in the treatment algorithm.

SUMMARY

The management of perianal CD requires a multidisciplinary approach with a combination of initial imaging and surgical assessment to adequately control local sepsis, optimization of biological therapy with adjunct antibiotics or immunomodulators, and close clinical follow-up with imaging to evaluate response to therapy and guide further surgical management options.

Treatment Strategy for Perianal Fistulas in Crohn Disease Patients: The Surgeon's Point of View

Perianal fistula is a frequent complication and one of the subclassifications of Crohn disease (CD). It is the most commonly observed symptomatic condition by colorectal surgeons. Accurately classifying a perianal fistula is the initial step in its management in CD patients. Surgical management is selected based on the type of perianal fistula and the presence of rectal inflammation; it includes fistulotomy, fistulectomy, seton procedure, fistula plug insertion, video-assisted ablation of the fistulous tract, stem cell therapy, and proctectomy with stoma creation. Perianal fistulas are also managed medically, such as antibiotics, immunomodulators, and biologics including anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents. The current standard treatment of choice for perianal fistula in CD patients is the multidisciplinary approach combining surgical and medical management; however, the rate of long-term remission is low and is reported to be 50% at most. Therefore, the optimum management strategy for perianal fistulas associated with CD remains controversial. Currently, the goal of management for CD-related perianal fistulas are controlling symptoms and maintaining long-term anal function without proctectomy, while monitoring progression to anorectal carcinoma. This review evaluates perianal fistula in CD patients and determines the optimal surgical management strategy based on recent evidence.

Management of perianal fistula in inflammatory bowel disease: identification of prognostic factors associated with surgery

PURPOSE

As one of the clinical manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), perianal fistula disease (PFD) can potentially impact the patient quality of life. The management of PFD employs a multidisciplinary approach which includes antibiotics, biological therapies, immunomodulators, and surgery. We analyzed the outcome and prognostic factors of anal fistula surgery in IBD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of IBD patients undergoing elective surgery for anal fistula between January 2015 and December 2018 at our University Department of Surgery. We collated demographic factors, disease activity, imaging (MRI and endoanal ultrasound), surgical interventions, and medical treatment assessing the rate of fistula closure and fecal incontinence, 2 months and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-five IBD patients with anal fistula underwent surgery (28 Crohn's disease, four ulcerative colitis, and three indeterminate colitis). Twenty-seven patients presented with complex fistulas and eight with simple fistulas with 10 patients undergoing single-stage surgery. In 25 patients, a two-stage surgical approach was planned and performed (draining seton plus medical treatment and then second-stage surgery with curative intent). At 1 year of follow-up, the fistula healing rate was 50% for single-stage surgery and 60% for two-stage surgery (P = 0.09). Overall, 19.2% of patients developed postoperative fecal incontinence. A time interval greater than 12 months between surgeries is a favorable prognostic factor for fistula healing with the two-stage approach (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In our retrospective study, two-stage surgery in IBD patients presenting with complex perianal fistulous disease results in a better medium-term outcome with a longer time interval between surgeries.