Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS?

Management of Hemorrhoids and Anal Fissures

Hemorrhoids and anal fissures are two of the most common benign anorectal diseases. Despite their high prevalence, diagnostic accuracy of benign anorectal disease is suboptimal at 70% for surgeons, especially for hemorrhoidal diseases. Once the diagnosis is correctly made, numerous medical and surgical treatment options are available, each with different rates of success and complications. In this article, the authors review each step of patient management, with emphasis on evidence-based treatment options for hemorrhoids and anal fissures. The article discusses the pathophysiology, diagnosis, medical management, and procedures for hemorrhoids followed by a detailed overview on the management of anal fissures.

The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland guideline on the management of anal fissure

AIM

The management of anal fissure: ACPGBI position statement was written 15 years ago. [KLR Cross et al., Colorectal Dis, 2008]. Our aim was to update the guideline and provide recommendations on the most effective treatment for patients with anal fissures utilising a multidisciplinary, rigorous guideline methodology.

METHODS

The development process consisted of six phases. In phase 1 we defined the scope of the guideline. The patient population included patients with acute and chronic anal fissure. The target group was all practitioners (primary and secondary care) treating patients with fissures and, in addition, healthcare workers and patients who desired information regarding fissure management. In phase 2 we formed a guideline development group (GDG) including a methodologist. In phase 3 review questions were formulated, using a reversed PICO process, starting with possible recommendations based on the GDG's knowledge. In phase 4 a comprehensive literature search focused on existing systematic reviews addressing each review question, supplemented by more recent studies if appropriate. In phase 5 data were extracted from the included papers and checked by the GDG. If indicated, meta-analysis of systematic review data was updated by the GDG. During phase 6 the GDG members decided what recommendations could be made based on the evidence in the literature and strength of the recommendation was assessed using 'grade'.

RESULTS

This guideline is divided into two sections: Primary care which includes (i) diagnosis; (ii) basic treatment; (iii) topical treatment; and secondary care which includes (iv) botulinum toxin therapy; (v) surgical intervention and (vi) special situations (including pregnancy and breast-feeding patients, children, receptive anal intercourse and low-pressure fissures). A total of 23 recommendations were formulated. A new term clinically healed was described by the GDG.

CONCLUSION

This guideline provides an up-to-date evidence-based summary of the current knowledge of the management of anal fissure and may serve as a useful guide for clinicians as well as a potential reference for patients.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Controlled Manual Anal Dilatation in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissures: A Single-center Observational Study

Objectives

Conventional anal dilatation for anal fissures has long been abandoned because of the high incidence of anal incontinence. However, less invasive and more precise dilation techniques have been developed that have shown high healing and low incontinence rates. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of controlled anal dilatation (CAD) using a standardized maximum anal diameter.

Methods

This study included 523 patients who underwent CAD for chronic anal fissures between January 2010 and December 2014. CAD was performed under sacral epidural anesthesia. The index fingers of both hands were placed in the anus and dilated evenly in various directions. CAD was completed when the anus was dilated to the sixth scale (35 mm in diameter) using a caliber ruler.

Results

The mean anal scale size expanded from 3.1 to 5.8 (p<0.001). Non-healing was observed in nine patients (1.7%) at 1 month postoperatively, six of whom underwent additional CAD. The mean maximal anal resting pressure (mmHg) decreased from 90.2 to 79.7 at three months postoperatively (p<0.001). Postoperative complications were observed in 11 (2.1%) patients, of whom three patients with thrombosed hemorrhoids underwent resection. None of the patients complained of anal incontinence during the mean follow-up period of 16.6 months. The cumulative recurrence-free rates at three and five years were 87.9% and 69.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

CAD is technically simple and safe and can achieve reasonable long-term outcomes. Thus, CAD appears to be the preferred procedure for patients with chronic anal fissures who do not respond to conservative treatments.