One Year Follow-up Result of Doppler-guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation and Recto-Anal Repair in 97 Consecutive Patients

A new technique of doppler dearterialization for hemorrhoidal disease: arterial detection ligation (ADL)

PURPOSE

We describe the arterial detection ligation (ADL) technique, designed to find arteries at time-appropriate depth for ligating, and report our preliminary results of using this technique to treat patients with the hemorrhoidal disease (HD).

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective analysis were patients with symptomatic grades 2 or 3 HD. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, postoperative complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction of the patients treated with ADL.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients were included in the study (male/female ratio 1.88; mean age 48 ± 19 years; mean BMI 24 ± 3 kg/m²). Thirty-nine patients (52%) did not require hospitalization and were discharged from the day clinic approximately 4 h postoperatively. Four patients (5.3%) suffered tenesmus for about 1 week postoperatively and two (2.7%) suffered temporary rectal bleeding. The mean VAS scores 1 day postoperatively, then at 1 week, 1 month and 1 year were 2.9, 1.5, 0.4, and 0, respectively. At the 1-month follow-up, there was no sign of recurrence and the satisfaction rate was 78.6% (n = 59). At the 1-year follow-up, three patients (4%) had a recurrence and the satisfaction rate was 86.7% (n = 65).

CONCLUSION

Based on our preliminary findings, ADL is an effective technique for treating HD, generally as an outpatient procedure, without serious morbidity. We anticipate that the incidence of tenesmus, which is encountered frequently after other dearterialization methods, will be lower after the ADL technique, which avoids both mass ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries deeper than 12 mm and running a long mucopexy suture line.

TRANSANAL HAEMORRHOIDAL DEARTERIALIZATION WITH MUCOPEXY (THD-M) FOR TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOIDS: IS IT APPLICABLE IN ALL GRADES? BRAZILIAN MULTICENTER STUDY

Background:

Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy (THD-M) is a valuable option for treating patients with haemorrhoidal disease. However, there is still controversy with regard to its efficacy for more advanced grades.

Aim:

To evaluate the effectiveness of THD-M technique for treating hemorrhoidal disease and to compare the immediate and late results in different grades.

Method:

Seven hundred and five consecutive patients with Goligher’s grade II, III or IV symptomatic haemorrhoids underwent surgical treatment using the THD-M method in five participating centres. Six well-trained and experienced surgeons operated on the patients. Average follow-up was 21 months (12-48).

Results:

Intraoperative complications were observed in 1.1% of cases, including four cases of haematoma, two of laceration of the mucosa, and two of bleeding. All of these were controlled by means of haemostatic suturing. In relation to postoperative complications, the most common of these were as follows: transitory tenesmus (21.4%); pain (7.2%); mucosal or haemorrhoidal prolapse (6.4%); residual skin tag (5.6%); faecal impaction (3.2%); haemorrhoidal thrombosis (2.8%); bleeding (2.1%); anal fissure (0.7%); and anal abscess (0.3%). Most of the complications were treated conservatively, and only 7.5% (53/705) required some type of surgical approach. There was no mortality or any severe complications. The recurrence of prolapse and bleeding was greater in patients with grade IV haemorrhoidal disease than in those with grade III and II (26.54% and 7.96% vs. 2.31% and 0.92% vs. 2.5% and 1.25%), respectively.

Conclusion:

The THD-M method is safe and effective for haemorrhoidal disease grades II and III with low rates of surgical complications. However, for grade IV hemorrhoids, it is associated with higher recurrence of prolapse and bleeding. So, THD-M method should not be considered as an effective option for the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids.

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing HAL-RAR Versus Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy: Postoperative Pain, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of hemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair (HAL-RAR) and excisional hemorrhoidectomy (EH). The primary objective was to compare postoperative pain, and the secondary objectives were the following: symptom resolution rates, postoperative morbidity, recurrence, and changes in quality of life.

METHOD

Prospective randomized controlled trial, including 40 patients with grades III-IV hemorrhoids who were allocated 1:1 to HAL-RAR and EH. Follow-up evaluation was performed at 15 days, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually. Pain was measured using a Visual Analogic Scale and was self-recorded by patients. Quality of life was measured with Short Form Survey-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain was lower in the HAL-RAR group during the first 30 postoperative days. Moreover, from day 7 onward more patients in the HAL-RAR group reported complete absence of pain (Visual Analogic Scale score = 0). Globally, symptom resolution was significantly higher ( P = .03) in the HAL-RAR group at day 15. Bleeding resolution was observed earlier in the HAL-RAR group than in the EH group ( P = .04), but no differences in the resolution of prolapse, itching, and soiling were observed during the 30-day follow-up. After a mean follow-up of 15 months (range 12-27 months), no differences in postoperative morbidity and no recurrences were observed. An improvement was observed in all sections evaluated by the Short Form Survey-36 questionnaire with both techniques.

CONCLUSION

HAL-RAR provokes less postoperative pain during a shorter period than EH and achieves resolution of hemorrhoidal symptoms with less postoperative complaints. No differences in morbidity and recurrence rate were observed after 12 months of follow-up.

Hemorrhoids screening and treatment prior to LVAD: is it a necessity?

Continuous-flow left ventricle assist devices (CF-LVADs) has become an essential modality in the management of stage D heart failure (HF) with significant improvement in survival and quality of life. Due to the durability of such devices and long term support complications such as bleeding and aortic insufficiency has emerged. Bleeding accounts for more than 20 % with the majority being from the gastrointestinal tract. The increase of bleeding tendency are mainly attributed to the loss of large von Willebrand's Factor (vWF) multimers due to shear stress with the chronic intake of anticoagulants. We are reporting two cases of patients with Stage D HF and history of hemorrhoids presenting for LVAD implantation. Many efforts that decrease bleeding related to CF-LVADs will be discussed with focus on hemorrhoids.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Suture-Fixation Mucopexy and Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation in Patients with Grade III Hemorrhoids

Background. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a suture-fixation mucopexy procedure by comparing with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) in the management of patients with grade III hemorrhoids. Methods. This was a randomized controlled trial. One hundred patients with grade III hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to receive suture-fixation mucopexy (n = 50) or DGHAL (n = 50). Outcome assessments were performed at 2 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months. Assessments included resolution of clinical symptoms, postoperative complications, duration of hospitalization, and total costs. Results. At 2 weeks, one (2%) patient in suture-fixation group and four (8%) patients in DGHAL group had persistent prolapsing hemorrhoids. Postoperative bleeding was observed in two patients (4%) in suture-fixation group and one patient in DGHAL group. There was no significant difference in short-term recurrence between groups. Postoperative complications and duration of hospitalization were comparable between the two groups. Rates of recurrence of prolapse or bleeding at 12 months did not differ between groups. However, recurrence of prolapse at 24 months was significantly more common in DGHAL group (19.0% versus 2.3%, p = 0.030). Conclusions. Compared with DGHAL, the suture-fixation mucopexy technique had comparable short-term outcomes and favorable long-term outcomes.

HAL-RAR (Doppler guided haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair) is a safe and effective procedure for haemorrhoids. Results of a prospective study after two-years follow-up

PURPOSE

To analyse prospectively results of HAL-RAR technique by evaluating pain, perioperative complications and clinical outcome after two years followup.

METHODS

A prospective study design including 30 consecutive patients with haemorrhoids grade III-IV treated from June 2012. After discharge, patients received a specific questionnaire to record postoperative pain, delayed complications, evolution/disappearance of the symptoms that led to the surgical intervention (bleeding, prolapse, itching, pain and soiling). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain. Outpatient follow-up was carried out at 7 days, and 1, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Pre, intra and postoperative data (including physical examination) had been recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

The median operating time (range) was 40 (26-60) minutes. Average hospital stay (range) was 11 (3-25) hours. No postoperative complications were observed in 29 cases (96.6%). Median follow-up was 26 (12-36) months. All the patients attended the follow-up. Mean postoperative pain was VAS = 1.7 on the seventh day and it was practically non-existent (VAS = 0.7) 1 month after the procedure. 87.5% of patients confirmed complete relief of symptoms after 30 days and 93% of patients feel free of symptoms 6 months after the procedure. No patient has experienced late complications as dyschezia, urgency, soiling or faecal incontinence. After 24 months follow-up, recurrence of bleeding and prolapse was observed in only 1 patient; 93% of patients have considered results of HAL-RAR as very good or excellent.

CONCLUSION

HAL-RAR is safe and almost painless technique and it has very good results in the control of haemorrhoidal symptoms. This procedure should be considered as an effective first treatment option for haemorrhoids.

Clinical outcome following Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a systematic review

AIM

Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHL) has experienced wider uptake and has recently received National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) approval in the UK. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess its safety and efficacy.

METHOD

This review was conducted in keeping with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies describing DGHL as a primary procedure and reporting clinical outcome were considered. Primary end-points were recurrence and postoperative pain. Secondary end-points included operation time, complications and reintervention rates. Studies were scored for quality with either Jadad score or NICE scoring guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies including 2904 patients were included in the final analysis. They were of poor overall quality. Recurrence ranged between 3% and 60% (pooled recurrence rate 17.5%), with the highest rates for grade IV haemorrhoids. Postoperative analgesia was required in 0-38% of patients. Overall postoperative complication rates were low, with an overall bleeding rate of 5% and an overall reintervention rate of 6.4%. The operation time ranged from 19 to 35 min.

CONCLUSION

DGHL is safe and efficacious with a low level of postoperative pain. It can be safely considered for primary treatment of grade II and III haemorrhoids.

Transanal desarterialization guided by Doppler associated to anorectal repair in hemorrhoids: THD technic

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment for hemorrhoids should be indicated individually and is based on the predominant symptom (bleeding or prolapse), severity of disease and the presence or absence of external component (plicoma). Surgeons must choose among varied techniques the one suitable for each case.

TECHNIC

The THD procedure consists of Doppler guided high ligation, selective to up six submucosal arterial branches that supply the hemorrhoids, leading to its desarterialization associated with prolapse repair (anorectal repair or lifting). It uses special equipment and kit.

CONCLUSION

THD technique has shown good initial results. Because surgical technique respects the anatomy, it acts directly on the pathophysiology of the disease and corrects its principal consequences; it looks quite promising. Its initial application may be in patients with hemorrhoids grade II, which have surgical indication, grades III and IV, the latter being associated with resection of plicomas.

DG-RAR for the treatment of symptomatic grade III and grade IV haemorrhoids: a 12-month multi-centre, prospective observational study

Background

Ultrasound-guided techniques represent a new treatment option in the treatment of haemorrhoids. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) proved efficacious in early haemorrhoidal disease, but lacks efficacy for stages III/IV. For these patients, haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) has been combined with a running suture to reduce prolapsing haemorrhoidal tissue (recto-anal repair (RAR)).

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in 184 patients with grade III (58 %) or grade IV (42 %) haemorrhoids in seven coloproctological centres. Primary endpoints were the recurrence of symptoms and need of further treatment (medical or surgical).

Results

Post-operative complications were seen in 8 % of patients. After a follow-up of 3 months, 91 % of patients were free of symptoms and 91 % of patients were satisfied with the result. After a follow-up of 12 months, 89 % of patients were free of symptoms and 88 % were satisfied with the result. Nineteen per cent of patients received further medical or surgical treatment.

Conclusions

Doppler-guided recto-anal repair (DG-RAR) proves to be an effective treatment option for the treatment of advanced haemorrhoidal disease that shows equal results to other established treatment options.