Chronic care services and variation between Danish general practices: A nationwide cohort study

Effectiveness of an adaptive, multifaceted intervention to enhance care for patients with complex multimorbidity in general practice: protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (the MM600 trial)

INTRODUCTION

Patients with complex multimorbidity face a high treatment burden and frequently have low quality of life. General practice is the key organisational setting in terms of offering people with complex multimorbidity integrated, longitudinal, patient-centred care. This protocol describes a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an adaptive, multifaceted intervention in general practice for patients with complex multimorbidity.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this study, 250 recruited general practices will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either the intervention or control group. The eligible population are adult patients with two or more chronic conditions, at least one contact with secondary care within the last year, taking at least five repeat prescription drugs, living independently, who experience significant problems with their life and health due to their multimorbidity. During 2023 and 2024, intervention practices are financially incentivised to provide an extended consultation based on a patient-centred framework to eligible patients. Control practices continue care as usual. The primary outcome is need-based quality of life. Outcomes will be evaluated using linear and logistic regression models, with clustering considered. The analysis will be performed as intention to treat. In addition, a process evaluation will be carried out and reported elsewhere.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the Helsinki Declaration in its most recent form and good clinical practice recommendations, as well as the regulation for informed consent. The study was submitted to the Danish Capital Region Ethical Committee (ref: H-22041229). As defined by Section 2 of the Danish Act on Research Ethics in Research Projects, this project does not constitute a health research project but is considered a quality improvement project that does not require formal ethical approval. All results from the study (whether positive, negative or inconclusive) will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05676541.

Temporal capital and unaligned times as inequality mechanisms: A case study of chronic care in general practice

Addressing persistent health inequality is one of the most critical challenges in public health. Structural features of 'time' may provide new perspectives on the link between social inequality and time in a healthcare context. Drawing on the case of chronic care in Danish general practice, we aim to use temporal capital as a theoretical frame to unfold how patients' social positions are interlinked with their medical treatment. We followed patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in general practice. Data were collected from interviews, observations, informal conversations, and medical records. We used the concept temporal capital to illuminate the mechanism of inequality in healthcare. We suggest understanding temporal capital as patients' abilities and possibilities to understand, navigate, negotiate, and manage the temporal rhythms of healthcare. Unaligned times, i.e. the mismatch between patients' temporal capital and healthcare organisations and/or professionals' rhythms, are unfolded in five themes: unaligned schedules (scheduling the consultation to fit everyday life and institutional rhythms and attending the consultation), sequences (preparing activities in a specific order to accommodate clinical linearity), agendas (timing the agenda to the clinical workflow), efficiency (ensuring efficiency in the consultation and balancing on-task and off-task content), and pace (conducting the consultation to accommodate fixed durations). Differences in temporal capital and hence abilities and possibilities for aligning with the temporal rhythms of healthcare may be facilitated or restrained by the individual patient's social position, thereby defining and establishing temporal mechanisms of social inequality in medical treatment. In conclusion, social inequality in medical treatment has several temporal references, resulting from pre-existing inequalities and causing new ones. Notions of temporal capital and temporal unalignment provide a useful lens for exploring social inequality in healthcare encounters.

Healthcare fragmentation, multimorbidity, potentially inappropriate medication, and mortality: a Danish nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with multimorbidity are frequent users of healthcare, but fragmented care may lead to suboptimal treatment. Yet, this has never been examined across healthcare sectors on a national scale. We aimed to quantify care fragmentation using various measures and to analyze the associations with patient outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a register-based nationwide cohort study with 4.7 million Danish adult citizens. All healthcare contacts to primary care and hospitals during 2018 were recorded. Clinical fragmentation indicators included number of healthcare contacts, involved providers, provider transitions, and hospital trajectories. Formal fragmentation indices assessed care concentration, dispersion, and contact sequence. The patient outcomes were potentially inappropriate medication and all-cause mortality adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic factors, and morbidity level.

RESULTS

The number of involved healthcare providers, provider transitions, and hospital trajectories rose with increasing morbidity levels. Patients with 3 versus 6 conditions had a mean of 4.0 versus 6.9 involved providers and 6.6 versus 13.7 provider transitions. The proportion of contacts to the patient's own general practice remained stable across morbidity levels. High levels of care fragmentation were associated with higher rates of potentially inappropriate medication and increased mortality on all fragmentation measures after adjusting for demographic characteristics, socioeconomic factors, and morbidity. The strongest associations with potentially inappropriate medication and mortality were found for ≥ 20 contacts versus none (incidence rate ratio 2.83, 95% CI 2.77-2.90) and ≥ 20 hospital trajectories versus none (hazard ratio 10.8, 95% CI 9.48-12.4), respectively. Having less than 25% of contacts with your usual provider was associated with an incidence rate ratio of potentially inappropriate medication of 1.49 (95% CI 1.40-1.58) and a mortality hazard ratio of 2.59 (95% CI 2.36-2.84) compared with full continuity. For the associations between fragmentation measures and patient outcomes, there were no clear interactions with number of conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Several clinical indicators of care fragmentation were associated with morbidity level. Care fragmentation was associated with higher rates of potentially inappropriate medication and increased mortality even when adjusting for the most important confounders. Frequent contact to the usual provider, fewer transitions, and better coordination were associated with better patient outcomes regardless of morbidity level.

Multimorbidity and determinants for initiating outpatient trajectories: A population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with multimorbidity often receive high numbers of hospital outpatient services in concurrent trajectories. Nevertheless, little is known about factors associated with initiating new hospital outpatient trajectories; identified as the continued use of outpatient contacts for the same medical condition.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the number of chronic conditions and sociodemographic characteristics in adults with multimorbidity is associated with entering a hospital outpatient trajectory in this population.

METHODS

This population-based register study included all adults in Denmark with multimorbidity on January 1, 2018. The exposures were number of chronic conditions and sociodemographic characteristics, and the outcome was the rate of starting a new outpatient trajectory during 2018. Analyses were stratified by the number of existing outpatient trajectories. We used Poisson regression analysis, and results were expressed as incidence rates and incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We followed the individuals during the entire year of 2018, accounting for person-time by hospitalization, emigration, and death.

RESULTS

Incidence rates for new outpatient trajectories were highest for individuals with low household income and ≥3 existing trajectories and for individuals with ≥3 chronic conditions and in no already established outpatient trajectory. A high number of chronic conditions and male gender were found to be determinants for initiating a new outpatient trajectory, regardless of the number of existing trajectories. Low educational level was a determinant when combined with 1, 2, and ≥3 existing trajectories, and increasing age, western ethnicity, and unemployment when combined with 0, 1, and 2 existing trajectories.

CONCLUSION

A high number of chronic conditions, male gender, high age, low educational level and unemployment were determinants for initiation of an outpatient trajectory. The rate was modified by the existing number of outpatient trajectories. The results may help identify those with multimorbidity at greatest risk of having a new hospital outpatient trajectory initiated.

Variation in Psychometric Testing in General Practice - A Nationwide Cohort Study

Objective

Most mental disorders are diagnosed and treated in general practice. Psychometric tests may help the general practitioner diagnose and treat mental disorders like dementia, anxiety, and depression. However, little is known about the use of psychometric tests in general practice and their impact on further treatment. We aimed to assess the use of psychometric tests in Danish general practice and to estimate whether variation in use is associated with the provided treatment and death by suicide in patients.

Methods

This nationwide cohort study included registry data on all psychometric tests performed in Danish general practice in 2007-2018. We used Poisson regression models adjusted for sex, age, and calendar time to assess predictors of use. We used fully adjusted models to estimate the standardized utilization rates for all general practices.

Results

A total of 2,768,893 psychometric tests were used in the study period. Considerable variations were observed among general practices. A positive association was seen between a general practitioner's propensity to use psychometric testing and talk therapy. Patients listed with a general practitioner with low use had an increased rate of redeemed prescriptions for anxiolytics [incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval):1.39 (1.23;1.57)]. General practitioners with high use had an increased rate of prescriptions for antidementia drugs [1.25 (1.05;1.49)] and first-time antidepressants [1.09 (1.01;1.19)]. High test use was seen for females [1.58 (1.55; 1.62)] and patients with comorbid diseases. Low use was seen for populations with high income [0.49 (0.47; 0.51)] and high educational level [0.78 (0.75; 0.81)].

Conclusion

Psychometric tests were used mostly for women, individuals with a low socioeconomic status, and individuals with comorbid conditions. The use of psychometric tests depends on general practice and is associated with talk therapy, redemptions for anxiolytics, antidementia drugs, and antidepressants. No association was found between general practice rates and other treatment outcomes.