1
|
Wu Q, Xie X, Liu W, Wu Y. Implementation efficiency of the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system in China: A case study of primary medical and health institutions in Fujian province. Int J Health Plann Manage 2021; 37:214-227. [PMID: 34523159 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system is at the core of China's new round of medical reforms. We evaluated the operational efficiency of the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system in primary medical and health institutions in Fujian Province. We used the data envelopment analysis algorithm to calculate 'input-output' data from 2016 to 2018 and established an index system. Regarding results for efficiency value, the implementation efficiency of Xiamen was 1.15, Fuzhou was 1.10, Zhangzhou was 1.09, Ningde was 1.06, Quanzhou was 0.98, Nanping was 0.96, Putian was 0.94, Longyan was 0.92, Sanming was 0.86, and Pingtan was 0.82. There were few and insufficient doctors providing services; in 2018, the number of practicing (assistant) doctors per 1000 permanent residents in primary medical institutions in Fujian was only 0.799. Outpatient and emergency service visits were increasing yearly; in Fujian, they increased by 8.39% from 2016 to 2018. From the incentive system of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, the redundancy rate of each city was generally high, with only that of Nanping (3.28%) and Longyan (0.00%) being lower. In general, for the hierarchical medical system to succeed, we should start with innovative management policy and explore ways to adapt to local circumstances (such as population, economy, etc.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinde Wu
- School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.,Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xianyu Xie
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Wenbin Liu
- School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yong Wu
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Iftikhar A, Bond RR, McGilligan V, Leslie SJ, McShane A, Knoery C, Rjoob K, Peace A. Computational time series analysis of patient referrals to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention service. Health Informatics J 2020; 26:2222-2236. [PMID: 31973634 DOI: 10.1177/1460458219899762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This article retrospectively analyses a primary percutaneous coronary intervention dataset comprising patient referrals that were accepted for percutaneous coronary intervention and those who were turned down between January 2015 and December 2018 at Altnagelvin Hospital (United Kingdom). Time series analysis of these referrals was undertaken for analysing the referral rates per year, month, day and per hour. The overall referrals have 70 per cent (n = 1466, p < 0.001) males. Of total referrals, 65 per cent (p < 0.001) of referrals were 'out of hours'. Seasonality decomposition shows a peak in referrals on average every 3 months (standard deviation = 0.83). No significant correlation (R = 0.03, p = 0.86; R = -0.11, p = 0.62) was found between the referral numbers and turndown rate. Being female increased the probability of being out of hour in all the groups. The 30-day mortality was higher in the turndown group. The time series of all the referrals depict variation over the months or days which is not the same each year. The average age of the patients in the turndown group is higher. The number of referrals does not impact on the turndown rate and clinical decision making. Most patients are being referred out of hours, especially females. This analysis leads to the emphasis on the importance of working 24/7 CathLab service.
Collapse
|
3
|
Dew R, Wilkes S. Evaluation of the referral management systems (RMS) used by GP practices in Northumberland: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028436. [PMID: 31289080 PMCID: PMC6629383 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Exploring the views of stakeholders to the referral management systems (RMS) used by GP practices in Northumberland, UK to evaluate its perceived effectiveness. DESIGN This was an in-depth qualitative semi-structured interview study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING 32 participants (GPs, hospital consultants, referral support, hospital managers, Clinical Commissioning Group manager) in the North East of England, UK. METHOD Interviews using a grounded theory approach and thematic analysis. RESULTS The main benefit of RMS mentioned by participants was that it allowed for unnecessary referrals to be vetted by consultants, and helps ensure patients are sent to the correct clinic. Generally, the consultants in our study felt that RMS did not significantly help them reject referrals. Some GPs experienced that RMS undermined GP autonomy and did not help when they had exhausted their abilities to manage a patient in primary care, and it was suggested that in some cases RMS may delay rather than prevent a referral. The main perceived disadvantage of RMS was the additional workload for GPs and consultants, and RMS was felt to be a barrier to commutation between GPs and consultants. Frustration with the system design and lack of knowledge of its cost-effectiveness were articulated. CONCLUSION Although RMS was reported to reduce some unnecessary referrals, the effect of referral delay and rejection is unknown. Although there were some positive attributes described, RMS was mostly received negatively by the stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie Dew
- School of Medicine, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | - Scott Wilkes
- School of Medicine, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ramos B, Loureiro C. Referral protocols to general pulmonology consultation: Yes we should. Pulmonology 2019; 25:121-122. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 11/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
5
|
Carty O, Toor H, Morris TA, Harrison JE. Orthodontic referral management systems: Do they make a difference? J Orthod 2019; 46:39-45. [DOI: 10.1177/1465312518824099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Aims: To assess the performance of the referral management system (RMS) compared to a previous paper-based referral system and to determine whether referrals reflected the patients’ malocclusion and met current guidelines. Design: Three-cycle audit. Setting: Orthodontic Department, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, UK. Participants: Consecutive new orthodontic patient referrals. Methods: Data were collected prospectively from orthodontic referral letters and new patient clinic proformas (2016–2017). Cycle 1 assessed the original paper-based referral form, Cycle 2 assessed the first RMS online form and Cycle 3 assessed a modified RMS form. Results: Cycles 1, 2 and 3 audited 83, 84 and 81 referrals, respectively. Agreement between the reason for referral and the new patient clinic findings was moderate for Cycles 1 and 3 (Kappa = 0.47 and 0.60, respectively) and fair for Cycle 2 (Kappa = 0.40). In Cycles 1, 2 and 3, the proportion of new patients appropriate for hospital orthodontic care reduced from 52% to 51% and 40%, respectively. None of the three cycles reached the 90% target for compliance with current referral guidelines. Conclusions: Cycle 3’s RMS form gave a truer reflection of the patients’ malocclusion but reduced the proportion of appropriate referrals. Further audit is required in this area to investigate the cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits of the RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orla Carty
- Department of Orthodontics, Liverpool University Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Henna Toor
- Department of Orthodontics, Liverpool University Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Timothy A Morris
- Department of Orthodontics, Liverpool University Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jayne E Harrison
- Department of Orthodontics, Liverpool University Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Greenwood-Lee J, Jewett L, Woodhouse L, Marshall DA. A categorisation of problems and solutions to improve patient referrals from primary to specialty care. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:986. [PMID: 30572898 PMCID: PMC6302393 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3745-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving access to specialty care has been identified as a critical issue in the delivery of health services, especially given an increasing burden of chronic disease. Identifying and addressing problems that impact access to specialty care for patients referred to speciality care for non-emergent procedures and how these deficiencies can be managed via health system delivery interventions is important to improve care for patients with chronic conditions. However, the primary-specialty care interface is complex and may be impacted by a variety of potential health services delivery deficiencies; with an equal range of interventions developed to correct them. Consequently, the literature is also diverse and difficult to navigate. We present a narrative review to identify existing literature, and provide a conceptual map that categorizes problems at the primary-specialty care interface with linkages to corresponding interventions aimed at ensuring that patient transitions across the primary-specialty care interface are necessary, appropriate, timely and well communicated. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from January 1, 2005 until Dec 31, 2014, grey literature and reference lists to identify articles that report on interventions implemented to improve the primary-specialty care interface. Selected articles were categorized to describe: 1) the intervention context, including the deficiency addressed, and the objective of the intervention 2) intervention activities, and 3) intervention outcomes. RESULTS We identified 106 articles, producing four categories of health services delivery deficiencies based in: 1) clinical decision making; 2) information management; 3) the system level management of patient flows between primary and secondary care; and 4) quality-of-care monitoring. Interventions were divided into seven categories and fourteen sub-categories based on the deficiencies addressed and the intervention strategies used. Potential synergies and trade-offs among interventions are discussed. Little evidence exists regarding the synergistic and antagonistic interactions of alternative intervention strategies. CONCLUSION The categorization acts as an aid in identifying why the primary-specialty care interface may be failing and which interventions may produce improvements. Overlap and interconnectedness between interventions creates potential synergies and conflicts among co-implemented interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Greenwood-Lee
- Centre for Science, Athabasca University, 6th Floor, 345 6 Avenue SE, Calgary, Alberta, T2G 4V1, Canada
| | - Lauren Jewett
- Geography & Planning, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, Rm 594, 100 St George St., Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, Canada
| | - Linda Woodhouse
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 3-10 Corbett Hall, 8205 114 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G4, Canada
| | - Deborah A Marshall
- Canada Research Chair, Health Services and Systems Research, Arthur J.E. Child Chair in Rheumatology Outcomes Research, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
- 3C56 Health Research Innovation Centre (HRIC), 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Goldthorpe J, Walsh T, Tickle M, Birch S, Hill H, Sanders C, Coulthard P, Pretty IA. An evaluation of a referral management and triage system for oral surgery referrals from primary care dentists: a mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundOral surgery referrals from dentists are rising and putting increased pressure on finite hospital resources. It has been suggested that primary care specialist services can provide care for selected patients at reduced costs and similar levels of quality and patient satisfaction.Research questionsCan an electronic referral system with consultant- or peer-led triage effectively divert patients requiring oral surgery into primary care specialist settings safely, and at a reduced cost, without destabilising existing services?DesignA mixed-methods, interrupted time study (ITS) with adjunct diagnostic test accuracy assessment and health economic evaluation.SettingThe ITS was conducted in a geographically defined health economy with appropriate hospital services and no pre-existing referral management or primary care oral surgery service. Hospital services included a district general, a foundation trust and a dental hospital.ParticipantsPatients, carers, general and specialist dentists, consultants (both surgical and Dental Public Health), hospital managers, commissioners and dental educators contributed to the qualitative component of the work. Referrals from primary care dental practices for oral surgery procedures over a 3-year period were utilised for the quantitative and health economic evaluation.InterventionsA consultant- then practitioner-led triage system for oral surgery referrals embedded within an electronic referral system for oral surgery with an adjunct primary care service.Main outcome measuresDiagnostic test accuracy metrics for sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Total referrals, numbers of referrals sent to primary care and the cost per referral are reported for the main intervention. Qualitative findings in relation to patient experience and whole-system impact are described.ResultsIn the diagnostic test accuracy study, remote triage was found to be highly specific (mean 88.4, confidence intervals 82.6 and 92.8) but with lower values for sensitivity. The implementation of the referral system and primary care service was uneventful. During consultant triage in the active phases of the study, 45% of referrals were diverted to primary care, and when general practitioner triage was used this dropped to 43%. Only 4% of referrals were sent from specialist primary care to hospital, suggesting highly efficient triage of referrals. A significant per-referral saving of £108.23 [standard error (SE) £11.59] was seen with consultant triage, and £84.13 (SE £11.56) with practitioner triage. Cost savings varied according the differing methods of applying the national tariff. Patients reported similar levels of satisfaction for both settings, and speed of treatment was their over-riding concern.ConclusionsImplementation of electronic referral management in primary care can lead, when combined with triage, to diversions of appropriate cases to primary care. Cost savings can be realised but are dependent on tariff application by hospitals, with a risk of overestimating where hospitals are using day case tariffs extensively.Study limitationsThe geographical footprint of the study was relatively small and, hence, the impact on services was minimal and could not be fully assessed across all three hospitals.Future workThe findings suggest that the intervention should be tested in other localities and disciplines, especially those, such as dermatology, that present the opportunity to use imaging to triage.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Goldthorpe
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tanya Walsh
- Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin Tickle
- Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Birch
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Harry Hill
- Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline Sanders
- Division of Population Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Coulthard
- Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Iain A Pretty
- Division of Dentistry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chalkley M, McCormick B, Anderson R, Aragon MJ, Nessa N, Nicodemo C, Redding S, Wittenberg R. Elective hospital admissions: secondary data analysis and modelling with an emphasis on policies to moderate growth. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr05070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe English NHS faces financial pressures that may render the growth rates of elective admissions seen between 2001/2 and 2011/12 unsustainable. A better understanding of admissions growth, and the influence of policy, are needed to minimise the impact on health gain for patients.ObjectivesThis project had several objectives: (1) to better understand the determinants of elective activity and policy to moderate growth at minimum health loss for patients; (2) to build a rich data set integrating health, practice and local area data to study general practitioner (GP) referrals and resulting admissions; (3) to predict patients whose treatment is unlikely to be cost-effective using patient-reported outcomes and to examine variation in provider performance; and (4) to study how policies that aim to reduce elective admissions may change demand for emergency care. The main drivers of elective admissions growth have increased either supply of or demand for care, and could include, for example, technical innovations or increased awareness of treatment benefits. Of the factors studied, neither system reform nor population ageing appears to be a key driver. The introduction of the prospective payment tariff ‘Payment by Results’ appears to have led to primary care trusts (PCTs) having increasingly similar lengths of stay. In deprived areas, increasing GP supply appears to moderate elective admissions. Reducing the incidence of single-handed practices tends to reduce referrals and admissions. Policies to reduce referrals are likely to reduce admissions but treatments may be particularly reduced in the lowest referring practices, in which resulting health loss may be greatest. In this model, per full-time equivalent, female and highly experienced GPs identify more patients admitted by specialists.ResultsIt appears from our studies that some patient characteristics are associated with not achieving sufficient patient gain to warrant cost-effective treatment. The introduction of independent sector treatment centres is estimated to have caused an increase in emergency activity rates at local PCTs. The explanations offered for increasing elective admissions indicate that they are manageable by health policy.ConclusionsFurther work is required to understand some of the results identified, such as whether or not high-volume Clinical Commissioning Groups are fulfilling unmet need; why some practices refer at low rates relative to admissions; why the period effect, which results from factors that equally affect all in the study at a point in time, dominates in the age–period–cohort analysis; and exactly how the emergency and elective sections of hospital treatment interact. This project relies on the analysis of secondary data. This type of research does not easily facilitate the important input of clinical experts or service users. It would be beneficial if other methods, including surveys and consultation with key stakeholders, could be incorporated into future research now that we have uncovered important questions.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barry McCormick
- Centre for Health Service Economics and Organisation, Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Anderson
- Centre for Health Service Economics and Organisation, Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Nazma Nessa
- Centre for Health Service Economics and Organisation, Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, UK
| | - Catia Nicodemo
- Centre for Health Service Economics and Organisation, Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stuart Redding
- Centre for Health Service Economics and Organisation, Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Raphael Wittenberg
- Centre for Health Service Economics and Organisation, Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Winpenny EM, Miani C, Pitchforth E, King S, Roland M. Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient services: a scoping review of interventions at the primary-secondary care interface. J Health Serv Res Policy 2016; 22:53-64. [PMID: 27165979 PMCID: PMC5482389 DOI: 10.1177/1355819616648982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Variation in patterns of referral from primary care can lead to inappropriate overuse or underuse of specialist resources. Our aim was to review the literature on strategies involving primary care that are designed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient services. Methods A scoping review to update a review published in 2006. We conducted a systematic literature search and qualitative evidence synthesis of studies across five intervention domains: transfer of services from hospital to primary care; relocation of hospital services to primary care; joint working between primary care practitioners and specialists; interventions to change the referral behaviour of primary care practitioners and interventions to change patient behaviour. Results The 183 studies published since 2005, taken with the findings of the previous review, suggest that transfer of services from secondary to primary care and strategies aimed at changing referral behaviour of primary care clinicians can be effective in reducing outpatient referrals and in increasing the appropriateness of referrals. Availability of specialist advice to primary care practitioners by email or phone and use of store-and-forward telemedicine also show potential for reducing outpatient referrals and hence reducing costs. There was little evidence of a beneficial effect of relocation of specialists to primary care, or joint primary/secondary care management of patients on outpatient referrals. Across all intervention categories there was little evidence available on cost-effectiveness. Conclusions There are a number of promising interventions which may improve the effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient services, including making it easier for primary care clinicians and specialists to discuss patients by email or phone. There remain substantial gaps in the evidence, particularly on cost-effectiveness, and new interventions should continue to be evaluated as they are implemented more widely. A move for specialists to work in the community is unlikely to be cost-effective without enhancing primary care clinicians’ skills through education or joint consultations with complex patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor M Winpenny
- 1 Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Céline Miani
- 1 Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emma Pitchforth
- 1 Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah King
- 1 Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Martin Roland
- 2 RAND Professor of Health Services Research, Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, University of Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Winpenny E, Miani C, Pitchforth E, Ball S, Nolte E, King S, Greenhalgh J, Roland M. Outpatient services and primary care: scoping review, substudies and international comparisons. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
AimThis study updates a previous scoping review published by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in 2006 (Roland M, McDonald R, Sibbald B.Outpatient Services and Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Research Into Strategies For Improving Outpatient Effectiveness and Efficiency. Southampton: NIHR Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre; 2006) and focuses on strategies to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient services.Findings from the scoping reviewEvidence from the scoping review suggests that, with appropriate safeguards, training and support, substantial parts of care given in outpatient clinics can be transferred to primary care. This includes additional evidence since our 2006 review which supports general practitioner (GP) follow-up as an alternative to outpatient follow-up appointments, primary medical care of chronic conditions and minor surgery in primary care. Relocating specialists to primary care settings is popular with patients, and increased joint working between specialists and GPs, as suggested in the NHS Five Year Forward View, can be of substantial educational value. However, for these approaches there is very limited information on cost-effectiveness; we do not know whether they increase or reduce overall demand and whether the new models cost more or less than traditional approaches. One promising development is the increasing use of e-mail between GPs and specialists, with some studies suggesting that better communication (including the transmission of results and images) could substantially reduce the need for some referrals.Findings from the substudiesBecause of the limited literature on some areas, we conducted a number of substudies in England. The first was of referral management centres, which have been established to triage and, potentially, divert referrals away from hospitals. These centres encounter practical and administrative challenges and have difficulty getting buy-in from local clinicians. Their effectiveness is uncertain, as is the effect of schemes which provide systematic review of referrals within GP practices. However, the latter appear to have more positive educational value, as shown in our second substudy. We also studied consultants who held contracts with community-based organisations rather than with hospital trusts. Although these posts offer opportunities in terms of breaking down artificial and unhelpful primary–secondary care barriers, they may be constrained by their idiosyncratic nature, a lack of clarity around roles, challenges to professional identity and a lack of opportunities for professional development. Finally, we examined the work done by other countries to reform activity at the primary–secondary care interface. Common approaches included the use of financial mechanisms and incentives, the transfer of work to primary care, the relocation of specialists and the use of guidelines and protocols. With the possible exception of financial incentives, the lack of robust evidence on the effect of these approaches and the contexts in which they were introduced limits the lessons that can be drawn for the English NHS.ConclusionsFor many conditions, high-quality care in the community can be provided and is popular with patients. There is little conclusive evidence on the cost-effectiveness of the provision of more care in the community. In developing new models of care for the NHS, it should not be assumed that community-based care will be cheaper than conventional hospital-based care. Possible reasons care in the community may be more expensive include supply-induced demand and addressing unmet need through new forms of care and through loss of efficiency gained from concentrating services in hospitals. Evidence from this study suggests that further shifts of care into the community can be justified only if (a) high value is given to patient convenience in relation to NHS costs or (b) community care can be provided in a way that reduces overall health-care costs. However, reconfigurations of services are often introduced without adequate evaluation and it is important that new NHS initiatives should collect data to show whether or not they have added value, and improved quality and patient and staff experience.FundingThe NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ellen Nolte
- RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Joanne Greenhalgh
- Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin Roland
- Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ball SL, Greenhalgh J, Roland M. Referral management centres as a means of reducing outpatients attendances: how do they work and what influences successful implementation and perceived effectiveness? BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2016; 17:37. [PMID: 27009255 PMCID: PMC4806456 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0434-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background The rising volume of referrals to secondary care is a continuing concern in the NHS in England, with considerable resource implications. Referral management centres (RMCs) are one of a range of initiatives brought in to curtail this rise, but there is currently limited evidence for their effectiveness, and little is known about their mechanisms of action. This study aimed to gain a better understanding of how RMCs operate and the factors contributing to the achievement of their goals. Drawing on the principles of realist evaluation, we sought to elicit programme theories (the ideas and assumptions about how a programme works) and to identify the key issues to be considered when establishing or evaluating such schemes. Methods Qualitative study with a purposive sample of health professionals and managers involved in the commissioning, set-up and running of four referral management centres in England and with GPs referring through these centres. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 participants. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed thematically. Results Interview data highlighted the diverse aims and functions of RMCs, reflecting a range of underlying programme theories. These included the overarching theory that RMCs work by ensuring the best use of limited resources and three sub-theories, relating to how this could be achieved, namely, improving the quality of referrals and patient care, reducing referrals, and increasing efficiency in the referral process. The aims of the schemes, however, varied between sites and between stakeholders, and evolved significantly over time. Three themes were identified relating to the context in which RMCs were implemented and managed: the impact of practical and administrative difficulties; the importance and challenge of stakeholder buy-in; and the dependence of perceived effectiveness on the aims and priorities of the scheme. Many RMCs were described as successful by those involved, despite limited evidence of reduced referrals or cost-savings. Conclusions The findings of this study have a number of implications for the development of similar schemes, with respect to the need to ensure clarity of aims and to identify indicators of success from the outset, to anticipate scheme evolution and plan for potential changes with respect to IT systems and referral processes. Also identified, is the need for further research that evaluates the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of particular models of RMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Ball
- RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK.
| | - Joanne Greenhalgh
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, LEEDS, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Martin Roland
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kriegel J, Jehle F, Moser H, Tuttle-Weidinger L. Patient logistics management of patient flows in hospitals: A comparison of Bavarian and Austrian hospitals. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/20479700.2015.1119370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
13
|
Pawson R, Greenhalgh J, Brennan C. Demand management for planned care: a realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe task of matching fluctuating demand with available capacity is one of the basic challenges in all large-scale service industries. It is a particularly pressing concern in modern health-care systems, as increasing demand (ageing populations, availability of new treatments, increased patient knowledge, etc.) meets stagnating supply (capacity and funding restrictions on staff and services, etc.). As a consequence, a very large portfolio of demand management strategies has developed based on quite different assumptions about the source of the problem and about the means of its resolution.MethodsThis report presents a substantial review of the effectiveness of main strategies designed to alleviate demand pressures in the area of planned care. The study commences with an overview of the key ideas about the genesis of demand and capacity problems for health services. Many different diagnoses were uncovered: fluctuating demand meeting stationary capacity; turf protection between different providers; social rather than clinical pressures on referral decisions; self-propelling diagnostic cascades; supplier-induced demand; demographic pressures on treatment; and the informed patient and demand inflation. We then conducted a review of the key ideas (programme theories) underlying interventions designed to address demand imbalance. We discovered that there was no close alignment between purported problems and advocated solutions. Demand management interventions take their starting point in seeking reforms at the levels of strategic decision-making, organisational re-engineering, procedural modifications and behavioural change. In mapping the ideas for reform, we also noted a tendency for programme theories to become ‘whole-system’ models; over time policy-makers have advocated the need for concerted action on all of these fronts.FindingsThe remainder and core of the report contains a realist synthesis of the empirical evidence on the effectiveness on a spanning subset of four major demand management interventions: referral management centres (RMCs); using general practitioners with special interests (GPwSIs) at the interface between primary and secondary care; general practitioner (GP) direct access to clinical tests; and referral guidelines. In all cases we encountered a chequered pattern of success and failure. The primary literature is replete with accounts of unanticipated problems and unintended effects. These programmes ‘work’ only in highly circumscribed conditions. To give brief examples, we found that the success of RMCs depends crucially on the balance of control in their governance structures; GPwSIs influence demand only after close negotiations on an agreed and intermediate case mix; significant efficiencies are created by direct GP access to tests mainly when there is low diagnostic yield and high ‘rule-out’ rates; and referral guidelines are more likely to work when implemented by staff with responsibility for their creation.ConclusionsThe report concludes that there is no ‘preferred intervention’ that has the capacity to outperform all others. Instead, the review found many, diverse, hard-won, local and adaptive solutions. Whatever the starting point, success in demand management depends on synchronising a complex array of strategic, organisational, procedural and motivational changes. The final chapter offers practitioners some guidance on how they might ‘think through’ all of the interdependencies, which bring demand and capacity into equilibrium. A close analysis of the implementation of different configurations of demand management interventions in different local contexts using mixed methods would be valuable to understand the processes through which such interventions are tailored to local circumstances. There is also scope for further evidence synthesis. The substitution theory is ubiquitous in health and social care and a realist synthesis to compare the fortunes of different practitioners placed at different professional boundaries (e.g. nurses/doctors, dentists/dental care practitioners, radiologists/radiographers and so on) would be valuable to identify the contexts and mechanisms through which substitution, support or short-circuit occurs.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray Pawson
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Joanne Greenhalgh
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Cathy Brennan
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Blank L, Baxter S, Woods HB, Goyder E, Lee A, Payne N, Rimmer M. What is the evidence on interventions to manage referral from primary to specialist non-emergency care? A systematic review and logic model synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr03240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundDemand management describes any method used to monitor, direct or regulate patient referrals. Several strategies have been developed to manage the referral of patients to secondary care, with interventions targeting primary care, specialist services, or infrastructure.ObjectiveThis research aimed to conduct an inclusive systematic review and logic model synthesis in order to better understand factors impacting on the effectiveness of interventions targeting referral between primary and secondary medical health care.DesignThe approach combined systematic review with logic modelling synthesis techniques to develop an evidence-based framework of factors influencing the pathway between interventions and system-wide changes.SettingPrimary health care.Main outcome measuresReferral from primary to secondary care.Review methodsSystematic searches were undertaken to identify recent, relevant studies. Quality of individual studies was appraised, with consideration of overall strength of evidence. A narrative synthesis and logic model summary of the data was completed.ResultsFrom a database of 8327 unique papers, 290 were included in the review. The intervention studies were grouped into four categories of education interventions (n = 50); process change interventions (n = 49); system change interventions (n = 38); and patient-focused interventions (n = 3). Effectiveness was assessed variously in these papers; however, there was a gap regarding the mechanisms whereby these interventions lead to demand management impacts. The findings suggest that, although individual-level interventions may be popular, the stronger evidence relates only to peer-review and feedback interventions. Process change interventions appeared to be more effective when the change resulted in the specialist being provided with more or better quality information about the patient. System changes including the community provision of specialist services by general practitioners, outreach provision by specialists and the return of inappropriate referrals appeared to have evidence of effect. The pathway whereby interventions might lead to service-wide impact was complex, with multiple factors potentially acting as barriers or facilitators to the change process. Factors related, first, to the doctor (including knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, and previous experiences of a service), second, to the patient (including condition and social factors) and, third, to the influence of the doctor–patient relationship. We also identified a number of potentially influential factors at a local level, such as perceived waiting times and the availability of a specialist. These elements are key factors in the pathway between an intervention and intended demand management outcomes influencing both applicability and effectiveness.ConclusionsThe findings highlight the complexity of the referral process and multiple elements that will impact on intervention outcomes and applicability to a local area. Any interventions seeking to change referral practice need to address factors relating to the individual practitioner, the patient and also the situation in which the referral is taking place. These conclusions apply especially to referral management in a UK context where this whole range of factors/issues lies well within the remit of the NHS. This work highlights that intermediate outcomes are important in the referral pathway. It is recommended that researchers include measure of these intermediate outcomes in their evaluation of intervention effectiveness in order to determine where blocks to or facilitators of system-wide impact may be occurring.Study registrationThe study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013004037.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Blank
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Susan Baxter
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Buckley Woods
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Elizabeth Goyder
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Lee
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nick Payne
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Melanie Rimmer
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Blank L, Baxter S, Woods HB, Goyder E, Lee A, Payne N, Rimmer M. Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence. Br J Gen Pract 2014; 64:e765-74. [PMID: 25452541 PMCID: PMC4240149 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14x682837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2014] [Accepted: 06/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Demand management defines any method used to monitor, direct, or regulate patient referrals. Strategies have been developed to manage the referral of patients to secondary care, with interventions that target primary care, specialist services, or infrastructure. AIM To review the international evidence on interventions to manage referral from primary to specialist care. DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review. METHOD Iterative, systematic searches of published and unpublished sources public health, health management, management, and grey literature databases from health care and other industries were undertaken to identify recent, relevant studies. A narrative synthesis of the data was completed to structure the evidence into groups of similar interventions. RESULTS The searches generated 8327 unique results, of which 140 studies were included. Interventions were grouped into four intervention categories: GP education (n = 50); process change (n = 49); system change (n = 38); and patient-focused (n = 3). It is clear that there is no 'magic bullet' to managing demand for secondary care services: although some groups of interventions may have greater potential for development, given the existing evidence that they can be effective in specific contexts. CONCLUSIONS To tackle demand management of primary care services, the focus cannot be on primary care alone; a whole-systems approach is needed because the introduction of interventions in primary care is often just the starting point of the referral process. In addition, more research is needed to develop and evaluate interventions that acknowledge the role of the patient in the referral decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Blank
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | - Susan Baxter
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | | | - Elizabeth Goyder
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | - Andrew Lee
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | - Nick Payne
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| | - Melanie Rimmer
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|