1
|
Tejero E, Pardo P, Sánchez-Sánchez S, Galera R, Casitas R, Martínez-Cerón E, García-Rio F. [Palliative Sedation at the End of Life: A Comparative Study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer Patients]. Respiration 2020; 100:1-10. [PMID: 33341817 DOI: 10.1159/000510537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receive poor-quality palliative care, information about the use of palliative sedation (PS) in the last days of life is very scarce. OBJECTIVES To compare the use of PS in hospitalized patients who died from COPD or lung cancer and identify factors correlating with PS application. METHODS In a retrospective observational cohort study, from 1,675 patients died at a teaching hospital between 2013 and 2015, 109 patients who died from COPD and 85 from lung cancer were compared. Sociodemographic data, clinical characteristics, health care resource utilization, application of PS and prescribed drugs were recorded. RESULTS In the last 6 months of life, patients who died from COPD had more hospital admissions due to respiratory causes and less frequent support by a palliative home care team (PHCT). Meanwhile, during their last hospitalization, patients who died from COPD had fewer do-not-resuscitate orders and were subjected to more intensive care unit admissions and cardiopulmonary resuscitation maneuvers. PS was applied less frequently in patients who died from COPD than in those who died from lung cancer (31 vs. 53%, p = 0.002). Overall, previous use of opioid drugs, support by a PHCT, and a diagnosis of COPD (adjusted odds ratio 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26-0.89, p = 0.020) were retained as factors independently related to PS. In COPD patients, only previous use of opioid drugs was identified as a PS-related factor. CONCLUSION During their last days of life, hospitalized COPD patients receive PS less frequently than patients with lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Tejero
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain
| | - Paloma Pardo
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain
| | | | - Raúl Galera
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Casitas
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisabet Martínez-Cerón
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco García-Rio
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain, .,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain, .,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heins M, Hofstede J, Rijken M, Korevaar J, Donker G, Francke A. Palliative care for patients with cancer: do patients receive the care they consider important? A survey study. BMC Palliat Care 2018; 17:61. [PMID: 29665807 PMCID: PMC5905150 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0315-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many countries, GPs and home care nurses are involved in care for patients with advanced cancer. Given the varied and complex needs of these patients, providing satisfactory care is a major challenge for them. We therefore aimed to study which aspects of care patients, GPs and home care nurses consider important and whether patients receive these aspects. METHODS Seventy-two Dutch patients with advanced cancer, 87 GPs and 26 home care nurses rated the importance of support when experiencing symptoms, respect for patients' autonomy and information provision. Patients also rated whether they received these aspects. Questionnaires were based on the CQ index palliative care. RESULTS Almost all patients rated information provision and respect for their autonomy as important. The majority also rated support when suffering from specific symptoms as important, especially support when in pain. In general, patients received the care they considered important. However, 49% of those who considered it important to receive support when suffering from fatigue and 23% of those who wanted to receive information on the expected course of their illness did not receive this or only did so sometimes. CONCLUSION For most patients with advanced cancer, the palliative care that they receive matches what they consider important. Support for patients experiencing fatigue may need more attention. When symptoms are difficult to control, GPs and nurses may still provide emotional support and practical advice. Furthermore, we recommend that GPs discuss patients' need for information about the expected course of their illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Heins
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jolien Hofstede
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mieke Rijken
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joke Korevaar
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gé Donker
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke Francke
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Expertise center palliative care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mitchell GK, Senior HE, Johnson CE, Fallon-Ferguson J, Williams B, Monterosso L, Rhee JJ, McVey P, Grant MP, Aubin M, Nwachukwu HTG, Yates PM. Systematic review of general practice end-of-life symptom control. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2018; 8:411-420. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundEnd of life care (EoLC) is a fundamental role of general practice, which will become more important as the population ages. It is essential that general practice’s role and performance of at the end of life is understood in order to maximise the skills of the entire workforce.ObjectiveTo provide a comprehensive description of the role and performance of general practitioners (GPs) and general practice nurses (GPNs) in EoLC symptom control.MethodSystematic literature review of papers from 2000 to 2017 were sought from Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Joanna Briggs Institute and Cochrane databases.ResultsFrom 6209 journal articles, 46 papers reported GP performance in symptom management. There was no reference to the performance of GPNs in any paper identified. Most GPs expressed confidence in identifying EoLC symptoms. However, they reported lack of confidence in providing EoLC at the beginning of their careers, and improvements with time in practice. They perceived emotional support as being the most important aspect of EoLC that they provide, but there were barriers to its provision. GPs felt most comfortable treating pain, and least confident with dyspnoea and depression. Observed pain management was sometimes not optimal. More formal training, particularly in the use of opioids was considered important to improve management of both pain and dyspnoea.ConclusionsIt is essential that GPs receive regular education and training, and exposure to EoLC from an early stage in their careers to ensure skill and confidence. Research into the role of GPNs in symptom control needs to occur.
Collapse
|
4
|
Van den Block L, Ko W, Miccinesi G, Moreels S, Donker GA, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Alonso TV, Deliens L. Final transitions to place of death: patients and families wishes. J Public Health (Oxf) 2017; 39:e302-e311. [PMID: 27694347 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This four-country study (Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy and Spain) examines prevalence and types of final transitions between care settings of cancer patients and the extent to which patient/family wishes are cited as a reason for the transition. Methods Data were collected from the EUROSENTI-MELC study over a 2-year period. General practitioners within existing Sentinel Networks registered weekly all deaths of patients within practices using a standardized questionnaire. This registration included place of care in the final 3 months and wishes for the final transition to place of death. All non-sudden deaths due to cancer (+18 years) were included in the analyses. Results We included 2048 non-sudden cancer deaths; 63% of patients had at least one transition between care settings in the final 3 months of life. 'Hospital death from home' (25-55%) and 'home death from hospital' (16-30%) were the most frequent types of final transitions in all countries. Patients' or families' wishes were mentioned as a reason for a final transition in 5-27% (P < 0.001) and 10-22% (P = 0.002) across countries. Conclusions 'Hospital deaths from home' is the most prevalent final transition in three of four countries studied, in a significant minority of cases because of patient/family wishes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieve Van den Block
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Winne Ko
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Guido Miccinesi
- Clinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ISPO, Florence, Italy
| | - Sarah Moreels
- Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health , Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ge A Donker
- NIVEL Primary Care Database, Sentinel Practices, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research , Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen
- EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Public and Occupational Health, and Palliative Care Expertise Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tomas V Alonso
- Public Health Directorate General, Health Department, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Luc Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vrijmoeth C, Christians MG, Festen DA, Groot M, van der Heide A, van der Rijt CC, Tonino M, Echteld MA. Physician-Reported Symptoms and Interventions in People with Intellectual Disabilities Approaching End of Life. J Palliat Med 2016; 19:1142-1147. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cis Vrijmoeth
- Intellectual Disabilities and Health, Department of Primary and Community Health Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Intellectual Disability Medicine, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Milou G.M. Christians
- Intellectual Disabilities and Health, Department of Primary and Community Health Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dederieke A.M. Festen
- Intellectual Disability Medicine, Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Groot
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Michael A. Echteld
- Prisma Foundation, Biezenmortel, The Netherlands
- Science in Balance Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The historical development of the Dutch Sentinel General Practice Network from a paper-based into a digital primary care monitoring system. J Public Health (Oxf) 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s10389-016-0753-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
7
|
Hoek P, Grandjean I, Verhagen CAHHVM, Jansen-Landheer MLEA, Schers HJ, Galesloot C, Vissers KCP, Engels Y, Hasselaar JG. Addressing Palliative Sedation during Expert Consultation: A Descriptive Analysis of the Practice of Dutch Palliative Care Consultation Teams. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0136309. [PMID: 26301746 PMCID: PMC4547749 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 08/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Main Objective Since palliative sedation is considered a complex intervention, consultation teams are increasingly established to support general practice. This study aims to offer insight into the frequency and characteristics of expert consultations regarding palliative sedation. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of a longitudinal database. This database contained all patient-related consultations by Dutch Palliative Care Consultation teams, that were requested between 2004 and 2011. We described the frequency and characteristics of these consultations, in particular of the subgroup of consultations in which palliative sedation was addressed (i.e. PSa consultations). We used multivariate regression analysis to explore consultation characteristics associated with a higher likelihood of PSa consultations. Main Results and Their Significance Of the 44,443 initial consultations, most were requested by general practitioners (73%) and most concerned patients with cancer (86%). Palliative sedation was addressed in 18.1% of all consultations. Palliative sedation was relatively more often discussed during consultations for patients with a neurologic disease (OR 1.79; 95% CI: 1.51–2.12) or COPD (OR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.15–1.69) than for patients with cancer. We observed a higher likelihood of PSa consultations if the following topics were also addressed during consultation: dyspnoea (OR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.22–1.40), agitation/delirium (OR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.47–1.68), exhaustion (OR 2.89; 95% CI: 2.61–3.20), euthanasia-related questions (OR 2.65; 95% CI: 2.37–2.96) or existential issues (OR 1.55; 95% CI: 1.31–1.83). Conclusion In conclusion, PSa consultations accounted for almost one-fifth of all expert consultations and were associated with several case-related characteristics. These characteristics may help clinicians in identifying patients at risk for a more complex disease trajectory at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Hoek
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Ilse Grandjean
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Henk J. Schers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cilia Galesloot
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kris C. P. Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Engels
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen G.J. Hasselaar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Never the right time: advance care planning with frail and older people. Br J Gen Pract 2014; 63:511-2. [PMID: 24152450 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13x673568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
|