Lateral elbow tendinosis: a review of diagnosis and management in general practice

Efficacy of PowerBall Versus Mulligan Mobilization With Movement on Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background Lateral epicondylitis (LE), sometimes referred to as tennis elbow or lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET), is one of the most common repetitive stress disorders in the elbow joint. Often, this involves the attachment of the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle. This study's primary focus is on treating people with LE, a condition that causes repetitive movements of the upper extremities. There is currently no research on how PowerBall gadget workouts affect the function and pain of individuals with lateral epicondylitis. Exercises using the "PowerBall device," which applies both intrinsic and extrinsic pressure to the wrist, elbow, and shoulder muscles, are thought to be beneficial forms of resistance training. It has been shown that there are improvements in strength, function, range of motion (ROM), discomfort, and quality of life (QOL). On the other side, it has been demonstrated that LE patients have reduced discomfort while using Mulligan Mobilization with Movement (MMWM). Methods The 50 patients with LE were split into two groups for the single-blinded, randomized clinical study after baseline assessment and randomization: Group A was the intervention group, and Group B was the conventional group. The "PowerBall device" exercise was provided to participants in Group A, and MMWM was given to those in Group B. Both groups can benefit from basic workouts and ultrasonography by following the prescribed routine. Quantification of pain, function, grip strength, and range of motion was done at the start and finish of therapy using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), portable dynamometer, and goniometer. Results After therapy, both groups showed considerable improvement (p<0.05). Both descriptive and inferential statistics were employed in the data analysis. Numerous statistical tests were employed, such as the student's paired and unpaired t-test and the chi-square test. From a statistical and clinical perspective, Group A's outcomes were more significant. On the visual analog scale, there was a decrease in pain intensity for wrist and elbow mobility at rest (p<0.0003), activity (p<0.003), PRTEE (p<0.001), grip strength (p<0.03), and range of motion (p<0.01). Both groups' assessments after rehabilitation indicated increases in pain and function; however, Group A (0.03) benefited more and saw early success with the PowerBall device. Conclusion Findings show that a three-week program incorporating resistance training exercises mediated by a "PowerBall device" enhances upper limb performance beyond traditional exercise treatment and increases grip strength, wrist extension strength, internal and external rotator concentric and eccentric strength. The findings and observations indicate that both groups have significantly improved.

Chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy with a supervised graded exercise protocol

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective Case Series.

BACKGROUND

Variety of studies inquired the effectiveness of exercise treatment in LET (Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy). The research on the effectiveness of these approaches are still ongoing and very much needed due to the uncertainty of the subject.

PURPOSE

We aimed to understand how the application of exercises in a graded manner affect the treatment outcomes in terms of pain and function.

METHODS

This study is completed by 28 patients with LET and it was planned as a prospective case series. Thirty participants were included to participate in the exercise group. Basic Exercises (Grade 1) were performed for four weeks. Advanced Exercises (Grade 2) were performed for another four weeks. The VAS (Visual Analog Scale), pressure algometer, the PRTEE (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation) and a grip strength dynamometer were used to measure outcomes. The measurements were performed at baseline, at the end of four weeks and at the end of eight weeks.

RESULTS

Investigation of the pain scores revealed that all VAS scores (p < 0.05, ES = 1.35; 0.72; 0,73 activity, rest, and night respectively) and pressure algometer results were improved both during basic (p < 0.05, ES = 0.91) and advanced exercises (p < 0.05, ES = 0,41). PRTEE scores were found to be improved in patients with LET after basic and advanced exercises (p > 0.001, ES = 1.15; p > 0.001, ES = 1.56 respectively). The grip strength only changed after basic exercises (p = 0.003, ES = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The basic exercises were beneficial for both pain and function. However, advanced exercises are required for obtaining further improvements in terms of pain, function, and grip strength.

A New Test for the Advanced Diagnosis of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy with Concomitant Intrasubstance Tear: Failure to Resist Extension Effort (the Free Test)

Background

Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is one of the most common causes of musculoskeletal pain. The diagnosis is based on the clinical history and different physical maneuvers. Ultrasound (US) is a complementary diagnostic method to detect degenerative tendon changes and intrasubstance tears (IST). To date, there is no available physical maneuver to identify an IST in patients with LET.

Aim

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an index test to detect an IST confirmed by ultrasound in patients with LET.

Methods

A diagnostic retrospective study was performed. Patients who presented medical records with LET were recruited. Two orthopaedic surgeons developed the physical maneuver. The index test was considered positive when the position failed to resist the wrist extension maximum effort. Clinical findings were associated with confirmation of IST by US. Data were calculated using diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Thirty-nine patients (39 elbows) were analyzed, 25 (64%) women and 14 (36%) men, with an average age of 47.7 years. The index test's sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.67-0.96). Accuracy was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91), and the specificity was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.31-0.89).

Conclusion

The index test presented very good sensitivity and good accuracy in patients with LET with US diagnostic confirmation of IST.

Level of Evidence

Diagnostic study, Level III.

Effects of Hypertonic Dextrose Injection (Prolotherapy) in Lateral Elbow Tendinosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematic review the effectiveness of hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) on pain intensity and physical functioning in patients with lateral elbow tendinosis (LET) compared with other active non-surgical treatments.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Dimensions, Global Health, NHS Health Technology Assessment, AMED and OVID nursing database from inception to 15 June 2021, without language restrictions.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently identified parallel or cross-over RCTs that evaluated the effectiveness of DPT in LET. The search identified 245 records; data from 8 studies (354 patients) were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed included studies. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to evaluate risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess quality of the evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pooled results favored the use of DPT in reducing tennis elbow pain intensity compared with active controls at 12 weeks post-enrollment, with standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.44 (95% CI -0.88 to -0.01, P =0.04) and of moderate heterogeneity (I²= 49%). Pooled results also favored the use of DPT on physical functioning compared with active controls at 12 weeks, with DASH score achieving mean difference (MD) -15.04 (95% CI -20.25 to -9.82, P < 0.001) and of low heterogeneity (I²= 0.0%). No major related adverse events have been reported.

CONCLUSIONS

DPT is superior to active controls at 12 weeks for decreasing pain intensity and functioning by margins that meet criteria for clinical relevance in the treatment of LET. While existing studies are too small to assess rare adverse events, for LET patients, especially those refractory to first-line treatments, DPT can be considered a non-surgical treatment option in carefully selected patients. Further high-quality trials with comparison with other injection therapies are needed.

Efficacy of a local corticosteroid injection on pain, disability and radial nerve thickness in patients with lateral epicondylitis

Introduction:

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a steroid injection with conservative therapy (CT) versus CT alone on pain, functional limitations and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the radial nerve (RN) in patients with lateral epicondylitis (LE).

Methods:

In this clinical trial, seventy subjects in the age group of 30–60 years with a clinical diagnosis of LE were recruited. Patients received an ultrasound-guided steroid injection and CT (Group A, n = 35) or CT alone (Group B, n = 35). Pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale), functional limitations (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire) and the CSA of RN (mm²) using ultrasound were assessed at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks.

Results:

There was a significant difference in pain intensity (P < 0.05) at 4 weeks in favour of Group A but not at 12 weeks. A statistically significant difference was not present favouring either group concerning disability at both the follow-ups. The difference in CSA of the RN at the affected side in both groups A and B was not statistically significant at either the spiral groove or the antecubital fossa at baseline or the subsequent follow-ups.

Conclusions:

The CT with a steroid injection proved to be more efficacious in the short term concerning pain intensity and functional limitations. The RN thickness is not increased in patients with LE, thereby refuting its role to some extent in the pathogenesis of LE.