Effectiveness of an intervention to optimise the use of mirabegron for overactive bladder: a quasi-experimental study in primary care

Deprescribing as a Way to Reduce Inappropriate Use of Drugs for Overactive Bladder in Primary Care (DROP): Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial With an Embedded Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medication remains a significant concern in general practices, particularly in the context of overactive bladder (OAB) treatment for individuals aged 65 years and older. This study focuses on the exploration of alternative options for treating OAB and the deprescribing of anticholinergic drugs commonly used in OAB. The research aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficiency of deprescribing through a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative assessment and qualitative exploration of perceptions, experiences, and potential barriers among patients and health care personnel.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the intervention in which health care staff in primary care encourage patients to participate in deprescribing their drugs for OAB. In addition, we aim to identify factors contributing to or obstructing the deprescribing process that will drive more informed decisions in the field of deprescribing and support effective and safe treatment of patients.

METHODS

The drugs for overactive bladder in primary care (DROP) study uses a rigorous research design, using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with an embedded sequential explanatory mixed methods approach. All general practices within the North Denmark Region will be paired based on the number of general practitioners (GPs) and urban or rural locations. The matched pairs will be randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive an algorithm designed to guide the deprescribing of drugs for OAB, promoting appropriate medication use. Quantitative data will be collected from the RCT including data from Danish registries for prescription analysis. Qualitative data will be obtained through interviews and focus groups with GPs, staff members, and patients. Finally, the quantitative and qualitative findings are merged to understand deprescribing for OAB comprehensively. This integrated approach enhances insights and supports future intervention improvement.

RESULTS

The DROP study is currently in progress, with randomization of general practices underway. While they have not been invited to participate yet, they will be. The inclusion of GP practices is scheduled from December 2023 to April 2024. The follow-up period for each patient is 6 months. Results will be analyzed through an intention-to-treat analysis for the RCT and a thematic analysis for the qualitative component. Quantitative outcomes will focus on changes in prescriptions and symptoms, while the qualitative analysis will explore experiences and perceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

The DROP study aims to provide an evidence-based intervention in primary care that ensures the deprescription of drugs for OAB when there is an unfavorable risk-benefit profile. The DROP study's contribution lies in generating evidence for deprescribing practices and influencing best practices in health care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06110975; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06110975.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/56277.

Deprescribing intervention activities mapped to guiding principles for use in general practice: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To identify and characterise activities for deprescribing used in general practice and to map the identified activities to pioneering principles of deprescribing.

SETTING

Primary care.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), Clinicaltrials.gov, ISRCTN registry, OpenGrey, Annals of Family Medicine, BMC Family Practice, Family Practice and British Journal of General Practice (BJGP) from inception to the end of June 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies were original research (randomised controlled trial, quasi-experimental, cohort study, qualitative and case studies), protocol papers and protocol registrations.

DATA EXTRACTION

Screening and data extraction was completed by one reviewer; 10% of the studies were independently reviewed by a second reviewer. Coding of full-text articles in NVivo was conducted and mapped to five deprescribing principles.

RESULTS

Fifty studies were included. The most frequently used activities were identification of appropriate patients for deprescribing (76%), patient education (50%), general practitioners (GP) education (48%), and development and use of a tapering schedule (38%). Six activities did not align with the five deprescribing principles. As such, two principles (engage practice staff in education and appropriate identification of patients, and provide feedback to staff about deprescribing occurrences within the practice) were added.

CONCLUSION

Activities and guiding principles for deprescribing should be paired together to provide an accessible and comprehensive guide to deprescribing by GPs. The addition of two principles suggests that practice staff and practice management teams may play an instrumental role in sustaining deprescribing processes within clinical practice. Future research is required to determine the most of effective activities to use within each principle and by whom.

Long-term effectiveness of an intervention to enhance mirabegron use revision and its deprescribing: 36-month follow-up of a quasi-experimental trial in primary care

OBJECTIVE

This is a follow-up study from a multicenter, prospective, before-and-after quasi-experimental, controlled trial to assess effectiveness at 36 months of an intervention designed to promote the revision and deprescribing of mirabegron in primary care in patients with overactive bladder.

METHODS

Intervention included patients who attended in 17 PHCs located in North Barcelona; control included patients who attended in the other 34 PHCs located in South, East and West Barcelona. The primary endpoint was mirabegron review and deprescribing when GPs considered appropriate, which was measured by the percentage of change of the number of patients with treatment at 36 months compared to the baseline. The intervention consisted of meetings with all the directors of the PHCs; distribution of the infographic to the GPs; providing information regarding the intervention for urologist and gynaecologist; and review of the treatments by the GPs. A monthly follow-up was done during the first year, and every three months thereafter until month 36.

RESULTS

Overall, 1932 patients were included, mean age 71.6 years (female 53.8%). A total of 540 patients included in the intervention discontinued mirabegron at some point during the 36 months follow-up (540/762, 70.8%) compared to 759 patients in the control (759/1170, 64.9%), (p < 0.001). A total of 324/433 patients (74.8%) who discontinued mirabegron use at 12 months remained without pharmacological treatment at 36 months. With respect to the baseline cohort, there was a lower introduction of new patients with mirabegron in the intervention (546/762, 71.6%) compared to the control (1246/1170, 106.5%), (p < .001). Regarding the treated patients, there was an increase of 41.6% in the control and a slight increase of 0.8% in the intervention at 36 months, (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that an intervention can enhance the review use of mirabegron in the primary care setting, and promote their deprescribing.