Doctor-patient interactions that exclude patients experiencing homelessness from health services: an ethnographic exploration

Benzodiazepine Prescriptions for Homeless Veterans Affairs Service Users With Mental Illness

OBJECTIVE

Despite elevated risk for substance use disorder and overdose death in the homeless population, benzodiazepine prescribing for this population has not been examined. In this study, the authors used data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system to examine benzodiazepine prescribing and risky and potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine prescribing practices for homeless VA service users.

METHODS

Using national VA administrative data (2018-2019), the authors conducted logistic regression to compare likelihood of benzodiazepine prescribing and t tests to compare indicators of risky and potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine prescribing patterns for homeless service users with mental illness (N=244,113) and their housed peers (N=2,763,513).

RESULTS

Unadjusted analyses showed that benzodiazepines were prescribed for 7.5% of homeless VA service users with mental illness, versus 9.4% of their housed peers (p<0.001). Analyses adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and health care utilization showed that homeless service users were less likely than their housed peers to receive a benzodiazepine prescription (AOR=0.70, 99% CI=0.68-0.72). However, compared with their housed peers, homeless service users received higher rates of risky and potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine prescriptions, including multiple concurrent benzodiazepine prescriptions (9.4% vs. 7.0%, p<0.001) and concurrent prescriptions for benzodiazepines and opioids (36.9% vs. 31.2%, p<0.001) or sedatives (61.9% vs. 45.9%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although homeless VA service users with mental illness were less likely than their housed peers to receive a benzodiazepine prescription, benzodiazepine prescriptions for these service users had more characteristics of risky and potentially inappropriate prescribing.

Exploring how greenspace programmes might be effective in supporting people with problem substance use: a realist interview study

BACKGROUND

Greenspace programmes are health projects run outside in nature, typically with the aim of improving mental health. Research suggests that programmes may also be effective in supporting people with problem substance use (PSU), but there is limited understanding of the key components that make them successful for this client group. Previous work has claimed that a realist-informed intervention framework for greenspace programmes for mental health could be transferable to programmes that support people with PSU, and that this could provide insight into the causal processes within programmes. However, this claim is yet to be explored in depth. The aim of this study was to further test, refine, and consolidate the proposed framework to show how greenspace programmes could support people with PSU.

METHODS

Using a realist approach, 17 participants (8 programme staff; 9 wider stakeholders) were interviewed about contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes (CMOs) relative to greenspace programmes for mental health and PSU. Semi-structured interviews were used since they facilitated exploration of the proposed framework but were flexible enough to allow identification of new CMOs for framework refinement. Interviews were audio-recorded, fully transcribed, and analysed inductively and deductively against the proposed framework.

RESULTS

Findings supported the proposed framework and indicated that greenspace programmes support people with poor mental health and PSU due to: feelings of escape; space to reflect; physical activity; self-efficacy; feelings of purpose; relationships; and shared experiences. However, data showed that programmes must also consider: explicit intervention focus to ensure adequate support for clients; existing challenges with funding and stakeholder buy-in; and the impact of COVID-19. Findings allowed development of a refined framework that shows how greenspace programmes can support people with PSU.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this project are theoretically novel and have practical relevance for those designing greenspace programmes by providing recommendations on how to optimise, tailor, and implement future interventions. Findings could be particularly relevant for academic researchers, multidisciplinary health professionals, and for those working in the third sector, developing and delivering greenspace programmes for people to improve their mental health and to support them with PSU.