Is uncertain vulvovaginal candidiasis a marker of vulvodynia? A study in a Dutch general practice research database

Chronic vulvar pain in gynecological outpatients

OBJECTIVES

Chronic vulvar pain (CVP) is pain in the vulvar area exceeding three months of duration. Previous studies have reported a prevalence of 7-8% in the general population and observed an association between CVP and other chronic pain, affective disorders and early life stressors. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of CVP among gynecological outpatients and to explore its association with child sexual abuse, comorbid fibromyalgia and mental health.

METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study among consecutive women attending an unselected general gynecological outpatient clinic at St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway, during the period August 1st, 2017, to June 30th, 2018. CVP was defined as having experienced either vulvar burning, sharp pain or allodynia for three months or more within the previous year. Fibromyalgia was defined as widespread pain in the past six months in conjunction with a symptom severity score ≥5 on the fibromyalgia symptom severity score inventory, an ordinal scale from zero to 12. We collected information on sexual coercion experience and assessed mental health with the mental health inventory (MHI-5) of the SF-36 health survey, which yields a zero to five scale.

RESULTS

Of 1,125 questionnaires distributed, 810 (72%) were returned, and 762 (68%) included in final analyses. Among these, 130 (17.1%) reported CVP within the previous year and 92 (16.7%) were classified as suffering from fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia was associated with CVP (adjusted OR of 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1). Child sexual abuse was reported by 96 (13.1%) and was associated with CVP (adjusted OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3). CVP and fibromyalgia were both associated with lower mental health scores; 0.51 and 0.58 points on the MHI-5 scale, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic vulvar pain is common among women in a gynecological outpatient clinic and associated with child sexual abuse, comorbid fibromyalgia and worse mental health. Ethical committee number: REK Midt No. 2016/2150.

Relapsing Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: Treatment with Oxygen Therapy and Hyaluronic Acid

OBJECTIVE. The aim of our open, anecdotical, retrospective, spontaneous trial has been to evaluate the efficacy of the association between high concentration oxygen and hyaluronic acid for treatment of relapsing candidiasis.METHODS. 45 women (30.9 ±4.4 years) with relapsing candidiasis, and complaining of dryness, dyspareunia, pain, appealing to our Second Opinion Medical Consultation Network, signed an informed consent form and were treated with oxygen/hyaluronic acid therapy treatment, once a week, for a total of five weeks at the outpatient clinic (Healthy Center, Sirio, Fidenza, Italy). The physicians of the Second Opinion Network followed up weekly from remote (WhatsApp, Skype) each treated patient as to state the effectiveness, tolerability, and side effects of the treatment.RESULTS. The mean VAS and VuAS scores measured at first visit were 2,660 and 2,622 and significantly (p<0,0001) reduced to 1,311 and 0,77 at last visit. The measurements of the vaginal pH and of the vaginal swab after the last treatment session confirmed significantly (p<0.0001) the absence of candidiasis. Three months later in the follow-up, the percentage of patients who had had only one VVC relapse was 4,44% (2/45), a percentage that increased just to 8,8% at six months (4/45). The elastography index was significantly (p<0.0001) increased after the last treatment session (2,55 ± 0,545 vs 4,48 ± 0,505).CONCLUSIONS. The combined oxygen therapy with hyaluronic acid gave definite therapeutic benefits in this cohort of relapsing candidiasis in the acute phase of the infection. The 6-month follow up, also detected a lower reinfection rate compared with the historical available data. The procedure is totally painless with excellent compliance by patients and no untoward effects.

Women's appraisal of the management of vulvodynia by their general practitioner: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Provoked Vulvodynia (PVD) is the most common cause of vulvar pain. General practitioners (GPs) are insufficiently familiar with it, causing a delay in many women receiving correct diagnosis and treatment. Besides patients factors, this delay can partly be explained by the reluctance of GPs to explore the sexual context of PVD and by their negative emotional reactions such as helplessness and frustration when consulted by patients with medically unexplained symptoms like PVD.

OBJECTIVE

To gain insight into how women with PVD perceive and evaluate condition management by their GP, in order to support GPs in the consultation of women with PVD.

METHODS

We performed face-to-face in-depth interviews with women diagnosed with PVD. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. The Consolidated Criteria for reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ-criteria) were applied.

RESULTS

Analysis of the interviews generated four interrelated themes: Doctor-patient relationship, Lack of knowledge, Referral process and Addressing sexual issues. Empathy of the GP, involvement in decision-making and referral were important factors in the appreciation of the consultation for women with PVD who were referred to a specialist. Because women were reluctant to start a discussion about sexuality, they expected a proactive attitude from their GP. The communication with and the competence of the GP ultimately proved more important in the contact than the gender of the GP.

CONCLUSION

Women with PVD prefer a patient-centred approach and want GPs to acknowledge their autonomy and to address sexuality proactively.

Antifungal (oral and vaginal) therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is frequent in women worldwide and usually responds rapidly to topical or oral antifungal therapy. However, some women develop recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), which is arbitrarily defined as four or more episodes every year. RVVC is a debilitating, long-term condition that can severely affect the quality of life of women. Most VVC is diagnosed and treated empirically and women frequently self-treat with over-the-counter medications that could contribute to an increase in the antifungal resistance. The effective treatment of RVVC has been a challenge in daily clinical practice. This review aims to assess the efficacy of antifungal agents administered orally or intravaginally for the treatment of RVVC, in order to define clinical practices that will impact on the reduction of the morbidity and antifungal resistance.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A comprehensive search of the following databases will be carried out: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Virtual Health Library)/Biblioteca Regional de Medicina (Regional Library of Medicine) (BVS/BIREME), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and in the clinical trials databases (www.trialscentral.org; www.controlled-trials.com; www.clinicaltrials.gov). The risk of bias will be assessed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We will perform data synthesis using the Review Manager (RevMan) software V.5.2.3. To assess heterogeneity, we will compute the I2 statistic.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will be a review of published data and it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. Findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018093817.

Facilitators and barriers in the diagnostic process of vulvovaginal complaints (vulvodynia) in general practice: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The gap between the relatively high prevalence of provoked vulvodynia (PVD) in the general population and the low incidence in primary care can partly be explained by physicians' lack of knowledge about the assessment and management of PVD.

OBJECTIVES

To recognize barriers and facilitators of GPs in the diagnostic process of women presenting with recurrent vulvovaginal complaints.

METHODS

A qualitative focus group study in 17 Dutch GPs, five men and 12 women. An interview guide, based on the scientific literature and the expertise of the researchers, including a vignette of a patient, was used to direct the discussion between the GPs. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A systematic text analysis of the transcripts was performed after data saturation was reached.

RESULTS

Analysis of the interviews generated three major themes: Identifying and discussing sexual complaints, importance of gender in professional experience, and coping with professional uncertainty. Within these themes, the reluctance regarding sexual complaints, male gender, negative emotional responses when faced with professional uncertainty, as well as lack of education were barriers to the diagnostic process and management of PVD. Female gender and understanding that patients can profit from enquiring about sexual health issues were found to be facilitating factors.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve the care for women with PVD, attitude and skills of GPs regarding taking a sexual history and performing a vulvovaginal examination should be addressed, as well as GPs' coping strategies regarding their professional uncertainty.