Delayed Paraplegia Triggered by Gastrointestinal Bleeding 8 Months after TEVAR: Persistent Vulnerability of Spinal Cord

Recognition of Significantly Delayed Spinal Cord Ischemia Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is an uncommon but serious complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). SCI after TEVAR is thought to result from decreased segmental blood supply to an important network of collateral blood flow in the spinal cord. Little is known about the prevalence and optimal treatment of SCI that occurs beyond the periprocedural period. We report a case of delayed SCI in a 67-year-old patient who underwent TEVAR. The patient presented almost two years after TEVAR with acute paraplegia preceded by pre-syncope. The delayed SCI was likely triggered by pre-syncope, a thrombosed endoleak shown on imaging, and the patient's vascular risk factors. Treatments included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation, and a naloxone infusion, which resulted in moderate recovery in lower extremity motor function. This case highlights the tenuous nature of spinal cord perfusion after TEVAR and that prompt recognition and early treatment of SCI are critical in preventing the progression from ischemia to infarction.

Self-Radiopaque Markers Guiding Physician-Modified Fenestration (S-Fenestration) in Aortic Arch Endovascular Repair

Backgrounds and Objectives: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has currently become the “first-line choice” for descending aortic pathologies. For pathologies located at the aortic arch, TEVAR with physician-modified fenestration (PMF) has been gained popularity as an alternative choice. However, stent fenestration is an experience-dependent technique and comes with possible adverse events such as misalignment. This study aims to introduce the self-radiopaque PMF (SF), which uses the radiopaque marker as a guiding indicator.

Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of 125 patients who underwent the SF-TEVAR in Second Xiangya Hospital from December 2015 to December 2020. Data include basic clinical information and technique records of SF-TEVAR with follow-up results.

Results: According to the SF-TEVAR protocol, we have performed the procedures on 125 patients and obtained an instant success rate of 98.4%. A total of 140 aortic stent-grafts and 44 bridging stents have been implanted in this study. The operation time is 64.6 ± 19.3 min, X-ray exposure time (from first digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to last DSA) is 25.6 ± 14.3 min, and contrast volume is 82.2 ± 22.6 ml. The success rate of PMF alignment is 98.4%. One bailout stent-graft was implanted into the left subclavian artery (LSA) by the chimney technique (0.8%). One fenestration was successfully and immediately corrected after misalignment (0.8%). Large simultaneous fenestration was performed in six patients (4.8%) for the left common carotid artery (LCCA) and LSA and in two patients (1.6%) for IA, LCCA, and LSA. One hundred twenty-two out of 125 patients' LSAs have been kept patent by the technique during the follow-up. The bridging stent group consists of 44 patients who received LSA stents, while the non-bridging stent group includes the other 81 patients. Type I endoleak has occurred in seven patients (5.6%) 1 week after the procedure. During follow-up (23 ± 18 months), survival rate is 95.7% and branch artery patent rate is 97.4%.

Conclusions: The SF-TEVAR technique, which utilizes the radiopaque marker in stent-graft as an indication for PMF in TEVAR, seems a likely safe, effective, and efficient procedure that brings acceptable survival rate and branch artery patency rate. SF-TEVAR serves as a progressive alternative method to keep the branch artery patent in aortic arch endovascular reconstruction.

Spinal cord infarction six months after thoracic endovascular aortic repair- A case report

Spinal cord infarction is reported to account for less than 1% of all strokes and is a relatively rare disease. In recent years, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become a common treatment for aortic aneurysms, and spinal cord ischemia is one of its complications. Most cases occur in the perioperative period; however, a few cases have been reported in the chronic stage. Here, we report a case of spinal cord infarction, 6 months after TEVAR. A 77-year-old man experienced sudden onset paraparesis following dumbbell exercises and defecation. He had a history of an infectious thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm treated by TEVAR 6 months prior. Paralysis and disturbance of the thermal pain and tactile sensations of the lower limbs were observed, but proprioception and deep sensation were preserved. Computed tomography (CT) showed no evidence of intraspinal hemorrhage, new aortic dissection, or endoleak around the aortic stent placed from Th11 to L3. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed intramedullary hyperintensity from Th11 to the conus 2 days after onset. Anticoagulant therapy and rehabilitation were performed, and the lower-limb muscle strength gradually improved. After aortic stenting, particularly including the level of the Adamkiewicz artery, the risk of spinal cord ischemia must be monitored, because spinal circulation depends on collateral circulation.

Retroperitoneal approach for the treatment of diaphragmatic crus syndrome: technical note

OBJECTIVE

Myelopathy selectively involving the lower extremities can occur secondary to spondylotic changes, tumor, vascular malformations, or thoracolumbar cord ischemia. Vascular causes of myelopathy are rarely described. An uncommon etiology within this category is diaphragmatic crus syndrome, in which compression of an intersegmental artery supplying the cord leads to myelopathy. The authors present the operative technique for treating this syndrome, describing their experience with 3 patients treated for acute-onset lower-extremity myelopathy secondary to hypoperfusion of the anterior spinal artery.

METHODS

All patients had compression of a lumbar intersegmental artery supplying the cord; the compression was caused by the diaphragmatic crus. Compression of the intersegmental artery was probably producing the patients' symptoms by decreasing blood flow through the artery of Adamkiewicz, causing lumbosacral ischemia.

RESULTS

All patients underwent surgery to transect the offending diaphragmatic crus. Each patient experienced substantial symptom improvement, and 2 patients made a full neurological recovery before discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Diaphragmatic crus syndrome is a rare or under-recognized cause of ischemic myelopathy. Patients present with episodic acute-on-chronic lower-extremity paraparesis, gait instability, and numbness. Angiography confirms compression of an intersegmental artery that gives rise to a dominant radiculomedullary artery. Transecting the offending diaphragmatic crus can produce complete resolution of neurological symptoms.