Updates on Ultrasonography Imaging in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

A pitfall in the echographic diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm: when para-aortic lymph nodes are the trick

The abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a potentially fatal asymptomatic disease. It progresses silently with clinical complications that, when they occur, constitute a very serious event, frequently resulting in the patient's exitus. As a result, early detection and treatment are critical because the right therapeutic strategy can halt the disease's natural progression. AAA is frequently discovered as an incidental finding during an abdominal ultrasound or a plain X-ray of the abdomen, which is required for other pathologies. The primary diagnostic tool for AAA identification is abdominal B-mode ultrasound. It is cheap, widely available, non-invasive, and has high diagnostic sensitivity. However, this diagnostic tool may fail in rare cases due to misleading anatomical findings. We present an unusual flaw in the echographic AAA evaluation that should be considered during the diagnostic work-up.

Assessment of the Global and Regional Circumferential Strain of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Different Size by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to use speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) to quantify circumferential aortic strain of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with different size.

METHODS

A total of 87 AAA patients were included. The morphological variables, including aortic maximum diameter (MD), end systolic area (ESA), end diastolic area (EDA), and thickness and area of intraluminal thrombus (ILT), were measured by ultrasound. STE was applied to calculate circumferential strain (CS) at 6 equally divided segments of the aorta at MD. We evaluated the mean value of peak strain along the 6 segments as global circumferential strain (GCS).

RESULTS

Large AAA (≥5.5 cm) patients had higher MD, ESA, EDA, AAA length, ILT thickness, and area, but lower fractional area change, GCS, and segmental CSs than small AAA (<5.5 cm) subjects (all P < .05). Compared with AAA <4.5 cm group, AAA patients ≥4.5 cm possessed increased MD, ESA, EDA, AAA length, ILT thickness, and area, which results were also reflected in the comparison between AAA <6.5 and ≥6.5 cm group. In small AAA patients, GCS and regional strains in CS1, CS3, and CS5 segments were lower in AAA subjects ≥4.5 cm than those <4.5 cm (all P<.05). However, no significant differences in the GCS and regional CS between ≥6.5 and <6.5 cm group were found. Correlation analysis revealed a significant negative association of GCS with MD, ESA, and EDA, even after adjusting the potential confounding factors (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may yield insight into the structural strain characteristics of AAA wall with different size, which adds the benefit of using simple echocardiography-derived biomechanics to stratify AAA patients.