Effects of Spironolactone on Arrhythmias in Hemodialysis Patients: Secondary Results of the SPin-D Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on new-onset or recurrent atrial fibrillation: a Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background Clinical and translational research suggests that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) may prevent atrial fibrosis and electrical remodeling associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to consolidate existing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of MRAs on incident or recurrent AF. Methods Medline, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched until February 12, 2024. Triple-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled using both pairwise and Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analyses. Results Twenty-three RCTs (13,358 participants) were identified. Based on the pairwise random effects meta-analysis, MRAs were associated with a significant reduction in AF events compared to placebo or usual care (risk ratio {RR}= 0.75; 95% confidence interval {CI}= [0.66, 0.87]; P< 0.001; I2= 3%). This protective effect was robust both for new-onset and recurrent AF episodes (subgroup p-value= 0.69), while the baseline HF status was not a significant effect modifier (subgroup p-value= 0.58). MRAs demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in AF events for patients with chronic renal disease compared to placebo (RR= 0.78; 95% CI= [0.62, 0.98]; P= 0.03; I2= 0%). The network meta-analyses revealed that only spironolactone was associated with a significant reduction in AF events (Bayesian RR= 0.76; 95% CI= [0.65, 0.89]; P< 0.001; level of evidence moderate; SUCRA 0.731), while eplerenone and finerenone showed a neutral effect. Conclusion MRAs confer a significant benefit in terms of reducing incident or recurrent AF episodes, irrespective of HF status. In this context, spironolactone may be preferable compared to eplerenone or finerenone.

Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the advantages or disadvantages of spironolactone use in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This study aimed to evaluate survival according to the use of spironolactone in a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD.

METHODS

This retrospective study used laboratory and clinical data from the national HD Quality Assessment Program and claims data. The participants of the quality assessment program were patients who had been undergoing maintenance HD for ≥ 3 months, patients undergoing HD at least twice a week. Patients with no spironolactone prescription during the assessment periods were designated as the control group. Patients with one or more prescriptions of spironolactone during the assessment periods were assigned to the SPR group.

RESULTS

The number of patients in the control and SPR groups were 54,588 and 315, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 69.1% and 59.1% in the control and SPR groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses showed that the hazard ratio in the SPR group was 1.34 (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis and 1.13 (P = 0.249) in multivariable analysis. Univariate Cox-regression analysis showed a better patient survival rate in the control group than in the SPR group; however, multivariable analyses showed similar patient survival rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study showed no difference in survival between patients undergoing HD with and without spironolactone use.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve cardiovascular outcomes in a variety of settings. This study aimed to assess whether cardioprotective effects of MRAs are modified by heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) status and to study their impact on AF events.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched to 24 March 2023 for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of MRAs as compared with placebo or usual care in reducing cardiovascular outcomes and AF events in patients with or at risk for cardiovascular diseases. Random-effects models and interaction analyses were used to test for effect modification.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of seven trials (20 741 participants, mean age: 65.6 years, 32% women) showed that the efficacy of MRAs, as compared with placebo, in reducing a composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization remains consistent across patients with HF [risk ratio = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.98] and without HF (risk ratio = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75-0.93; interaction P = .77). Among patients with HF, MRAs reduced cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization in patients with AF (hazard ratio = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.54-1.66) to a similar extent as in those without AF (hazard ratio = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.63-1.07; interaction P = .65). Pooled data from 20 trials (21 791 participants, mean age: 65.2 years, 31.3% women) showed that MRAs reduce AF events (risk ratio = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.67-0.87) in both patients with and without prior AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are similarly effective in preventing cardiovascular events in patients with and without HF and most likely retain their efficacy regardless of AF status. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may also be moderately effective in preventing incident or recurrent AF events.