Should Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistulas Be Used? CON

Hemodialysis nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practices in managing vascular access: A cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia

Hemodialysis continues to be the primary approach for renal replacement therapy. Vascular access (VA), particularly arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, is the preferred technique for establishing hemodialysis access due to its lower risk of infection and central venous stenosis compared to catheters. The aim of this cross-sectional investigation was to examine hemodialysis nurses' knowledge, confidence, and practices in managing VA in Saudi Arabia. This is an online cross-sectional survey study that was conducted in Saudi Arabia between June and August 2023. This study utilized a previously validated questionnaire. Examined dialysis nurses' knowledge, attitude, practice, and self-efficacy pertaining to VA cannulation and evaluation. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of better knowledge of dialysis VA. A total of 197 participants were involved in this study. Around one-third of the study participants (37.0%) reported that they have received specialized training in managing VA. Participants agreement (answered agree or strongly agree) on statements that examined attitudes toward dialysis VA cannulation and management was high and ranged between 75.0% and 93.0%. The majority of participants (97.5%) reported that they perform this assessment. Most nurses (65%) preferred the rope-ladder technique. Participants agreement on statements that examined self-efficacy on dialysis VA cannulation and management was high and ranged between 72.1% and 98.0%. The most commonly agreed upon statement was that "they have confident in performing hemodialysis access (arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft) assessment before cannulation." With 98.0% (answered agree and strongly agree). The mean knowledge score for our study sample was 6.4 (SD: 2.0) out of 12 (53.3%); which reflects marginal-level of knowledge on dialysis VA. Binary logistic regression analysis identified that nurses who have undergraduate degree are 92% more likely to be knowledgeable on dialysis VA compared to others (P < .05). Concerning VA, the level of knowledge among hemodialysis nurses working in Saudi Arabia was inadequate. Nurses who hold an undergraduate degree are presumed to have a more extensive understanding of dialysis VA. Further education programs are necessary for HD nurses to enhance their knowledge of VA, thereby optimizing their professional practices and enhancing the outcomes for their patients.

Hemodialysis patients and complications management costs in Italy: Plastic cannulae a potentially cost-effective strategy

BACKGROUND

The treatment of end-stage chronic renal failure involves substantial costs for health care, which could be higher considering hemodialysis access complications management costs. Complications could be addressed by cannulation technique, but also by the needle. In particular, the use of a metal needle for cannulation is responsible for several complications that compromise dialysis delivery and require interventions. This analysis aims to evaluate, from a hospital perspective, the direct costs related to complications that may occur in hemodialysis patients in Italy.

METHODS

To identify the main complications to consider in our analysis and related patient pathway for their management, we conducted an international literature search on PubMed and validated the data for Italy with an Italian Key Opinion Leader (KOL). A micro-costing analysis was developed to precisely assess the economic costs of healthcare interventions to manage complications due to vascular access cannulation.

RESULTS

The major complications identified, and the average cost/per episode for their management are the following ones: Local infection € 1455 (min € 745 and max € 2160); Sepsis, that requires hospitalization in ward € 4401 (min € 3693 and max € 4623); Sepsis (ICU) € 17,190; Hematoma € 304 (min € 252 and max € 728); Aneurysm € 3632 (min € 3139 and max € 4014); Pseudoaneurysm € 3695 (min € 3615 and max € 4014); Stenosis € 2229 (min € 1874 and max € 4857); Thrombosis € 2151 (min € 1941 and max € 3395).

CONCLUSIONS

In making decisions, hospital administration, and payer should take into consideration, not just the price of devices, but the entire patient's pathway. The use of plastic cannulae in hemodialysis patients shows improved outcomes compared to traditional metal needles. Furthermore, combining it with accurate and efficient cannulation techniques reduces complication rates, improves patients' quality of life, and reduces healthcare resource consumption.

Characteristics, practices, and outcomes in a Belgian cohort of incident home hemodialysis patients: A 6-year experience

BACKGROUND

Home hemodialysis (HHD) remains underused in patients with kidney failure. Current literature on HHD mostly originates from non-European countries, making generalization difficult. The present study describes patients' profile and practice patterns from a Belgian HHD center, and assesses patient and technique survival and complications associated with HHD.

METHODS

We analyzed data from all our incident patients during a 6-year period. The patient's characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Transition to another therapeutic modality, estimated using a risk model with death and transplantation as competing events, episodes of respite cares and hospitalizations, and access complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (mean age: 47 years; male: 64%) met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-one percent of patients initiated dialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC) and 96% were not assisted. Arterio-venous fistula (AVF) cannulation was performed using buttonhole technique. Standard-frequent HD (47%) and short-frequent low-flow dialysate HD (34%) were mostly used at HHD initiation. Cumulative incidences of technique failure and death were 15%, 24%, and 32% at 1, 2, and 5 years. Incidence rates for respite dialysis and hospitalizations were 2.39 and 0.54 per patient-year of HHD. In comparison with AVF, incidence rate ratios of overall access complications and access-related infections for CVC were 4.3 (95% CI: 3.1-6, p < 0.01) and 4.4 (95% CI: 2.1-10, p < 0.01), respectively. Buttonhole cannulation was complicated by 0.26 (95% CI: 0.15-0.46) infections per 1000 AVF-days.

CONCLUSIONS

This present study provides important information about patient's profile and practice patterns and safety in a cohort of 80 incident Belgian HHD patients, with encouraging techniques and patient survival.

Direction- and Angle-Assisted Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale & Objective

Arteriovenous fistula cannulation with the buttonhole technique is often preferred by patients but has been associated with an increased infection risk. Guidelines disagree on whether it should be abandoned, thus we assessed a technologically simple method to facilitate gentler arteriovenous fistula cannulation with potentially less discomfort and damage to the epithelial lining of the buttonhole tract.

Study Design

8-week, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Setting & Participants

Patients with buttonhole tracts receiving hemodialysis at 7 dialysis centers in Norway were randomized to the intervention group (43 patients, 658 cannulations) or control group (40 patients, 611 cannulations).

Intervention

Direction and angle of the established buttonhole tract were marked on the forearm skin in the intervention group, whereas the control group had no structured cannulation information system.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was successful cannulation, defined as correct placement of both blunt needles at the first attempt without needing to change needles, perform extra perforations, or reposition the needle. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported difficulty of cannulation (verbal rating scale: 1 = very easy, 6 = impossible) and intensity of pain (numeric rating scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain).

Results

After a 2-week run-in period, successful cannulation was achieved in 73.9% and 74.8% of the patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.12; P = 0.85). However, the probability of a difficult arterial cannulation (verbal rating scale, 3-6) was significantly lower in the intervention group (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P = 0.001). There were no improvements for venous cannulations. Furthermore, the probability of a painful cannulation (numeric rating scale, 3-10) was lower in the intervention group (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.02; P = 0.06).

Limitations

Unable to evaluate hard end points such as infections and thrombosis owing to the small sample size.

Conclusions

Marking direction and angle of cannulation did not improve cannulation success rates; however, patients more often reported an unproblematic procedure and less pain.

Funding

None.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01536548).

Complications and challenges of home hemodialysis: A historical review

Home hemodialysis (HHD) has evolved as a preferred and safe kidney replacement modality over the past six decades. Despite advances in technological aspects of HHD, potential complications still pose a challenge to health care givers, patients, and their families. In this narrative review, we describe vascular access and cannulation, anticoagulation, nutritional, residual kidney function, psychosocial, technique failure, and machine/procedural-related complications. Addressing these problems is essential for favorable patient outcomes.

Relationship between arteriovenous fistula cannulation practices and dialysis adequacy: A prospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Successful arteriovenous fistula cannulation ensures maximum patient benefit in the haemodialysis procedure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of various cannulation methods used for arteriovenous fistulas on dialysis adequacy.

DESIGN

It is a descriptive, cross-sectional and multicenter study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 164 dialysis patients from four dialysis centers were included.

MEASUREMENTS

Data were collected by determining patients' characteristics and the arteriovenous fistula cannulation method used, in addition to recording the Kt/V and urea reduction ratio values to evaluate dialysis adequacy. The mean Kt/V and urea reduction ratio values over 3 months after dialysis initiation were used. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04270292.

RESULTS

Cannulation with the puncture method was used in 53% of the patients; the fistula needles were inserted in the antegrade direction in 43.9% of the patients; the arterial needle was rotated after fistula needle placement in 63.4% of the patients; and the arterial and venous needles were on the same vascular line in 15.2% of the patients. Placement of the fistula needle in the antegrade direction increased the Kt/V value 0.164 times (95% confidence interval: 0.002-0.212, p = .047).

CONCLUSION

Antegrade placement could be a factor influencing dialysis adequacy. We suggest antegrade interventions to the fistula to maximize the patient benefit from the haemodialysis treatment.