Stakeholder-Guided Development of Dialysis Vascular Access Education Materials

Patient Perspectives on Arteriovenous Fistula Placement, Maturation, and Use: A Qualitative Study

Rationale & Objective

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) use among US hemodialysis (HD) patients is suboptimal, especially among Black patients. We interviewed a group of predominantly Black HD patients to probe experiences and perspectives surrounding steps along the AVF care continuum, which includes placement, maturation, and use of AVFs.

Study Design

Individual semistructured interviews.

Setting & Participants

Patients with kidney failure receiving HD in Birmingham, Alabama.

Analytical Approach

Transcripts were coded and thematically analyzed.

Results

We interviewed 53 Black and 6 White patients at different steps of the AVF care continuum: 29 were dialyzing with a central venous catheter (15 had not undergone AVF placement, 9 had a maturing AVF, and 5 had a nonfunctional AVF) and 30 were dialyzing with an AVF. We coded transcripts using qualitative thematic analysis. Three themes emerged: (1) the circumstances of dialysis initiation sometimes altered the timeline of AV access placement; (2) patients had variable levels of knowledge of steps along the AVF continuum; and (3) the life impacts of dialysis access were a significant factor in patients' experience of dialysis.

Limitations

Single-institution study; low number of non-Black participants limited comparison of patient experiences by race.

Conclusions

Among a group of predominantly Black HD patients, perspectives surrounding the AVF care continuum included consideration of the circumstances of dialysis initiation, patient knowledge, and the life impacts of dialysis access. These findings may inform targeted interventions aimed at optimizing dialysis access use and addressing disparities across the AVF continuum.

A Community-Based Participatory Framework to Co-Develop Patient Education Materials (PEMs) for Rare Diseases: A Model Transferable across Diseases

At least 50% of chronic disease patients don't follow their care plans, leading to lower health outcomes and higher medical costs. Providing Patient Education Materials (PEMs) to individuals living with a disease can help to overcome these problems. PEMs are especially beneficial for people suffering from multisystemic and underrecognized diseases, such as rare diseases. Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are ultra-rare diseases, where a need was identified for PEMs in plain language that can clearly explain complex information. Community involvement in the design of PEMs is extremely important for diseases whose needs are underserved, such as rare diseases; however, attempts to involve lay and professional stakeholders are lacking. This paper presents a community-based participatory framework to co-create PEMs for CDG, that is transferable to other diseases. A literature review and questionnaire were performed, and only four articles describing the development of PEMS for rare diseases have been found, which demonstrates a lack of standardized approaches. The framework and PEMs were co-developed with CDG families and will be crucial in increasing health literacy and empowering families. We will close a gap in the creation of PEMs for CDG by delivering these resources in lay language in several languages.

Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in Vascular Access Selection: A Qualitative Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Collaborative approaches to vascular access selection are being increasingly encouraged to elicit patients' preferences and priorities where no unequivocally superior choice exists. We explored how patients, their caregivers, and clinicians integrate principles of shared decision making when engaging in vascular access discussions.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative description.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, their caregivers, and clinicians from outpatient hemodialysis programs in Alberta, Canada.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

We used a thematic analysis approach to inductively code transcripts and generate themes to capture key concepts related to vascular access shared decision making across participant roles.

RESULTS

42 individuals (19 patients, 2 caregivers, 21 clinicians) participated in this study. Participants identified how access-related decisions follow a series of major decisions about kidney replacement therapy and care goals that influence vascular access preferences and choice. Vascular access shared decision making was strengthened through integration of vascular access selection with dialysis-related decisions and timely, tailored, and balanced exchange of information between patients and their care team. Participants described how opportunities to revisit the vascular access decision before and after dialysis initiation helped prepare patients for their access and encouraged ongoing alignment between patients' care priorities and treatment plans. Where shared decision making was undermined, hemodialysis via a catheter ensued as the most readily available vascular access option.

LIMITATIONS

Our study was limited to patients and clinicians from hemodialysis care settings and included few caregiver participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that earlier, or upstream, decisions about kidney replacement therapies influence how and when vascular access decisions are made. Repeated vascular access discussions that are integrated with other higher-level decisions are needed to promote vascular access shared decision making and preparedness.

New Frontiers in Vascular Access Practice: From Standardized to Patient-tailored Care and Shared Decision Making

Vascular access planning is critical in the management of patients with advanced kidney disease who elect for hemodialysis for RRT. Policies put in place more than two decades ago attempted to standardize vascular access care around the model of optimal, namely arteriovenous fistula, and least preferred, namely central venous catheter, type of access. This homogenized approach to vascular access care emerged ineffective in the increasingly heterogeneous and complex dialysis population. The most recent vascular access guidelines acknowledge the limitations of standardized care and encourage tailoring vascular access care on the basis of patient and disease characteristics. In this article, we discuss available literature in support of patient-tailored access care on the basis of differences in vascular access outcomes by biologic and social factors-age, sex, and race. Further, we draw attention to the overlooked dimension of patient-reported preferences and shared decision making in the practice of vascular access planning. We discuss milestones to overcome as requisite steps to implement effective shared decision making in vascular access care. Finally, we take into consideration local practice cofactors as major players in vascular access fate. We conclude that a personalized approach to hemodialysis vascular access will require dynamic care specifically relevant to the individual on the basis of biologic factors, fluctuating clinical needs, values, and preferences.