Automated Segmentation and Connectivity Analysis for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Analysis of Shunt Treatment in Presurgery and Postsurgery Computed Tomography Brain Scans of Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt procedures can improve idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) symptoms. However, there are no automated methods that quantify the presurgery and postsurgery changes in the ventricular volume for computed tomography scans. Hence, the main goal of this research was to quantify longitudinal changes in the ventricular volume and its correlation with clinical improvement in iNPH symptoms. Furthermore, our objective was to develop an end-to-end graphical interface where surgeons can directly drag-drop a brain scan for quantified analysis.

METHODS

A total of 15 patients with 47 longitudinal computed tomography scans were taken before and after shunt surgery. Postoperative scans were collected between 1 and 45 months. We use a UNet-based model to develop a fully automated metric. Center slices of the scan that are most representative (80%) of the ventricular volume of the brain are used. Clinical symptoms of gait, balance, cognition, and bladder continence are studied with respect to the proposed metric.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with iNPH demonstrate a decrease in ventricular volume (as shown by our metric) postsurgery and a concurrent clinical improvement in their iNPH symptomatology. The decrease in postoperative central ventricular volume varied between 6 cc and 33 cc (mean: 20, SD: 9) among patients who experienced improvements in gait, bladder continence, and cognition. Two patients who showed improvement in only one or two of these symptoms had <4 cc of cerebrospinal fluid drained. Our artificial intelligence-based metric and the graphical user interface facilitate this quantified analysis.

CONCLUSION

Proposed metric quantifies changes in ventricular volume before and after shunt surgery for patients with iNPH, serving as an automated and effective radiographic marker for a functioning shunt in a patient with iNPH.

Structural neuroimaging markers of normal pressure hydrocephalus versus Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease, and hydrocephalus versus atrophy in chronic TBI-a narrative review

Introduction

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) is a prominent type of reversible dementia that may be treated with shunt surgery, and it is crucial to differentiate it from irreversible degeneration caused by its symptomatic mimics like Alzheimer's Dementia (AD) and Parkinson's Disease (PD). Similarly, it is important to distinguish between (normal pressure) hydrocephalus and irreversible atrophy/degeneration which are among the chronic effects of Traumatic Brain Injury (cTBI), as the former may be reversed through shunt placement. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the structural imaging markers which may be foundational to the development of accurate, noninvasive, and accessible solutions to this problem.

Methods

By searching the PubMed database for keywords related to NPH, AD, PD, and cTBI, we reviewed studies that examined the (1) distinct neuroanatomical markers of degeneration in NPH versus AD and PD, and atrophy versus hydrocephalus in cTBI and (2) computational methods for their (semi-) automatic assessment on Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans.

Results

Structural markers of NPH and those that can distinguish it from AD have been well studied, but only a few studies have explored its structural distinction between PD. The structural implications of cTBI over time have been studied. But neuroanatomical markers that can predict shunt response in patients with either symptomatic idiopathic NPH or post-traumatic hydrocephalus have not been reliably established. MRI-based markers dominate this field of investigation as compared to CT, which is also reflected in the disproportionate number of MRI-based computational methods for their automatic assessment.

Conclusion

Along with an up-to-date literature review on the structural neurodegeneration due to NPH versus AD/PD, and hydrocephalus versus atrophy in cTBI, this article sheds light on the potential of structural imaging markers as (differential) diagnostic aids for the timely recognition of patients with reversible (normal pressure) hydrocephalus, and opportunities to develop computational tools for their objective assessment.

Semisupervised 3D segmentation of pancreatic tumors in positron emission tomography/computed tomography images using a mutual information minimization and cross-fusion strategy

Background

Accurate segmentation of pancreatic cancer tumors using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) multimodal images is crucial for clinical diagnosis and prognosis evaluation. However, deep learning methods for automated medical image segmentation require a substantial amount of manually labeled data, making it time-consuming and labor-intensive. Moreover, addition or simple stitching of multimodal images leads to redundant information, failing to fully exploit the complementary information of multimodal images. Therefore, we developed a semisupervised multimodal network that leverages limited labeled samples and introduces a cross-fusion and mutual information minimization (MIM) strategy for PET/CT 3D segmentation of pancreatic tumors.

Methods

Our approach combined a cross multimodal fusion (CMF) module with a cross-attention mechanism. The complementary multimodal features were fused to form a multifeature set to enhance the effectiveness of feature extraction while preserving specific features of each modal image. In addition, we designed an MIM module to mitigate redundant high-level modal information and compute the latent loss of PET and CT. Finally, our method employed the uncertainty-aware mean teacher semi-supervised framework to segment regions of interest from PET/CT images using a small amount of labeled data and a large amount of unlabeled data.

Results

We evaluated our combined MIM and CMF semisupervised segmentation network (MIM-CMFNet) on a private dataset of pancreatic cancer, yielding an average Dice coefficient of 73.14%, an average Jaccard index score of 60.56%, and an average 95% Hausdorff distance (95HD) of 6.30 mm. In addition, to verify the broad applicability of our method, we used a public dataset of head and neck cancer, yielding an average Dice coefficient of 68.71%, an average Jaccard index score of 57.72%, and an average 95HD of 7.88 mm.

Conclusions

The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our MIM-CMFNet over existing semisupervised techniques. Our approach can achieve a performance similar to that of fully supervised segmentation methods while significantly reducing the data annotation cost by 80%, suggesting it is highly practicable for clinical application.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Radiological Markers of Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) on Non-Contrast CT Scans of the Brain

Diagnosing normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) via non-contrast computed tomography (CT) brain scans is presently a formidable task due to the lack of universally agreed-upon standards for radiographic parameter measurement. A variety of radiological parameters, such as Evans' index, narrow sulci at high parietal convexity, Sylvian fissures' dilation, focally enlarged sulci, and more, are currently measured by radiologists. This study aimed to enhance NPH diagnosis by comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of radiological parameters, as evaluated by radiologists and AI methods, utilizing cerebrospinal fluid volumetry. Results revealed a sensitivity of 77.14% for radiologists and 99.05% for AI, with specificities of 98.21% and 57.14%, respectively, in diagnosing NPH. Radiologists demonstrated NPV, PPV, and an accuracy of 82.09%, 97.59%, and 88.02%, while AI reported 98.46%, 68.42%, and 77.42%, respectively. ROC curves exhibited an area under the curve of 0.954 for radiologists and 0.784 for AI, signifying the diagnostic index for NPH. In conclusion, although radiologists exhibited superior sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing NPH, AI served as an effective initial screening mechanism for potential NPH cases, potentially easing the radiologists' burden. Given the ongoing AI advancements, it is plausible that AI could eventually match or exceed radiologists' diagnostic prowess in identifying hydrocephalus.