The Effect of the CO2 Fractional Laser or Premarin Vaginal Cream on Improving Sexual Function in Menopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Physical energies for the management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: An overview of a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Energy-based devices (laser and radiofrequency) have been used to treat genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of physical energy use in managing GSM symptoms.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Five databases were searched from inception to December 2022. Language restrictions were not imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses that described postmenopausal women with symptoms of GSM treated with physical energy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis using frequentist methods to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Methodological and reporting quality were assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2).

MAIN RESULTS

Nine reviews were included in the overview, six of which were meta-analyses. Four randomized controlled trials, representing 218 participants and nine different study arms, met the criteria for inclusion in our component network meta-analysis. Confidence in review findings was low in six reviews and critically low in three. Our network meta-analysis results showed that premarin (SMD 2.60, 95% CI 7.76-3.43), conjugated estrogens (SMD 2.13, 95% CI 1.34-2.91), carbon dioxide laser (SMD 1.71, 95% CI 1.10-2.31), promestriene (SMD 1.41, 95% CI 0.59-2.24), and vaginal lubricant (SMD 1.37, 95% CI 0.54-2.20) were more effective than sham for reducing sexual dysfunction, with a consequent increase in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Two studies showed a high risk of bias, owing to a lack of blinding.

CONCLUSION

Several gaps in the use of physical energy for managing GSM still need to be addressed. The small number of blind clinical trials made the results fragile.

Vaginal dryness: a review of current understanding and management strategies

The issue of vaginal dryness in genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and its pervasive impact on women's quality of life is often overlooked. Extensive surveys conducted worldwide reveal limited understanding of vaginal dryness among public and health-care providers. Physician knowledge on menopause medicine varies globally, highlighting the need for standardized training. Effective communication between physicians and patients plays a crucial role in diagnosing and treating GSM symptoms. There are multiple treatment options to improve vaginal lubrication, including hormonal and non-hormonal therapies, along with lifestyle modifications. Tailoring treatments to individual patient preferences is crucial for compliance. Overall, GSM is multifaceted, from the prevalence of vaginal dryness to the nuances of treatment preferences. The urgency of widespread education and awareness of this matter must be underscored to meet the aim of enhancing the well-being and quality of life for women.

Nonestrogen Therapies for Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature and provide clinical practice guidelines regarding various nonestrogen therapies for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to July 2021. We included comparative and noncomparative studies. Interventions and comparators were limited to seven products that are commercially available and currently in use (vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA], ospemifene, laser or energy-based therapies, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, Tibolone, vaginal hyaluronic acid, testosterone). Topical estrogen, placebo, other nonestrogen products, as well as no treatment were considered as comparators.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We double-screened 9,131 abstracts and identified 136 studies that met our criteria. Studies were assessed for quality and strength of evidence by the systematic review group.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Information regarding the participants, details on the intervention and comparator and outcomes were extracted from the eligible studies. Alternative therapies were similar or superior to estrogen or placebo with minimal increase in adverse events. Dose response was noted with vaginal DHEA and testosterone. Vaginal DHEA, ospemifene, erbium and fractional carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) laser, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, tibolone, hyaluronic acid, and testosterone all improved subjective and objective signs of atrophy. Vaginal DHEA, ospemifene, tibolone, fractional CO 2 laser, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, and testosterone improved sexual function.

CONCLUSION

Most nonestrogen therapies are effective treatments for the various symptoms of GSM. There are insufficient data to compare nonestrogen options to each other.

Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

The perimenopausal and postmenopausal periods are associated with many symptoms, including sexual complaints. This review is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the effect of hormone therapy on sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

SEARCH METHODS

On 19 December 2022 we searched the Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, ISI Web of Science, two trials registries, and OpenGrey, together with reference checking and contact with experts in the field for any additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials that compared hormone therapy to either placebo or no intervention (control) using any validated assessment tool to evaluate sexual function. We considered hormone therapy: estrogen alone; estrogen in combination with progestogens; synthetic steroids, for example, tibolone; selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), for example, raloxifene, bazedoxifene; and SERMs in combination with estrogen.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We analyzed data using mean differences (MDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs). The primary outcome was the sexual function score. Secondary outcomes were the domains of sexual response: desire; arousal; lubrication; orgasm; satisfaction; and pain. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 36 studies (23,299 women; 12,225 intervention group; 11,074 control group), of which 35 evaluated postmenopausal women; only one study evaluated perimenopausal women. The 'symptomatic or early postmenopausal women' subgroup included 10 studies, which included women experiencing menopausal symptoms (symptoms such as hot flushes, night sweats, sleep disturbance, vaginal atrophy, and dyspareunia) or early postmenopausal women (within five years after menopause). The 'unselected postmenopausal women' subgroup included 26 studies, which included women regardless of menopausal symptoms and women whose last menstrual period was more than five years earlier. No study included only women with sexual dysfunction and only seven studies evaluated sexual function as a primary outcome. We deemed 20 studies at high risk of bias, two studies at low risk, and the other 14 studies at unclear risk of bias. Nineteen studies received commercial funding. Estrogen alone versus control probably slightly improves the sexual function composite score in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women (SMD 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.04 to 0.96; I² = 88%; 3 studies, 699 women; moderate-quality evidence), and probably makes little or no difference to the sexual function composite score in unselected postmenopausal women (SMD 0.64, 95% CI -0.12 to 1.41; I² = 94%; 6 studies, 608 women; moderate-quality evidence). The pooled result suggests that estrogen alone versus placebo or no intervention probably slightly improves sexual function composite score (SMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.04; I² = 92%; 9 studies, 1307 women, moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of estrogen combined with progestogens versus placebo or no intervention on the sexual function composite score in unselected postmenopausal women (MD 0.08 95% CI -1.52 to 1.68; 1 study, 104 women; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of synthetic steroids versus control on the sexual function composite score in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women (SMD 1.32, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.47; 1 study, 883 women; very low-quality evidence) and of their effect in unselected postmenopausal women (SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.85; 1 study, 105 women; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of SERMs versus control on the sexual function composite score in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women (MD -1.00, 95% CI -2.00 to -0.00; 1 study, 215 women; very low-quality evidence) and of their effect in unselected postmenopausal women (MD 2.24, 95% 1.37 to 3.11 2 studies, 1525 women, I² = 1%, low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of SERMs combined with estrogen versus control on the sexual function composite score in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women (SMD 0.22, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.43; 1 study, 542 women; very low-quality evidence) and of their effect in unselected postmenopausal women (SMD 2.79, 95% CI 2.41 to 3.18; 1 study, 272 women; very low-quality evidence). The observed heterogeneity in many analyses may be caused by variations in the interventions and doses used, and by different tools used for assessment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hormone therapy treatment with estrogen alone probably slightly improves the sexual function composite score in women with menopausal symptoms or in early postmenopause (within five years of amenorrhoea), and in unselected postmenopausal women, especially in the lubrication, pain, and satisfaction domains. We are uncertain whether estrogen combined with progestogens improves the sexual function composite score in unselected postmenopausal women. Evidence regarding other hormone therapies (synthetic steroids and SERMs) is of very low quality and we are uncertain of their effect on sexual function. The current evidence does not suggest the beneficial effects of synthetic steroids (for example tibolone) or SERMs alone or combined with estrogen on sexual function. More studies that evaluate the effect of estrogen combined with progestogens, synthetic steroids, SERMs, and SERMs combined with estrogen would improve the quality of the evidence for the effect of these treatments on sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Vaginal laser therapy for GSM/VVA: where we stand now - a review by the EUGA Working Group on Laser

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic progressive condition that involves the genital and lower urinary tracts, related to the decrease of serum estrogenic levels when menopause occurs. The definition of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a medically more accurate, all-encompassing and publicly acceptable term than VVA. Due to the chronic progressive trend of GSM, symptoms tend to reappear after the cessation of therapy, and frequently long-term treatment is required. First-line therapies include vulvar and vaginal lubricant or moisturizers, and, in the case of failure, low-dose vaginal estrogens are the preferred pharmacological therapy. Populations of patients, such as breast cancer (BC) survivors, are affected by iatrogenic GSM symptoms with concerns about the use of hormonal therapies. The non-ablative erbium:YAG laser and the fractional microablative CO2 vaginal laser are the two main lasers evaluated for GSM treatment. The aim of this comprehensive review is to report the efficacy and safety of Er:YAG and CO2 vaginal lasers for GSM treatment. Vaginal laser therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in restoring vaginal health, improving VVA symptoms and sexual function. The data suggest that both Er:YAG and CO2 vaginal lasers are safe energy-based therapeutic options for management of VVA and/or GSM symptoms in postmenopausal women and BC survivors.

The efficacy of CO2 laser in the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

CO₂ laser has been proposed as a treatment strategy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). In order to assess its efficacy for treating GSM, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. To identify the current state of randomized controlled trials on CO₂ laser therapy for GSM, a literature review was conducted. We systematically searched the following databases: PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. In addition, a review of the references in the retrieved studies was carried out. Of 562 identified studies, 9 were eligible and were included in our analysis, involving 523 patients in total. Based on our analysis, CO₂ laser has no statistical difference compared with estrogen in VHI (p = 0.87), FSFI total score (p = 0.19), FSFI-Arousal (p = 0.11), FSFI-Desire (p = 0.72), FSFI-Orgasm (p = 0.45) and FSFI-Satisfaction (p = 0.08). The meta-analysis also showed that CO₂ laser significantly improved FSFI-Lubrication scores compared with estrogen therapy (p = 0.0004). Furthermore, compared with the sham group, CO₂ laser group had statistically improved VHI scores (p = 0.003) and FSFI scores (p < 0.00001). CO₂ laser therapy may be an effective alternative to estrogen therapy for GSM both in cases where estrogen is not applicable because of comorbidities and in cases in which women do not desire to take estrogen.

Menopause hormone therapy and urinary symptoms: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Urogenital changes associated with menopause are now classified as genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), which includes symptoms of urgency, frequency, dysuria, and recurrent urinary tract infections for which the recommended treatment is estrogen. However, the association between menopause and urinary symptoms and the efficacy of hormone therapy for these symptoms is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to define the relationship between menopause and urinary symptoms including dysuria, urgency, frequency, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), and urge and stress incontinence by conducting a systematic review of the effects of hormone therapy (HT) for urinary symptoms in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Eligible studies included randomized control trials with perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with a primary or secondary outcome of the following urinary symptoms: dysuria, frequent UTI, urgency, frequency, and incontinence, included at least one treatment arm of estrogen therapy, and were in English. Animal trials, cancer studies and pharmacokinetic studies, secondary analyses, and conference abstracts were excluded. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until April 2022. Two authors reviewed each article with discrepancies resolved through whole group consensus. Data extracted included the following: publication date, country, setting, subject number, follow-up, duration, age, race/ethnicity, study design, inclusion criteria, and main findings.

FINDINGS

There is insufficient evidence to confirm that menopause is associated with urinary symptoms. The effect of HT on urinary symptoms depends on type. Systemic HT may cause urinary incontinence or worsen existing urinary symptoms. Vaginal estrogen improves dysuria, frequency, urge and stress incontinence, and recurrent UTI in menopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Vaginal estrogen improves urinary symptoms and decreases the risk of recurrent UTI in postmenopausal women.

Safety and efficacy of fractional CO2 laser treatment to the vestibule: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, prospective 3-site clinical study in women with vestibular pain

BACKGROUND

Data are limited regarding fractional CO2 laser as a nonhormonal treatment for vestibular pain.

AIM

We sought to perform what is, to our knowledge, the first multisite prospective randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of fractional CO2 laser treatment to the vestibule in women with vestibular pain.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 70) meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria at each of 3 sites were randomized 2:1 to active or sham (zero energy) fractional CO2 laser treatment using the vestibular probe (SmartXide2 V2LR - MonaLisa Touch, DEKA, Florence, Italy). Subjects in each treatment arm received 3 treatments 4 weeks apart. At the initial follow-up (week 12), subjects were unblinded and those initially assigned to sham started active treatment.

OUTCOMES

Outcome measures included changes from baseline in sexual activity diaries and scores for the Vulvoscopic Genital Tissue Appearance Scale (VGTA), vestibular cotton-tipped swab testing, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), and the O'Leary-Sant voiding and pain indices, the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) and Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI).

RESULTS

After active treatment, VGTA scores significantly improved in 5 parameters. Pain associated with cotton-tipped swab testing was significantly reduced at weeks 4 through 16 (mean change from baseline -0.64 [95% CI, -0.79 to -0.50] and -1.31 [95% CI, -1.46 to -1.16], respectively). FSFI pain domain scores improved significantly at weeks 12 and 16 (mean change from baseline 0.925 [95% CI, 0.10-1.75] and 1.22 [95% CI, 0.40-2.05], respectively). FSFI total scores increased significantly at weeks 12 and 16 (mean change from baseline 6.24 [95% CI, 2.64-9.85] and 4.96 [95% CI, 1.36-8.57], respectively). FSDS-R scores decreased significantly at weeks 12 and 16 (mean change from baseline -5.84 [95% CI, -8.80 to -2.87] and -9.15 [95% CI, -12.11 to -6.18], respectively). ICSI scores decreased significantly at weeks 12 and 16 (mean change from baseline -0.91 [95% CI, -1.65 to -0.18] and -0.754 [95% CI, -1.49 to -0.02], respectively). ICPI scores decreased significantly at week 16 (mean change from baseline -0.99 [95% CI, -1.63 to -0.34]). In contrast, there were no significant changes in outcomes in the sham arm. No serious adverse events occurred.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Fractional CO2 laser treatment in women with vestibular pain resulted in improvement from baseline in multiple key outcome measures of vestibular health.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths of the study were that it was a multisite prospective randomized double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial that included multiple measures related to vestibular pain and sexual function. Limitations were the nonvalidated primary outcome measure and limited study cohort.

CONCLUSION

Fractional CO2 laser therapy is a safe and effective nonhormonal treatment for vestibular pain.

Comparison of Severity of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause Symptoms After Carbon Dioxide Laser vs Vaginal Estrogen Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Vaginal estrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) should be used with caution in women with contraindications, highlighting the need for effective treatment alternatives.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the severity of GSM after vaginal laser vs estrogen therapy.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published from database inception to April 8, 2022, with no language restrictions. Reference lists were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the use of lasers with vaginal estrogen in adults were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two investigators independently extracted data from included studies. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs was used to assess risk of bias of each study. A random-effects model was used to pool mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were Vaginal Analog Scale (VAS; higher scores indicate severer symptoms), Vaginal Health Index (VHI; higher scores indicate better vaginal health), Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI; higher scores indicate higher estrogen effect on the vaginal epithelium), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI; higher scores indicate better female sexual function), and Sexual Quotient-Female (SQ-F; higher scores indicate better female sexual function) questionnaire scores. Urinary symptoms were assessed as an additional outcome. Data analyses were performed from April 9 to 12, 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 6 RCTs with 270 women with GSM were included (135 were randomized to laser therapy and 135 to estrogen therapy; mean age ranged from 54.6 to 61.0 years). No significant differences were found between carbon dioxide laser and vaginal estrogen from baseline to the end of follow-up in overall VAS scores (MD, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.67 to 0.36; I2, 33.31%), VHI (MD, 0.20; 95% CI, -0.56 to 0.97; I2, 83.25%), VMI (MD, -0.56; 95% CI, -1.14 to 0.02; I2, 35.07%), FSFI (MD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.36; I2, 41.60%), and SQ-F (P = .37 based on 1 study). Other questionnaire-based outcome measures demonstrated no difference between groups from baseline to the end of follow-up for changes in urinary symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs found that vaginal laser treatment is associated with similar improvement in genitourinary symptoms as vaginal estrogen therapy. Further research is needed to test whether vaginal laser therapy could be a potential treatment option for women with contraindications to vaginal estrogen.

Vaginal laser therapy for gynecologic conditions: re-examining the controversy and where do we go from here

Despite significant controversy, vaginal laser therapy continues to be used for treatment of many gynecologic and pelvic conditions including vaginal atrophy, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, urinary incontinence and pelvic pain. This commentary reviews the controversy surrounding vaginal laser therapy and summarizes the important distinction between ablative and non-ablative vaginal lasers. While much research is still needed, the article describes what is important for healthcare professionals to know before making the decision to integrate this technology into their clinical practice.

Vaginal laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause - systematic review

BACKGROUND

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) can have a great impact on the quality of life (QOL), and affects between 53.8% and 90% of postmenopausal women. The literature suggests that vaginal laser therapy could be an effective treatment for GSM symptoms, but its efficacy and safety have not been established and international societies do not endorse its use. Despite that, there has been an increase in the use of vaginal laser therapy globally over the last decade.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the literature which assesses the efficacy and safety of the vaginal laser therapy in the treatment of GSM.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted electronically using Embase and PubMed to retrieve studies assessing evidence for the efficacy and safety of vaginal laser therapy for GSM or vulvovaginal atrophy up to June 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 64 studies were finally included in the review. There were 10 controlled intervention studies, 7 observational cohort and cross-sectional studies and 47 before-after studies without a control group.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal laser seems to improve scores on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Vaginal Health Index (VHI) in GSM over the short term. Safety outcomes are underreported and short-term. Further well-designed clinical trials with sham-laser control groups and evaluating objective variables are needed to provide the best evidence on efficacy.

Energy-Based Devices for Functional Vaginal Problems: Issues and Answers

Abstract

Vaginal rejuvenation is a marketing term that encompasses surgical and medical treatments for functional vaginal/vulvar problems including but not limited to genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), sexual dysfunction, vaginal laxity, and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and for esthetic concerns including dissatisfaction with vulvovaginal appearance. Multiple treatment options have become available for indications of functional vaginal problems. Noninvasive management options including the use of more novel treatments such as energy-based devices have gained interest. Previously, studies regarding the efficacy and safety of the energy-based devices for functional vaginal problems were mostly limited to cohort studies without sham treatment, control groups, randomization, or double blinding. As a result of this insufficient data in 2018, the FDA released a statement of warning against the use of energy-based devices in the treatment of functional vaginal problems or vaginal cosmetic procedures (Https://Www.Fda.Gov/Medical-Devices/Safety-Communications/Fda-Warns-Against-Use-Energy-Based-Devices-Perform-Vaginal-Rejuvenation-or-Vaginal-Cosmetic. 1–4, 2018).

Purpose of Review

This article reviews the most current treatment modalities in the realm of vaginal rejuvenation therapy with an emphasis on the efficacy and safety of the energy-based devices.

Recent Findings

In the most recent literature, there have been studies with improvements in study design that support the efficacy and the short-term safety of the energy-based devices.

Summary

More recent studies with improved study design evidence that the use of energy-based devices results in improvements in functional vaginal problems and that serious adverse events appear to be rare. The availability of these devices as treatment options for functional vaginal problems has the potential to impact patient by improving their symptoms and quality of life. Caution still remains however regarding their safety following a longer period of time after their use.