Comparing the Success Rate and Side Effects of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation to Treat Varicose Veins in the Lower Limbs: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation vs laser ablation in patients with lower extremity varicose veins: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA) have been commonly used for treating lower extremity varicose veins (LEVVs). Their therapeutic effects have been widely recognized compared with conventional surgery. However, there have been some controversies regarding the choice between RFA and LA. The objective of our study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the early and long-term outcomes of RFA and LA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant literature on endovenous thermal ablation for primary LEVV up until June 2023. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies involving RFA and LA for LEVV treatment were included. The primary endpoints were the occlusion rate of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and occurrence of venous thrombotic events. Secondary outcomes included nerve injury, hyperpigmentation, burns, recurrence of VVs, postoperative pain, and phlebitis. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 16 randomized controlled trials and 13 cohort studies. At 1 month, the occlusion rates of GSV were 98.35% for RFA and 98.04% for LA, whereas at 1 year, the rates were 93.13% for RFA and 94.18% for LA. Subgroup analyses revealed that RFA had higher GSV occlusion rates at 1 year since 2016 (93.27% vs 91.24%; odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.83; P = .05). The incidence of postoperative venous thrombotic events was 0.78% for RFA and 0.87% for LA at 1 month (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.77-2.74; P = .24). RFA showed a reduced risk of burns and ecchymosis (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87; P = .005), postprocedural pain (mean difference, -0.85; 95% CI, -1.06 to -0.64; P < .001), recurrence of VVs (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; P = .02), and paresthesia since 2016 (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.91; P = .03), but an increased risk of skin pigmentation (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.06-2.9; P = .03) compared with LA therapy. The rate of phlebitis was similar between RFA and LA (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.33-2.27; P = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

RFA and LA demonstrated similar efficacy in terms of early and long-term occlusion rates of GSV and the incidence of thrombotic and phlebitis complications. However, since 2016, RFA has shown higher GSV occlusion rates compared with LA. Furthermore, RFA was associated with fewer complications such as paresthesia, burns and ecchymosis, and recurrence of VVs when compared with LA.

Safety and efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation for treatment of varicose veins of the lower limbs in China: A prospective registered clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of a new Chinese device using microwave ablation for treating symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) varicose veins (VVs).

METHODS

This prospective, single-arm, single-center, cohort study investigated the safety and efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation for the treatment of symptomatic VVs. A total of 50 patients with lower limb varicose veins were enrolled from the Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. The primary outcome was the occlusion rate of GSV immediately and at 1, 6, and 12 months after the treatment. The secondary outcomes included the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), the chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire 14 items (CIVIQ-14) score, the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) score, and the pain visual analog scale (VAS) score. This study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04645771).

RESULTS

In total, 50 limbs from 50 patients (26 female; mean age: 53.45 ± 9.78 years) were treated. A technical success rate of 100% was achieved and no serious adverse events were recorded. During the follow-up period, the occlusion rate of the major/minor saphenous vein trunk remained 100% at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery except one patient fell off. The median 24-h VAS value was 2 (2,3). The VCSS score, CIVIQ-14 score, and AVVQ score (p < .05) at 1, 6, and 12 months improved significantly compared with the value preoperative (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

EMA was safe and effective for treating varicose veins in the lower limbs, with a high rate of venous trunk occlusion and few complications, thus improving patients' postoperative quality of life.

Appropriateness of care in superficial venous disease

Chronic superficial venous disease, including superficial venous insufficiency, superficial venous thrombosis, and aneurysms, are prevalent conditions that affect millions of individuals worldwide. With chronic venous insufficiency specifically, the advent of office-based minimally invasive procedures in recent decades has significantly expanded access to outpatient treatment. However, as venous insufficiency is rarely life- or limb-threatening, the clinical diagnosis, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment indications should be considered carefully when recommending elective intervention. Appropriateness of care guidelines intend to aid providers and patients in the decision-making process, based on the available evidence in the scientific literature, to select the best care for the patient when treating their superficial venous disease.

Radiofrequency venous ablation for symptomatic relief in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: a case series

Background

Hypovolemic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is thought to be caused by dysregulated circulating blood volume. Management is mainly limited to symptom-targeted lifestyle changes. Radiofrequency venous ablation (RFA) represents a minimally invasive method of increasing circulating blood volume. The following case series describes a novel application of RFA to successfully target POTS symptoms in patients demonstrating venous insufficiency. The use of RFA in alleviating POTS symptoms has not previously been reported.

Case summary

We describe four patients with either a well-established historical POTS diagnosis or dysautonomia symptoms refractory to both medical management and lifestyle modifications. They all demonstrated venous reflux on lower extremity venous ultrasound testing. Upon vascular surgery referral, all underwent great and small saphenous vein RFA. They each subsequently reported subjective improvement in their dysautonomia symptoms and quality-of-life. Two with symptom recurrence years later were found to have new-onset pelvic venous congestion and are being evaluated for pelvic venous insufficiency interventions.

Discussion

Lower extremity venous pooling can exacerbate dysautonomia symptoms in POTS patients. Patients refractory to conventional treatment strategies should undergo venous insufficiency workup, and if positive, should be referred for venous pooling intervention evaluation. The success of RFA at treating refractory POTS symptoms in these four patients with lower extremity venous reflux, including no surgical intervention and no adverse effects, are compelling grounds to further explore this therapy and to quantify and standardize symptom improvement assessment in a larger patient population. Future directions include a demonstration of quality-of-life improvement in randomized clinical trials.

PREVAIT after modern open surgery and endothermal ablation: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Presence of varices after operative treatment (PREVAIT) is a common finding after varicose vein surgery, and has been shown to significantly reduce the quality of life of those it affects. As such, long-term results after varicose vein interventions have to be taken into account when choosing a technique. This study aims to systematically review current evidence on the recurrence of varicose veins after three different techniques: conventional surgery (HLS), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was performed on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which returned 546 studies. Fourteen studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 2795 patients were included, for a total of 3056 legs treated. 503 legs (16.5%) were treated by HLS, 1791 (58.6%) by EVLA and 762 (25.0%) by RFA. PREVAIT was reported in 34.4% for patients treated by HLS, for a mean follow-up comprised between 18 months and 5 years; 16.6% by EVLA, for a mean follow-up between 112 days and 5 years and 6.7% of those treated by RFA, for a mean follow-up between 106 days and 5 years. Regarding patterns of recurrence, the development of new varicose veins was the most commonly reported mechanism of recurrence after HLS (range: 29.8-91%) and EVLA (range: 40-81.6%), but not RFA, where recanalization of the occluded saphenous trunk accounted for up to 67.0% of the cases. Only one study reported quality of life related recurrence, and included patients treated by HLS and EVLA, but not RFA. Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score, physical functioning domains of the SF-36 score and patient satisfaction were significantly worse in patients with clinical recurrence. Re-intervention rates after recurrence were reported in 5 studies, ranging between 7.7% and 37.7% for HLS and 0-57.0% for EVLA. Only one study reported data on re-intervention for RFA patients, which was 6.67%.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence is a reliable indicator of long-term efficacy of a varicose vein treatment and appears to occur more frequently after HLS. Although there are several mechanisms of recurrence, the development of new varicose veins was the most commonly observed. There is clear heterogeneity among definitions of recurrence and follow-up periods in literature.

Strategies and challenges in treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency

Patients with varicose veins can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches based on the clinical conditions and patient preferences. In the recent decade, the recommendations for managing symptomatic varicose veins have changed dramatically due to the rise of minimally invasive endovascular techniques. The literature was systematically searched on Medline without language restrictions. All papers on the treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency with different procedures were included and reviewed. Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) both are same safe and effective in terms of occlusion rate, and time to return to normal activity. In comparison with RFA or EVLT, Cure conservatrice et Hemodynamique de l'Insufficience Veineuse en Ambulatoire (CHIVA) may cause more bruising and make little or no difference to rates of limb infection, superficial vein thrombosis, nerve injury, or hematoma. In terms of recurrence of varicose veins, there is little or no difference between CHIVA and stripping, RFA, or EVLT. Great saphenous vein recanalization is highest in the ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (FS) group (51%) during 1 year of follow-up. The 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines recommend surgery as a third-line therapeutic option after EVLA or RFA and sclerotherapy. Although the mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) is a non-thermal, non-tumescent option and appears to be of similar efficacy to stab avulsion with no potential risk of nerve damage, the overall success rate of MOCA is lower than those of other procedures such as EVLA, RFA, or high ligation and stripping. EVLA is the most cost-effective therapeutic option, with RFA being a close second for the treatment of patients with varicose veins. Endovenous thermal ablation (EVLA or RFA) is recommended as a first-line treatment for varicose veins and has substituted the high ligation of saphenofemoral junctional reflux and stripping of varicose veins. Ultrasound-guided FS is associated with a high recurrence rate and can be used in conjunction with other procedures. MOCA and cyanoacrylate embolization appear promising, but evidence of their effectiveness is required.