The Case for Interprofessional Teaching in Graduate Medical Education

Who Is Teaching Residents in the Intensive Care Unit? Perceptions of Interprofessional Teaching at an Academic Medical Center

Background

Teamwork is essential for high-quality care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Interprofessional education has been widely endorsed as a way of promoting collaborative practice. Interprofessional providers (IPPs), including nurses, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists (RTs), routinely participate in multidisciplinary rounds in the ICU, but their role in teaching residents at academic medical centers has yet to be characterized.

Objective

To characterize perceptions of interprofessional teaching during and outside of rounds in the ICU.

Methods

The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of critical care physicians, internal medicine residents, nurses, pharmacists, and RTs across three ICUs at a tertiary academic medical center from September 2019 to March 2020. The frequency of different types of rounds contributions was rated on a Likert scale. Means and medians were compared across groups.

Results

A total of 221 of 285 participants completed the survey (78% response rate). All IPPs described that they report data, provide clinical observations, and make recommendations frequently during ICU rounds, but teaching occurred infrequently (mean values, nurses = 2.9; pharmacists = 3.5; RTs = 3.7; 1 = not at all; 5 = always). Nurses were least likely to report teaching (P = 0.0017). From residents' and attendings' perspectives, pharmacists taught most frequently (mean values, 3.7 and 3.4, respectively). RTs self-report of teaching was higher than physicians' reports of RT teaching (P < 0.0001). Outside of rounds, residents reported a low frequency of teaching by nurses and RTs (means, nurses = 3.1; RTs = 3.1), but they reported a high rate of teaching by pharmacists (mean, 4.4).

Conclusion

Nonphysician IPPs routinely participate in ICU rounds but teach medical trainees infrequently. Physicians' perception of IPP teaching frequency was generally lower than self-reports by IPPs. Exploring modifiers of interprofessional teaching may enhance education and collaboration.

"A Lot to Offer": Nurses as Educators for Medical Residents in an Academic Medical Center Intensive Care Unit

INTRODUCTION

The role of fully trained interprofessional clinicians in educating residents has not been rigorously explored. The intensive care unit (ICU), where multiprofessional teamwork is essential to patient care, represents an ideal training environment in which to study this role. This study aimed to describe the practices, perceptions, and attitudes of ICU nurses regarding teaching medical residents and to identify potential targets to facilitate nurse teaching.

METHODS

Using a concurrent mixed-methods approach, we administered surveys and focus groups to ICU nurses from September to November 2019 at a single, urban, tertiary, academic medical center. Survey data were analyzed with descriptive and comparative statistics. Focus group data were analyzed using the Framework method of content analysis.

RESULTS

Of nurses surveyed, 75 of 96 (78%) responded. Nurses generally held positive attitudes about teaching residents, describing it as both important (52%, 36/69) and enjoyable (64%, 44/69). Nurses reported confidence in both clinical knowledge base (80%, 55/69) and teaching skills (71%, 49/69), but identified time, uncertainty about teaching topics, and trainee receptiveness as potential barriers. Ten nurses participated in focus groups. Qualitative analysis revealed three major themes: nurse-specific factors that impact teaching, the teaching environment, and facilitators of teaching.

DISCUSSION

ICU nurses carry positive attitudes about teaching residents, particularly when facilitated by the attending, but this enthusiasm can be attenuated by the learning environment, unknown learner needs, and trainee attitudes. Identified facilitators of nurse teaching, including resident presence at the bedside and structured opportunities for teaching, represent potential targets for interventions to promote interprofessional teaching.

Creation of an International Interprofessional Simulation-enhanced Mechanical Ventilation Course

Background

Evidence shows poor adherence to strategies for reducing morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving mechanical ventilation globally. Best practice management relies on training all members of the interprofessional ICU team, each with complementary roles in patient management.

Objectives

To develop and evaluate a novel two-phase, train-the-trainer, interprofessional and multicultural “Best Practice Management of the Ventilated ICU Patient” multimodality, simulation-enhanced curriculum for Thai education leaders in critical care.

Methods

In phase 1 (Oregon Health and Science University cohort), two groups of nine ICU nurses and one critical care physician representing experts in critical care and education from a large hospital system in Thailand participated in a weeklong, immersive course consisting of didactic, simulation, and in situ immersive sessions focused on best practice management of mechanically ventilated ICU patients, as well as training in our educational techniques. Outcomes were assessed with pre- and postcourse knowledge assessments and overall course evaluation. In phase 2 (Thai cohort), participants from phase 1 returned to Thailand and implemented a lower fidelity curriculum in two hospitals, using the same pre- and posttest knowledge assessment in 41 participants, before the onset of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) 6 pandemic.

Results

In the Oregon Health and Science University cohort, the mean pretest knowledge score was 58.4 ± 13.2%, with a mean improvement to 82.5 ± 11.6% after completion of the course (P , 0.05). The greatest improvements were seen in respiratory physiology and advanced/disease-specific concepts, which demonstrated absolute improvements of 30.4% and 30.6%, respectively (P < 0.05). Participants had a high degree of satisfaction, with 90% rating the course as “excellent” and .90% reporting that the course “greatly improved” their understanding of best practices and comfort in managing mechanical ventilation. The Thai cohort had a mean baseline score of 45.4 ± 15.0% and a mean improvement to 70.3 ± 19.1% after training (P < 0.05). This cohort also saw the greatest improvement in respiratory physiology and advanced/disease-specific concepts, with 26.2% and 26.3% absolute improvements, respectively (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

A novel, two-phase, interprofessional, multicultural, simulation-enhanced train-the-trainer curriculum was feasible and effective in improving education in best practice management of mechanically ventilated patients and may be a useful model for improving the care of ICU patients across the world.