Surgical strategies for treatment of clinical T4 esophageal cancer in Japan

Survival Outcomes of Patients with Esophageal Cancer and Post-chemoradiotherapy Surgical T4b Disease: Is Palliative Resection Justified?

BACKGROUND

In patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who had undergone chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the limitations of radiological evaluation may necessitate surgical exploration to ascertain disease resectability. Upon intraoperative confirmation of T4b disease (sT4b), the optimal management strategy remains unclear. While some surgeons may opt against resection, others advocate for palliative esophagectomy (PE). Regrettably, the current literature does not provide a consensus on the most effective approach for managing these intricate cases.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 68 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who presented with sT4b disease following CRT. The perioperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients who underwent PE (n = 56) and those who received an open-close (OC) procedure (n = 12).

RESULTS

Patients who underwent an OC procedure experienced a shorter hospital stay (16.5 vs. 28.8 days; p = 0.052) and showed a non-significant reduction in the rate of major complications (33.9% vs. 25%; p = 0.549) and in-hospital mortality (0% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.412) than those who received PE; however, PE was associated with a superior 2-year OS rate than OC (9.6% vs. 0%; p = 0.009). In multivariable analysis, a pretreatment clinical stage of II/III (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.87; p = 0.013) and PE with retrosternal reconstruction (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.49; p = 0.010) were independently associated with a more favorable OS.

CONCLUSION

PE with retrosternal reconstruction may be a feasible approach for patients with ESCC exhibiting sT4b disease after CRT.

Pectoralis Major Muscle Flap Utilization in Salvage Esophagectomy Including Great Vessel Resection Reconstructed by Prosthetic Grafts

BACKGROUND

Salvage surgery is a therapeutic option for recurrent or residual esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy. This report aimed to describe the procedure of reconstruction after salvage esophagectomy involving great vessel resection using prosthetic grafts, a pectoralis major muscle (PM) flap, and free jejunal transfer, if required. To the best of our knowledge, no previous report has described the reconstruction of the defect after combined esophageal and great vessel resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2022, 4 patients underwent salvage esophagectomy with excision of the great vessels and reconstruction with prosthetic grafts, as well as a PM flap placement in a single center. We retrospectively investigated the patients' clinical data. The patients were all men, with a median age of 70 (range, 67-77) years. Regarding neoadjuvant therapy, 2 patients received chemoradiation therapy, 1 patient received radiotherapy only due to drug-induced pneumonia, and 1 patient received chemotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Alimentary tract reconstruction was performed by free jejunal transfer in 2 cases, direct suture in 1 case, and stomach roll in 1 case. In all cases, a vascular bypass was established before tumor resection. We created mediastinal tracheostoma in 2 cases. A PM flap was inserted to cover the prosthetic grafts and approximate the tracheal mucosa. With regard to major complications, leakage from the jejunal esophageal anastomotic site was observed in 2 cases. The leakage improved with conservative treatment without graft removal or replacement in both cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of locally recurrent or residual tumors after definitive chemoradiation therapy, salvage esophagectomy along with great vessel resection, followed by reconstruction using prosthetic grafts, PM flaps, and free jejunal transfer, if necessary, is a useful option.

The prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index in surgical esophageal cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis

Purpose

To identify the prognostic role of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in esophageal cancer patients receiving operation.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WanFang and CNKI electronic databases were searched up to February 17, 2022 for relevant studies. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to assess the association between SII and prognosis in surgical esophageal cancer patients. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). All statistical analyses were conducted by STATA 15.0 software.

Results

A total of nine retrospective studies involving 3,565 participates were included. The pooled results indicated that high SII was significantly related with poor OS (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23–2.02, P < 0.001). However, subgroup analysis based on pathological type demonstrated that high SII was an independent predictor for poor OS only in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients (HR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.34–2.21, P < 0.001). Besides, SII was also significantly associated with poor PFS (HR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.61–2.35, P < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04–1.99, P = 0.027) in ESCC patients.

Conclusion

The SII could serve as an independent prognostic factor in surgical ESCC patients and higher SII was related with worse survival. However, more prospective high-quality studies are still needed to verify above findings.