Intra-breath oscillometry for the evaluation of lung function in children and adolescents with a history of preterm birth

Impaired lung function and associated risk factors in children born prematurely: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immature lung development and respiratory morbidity place preterm-born children at high risk of long-term pulmonary sequelae. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to quantify lung function in preterm-born children and identify risk factors for a compromised lung function.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for relevant studies published on preterm cohorts born since 1990. Studies comparing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in preterm-born children aged ≥5 years to term-born controls or normative data were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Standardised mean differences in FEV1 and secondary spirometry outcomes per study were pooled using meta-analysis. The impact of different demographic and neonatal variables on studies' FEV1 effect sizes was investigated by meta-regression analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.

RESULTS

We identified 42 studies with unique cohorts including 4743 preterm children and 9843 controls. Median gestational age in the studies was 28.0 weeks and age at assessment ranged from 6.7 to 16.7 years. Preterm children had lower FEV1 than controls (-0.58 sd, 95% CI -0.69- -0.47 sd, p<0.001) resulting in a relative risk of 2.9 (95% CI 2.4-3.4) for abnormal outcome, with high certainty of evidence. FEV1 was significantly associated with gestational age, birthweight, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and invasive mechanical ventilation in univariate meta-regression analyses (R2=36-96%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows robust evidence of impaired lung function in preterm-born children with a high certainty of evidence.

Reactance inversion in moderate to severe persistent asthma: low birth weight, prematurity effect, and bronchodilator response

INTRODUCTION

Reactance inversion (RI) has been associated with impaired peripheral airway function in persistent asthma. However, there is little to no data about the difference between asthmatic children with and without RI. This study aimed to detect clinical and lung function differences in moderate-severe asthmatic children with and without RI.

METHODS

This study was conducted between 2021 and 2022 in asthmatic school-age children. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) and spirometry were performed according to ATS/ERS standards.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients, with a mean age of 8.4 years, 54.8% were males and were divided into three groups: group 1 (32.3%) with no RI, group 2 (27.4%) with RI but disappearing after bronchodilator test and group 3 (40.3%) with persistent RI after bronchodilator test. Children in groups 2 and 3 had significantly lower birth weights than in group 1. Group 2 had lower gestational age compared to group 1. FEV1 and FEF25-75 of forced vital capacity were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3. In group 3, R5, AX, R5-20, and R5-R20/R5 ratios were significantly higher. Bronchodilator responses (BDR) in X5c, AX, and R5-R20 were significantly different between groups and lower in group 3.

CONCLUSION

RI is frequently found in children with moderate-severe persistent asthma, particularly in those with a history of prematurity or low birth weight. In some patients, RI disappears after the bronchodilator test; however, it, persists in those with the worst pulmonary function. RI could be a small airway dysfunction marker.

Understanding the fundamentals of oscillometry from a strip of lung tissue

Metrics used in spirometry caught on in respiratory medicine not only because they provide information of clinical importance but also because of a keen understanding of what is being measured. The forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), for example, is the maximal volume of air that can be expelled during the first second of a forced expiratory maneuver starting from a lung inflated to total lung capacity (TLC). Although it represents a very gross measurement of lung function, it is now used to guide the diagnosis and management of many lung disorders. Metrics used in oscillometry are not as concrete. Resistance, for example, has several connotations and its proper meaning in the context of a lung probed by an external device is not always intuitive. I think that the popularization of oscillometry and its firm implementation in respiratory guidelines starts with a keen understanding of what exactly is being measured. This review is an attempt to clearly explain the basic metrics of oscillometry. In my opinion, the fundamentals of oscillometry can be understood using a simple example of an excised strip of lung tissue subjected to a sinusoidal strain. The key notion is to divide the sinusoidal reacting force from the tissue strip into two sinusoids, one in phase with the strain and one preceding the strain by exactly a quarter of a cycle. Similar notions can then be applied to a whole lung subjected to a sinusoidal flow imposed at the mouth by an external device to understand basic metrics of oscillometry, including resistance, elastance, impedance, inertance, reactance and resonant frequency.

Pseudorandom Noise Forced Oscillation Technique to Assess Lung Function in Prematurely Born Children

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is a non-volitional assessment that is used during tidal breathing. A variant of FOT uses a pseudorandom noise (PRN) signal which we postulated might have utility in assessing lung function in prematurely born children. We, therefore, undertook a systematic review to evaluate the evidence regarding PRN FOT. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted by using the following databases: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL. Observational studies, case series/reports and randomized-controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Article abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by discussion or a third reviewer if necessary. Five studies were included (n = 587 preterm children). Three compared PRN FOT with spirometry, and two compare it to the interrupter technique. Most studies failed to report comprehensive methodology of the frequency spectra used to generate the PRN signal. There was evidence that poorer lung function, as assessed by PRN FOT, was associated with a greater burden of respiratory symptoms, but there was insufficient evidence to determine whether PRN FOT performed better than other lung-function tests. Detailed methodological documentation, in accordance with ERS guidance, is needed to assess the benefits of PRN FOT prior to routine clinical incorporation to assess prematurely born children.