Comparison of the Outcomes between Coronary No-Reflow and Slow-Flow Phenomenon in Non-STEMI Patients

Prognostic implication of coronary slow flow assessed by cTFC in patients with myocardial infarction with Non-obstructive coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Coronary slow flow (CSF) is common and linked to worse cardiovascular events and life-threatening arrhythmias. However, the clinical implication of CSF among myocardial infarction with the non-obstructive coronary artery (MINOCA) has never been studied. We aimed to evaluate the impact of CSF on the MINOCA population.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with MINOCA were consecutively selected. The corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) was used to evaluate the coronary flow. CSF was defined as cTFC greater than 27 frames per second (FPS) in any of the three coronary arteries. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are the primary endpoint. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between CSF and MACE.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients with MINOCA were enrolled, of which 54 (34.2%) patients had CSF. Forty incidents of MACE occurred during the median 28 months of follow-up. The MACE incidence was higher among patients who presented with CSF than the normal coronary flow patients (35.2% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.040). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, CSF patients had significantly higher rates of MACE (log-rank P = 0.034). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CSF was an independent predictor linked to an increased hazard of MACE (adjusted HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.34-5.67; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The presence of CSF is associated with a higher risk of adverse events and is an independent predictor of clinical outcomes among patients with MINOCA. This result suggests that CSF might serve as a robust tool to stratify MINOCA patients.