1
|
Wen W, Ye Q, Zhang LX, Ma LK. A risk predictive model for determining the severity of coronary artery lesions in older postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE 2024; 14:106-115. [PMID: 38764551 PMCID: PMC11101962 DOI: 10.62347/twby9801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the risk factors affecting the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in older postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease (CHD) and to construct a personalized risk predictive model. METHODS In this cohort study, clinical records of 527 female patients aged ≥60 with CHD who were hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China from March 2018 to February 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The severity of CAD was determined using the Gensini scores that are based on coronary angiography findings. Patients with Gensini scores ≥40 and <40 were divided into high-risk (n=277) and non-high-risk groups (n=250), respectively. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of CAD severity. The nomogram prediction model of CAD severity was plotted by the R software. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves were used to evaluate the predictive efficiency of the nomogram model, and the decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical applicability of the nomogram model. RESULTS Multivariate analysis showed that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, RBC count, WBC count, BMI, and diabetes mellitus were independent risk factors associated with CAD severity in older menopausal women (P<0.05); the area under the ROC curve of the nomogram constructed based on the independent risk factors was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.756-0.937). The area under the ROC curve after internal validation of the nomogram by the Bootstrap method after resampling 1000 times was 0.840 (95% CI: 0.741-0.923). The calibration curve suggested that the nomogram had an excellent predictive agreement, and the DCA curve indicated that the net benefit of applying the nomogram was significantly higher than that of the "no intervention" and "all intervention" methods when the risk probability of patients with high-risk CAD severity was 0.30-0.81. CONCLUSION A personalized risk assessment model was constructed based on the risk factors of severe CAD in older menopausal women with CHD, which had good prediction efficiency based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability evaluation indicators. This model could assist cardiology medical staff in screening older menopausal women with CHD who are at a high risk of severe CAD to implement targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wen
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei 230001, Anhui, China
| | - Qing Ye
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei 230001, Anhui, China
| | - Li-Xiang Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei 230001, Anhui, China
| | - Li-Kun Ma
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China Hefei 230001, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dawson LP, Rashid M, Dinh DT, Brennan A, Bloom JE, Biswas S, Lefkovits J, Shaw JA, Chan W, Clark DJ, Oqueli E, Hiew C, Freeman M, Taylor AJ, Reid CM, Ajani AE, Kaye DM, Mamas MA, Stub D. No-Reflow Prediction in Acute Coronary Syndrome During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The NORPACS Risk Score. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 17:e013738. [PMID: 38487882 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suboptimal coronary reperfusion (no reflow) is common in acute coronary syndrome percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to develop and externally validate a clinical risk score for angiographic no reflow for use following angiography and before PCI. METHODS We developed and externally validated a logistic regression model for prediction of no reflow among adult patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndrome using data from the Melbourne Interventional Group PCI registry (2005-2020; development cohort) and the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society PCI registry (2006-2020; external validation cohort). RESULTS A total of 30 561 patients (mean age, 64.1 years; 24% women) were included in the Melbourne Interventional Group development cohort and 440 256 patients (mean age, 64.9 years; 27% women) in the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society external validation cohort. The primary outcome (no reflow) occurred in 4.1% (1249 patients) and 9.4% (41 222 patients) of the development and validation cohorts, respectively. From 33 candidate predictor variables, 6 final variables were selected by an adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model for inclusion (cardiogenic shock, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with symptom onset >195 minutes pre-PCI, estimated stent length ≥20 mm, vessel diameter <2.5 mm, pre-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow <3, and lesion location). Model discrimination was very good (development C statistic, 0.808; validation C statistic, 0.741) with excellent calibration. Patients with a score of ≥8 points had a 22% and 27% risk of no reflow in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The no-reflow prediction in acute coronary syndrome risk score is a simple count-based scoring system based on 6 parameters available before PCI to predict the risk of no reflow. This score could be useful in guiding preventative treatment and future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke P Dawson
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., A.J.T., D.M.K., D.S.)
- The Baker Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., D.M.K., D.S.)
| | - Muhammad Rashid
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Stroke on Trent, United Kingdom (M.R., A.E.A., M.A.M.)
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, University of Leicester, United Kingdom (M.R., A.E.A.)
- University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service (NHS) Trust, United Kingdom (M.R., A.E.A.)
| | - Diem T Dinh
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
| | - Angela Brennan
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
| | - Jason E Bloom
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., A.J.T., D.M.K., D.S.)
- The Baker Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., D.M.K., D.S.)
| | - Sinjini Biswas
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
| | - Jeffrey Lefkovits
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia (J.L.)
| | - James A Shaw
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., A.J.T., D.M.K., D.S.)
- The Baker Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., D.M.K., D.S.)
| | - William Chan
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne University, Victoria, Australia (W.C.)
| | - David J Clark
- Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (D.J.C.)
| | - Ernesto Oqueli
- Department of Cardiology, Grampians Health Ballarat, Victoria, Australia (E.O.)
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia (E.O.)
| | - Chin Hiew
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Geelong, Victoria, Australia (C.H.)
| | - Melanie Freeman
- Department of Cardiology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (M.F.)
| | - Andrew J Taylor
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., A.J.T., D.M.K., D.S.)
| | - Christopher M Reid
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
- Centre of Clinical Research and Education, School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (C.M.R.)
| | - Andrew E Ajani
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Stroke on Trent, United Kingdom (M.R., A.E.A., M.A.M.)
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, University of Leicester, United Kingdom (M.R., A.E.A.)
- University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service (NHS) Trust, United Kingdom (M.R., A.E.A.)
| | - David M Kaye
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., A.J.T., D.M.K., D.S.)
- The Baker Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., D.M.K., D.S.)
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Stroke on Trent, United Kingdom (M.R., A.E.A., M.A.M.)
| | - Dion Stub
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., D.T.D., A.B., S.B., J.L., W.C., C.M.R., A.E.A., D.S.)
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., A.J.T., D.M.K., D.S.)
- The Baker Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (L.P.D., J.E.B., J.A.S., D.M.K., D.S.)
| |
Collapse
|