Brazilian Position Statement on Resistant Hypertension - 2020

Blood Pressure Control and Clinical Outcomes After Renal Denervation Through Irrigated Catheter Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension: A Case Series with Up to 10 Years of Follow-Up

INTRODUCTION

The long-term efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has not been extensively documented.

AIM

To describe the long-term follow-up of patients after RDN.

METHODS

We evaluated patients with resistant hypertension (RH) who underwent RDN with irrigated catheter from 2012 to 2014 at a single centre. Office blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory BP were assessed. Clinical event (stroke, myocardial infarction, need for dialysis, or death from any cause), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The analysis included 20 individuals (age 51 ± 10 years, 75% female, ambulatory systolic BP [SBP] 168 ± 22 mmHg, ambulatory diastolic BP [DBP] 101 ± 19 mmHg, taking 7 [IQR: 6-8] antihypertensive medications). The median follow-up period was 8.5 (IQR: 5.6-9.4) years. Mean (± SD) changes from baseline were: -47 ± 41 mmHg for office SBP, -25 ± 20 mmHg for office DBP, -29 ± 26 mmHg for ambulatory SBP, and -15 ± 16 mmHg for ambulatory DBP. The number of antihypertensive drugs markedly decreased one month after RDN and a gradual upward trend was observed over time. A clinical event occurred in 9 (45%) participants. LVMI decreased from 152 ± 37 to 120 ± 31 g/m2 (p = 0.015), the eGFR declined from 88.9 ± 15.6 to 73.1 ± 24.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.034), and the uACR did not significantly change from baseline to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study of patients with uncontrolled RH, RDN with an irrigated catheter was associated with a sustained BP reduction for up to a decade. However, a potential waning efficacy was suggested by the increasing use of antihypertensive medications over time.

Obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension-mediated organ damage in nonresistant and resistant hypertension

The potential role of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) may be influenced by the presence of resistant hypertension (RH). Herein, we enrolled patients with hypertension from a tertiary center for clinical evaluation and performed a sleep study to identify OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥15 events/h) and a blinded analysis of four standard HMOD parameters (left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH], increased arterial stiffness [≥10 m/s], presence of retinopathy, and nephropathy). RH was diagnosed based on uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) (≥140/90 mmHg) despite concurrent use of at least three antihypertensive drug classes or controlled BP with concurrent use of ≥4 antihypertensive drug classes at optimal doses. To avoid the white-coat effect, ambulatory BP monitoring was performed to confirm RH diagnosis. One-hundred patients were included in the analysis (mean age: 54 ± 8 years, 65% females, body mass index: 30.4 ± 4.5 kg/m²). OSA was detected in 52% of patients. Among patients with non-RH (n = 53), the presence of OSA (52.8%) was not associated with an increased frequency of HMOD. Conversely, among patients with RH, OSA (51.1%) was associated with a higher incidence of LVH (RH-OSA,61%; RH + OSA,87%; p = 0.049). Logistic regression analysis using the total sample revealed that RH (OR:7.89; 95% CI:2.18-28.52; p = 0.002), systolic BP (OR:1.04; 95% CI:1.00-1.07; p = 0.042) and OSA (OR:4.31; 95% CI:1.14-16.34; p = 0.032) were independently associated with LVH. No significant association was observed between OSA and arterial stiffness, retinopathy, or nephropathy. In conclusion, OSA is independently associated with LVH in RH, suggesting a potential role of OSA in RH prognosis.

The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Peripheral and Central Hemodynamic Parameters on Resistant Hypertension: A Case Report

Resistant hypertension (RH) is characterized by being difficult to control, even with the use of various antihypertensive drugs and is associated with target organ lesions and other comorbidities. Thus, new treatment alternatives such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can offer benefits to resistant hypertensive patients by reducing blood pressure (BP) in a non-invasive way and without the need for the association of more antihypertensive drugs. In this case, a patient with RH was submitted to three weekly applications of TENS on the stellate ganglion lasting 40 min each for 1 month. Peripheral and central hemodynamic assessments were performed by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) before and after TENS applications. After completion of the TENS applications, significant reductions in office systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were observed. There was also a decrease in peripheral SBP and DBP in the 24-h ABPM and sleep and SBP during wakefulness. Additionally, central parameters including central SBP and pulse wave velocity presented a significant reduction in the 24-h ABPM, during the wakefulness and sleep. TENS is able to attenuate the sympathetic hyperactivity present in RH cases and decrease the peripheral and central hemodynamic parameters of a resistant hypertensive patient.

Resistant hypertension: Prevalence and profile of patients followed in a university ambulatory

BACKGROUND

Hypertension affects about 36 million Brazilians. It is estimated that 10%-20% of these have resistant hypertension. These patients are at an increased risk of early target organ damage, as well as cardiovascular and renal events.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of resistant hypertension in a specialized outpatient clinic, to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of these patients, and to identify possible factors associated with resistant hypertension.

METHODS

Data collection from medical records of hypertensive patients treated using oral antihypertensive drugs in optimized doses at a specialized university clinic from March 2014 to December 2014, after ethical approval statement. All patients were using appropriate antihypertensive drugs in optimized doses and assisted at a teaching-assistance clinic of internal medicine of the Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health in Brazil.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were enrolled and 31.7% (n = 33) had criteria for resistant hypertension. Of the total participants, 75.7% were female and 54.8% were black or brown. The average age was 61.7 years (SD ± 10.1). In the resistant hypertension group, 63.6% had diabetes, compared to 32.4% in the hypertension group. Among resistant hypertensive patients, 51.5% had dyslipidemia. Regarding drug treatment, 75.8% of the resistant hypertension group and 51.4% of the hypertension group used statins. Among patients with resistant hypertension, 90.9% used angiotensin II receptor blockers and 66.7%, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. In the resistant hypertension group, 75.8% used beta-blockers, against 25.4% in the hypertension group.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of hypertension was higher than that described in the global literature, which may be associated with the high percentage of black and brown ("pardos") patients in the population studied, and also because the study was performed in a specialized outpatient clinic.

Evidence of Nonadherence in Cases of Pseudoresistant Hypertension

Resistant hypertension (RH) is characterized by the use of three or more antihypertensive drugs without reaching the goal of controlling blood pressure (BP). For a definitive diagnosis of RH, it is necessary to exclude causes of pseudoresistance, including the white-coat effect, errors in BP measurement, secondary hypertension, therapeutic inertia, and poor adherence to lifestyle changes and pharmacological treatment. Herein, we report the history of a patient with long-standing uncontrolled BP, even when using seven antihypertensive drugs. Causes of secondary hypertension that justified the high BP levels were investigated, in addition to the other causes of pseudo-RH. In view of the difficult-to-control BP situation, it was decided to hospitalize the patient for better investigation. After 5 days, he had BP control with practically the same medications previously used. Finally, all factors related to the presence of pseudo-RH are discussed, especially poor adherence to treatment. Poor adherence to antihypertensive treatment is common in daily medical practice, and its investigation is of fundamental importance for better management of BP.