Associação entre a Gravidade da Doença Arterial Coronariana e Câncer de Pulmão: Um Estudo Piloto Transversal

High-fat-diet-induced obesity promotes simultaneous progression of lung cancer and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice

Background

Clinical studies have shown that atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cancer often co-exist in the same individual. The present study aimed to investigate the role of high-fat-diet (HFD)-induced obesity in the coexistence of the two diseases and the underlying mechanism in apolipoprotein E-knockout (ApoE-/-) mice.

Methods

Male ApoE-/- mice were fed with a HFD or a normal diet (ND) for 15 weeks. On the first day of Week 13, the mice were inoculated subcutaneously in the right axilla with Lewis lung cancer cells. At Weeks 12 and 15, serum lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and blood monocytes and macrophages were measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. At Week 15, the volume and weight of the local subcutaneous lung cancer and metastatic lung cancer and the amount of aortic atherosclerosis were measured.

Results

At Week 15, compared with mice in the ND group, those in the HFD group had a larger volume of local subcutaneous cancer (p = 0.0004), heavier tumors (p = 0.0235), more metastatic cancer in the lungs (p < 0.0001), a larger area of lung involved in metastatic cancer (p = 0.0031), and larger areas of atherosclerosis in the aorta (p < 0.0001). At Week 12, serum LOX-1, serum vascular endothelial growth factor, and proportions of blood monocytes and macrophages were significantly higher in the HFD group than those in the ND group (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0029, p = 0.0480, and p = 0.0106, respectively); this trend persisted until Week 15 (p = 0.0014, p = 0.0012, p = 0.0001, and p = 0.0204).

Conclusions

In this study, HFD-induced obesity could simultaneously promote progression of lung cancer and atherosclerosis in the same mouse. HFD-induced upregulation of LOX-1 may play an important role in the simultaneous progression of these two conditions via the inflammatory response and VEGF.

The Interplay Between Cardiovascular Disease and Lung Cancer

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and lung cancer are among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, with a significant interplay that complicates patient management and treatment outcomes. This review explores the complex relationship between various forms of CVD - such as coronary artery disease, heart failure (HF), arrhythmias, and valvular heart disease - and lung cancer. Shared risk factors, including smoking, aging, and chronic inflammation, contribute to the co-occurrence of these conditions. Additionally, treatments for lung cancer, particularly chemotherapy and radiation therapy, can exacerbate CVD, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to patient care. We delve into specific CVD-related impacts on lung cancer prognosis and vice versa, examining mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and management strategies. Our findings highlight the need for integrated care involving oncologists, cardiologists, and other healthcare providers to optimize treatment plans and improve patient outcomes. Emphasizing comprehensive cardiovascular risk management in lung cancer patients, we advocate for further research to deepen our understanding and develop novel therapeutic approaches, ultimately enhancing the quality of life and survival rates in patients suffering from both CVD and lung cancer.

Impact of continuous care on cardiac function in patients with lung cancer complicated by coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Despite sharing similar pathogenic factors, cancer and coronary heart disease (CHD) occur in comparable populations at similar ages and possess similar susceptibility factors. Consequently, it is increasingly commonplace for patients to experience the simultaneous occurrence of cancer and CHD, a trend that is steadily rising.

AIM

To determine the impacts of continuing care on lung cancer patients with CHD following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

There were 94 lung cancer patients with CHD following PCI who were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 38) and the control group (n = 41). In the intervention group, continuing care was provided, while in the control group, routine care was provided. An evaluation of cardiac and pulmonary function, medication compliance, a 6-min walk test, and patient quality of life was performed.

RESULTS

Differences between the two groups were significant in left ventricular ejection fraction, 6-min walk test, oxygen uptake, quality of life and medication compliance (P < 0.05). In comparison with the control group, the enhancement in the intervention group was more significant. The intervention group had more patients with high medication compliance than the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

After undergoing PCI, lung patients with CHD could benefit from continued care in terms of cardiac and pulmonary function, medications compliance, and quality of life.

Are cardiovascular comorbidities always associated with a worse prognosis in patients with lung cancer?

Many factors contribute to mortality in lung cancer, including the presence of concomitant cardiovascular disease. In the treatment of early stage of lung cancer, the presence of comorbidities and occurence of cardiotoxicity may be prognostic. The effect of cardiotoxicity of radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on overall survival has been documented. Acute arterial and venous thromboembolic events seem to correlate with the degree of the histological malignancy, its clinical advancement, and even with optimal cardiac treatment, they may influence the survival time. In the case of high-grade and advanced lung cancer stage especially in an unresectable stadium, the prognosis depends primarily on the factors related to the histopathological and molecular diagnosis. Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic abnormalities may be prognostic factors, as they seem to correlate with the patient's performance status as well as tumor localization and size.

Inflammation-based different association between anatomical severity of coronary artery disease and lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with cancer. The role of inflammation in the association of CAD with cancer remains unclear. The study investigated whether inflammation could impact the relationship between CAD and lung cancer.

METHODS

The study involved 96 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients without receiving anti-cancer therapy and 288 matched non-cancer patients. All the patients underwent coronary angiography and were free from previous percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. SYNTAX score (SXscore) were used to assess severity of CAD. High SXscore (SXhigh) grade was defined as SXscore > 16 (highest quartile). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) served as an inflammatory biomarker. NLR-high grade referred to NLR > 2.221 (median).

RESULTS

Among 384 study patients, 380 patients (98.96%) had NLR value (median: 2.221, interquartile range: 1.637-3.040). Compared to non-cancer patients, lung cancer patients had higher rate of SXhigh among total study patients (P = 0.014) and among patients with NLR-high (P = 0.006), but had not significantly higher rate of SXhigh among patients with NLR-low (P = 0.839). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SXhigh was associated with lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 1.834, 95% CI: 1.063-3.162, P = 0.029]. Subgroup analysis showed that SXhigh was associated with lung cancer among patients with NLR-high (OR = 2.801, 95% CI: 1.355-5.794, P = 0.005), however, the association between SXhigh and lung cancer was not significant among patients with NLR-low (OR = 0.897, 95% CI: 0.346-2.232, P = 0.823).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation could lead different association between anatomical severity of CAD and lung cancer. Severity of CAD was significantly associated with increased risk of lung cancer among patients with high inflammation rather than among patients with low inflammation.