Do Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns Matter? An Algorithm for the Treatment of Patients With Impetigo

Ideal Features of Topical Antibiotic Therapy for the Treatment of Impetigo: An Italian Expert Consensus Report

Background

A group of Italian experts in impetigo medical care sought to define 10 statements to describe the ideal characteristics of the best local antibiotic treatments, and to provide relevant information re- garding their appropriate use and prescription that should be considered in clinical practice for impetigo management.

Objective

A group of Italian experts in impetigo medical care sought to define 10 statements to describe the ideal characteristics of the best local antibiotic treatments, and to provide relevant information regarding their appropriate use and prescription that should be considered in clinical practice for impetigo management.

Methods

A consensus on ideal features of antibiotic therapy for the treatment of impetigo was appraised by an online Delphi-based method, based on a panel of 61 infectious disease specialists, pediatricians, and dermatologists coordinated by a scientific committee of 5 experts specializing in impetigo management.

Results

Full or very high consensus was reached on the 10 statements identified to describe the characteristics of the best hypothetic antibiotic therapy for impetigo together with indications for appropriate antibiotics use.

Conclusions

Several criteria have to be considered when selecting topical antibacterial therapy for impetigo. Beyond efficacy and safety, antimicrobial susceptibility and pharmacological characteristics of the agent are essential points. Formulation of the antimicrobial product is fundamental, as well as patient and caregiver preference, to facilitate therapeutic adherence, to achieve the infection control, and to obtain the best benefit from treatment (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2023; 84:XXXXXX).

Antimicrobial activity of ozenoxacin and other antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical skin specimens in Japan in 2019 and 2020

Skin infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the spread of antimicrobial resistance are a major problem in Japan. Here, we investigated the susceptibility of S. aureus clinical isolates to ozenoxacin (OZNX), a topical antimicrobial approved for superficial skin infection treatment in Japan. Susceptibility to OZNX was measured in 110 skin-derived methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 130 MRSA strains isolated in 2019 and 2020 in Japan. The broth microdilution method was performed, and results were analyzed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (M07 and M100) guidelines. The results were compared with those of other antimicrobials used against S. aureus. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC)90 of OZNX for MSSA and MRSA were 0.12 and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively, indicating that OZNX exhibited the same or stronger antibacterial activity than that of the other antimicrobials tested, such as nadifloxacin, fucidic acid, and gentamicin. No strains exhibited reduced OZNX susceptibility. Notably, a low MIC of OZNX was observed even for strains with reduced susceptibility to nadifloxacin, a similar quinolone-based topical antimicrobial. OZNX is a highly potent antimicrobial used in Japan for superficial skin infections caused by S. aureus, such as impetigo contagiosa and related diseases.

Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in Spain

Background

Impetigo is a common dermatological paediatric infection that can be treated with topical antibiotics: the common are mupirocin (MUP), fusidic acid (FA) and, most recently, ozenoxacin (OZ).

Aim

This study assesses the clinical and economic consequences of the use of OZ vs. MUP and vs. FA for the treatment of impetigo in routine clinical practice in Spain.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study using real-life data from electronic medical records of patients with impetigo who started treatment with OZ, MUP or FA (maximum follow-up: 3 months; n = 10,974). We compared treatment duration, comorbidities, use of systemic medication, complications, utilization of resources and associated costs across treatments (p<0.05). Cost-effectiveness of OZ was assessed from a social perspective. Complication rates and treatment duration were the effectiveness measures.

Results

Mean age was 12.6 (standard deviation [SD]: 16.6) years; 48.6% were male; treatment: 9.3% (OZ), 56.4% (MUP), 34.5% (FA). The percentage of patients ending treatment after 2 weeks was 87.6% (OZ) vs. 83.2% (MUP) vs. 82.4% (FA); p<0.001; complication rates were 1.8% (OZ), 3.3% (MUP) and 3.2% (FA), p<0.001; mean costs were €158 (OZ), €265 (MUP) and €287 (FA), p<0.001.

Conclusions

OZ is a cost-effective and dominant alternative for the treatment of impetigo.

Bacterial resistance and dermatological ramifications

The spread of COVID-19 serves as a reminder of the might of microbes in the era of modern medicine. For years, another threat has preoccupied infectious disease experts and public health officials alike: rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Resistance is exceeding stewardship efforts and the rates of new drug development and approval in the market. A dry antimicrobial pipeline is threatening our regression to a pre-antibiotic era. While the consequences of resistance may seem far removed from daily clinical practices, awareness of AMR is significant to dermatological care given that dermatologists prescribe more antibiotics per physician than other providers. Antibiotics in dermatology are often used for prolonged courses, with a significant potential for microbiome alteration and antibiotic-related adverse effects. Through this review we hope to contribute to efforts of bringing the crisis of AMR to the forefront of daily dermatological practice.