Relationship of Arterial Stiffness and Central Hemodynamics With Cardiovascular Risk In Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is becoming a serious public health problem and noninvasive estimation of central hemodynamics and artery stiffness have been identified as important predictors of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

The study included 4,311 participants, both sex and aged between 20 and 79 years. Arterial velocity pulse index, arterial pressure-volume index (AVI, API, and the index of artery stiffness), central systolic blood pressure, central artery pulse pressure (CSBP, CAPP, and estimated via oscillometric blood pressure monitor), and 10-year risk score of cardiovascular disease in China (China-PAR) and Framingham cardiovascular risk score (FCVRS) were assessed at baseline. Regression model was performed to identify factors associated with high cardiovascular disease risk stratification. The relationships between CSBP, CAPP and China-PAR, and FCVRS were analyzed by restrictive cubic spline functions.

RESULTS

The uncontrolled hypertension group showed the highest values of AVI, API, CSBP, and CAPP. In the regression analysis, CAPP and hypertension subtypes were identified as significant predictors of high cardiovascular risk stratification, and CAPP was strongly correlated with API in this cohort. Finally, CSBP and CAPP showed significant J-shaped relationships with China-PAR and FCVRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with uncontrolled hypertension present with elevated values of CAPP, CSBP, API, AVI, China-PAR, and FCVRS scores. CAPP was independently associated with high cardiovascular risk stratification, and there was a significant J-shaped relationship with China-PAR and FCVRS that may identify people with higher cardiovascular risk.

US Shear-Wave Elastography Dispersion for Characterization of Chronic Liver Disease

Background Little is known about the benefits of the use of dispersion slope (DS) as a viscosity-related parameter derived from two-dimensional (2D) shear-wave elastography (SWE) in the stratification of hepatic pathologic stages. Purpose To evaluate whether DS as an additional parameter can improve the diagnostic performance in detecting liver necroinflammation, fibrosis, and steatosis. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, consecutive participants with chronic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy and 2D SWE were recruited between July 2019 and September 2020. DS and liver stiffness (LS) measurements were obtained with use of a 2D SWE system immediately before biopsy. The biopsy specimens were assessed to obtain the scores of fibrosis, necroinflammation, and steatosis. Differences in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to compare the diagnostic performance of DS, LS, and a combination of DS and LS. Results There were 159 participants evaluated (among them, 79 participants with chronic hepatitis B and 11 participants with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease). The distributions of DS values among various necroinflammatory activities (P = .02) and fibrosis stages (P < .001) were different. Moreover, DS was only associated with fibrosis after subgroup analysis based on the fibrosis stages and necroinflammatory activities (P < .001). The AUCs of DS in detecting clinically significant fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≥F2), cirrhosis (fibrosis stage of F4), and moderate to severe necroinflammatory activity (necroinflammatory activity ≥A2) were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.79), 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.78), and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.71), respectively. The differences of AUCs were not apparent for the DS and LS combination model after excluding DS (fibrosis stage ≥F2: 0.00 [95% CI: 0.00, 0.01], fibrosis stage of F4: -0.01 [95% CI: -0.02, 0.00], and necroinflammatory activity ≥A2: 0.00 [95% CI: 0.00, 0.01]). Conclusion The addition of dispersion slope derived from two-dimensional shear-wave elastography did not improve the diagnostic performance in detecting liver fibrosis, necroinflammation, or steatosis in patients with primarily viral hepatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT03777293 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.