New evidence in severe pneumonia: meropenem-vaborbactam

Effects of nursing team communication and collaboration on treatment outcomes in intensive care unit patients with severe pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Severe pneumonia is a common severe respiratory infection worldwide, and its treatment is challenging, especially for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

AIM

To explore the effect of communication and collaboration between nursing teams on the treatment outcomes of patients with severe pneumonia in ICU.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients with severe pneumonia who were treated at the ICU of the hospital between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2023. We compared and analyzed the respiratory mechanical indexes [airway resistance (Raw), mean airway pressure (mPaw), peak pressure (PIP)], blood gas analysis indexes (arterial oxygen saturation, arterial oxygen partial pressure, and oxygenation index), and serum inflammatory factor levels [C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), cortisol (COR), and high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1)] of all patients before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Before treatment, there was no significant difference in respiratory mechanics index and blood gas analysis index between 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, after treatment, the respiratory mechanical indexes of patients in both groups were significantly improved, and the improvement of Raw, mPaw, plateau pressure, PIP and other indexes in the combined group after communication and collaboration with the nursing team was significantly better than that in the single care group (P < 0.05). The serum CRP and PCT levels of patients were significantly decreased, and the difference was statistically significant compared with that of nursing group alone (P < 0.05). The levels of serum COR and HMGB1 before and after treatment were also significantly decreased between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The communication and collaboration of the nursing team have a significant positive impact on respiratory mechanics indicators, blood gas analysis indicators and serum inflammatory factor levels in the treatment of severe pneumonia patients in ICU.

Effect of Colistin, Fosfomycin and Meropenem/Vaborbactam on Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in Egypt: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

The increasing multi-drug carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales are a severe health problem limiting therapeutic options and worsen the prognosis. This study characterizes carbapenemase genes and integrons among uropathogenic carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates recovered from Mansoura University Hospitals and evaluates the effect of colistin, fosfomycin and meropenem-vaborbactam on these isolates.

Patients and Methods

A total of 200 Enterobacterales isolates were collected from patients with urinary tract infections. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the disc diffusion method. Colistin susceptibility was tested using the broth microdilution method and fosfomycin and meropenem/vaborbactam susceptibility were tested by MIC Test Strips. Carbapenem resistant isolates were screened for carbapenemase activity phenotypically using the modified carbapenem inactivation method and EDTA-modified carbapenem inactivation method and genotypically by multiplex PCR. Integrons class 1 and 2 and fosA gene were assayed by PCR. Data were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16. The Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to compare groups, as appropriate.

Results

Ninety-two Enterobacterales isolates were resistant to meropenem (46%); 52 E. coli and 40 K. pneumoniae strains. All CRE isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR). Sensitivity of CRE isolates to colistin, fosfomycin and meropenem/vaborbactam were 67.4%, 82.6% and 58.7%, respectively. Carbapenemase genes were detected by multiplex PCR in 69.6% of CRE isolates (Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) mainly blaNDM (37%). CPE isolates were significantly more resistant to meropenem/vaborbactam than non-CPE isolates; 51.6% vs 17.8%, respectively (P = 0.003) especially blaNDM carrying isolates (70.6%). Class 1 integrons and fosA gene were detected in 91.3% and 11.9% of CRE isolates, respectively.

Conclusion

This study revealed that about half of the uropathogenic Enterobacterales isolates were MDR CRE. Carbapenemase gene blaNDM was the main gene among CRE isolates. Meropenem/vaborbactam sensitivity was significantly higher on non-CPE than CPE isolates and limited by the predominance of blaNDM .