Effects of individual and binary mixtures of estrogens on male goldfish (Carassius auratus)

Adverse effects of five typical environmental estrogens, namely estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), 4-n-octylphenol (4-n-OP), 4-n-nonylphenol (4-n-NP) and bisphenol A (BPA) on adult male goldfish (Carassius auratus) were investigated both individually and in binary mixtures, using serum vitellogenin (VTG) induction and gonadosomatic index (GSI) as the endpoints. Doses of individual and binary mixtures of estrogens were chosen at broad ranges. Five individual estrogens induced common dose-dependent increases of serum VTG in the experimental fish when injection doses of the estrogen series were comparatively low. The levels of VTG induction in fish descended after peaked at a certain dose of the individual estrogen. Significant GSI decreases were observed in fish treated by all dose series of E1 and E2, and comparatively high doses of 4-n-OP, 4-n-NP and BPA when compared with that of solvent control (SC). Effects of binary mixtures of the five typical estrogens on VTG induction in male goldfish were in additive manner at low-effect doses, but divergences occurred at high dose levels, with the predicted effects by additive manner exceeding those were observed. All of GSI of fish treated by the binary mixtures were about or lower than 10(-3)%. Serious atrophy of gonads was observed in all the mixture treatment groups when compared with that of SC. These findings highlight the potential reproductive risk of fish resulted from existing mixtures of hormones in the aquatic environment, and they have important implications for environmental estrogen hazard assessment.

Predicted no-effect concentration and risk assessment for 17-[beta]-estradiol in waters of China

Contamination of the aquatic environment by EDCs has received considerable attention from scientists, government officials, and the public. E2, one of the EDCs with high estrogenic effect, has the potential to cause multiple endocrine-disrupting effects, even at small concentrations. In the present review, the toxicity of E2 to aquatic organisms was reviewed. Results of published studies show that, for aquatic species, reproductive effects were the most sensitive endpoint for E2 exposure.Although the risks posed by EDCs have caused much attention, the research on the WQC 'for EDCs is still at the initial stage. It has been suggested in several reports that the PNEC can be regarded as the most appropriate reference value for developing WQC for the EDCs. The SSD method was applied to derive PNECs that were based on reproductive effects endpoints. In the present review, 31 NOECs, based on reproductive effect endpoints for different species, were selected to construct the curve. ThePNEC value was determined to be 0.73 ng E2/L, which could protect the biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems. Moreover, 6 NOECs for multigeneration species were also analyzed in anticipation of sensitivity comparison between the Fa and the F1 generations.When multiple generations of aquatic species were exposed to concentrations no greater than 100 ng E2/L, nearly 71.4% of the F 1 generation individuals were more sensitive to the effects of E2 than those of the Fa generation. This result indicated that different generations of the same species may respond differently to EDCs exposure.Individuals of the F 1 generation were slightly more sensitive than those of the Fa generation,in general. Therefore, protecting the F1 generation of aquatic organisms is particularly important when WQC values for the EDCs are established.Considering the toxic effects of EDCs on reproduction, long-term toxic effects(viz., full-life cycle study and the most sensitive life stage) should be used in settingWQC. Unfortunately, the NOECs of E2 for multigeneration species did not meet the requirement of PNEC derivation for protecting the Fl generation. Therefore, further research results are needed on the Fl generation of aquatic species to provide more insight into what constitutes adequate protection for aquatics lives. In the present review, the PNEC values derived in the study were compared to thePNEC values developed by others, and the results showed that they were highly consistent. In addition, we also compared the PNEC value for E2 to the PNEC value for EE2, a similar estrogen, and the result was also highly consistent when their EEFs were considered. These comparisons affirmed that the method we used for deriving the PNEC value of E2 was reasonable and the PNEC values we derived were acceptable for protecting aquatic organisms. By comparing the PNEC values we calculated to actual E2 concentrations in the natural water environment, we found that E2 in surface waters may pose high risks in many countries, especially China, Japan, the USA, Great Britain, and Italy.