A Closed System for Islet Isolation and Purification Using the COBE2991 Cell Processor May Reduce the Need of Clean Room Facilities

Isolation and Purification of Human Pancreatic Islets

Successful islet isolation is the key to islet transplantation in diabetic patients. However, islet isolation is a technically complex and time-consuming manual process. Optimizing the islet isolation process can improve islet yield and quality, reduce operators, and thus reduce costs.The isolation and purification of human islets include pancreas acquisition and preservation, pancreas digestion, islet purification, islet culture, and islet quality identification. Briefly, after the duodenum was removed, the pancreas was trimmed, the main pancreatic duct was intubated at the distal end of the pancreatic head, collagenase was injected into the pancreatic duct, and the perfused pancreatic tissue was cut and then digested in a Ricordi chamber. A digestion temperature of 37 °C was continuously used to assess the number of samples and the integrity of the lysed and released islets. At the end of the digestion process, collect the digested tissue in a 500 mL centrifuge tube prefilled with 25 mL of cold (4 °C) human serum albumin and centrifuge twice at 150 g for 3 min. After mixing with UW solution as islet storage solution, put it on ice (shake occasionally to prevent clumping) after 30 min. Digested pancreatic tissue was centrifuged at 2200 rpm for 5 min in a COBE 2991 cell processor to isolate islets from exocrine tissue using a continuous density gradient. The purified islet fractions were washed twice in HBSS supplemented with 10% human serum albumin and finally collected in CMRL1066 medium supplemented with the corresponding liquid. The purity of purified islets was calculated by DTZ staining, the survival rate of islets was calculated by FDA/PI staining, and islet function was determined by in vitro glucose-stimulated insulin secretion test.

PRISM: A Novel Human Islet Isolation Technique

BACKGROUND

Successful pancreatic islet isolations are a key requirement for islet transplantation in selected patients with type 1 diabetes. However, islet isolation is a technically complex, time-consuming, and manual process. Optimization and simplification of the islet isolation procedure could increase islet yield and quality, require fewer operators, and thus reduce cost.

METHODS

We developed a new, closed system of tissue collection, washing, buffer change, and islet purification termed PancReatic Islet Separation Method (PRISM). In the developmental phase, pump and centrifuge speed was tested using microspheres with a similar size, shape, and density as digested pancreatic tissue. After optimization, PRISM was used to isolate islets from 10 human pancreases.

RESULTS

Islet equivalents viability (fluorescein diacetate/propidium iodide), morphology, and dynamic glucose-stimulated insulin secretion were evaluated. PRISM could be performed by 1 operator in 1 flow cabinet. A similar islet yield was obtained using PRISM compared to the traditional islet isolation method (431 234 ± 292 833 versus 285 276 ± 197 392 islet equivalents, P = 0.105). PRISM islets had similar morphology and functionality.

CONCLUSIONS

PRISM is a novel islet isolation technique that can significantly improve islet isolation efficiency using fewer operators.

Variations in novel cellular therapy products manufacturing

BACKGROUND AIMS

At the frontier of transfusion medicine and transplantation, the field of cellular therapy is emerging. Most novel cellular therapy products are produced under investigational protocols with no clear standardization across cell processing centers. Thus, the purpose of this study was to uncover any variations in manufacturing practices for similar cellular therapy products across different cell processing laboratories worldwide.

METHODS

An exploratory survey that was designed to identify variations in manufacturing practices in novel cellular therapy products was sent to cell processing laboratory directors worldwide. The questionnaire focused on the manufacturing life cycle of different cell therapies (i.e., collection, purification, in vitro expansion, freezing and storage, and thawing and washing), as well as the level of regulations followed to process each product type.

RESULTS

The majority of the centers processed hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) from peripheral blood (n = 18), bone marrow (n = 16) or cord blood (n = 19), making HPCs the most commonly processed cells. The next most commonly produced cellular therapies were lymphocytes (n = 19) followed by mesenchymal stromal cells (n = 14), dendritic cells (n = 9) and natural killer (NK) cells (n = 9). A minority of centers (<5) processed pancreatic islet cells (n = 4), neural cells (n = 3) and induced-pluripotent stem cells (n = 3). Thirty-two laboratories processed products under an investigational status, for either phase I/II (n = 27) or phase III (n = 17) clinical trials. If purification methods were used, these varied for the type of product processed and by institution. Environmental monitoring methods also varied by product type and institution.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory survey shows a wide variation in cellular therapy manufacturing practices across different cell processing laboratories. A better understanding of the effect of these variations on the quality of these cell-based therapies will be important to assess for further process evaluation and development.

PK11195, a specific ligand of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, may protect pancreatic beta-cells from cytokine-induced cell death

We cultured isolated islets from human or porcine origin in the presence or absence of IL1 and TNFα and studied cytoprotective effects of two structurally different PBR ligands. Storage of pig or human islets in the presence of cytokines significantly lowered the fraction of vital beta-cells. Compared with cytokine incubations PK11195 alone or in combination with cytokines was effective to prevent cytokine induced cell death. The data indicate that cold storage in the presence of PK11195 may further protect beta-cells from cytokine induced cell death. This ligand may be helpful to preserve beta-cell survival before transplantation.

Toward improving human islet isolation from younger donors: rescue purification is efficient for trapped islets

Several reports suggest that islets isolated from younger donor pancreata are of better quality for clinical islet transplantation. The relative inefficiency of the continuous gradient purification process (CGP) is one of the major obstacles to the utilization of these younger donor pancreata. This study demonstrates the benefits of utilizing an additional purification step, rescue gradient purification (RGP), to recover trapped islets and examines the possible superiority of these rescued islets. Seventy-three human islet isolations purified by RGP following CGP were divided into two groups based on age, and the isolation results were retrospectively analyzed (group I: age < or = 40, group II: age > 40). The quality of islets from both CGP and RGP were assessed by beta-cell fractional viability (beta FV) and ADP/ATP ratio. Significant increases in the percent islet recovery from RGP and the percent trapped islets in group I compared to group II were observed. Donor age correlated negatively to the percent islets recovered from RGP (R = 0.440) and to the percent of trapped islets (R = 0.511). RGP islets had higher beta FV and better ADP/ATP ratio compared to CGP islets. In conclusion, RGP improved the efficiency in the purification of trapped islets, which often come from younger donor pancreata. The better quality of beta-cells in RGP islets encourages us to perform RGP, considering the higher quality as well as the quantity of remaining islets.

Human islet separation utilizing a closed automated purification system

A central step within the human islet isolation process is the separation of islets from contaminating exocrine tissue utilizing linear, continuous density gradients manufactured by means of manually controlled standard gradient makers (SGM). The present study was performed to develop a closed, automated purification system (APS) that customizes density gradient profiles aiming to standardize and optimize human islet purification. Digested human pancreata were pooled, split evenly, and incubated in UW solution according to our standard protocol (n = 11). Continuous density gradient centrifugation was performed in parallel in two refrigerated COBE 2991 cell separators loaded with light (1.076 g/ml) and heavy (1.097 g/ml) Ficoll utilizing either an SGM or two computer-controlled pumps connected to Ficoll-containing bags. Quality control included islet equivalent (IE) yield, purity, in vitro function, and islet cytokine expression. Gradient profiles demonstrated that the APS readily customizes linear and nonlinear gradients. In comparison to the SGM, the APS recovered a higher percentage of the expected volume of continuous gradients (90.0 +/- 1.1% vs. 98.2 +/- 2.0%, p < 0.05). Islet yield (120,468 +/- 15,970 vs. 114,570 +/- 15,313 IE, NS) and purity (51.7 +/- 4.8% vs. 54.4 +/- 4.9%, NS) were nearly identical utilizing the SGM or APS. Decreased MCP-1, IL-6, and IL-8 expression indicated that APS-purified islets were possibly exposed to less proinflammatory stress. Compared to standard procedures, similar success and gentle continuous density gradient separation of human islets is feasible utilizing the APS. The APS facilitates the standardization of this complex procedure according to cGMP standards.