Apatinib Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases

Comparison of cardiotoxicity induced by alectinib, apatinib, lenvatinib and anlotinib in zebrafish embryos

Four tyrosine kinase inhibitors, alectinib, apatinib, lenvatinib and anlotinib, have been shown to be effective in the treatment of clinical tumors, but their cardiac risks have also raised concerns. In this study, zebrafish embryos at 6 h post fertilization (hpf) were exposed to the four drugs at concentrations of 0.05-0.2 mg/L until 72 hpf, and then the development of these embryos was quantified, including heart rate, body length, yolk sac area, pericardial area, distance between venous sinus and balloon arteriosus (SV-BA), separation of cardiac myocytes and endocardium, gene expression, vascular development and oxidative stress. At the same exposure concentrations, alectinib and apatinib had little effect on the cardiac development of zebrafish embryos, while lenvatinib and anlotinib could induce significant cardiotoxicity and developmental toxicity, including shortened of body length, delayed absorption of yolk sac, pericardial edema, prolonged SV-BA distance, separation of cardiomyocytes and endocardial cells, and downregulation of key genes for heart development. Heart rate decreased in all four drug treatment groups. In terms of vascular development, alectinib and apatinib did not inhibit the growth of embryonic intersegmental vessels (ISVs) and retinal vessels, while lenvatinib and anlotinib caused serious vascular toxicity, and the inhibition of anlotinib in vascular development was more obvious. Besides, the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the lenvatinib and anlotinib treatment groups was significantly increased. Our results provide reference for comparing the cardiotoxicity of the four drugs.

Apatinib plus docetaxel or pemetrexed shows promising activities against non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: a retrospective analysis

Background

So far, the treatment options for most advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastasis have been limited. Apatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with anti-angiogenesis properties, has been approved for advanced gastric cancer in China. Clinical studies have demonstrated that apatinib also displays anticancer effects against several other human cancers, including NSCLC. We have observed that apatinib combined with pemetrexed or docetaxel shows promising efficiency for advanced NSCLC patients who have previously undergone two or more lines of treatment, we would like to further perform a retrospective efficiency analysis of apatinib combined with pemetrexed or docetaxel in advanced NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastasis in this study.

Methods

A total of 35 patients, between 18 and 70 years old, who were clinically and pathologically confirmed as having advanced NSCLC were included in this study. All of the included patients had accepted two or more lines of treatment. These patients received apatinib combined with pemetrexed or docetaxel between January 2014 and November 2020 in Hubei Cancer Hospital.

Results

The results showed that apatinib combined with pemetrexed or docetaxel could effectively delay the disease progression of brain metastasis in advanced NSCLC, with an approximate overall response rate (ORR) for measurable and non-measurable lesions of 10% and 15%, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) for intracranial lesions was 66%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months. The most common treatment-related toxicities, such as fatigue, decreased appetite, and hand-foot syndrome (HFS), were either mild or moderate and tolerable.

Conclusions

Since there is currently no effective treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC patients with brain metastasis who have already undergone two or more lines of treatment, the promising efficiency of apatinib combined with pemetrexed or docetaxel would be of great significance for these heavily ill patients. The real therapeutic value of this method against brain metastasis needs to be confirmed by large, random, and prospective clinical trials in the future.

The Sequence of Intracranial Radiotherapy and Systemic Treatment With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Gene-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases in the Targeted Treatment Era: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

Purpose

The high intracranial efficacy of targeted therapeutic agents poses a challenge in determining the optimal sequence of local radiation therapy (RT) and systemic treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM). Therefore, we conducted a cohort study to elucidate the appropriate treatment strategy, either upfront RT or deferred RT including a toxicity assessment, in these patients.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated patients with gene-driven BMs from a single institution and divided them into deferred and upfront RT groups. Survival was estimated using a log-rank test. Intracranial progression was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risks model. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed for multivariable analysis in the entire group and subgroups.

Results

Among the 198 eligible patients, 94 and 104 patients received deferred and upfront RT, respectively. The upfront RT group showed a lower intracranial progression risk with an adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratios of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.30–0.57) than did the deferred RT group (median intracranial progression-free survival [iPFS], 19.9 months vs. 11.1 months; p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS; 43.2 months vs. 49.1 months, p = 0.377) and BM-specific survival (92.1 months vs. 82.9 months, p = 0.810) after salvage therapy were not significantly different between the upfront and deferred groups. Among patients with progressed extracranial disease, the deferred RT group showed significantly better OS than did the upfront RT group (44.0 vs. 28.1 months, p = 0.022). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were rare, and similar toxicities were observed between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared to the deferred RT group, the upfront RT group achieved longer iPFS and similar survival outcomes in most patients with gene-driven NSCLC BM, although patients with progression of extracranial disease might benefit from deferred RT. Both groups showed well-tolerated toxicities.

Trial registration ID

NCT04832672.

Continuous Low-Dose Apatinib Combined With WBRT Significantly Reduces Peritumoral Edema and Enhances the Efficacy of Symptomatic Multiple Brain Metastases in NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic multiple brain metastases with peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) occur in non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) who are without driver mutations or are resistant to epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TKI) are often associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) which comes with many complications and unsatisfactory effects, is the only option for the treatment. Previous studies have shown that bevacizumab can reduce the volume of PTBE and improve efficiency of radiotherapy. This study evaluated the effects and safety of apatinib combined with WBRT in NSCLC patients with symptomatic multiple brain metastases and PTBE.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 34 patients with symptomatic multiple brain metastases from NSCLC (number >4, and at least 1 measurable brain metastasis lesion with cerebral edema). Intracranial objective response rate (IORR), peritumoral edema and intracranial tumor volumetric measurement, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Median intracranial progression-free survival (mIPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen cases received apatinib (125 mg or 250 mg, QD, oral) combined with WBRT and 21 cases received chemotherapy combined with WBRT were inclued. Apatinib combination group can better reduce the volume of intracranial tumors and PTBE and total steroid dosage used. It was associated with a better IORR (84.6% vs 47.6%, P = 0.067), longer mIPFS (6.97 vs 4.77months; P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in mOS(7.70 vs 6.67 months; P = 0.14) between the 2 groups. The most common adverse events of apatinib combination WBRT included grade 1/2 nausea (4/13), fatigue (3/13), hypertension (2/13) and white blood cell decrease (2/13). No grade 3/4 AEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib plus WBRT is well tolerated and may be a potential choice for relapsed or drug-resistant advanced NSCLC patients with symptomatic multiple brain metastases and PTBE.

Novel Nutrition-Based Nomograms to Assess the Outcomes of Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Anlotinib or Apatinib

Background

Previous studies have indicated that the changes in body composition during treatment are prognostic in lung cancer. The question which follows is it may be too late to identify vulnerable patients after treatment and to improve outcomes for these patients. In our study, we sought to explore the alterations of body composition and weight before the outset of the antiangiogenic treatment and its role in predicting clinical response and outcomes.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 122 patients with advanced lung cancer treated with anlotinib or apatinib were analyzed. The changes in weight and body composition including skeletal muscle index (SMI), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) for 3 months before the outset of antiangiogenic treatment and other clinical characteristics were evaluated with LASSO Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression analysis, which were applied to construct nomograms. The performance of the nomograms was validated internally by using bootstrap method with 1,000 resamples models and was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 128 (95% CI 103.2–152.8) days and 292 (95% CI 270.9–313.1) days. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), brain metastases, the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), clinical response, therapeutic regimen, and ΔL1SMI per 90 days were significantly associated with PFS, while ECOG PS, GPS, clinical response, therapeutic regimen, ΔL1SMI per 90 days were identified for OS. The C-index for the nomograms of PFS and OS were 0.763 and 0.748, respectively. The calibration curves indicated excellent agreement between the predicted and actual survival outcomes of 3- and 4-month PFS and 7- and 8-month OS. DCA showed the considerable value of the model.

Conclusion

Nomograms were developed from clinical features and nutritional indicators to predict the probability of achieving 3-month and 4-month PFS and 7-month and 8-month OS with antiangiogenic therapy for advanced lung cancer. Dynamic changes in body composition before the initiation of treatment contributed to early detection of poor outcome.

Emerging and investigational targeted chemotherapy and immunotherapy agents for metastatic brain tumors

INTRODUCTION

Metastases to the central nervous system are the most common cause of malignant intracranial tumors in adults. Current standard of care includes surgery and radiation, but overall survival remains poor. A range of systemic therapies are emerging as promising treatment options for these patients.

AREAS COVERED

This study reviews novel drug regimens that are under investigation in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. To identify relevant therapies under clinical investigation, a search was performed on http://clinicaltrials.gov and Pubmed with the keywords brain metastasis, Phase I clinical trial, and Phase II clinical trial from 2016 to 2020. The authors detail the mechanisms of action of all trial agents, outline evidence for their utility, and summarize the current state of the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Current advancements in the medical management of brain metastases can be categorized into targeted therapies, methods of overcoming treatment resistance, novel combinations of therapies, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment with a specific focus on immunotherapy. Each of these realms holds great promise for the field going forward. A more streamlined structure for enrollment into clinical trials will be a crucial step in accelerating progress in this area.