Differential allelic distribution of V-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog2 (ETS2) functional polymorphisms in different group of patients

RNAi targeting GPR4 influences HMEC-1 gene expression by microarray analysis

G-protein coupled receptor 4 (GPR4) belongs to a protein family comprised of 3 closely related G protein-coupled receptors. Recent studies have shown that GPR4 plays important roles in angiogenesis, proton sensing, and regulating tumor cells as an oncogenic gene. How GPR4 conducts its functions? Rare has been known. In order to detect the genes related to GPR4, microarray technology was employed. GPR4 is highly expressed in human vascular endothelial cell HMEC-1. Small interfering RNA against GPR4 was used to knockdown GPR4 expression in HMEC-1. Then RNA from the GPR4 knockdown cells and control cells were analyzed through genome microarray. Microarray results shown that among the whole genes and expressed sequence tags, 447 differentially expressed genes were identified, containing 318 up-regulated genes and 129 down-regulated genes. These genes whose expression dramatically changed may be involved in the GPR4 functions. These genes were related to cell apoptosis, cytoskeleton and signal transduction, cell proliferation, differentiation and cell-cycle regulation, gene transcription and translation and cell material and energy metabolism.

Potential contribution of SIM2 and ETS2 functional polymorphisms in Down syndrome associated malignancies

Background

Proper expression and functioning of transcription factors (TFs) are essential for regulation of different traits and thus could be crucial for the development of complex diseases. Subjects with Down syndrome (DS) have a higher incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) while solid tumors, like breast cancer (BC) and oral cancer (OC), show rare incidences. Triplication of the human chromosome 21 in DS is associated with altered genetic dosage of different TFs. V-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2 (ETS2) and Single Minded 2 (SIM2) are two such TFs that regulate several downstream genes involved in developmental and neurological pathways. Here we studied functional genetic polymorphisms (fSNP) in ETS2 and SIM2 encoding genes in a group of patients and control subjects to better understand association of these variants with DS phenotypes.

Methods

We employed an in silico approach to identify potential target pathways of ETS2 and SIM2. fSNPs in genes encoding for these two TFs were identified using available databases. Selected sites were genotyped in individuals with DS, their parents, ALL, BC, OC as well as ethnically matched control individuals. We further analyzed these data by population-based statistical methods.

Results

Allelic/genotypic association analysis showed significant (P < 0.03) differences of rs2070530, rs1051476, rs11254, rs711 for DS subjects compared to control. rs711 also exhibited significantly different genotypic distribution pattern in parents of DS probands (P < 0.02) and BC patients (P < 0.02). Interaction analysis revealed independent main effect of rs711 in all the groups, while rs11254 exhibited independent main effect in DS subjects only. High entropy values were noticed for rs461155 in the solid tumor groups. Significant interactive effects of rs2070531 with rs1051475, rs1051476, rs11254 were observed in all the groups except DS.

Conclusions

We infer from the present investigation that the difference in frequencies of fSNPs and their independent as well as interactive effects may be the cause for altered expression of SIM2 and ETS2 in DS and malignant groups, which affects different downstream biological pathways. Thus, altered expression of SIM2 and ETS2 could be one of the reasons for variable occurrence of different malignant conditions in DS.