1
|
Johnston ME, Carter MM, Wilson GC, Ahmad SA, Patel SH. Surgical management of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:578-589. [PMID: 32655937 PMCID: PMC7340810 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.12.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are the second most common malignancy of the pancreas, and their incidence is increasing. PanNETs are a diverse group of diseases which range from benign to malignant, can be sporadic or associated with genetic mutations, and be functional or nonfunctional. In as much, the treatment and management of PanNETs can vary from a "Wait and See" approach to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Despite this, surgical resection is still the primary treatment modality to achieve cure. This review focuses on the surgical management of PanNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Johnston
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Michela M Carter
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Gregory C Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moris D, Tsilimigras DI, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Beal EW, Felekouras E, Vernadakis S, Fung JJ, Pawlik TM. Liver transplantation in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review. Surgery 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
3
|
Sher LS, Levi DM, Wecsler JS, Lo M, Petrovic LM, Groshen S, Ji L, Uso TD, Tector AJ, Hamilton AS, Marsh JW, Schwartz ME. Liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: Outcomes and prognostic variables. J Surg Oncol 2015; 112:125-32. [PMID: 26171686 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient selection for liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors remains a topic of debate. There is no established MELD exception, making it difficult to obtain donor organs. METHODS A multicenter database was created assessing outcomes for liver and multivisceral transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and identifying prognostic factors for survival. Demographic, transplant, primary tumor site and management, pathology, recurrent disease and survival data were collected and analyzed. Survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Analysis included 85 patients who underwent liver transplantation November 1988-January 2012 at 28 centers. One, three, and five-year patient survival rates were 83%, 60%, and 52%, respectively; 40 of 85 patients died, with 20 of 40 deaths due to recurrent disease. In univariate analyses, the following were predictors of poor prognosis: large vessel invasion (P < 0.001), extent of extrahepatic resection at liver transplant (P = 0.007), and tumor differentiation (P = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, predictors of poor overall survival included large vessel invasion (P = 0.001), and extent of extrahepatic resection at liver transplant (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION In the absence of poor prognostic factors, metastatic neuroendocrine tumor is an acceptable indication for liver transplantation. Identification of favorable prognostic factors should allow assignment of a MELD exception similar to hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda S Sher
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - David M Levi
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Julie S Wecsler
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mary Lo
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lydia M Petrovic
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Susan Groshen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lingyun Ji
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Teresa Diago Uso
- Department of General Surgery and Transplant Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - A Joseph Tector
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Ann S Hamilton
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - J Wallis Marsh
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Myron E Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karakaxas D, Gazouli M, Liakakos T, Vaiopoulou A, Apessou D, Papaparaskeva K, Patapis P, Dervenis C. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: current opinions on a rare, but potentially curable neoplasm. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26:826-35. [PMID: 24987821 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) share a unique genetic identity, functional behavior, and clinical course. Compared with tumors of the exocrine pancreas, they are rare and show a different biologic behavior and prognosis. On the basis of data from recent studies, all PNETs, outside of small insulinomas, should be considered potentially malignant and treated accordingly. Untreated tumors have a high possibility to grow locally into adjacent structures or spread to distant organs. Although surgical excision irrespective of tumor functioning or nonfunctioning state remains the cornerstone of therapy, providing the best disease-free and survival rates to date, the understanding of the genetic nature of the disease yields new 'targets' to consider in drug development. The aim of this review is to summarize all recent advances of genetic research and new drug development in terms of PNETs, especially their genetic identity and subsequent alterations leading to the development of near or total malignant activity, and the new medical treatment strategies of this potentially curable disease on the basis of therapeutical agents acting, where possible, at the genetic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Karakaxas
- aSurgical Department-HPB Surgical Unit, Konstantopouleion Agia Olga General Hospital bLaboratory of Biology, Department of Basic Medical Science, School of Medicine, University of Athens cThird Department of Surgery, University of Athens School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Squires RH, Ng V, Romero R, Ekong U, Hardikar W, Emre S, Mazariegos GV. Evaluation of the pediatric patient for liver transplantation: 2014 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American Society of Transplantation and the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Hepatology 2014; 60:362-98. [PMID: 24782219 DOI: 10.1002/hep.27191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Accepted: 04/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Squires
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Liver transplantation is a validated treatment of primary hepatobiliary tumours. Over the last decade, a renewed interest for liver transplantation as a curative treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CR-LM) and neuro-endocrine metastasis (NET-LM) has developed. RECENT FINDINGS The ELTR and UNOS analyses showed that liver transplantation may offer excellent disease-free survival (ranging from 30 to 77%) in case of NET-LM, on the condition that stringent selection criteria are implemented. The interest for liver transplantation in the treatment of CR-LM has been fostered by the Norwegian SECA study. Five-year A 5-year survival rate of 60% could be reached. Despite the high recurrence rate (90%), one-third of patients were disease free following pulmonary surgery for metastases. SUMMARY Liver transplantation will take a more prominent place in the therapeutic algorithm of CR-LM and NET-LM. Larger experiences are necessary to improve knowledge about tumour biology and to refine selection criteria. A multimodal approach adding neo and adjuvant medical treatment to the transplant procedure will be key to bring this oncologic transplant project into the clinical arena. The preserved liver function in these patients will allow a more deliberate access to split liver and living donation for these indications.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) have increased in incidence in the USA over the last 20 years. Although PanNETs are often misconceived as being indolent tumors as they have a far more favorable prognosis over pancreatic adenocarcinoma, roughly 60-70% of patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis due to presentation late in the disease process. While improvements in imaging modalities allow for early detection and better tumor localization, recent advancements in basic science, as well as surgical and medical management of PanNETs have further improved the prognosis. The mainstay of therapy for localized PanNETs is surgical intervention, which has become safer and is slowly shifting towards a more minimally invasive approach. However, the prognosis still remains relatively bleak for patients with unresectable disease. Fortunately, novel molecular targeted therapies, such as everolimus and sunitinib, have recently come into the limelight and have shown significant promise for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miral R Sadaria
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Division of GI, Tumor and Endocrine Surgery, Academic Office One, 12631 East 17th Avenue, C311, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors account for 1% to 2% of pancreatic neoplasms and may occur sporadically or as part of a hereditary syndrome. Patients may present with symptoms related to hormone secretion by functional tumors or to locally advanced or metastatic nonfunctional tumors. Asymptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are increasingly detected incidentally during abdominal imaging performed for other reasons. The management of localized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is surgical resection. Hepatic metastases are common and their management involves a variety of liver-directed therapies, which should be tailored according to extent of disease, symptoms, presence of extrahepatic metastases, and patient performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paxton V Dickson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Avenue, Suite 208, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Surgical treatment and survival in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Hepatol 2013; 2013:235040. [PMID: 23509630 PMCID: PMC3590743 DOI: 10.1155/2013/235040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2012] [Revised: 01/07/2013] [Accepted: 01/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. The role of hepatic resection in patients with liver metastases from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is still poorly defined. Therefore, we examined the results obtained with surgical resection and other locoregional or systemic therapies by reviewing the recent literature on this topic. We performed the meta-analysis for comparing surgical resection of hepatic metastases with other treatments. Materials and Methods. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, the literature search was undertaken between 1990 and 2012 looking for studies evaluating the different survivals between patients treated with surgical resection of hepatic metastases and with other surgical or nonsurgical therapies. The studies were evaluated for quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI.95) were calculated using fixed-effects model. Results. We selected six studies in the review, five of which were suitable for meta-analysis. We found a significant longer survival in patients treated with hepatic resection than embolisation HR 0.34 (CI.95 0.21-0.55) or all other nonsurgical treatments HR 0.45 (CI.95 0.34-0.60). Only one study compared surgical resection with liver transplantation and meta-analysis was not feasible. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the hypothesis that hepatic resection increases overall survival in patients with liver metastases from GEP-NETs. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings and it would be desirable to identify new markers to properly select patients for surgical treatment.
Collapse
|