Pain assessment during conscious sedation for cervical cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Pain scores reduction with the use of ultrasound-guided paracervical nerve block in patients with cervical cancer undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy: A randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided paracervical nerve blocks for the painless treatment of patients with cervical cancer post-implantation.

DESIGN

Single-center randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (July 2023 to October 2023).

TRIAL NUMBER

ChiCTR2300071580 [https://clin.larvol.com/trial-detail/ChiCTR2300071580].

PATIENTS

Eighty patients with cervical cancer underwent post-implantation treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients receiving and not receiving paracervical nerve blocks (Groups T and C, respectively) were randomly allocated.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary measures included visual analog scale (VAS) scores and patient body movement scores at various stages, including vaginal speculum placement (T1), applicator/needle insertion (T2), treatment administration following connection of the treatment tube (T3), needle withdrawal and hemostasis (T4), and willingness to receive further treatment. The secondary observation indices in this study included the operation time, incidence of hypoxemia, occurrence of nausea and vomiting, adverse events related to the circulatory system, patient satisfaction score, operator satisfaction score, and operation duration required by patients with an Alderte score of ≥ 9.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty patients each were randomly allocated into Groups T and C. The VAS scores did not differ significantly between the two groups at T1. However, at T3 and T4, the VAS scores of Group T was significantly lower than that of Group C. No significant difference was observed in the body movement scores between the two groups at T1 and T3. However, the body movement score of Group T was significantly lower than that of Group C (P < 0.001) at T2 and T4. Group T showed higher postoperative satisfaction and willingness to receive further treatment compared to that of Group C.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided paracervical nerve block effectively reduced the pain scores in patients with cervical cancer undergoing post-implantation treatment and enhanced their inclination to undergo further treatment.

Analgesia and Anesthesia Practice Patterns for Gynecologic Brachytherapy Procedures and Potential Impact on Women's Procedural Experience: A National Survey

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the current U.S. practice patterns of analgesia (AG) and anesthesia (AS) for gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) procedures.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 27-item survey created with expertise from 5 brachytherapists was distributed electronically to 90 U.S. radiation oncology academic programs and publicized on social media and at 2 national meetings from June to October 2023.

RESULTS

Forty-one responses were received (46%). Fifty-four percent identified as female, 66% as Caucasian, and 85% as non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Forty-nine percent use a BT suite ± computed tomography (CT) simulator alone, 39% the operating room ± BT suite or CT simulator or other location, 10% CT simulation room alone, and 2% clinic examination room. Thirty-four percent use general anesthesia alone (GA) for intracavitary BT (n = 41), 20% conscious sedation (CS) alone, 10% oral analgesia (OA) alone, 9% spinal or epidural AS alone, and 27% combination. Among those performing hybrid BT (n = 25), 40% use GA alone, 16% use CS alone, 12% epidural or spinal AS alone, 4% OA alone, and 28% combination. For template interstitial BT (n = 25), 44% use GA alone, 48% epidural alone or in combination with other AS, and 8% CS alone. Twenty-two percent of respondents provide AG or AS during applicator placement only, whereas 32% provide it during placement, planning, treatment, and removal. The most common reasons for not using CS or GA were the lack of AS resources and clinician preference. Seventy-three percent reported the belief that patients suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after BT. However, 68% reported not using techniques to alleviate BT-related emotional distress.

CONCLUSIONS

Many U.S. brachytherapists report using GA, CS, or epidural AS; however, 10% are using only OA, and 22% offer AG/AS only during applicator placement. Furthermore, a majority of respondents believe post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms can occur after BT, but few offer any intervention. AS resources and clinician preferences should be targeted for the expansion of higher-quality care.

Effects of pain management using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug suppositories during brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A single-center prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

No standardized pain management protocol exists for intracavitary brachytherapy, and various methods of analgesia have been used in different countries and institutions. This study aimed to investigate the effects of pain management during intracavitary brachytherapy using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or acetaminophen suppositories.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, observational study, patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer completed a questionnaire survey after each brachytherapy session, which comprised questions regarding pain intensity, satisfaction with analgesia, and desire for effective anesthesia.

RESULTS

Data analysis was performed using data from 100 brachytherapy sessions of 27 patients. The median numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10) score for each intracavitary brachytherapy session was 3-4. The median satisfaction scale score for analgesia (5-point scale, 1-5) for each session was approximately 4. Eight patients (29.6%) answered that they desired anesthesia more effective than suppositories at any session of brachytherapy. A comparison of the high (NRS ≥4) and low (NRS ≤3) NRS groups during the first session revealed that the high NRS group tended to have higher NRS scores and lower satisfaction with analgesia during all sessions. A positive correlation was observed between tumor size and the NRS score during the first brachytherapy session.

CONCLUSIONS

The NRS score was approximately 3-4, and satisfaction with analgesia was approximately 4 out of 5 when NSAIDs or acetaminophen suppositories were used as analgesics during intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Although the current pain management protocol is clinically acceptable, inadequate analgesia is indicated in approximately 30% of patients.

Oncologic outcomes after MRI-assisted image-guided brachytherapy with hybrid interstitial and intra-cavitary applicators under moderate sedation for locally advanced cervix cancer

Purpose

To report outcomes of using image-guided hybrid intra-cavitary/interstitial applicators under moderate sedation for locally advanced cervical cancer patients in our institution.

Material and methods

A total of 69 fractions of brachytherapy with hybrid applicators were performed in 33 patients from January 2017 to April 2021. All patients underwent MRI pelvis 1 week pre-brachytherapy to determine suitability for interstitial brachytherapy and pre-plan needle placement. All insertion of applicators were performed under moderate sedation with midazolam and/or fentanyl. Fifty-eight (84.1%) fractions were planned with CT alone. Clinical outcomes, dose volume parameters, and toxicities were analyzed.

Results

The median follow-up was 28 months. A total of 320 needles (median, 5 needles per fraction) were implanted, with a median insertion depth of 3 cm (range, 1.5-4 cm). The median high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) during initial brachytherapy was 34.5 cc (range, 17.8-74.7 cc). The median total EQD2 D2cc of the rectum, bladder, sigmoid, and small intestine colon was 71.8 Gy, 81.5 Gy, 69 Gy, and 58.3 Gy, respectively. The 2-year local control and overall survival were 80.7% and 77.7%, respectively. Larger volume HR-CTV was significantly associated with worse local control (HR = 1.08, p = 0.005) and overall survival (HR = 1.04, p = 0.015). None of the patients required in-patient admission or blood transfusion post-procedure. Late grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were observed in 4 patients (12.2%).

Conclusions

Hybrid applicators inserted under moderate sedation are feasible and safe. Image-guided interstitial brachytherapy with CT planning aided by MRI performed 1 week pre-brachytherapy is associated with favorable outcomes and modest toxicities.

Pain in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) is part of the main treatment for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence and intensity of pain and patients' satisfaction during HDR. Risk factors for suffering pain were also analyzed. A retrospective study was carried out by extracting data from patients who had received HDR treatment for five years. Postoperative analgesia had been administered using pre-established analgesic protocols for 48 h. Pain assessment was collected according to a protocol by the acute pain unit. Analgesic assessment was compared according to analgesic protocol administered, number of needles implanted, and type of anesthesia performed during the procedure. From 172 patients treated, data from 247 treatments were analyzed. Pain was considered moderate in 18.2% of the patients, and 43.3% of the patients required at least one analgesic rescue. Patients receiving major opioids reported worse pain control. No differences were found regarding the analgesic management according to the intraprocedural anesthesia used or the patients' characteristics. The number of inserted needles did not influence the postoperative analgesic assessment. Continuous intravenous infusion of tramadol and metamizole made peri-procedural pain during HDR mild in most cases. Many patients still suffered from moderate pain.

Demographic and clinical factors associated with variations in opioid administration using conscious sedation during HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To examine patient characteristics that predispose to higher opioid administration during tandem and ovoid (T&O) high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS A single-institution retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Patients were included if they received at least one fraction of HDR T&O brachytherapy with analgesia administration recorded in the Medication Administration Record. Fentanyl dose was dichotomized as "low" (mean <125 μg per fraction), or "high" (mean ≥ 125 μg per fraction). Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed comparing mean opioid dose per fraction with demographic and clinical information. RESULTS From July 2014 through May 2020, 113 patients underwent 531 T&O HDR brachytherapy fractions with oral benzodiazepine and intravenous opioid fentanyl for conscious sedation. The median opioid dose per fraction was 100 μg fentanyl (range 0-250 μg). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, younger age (OR 1.071, p = 0.002) and higher BMI (OR 1.091, p = 0.019) were associated with increased opioid administration during brachytherapy. Black women received less opioid during brachytherapy when compared to White women (OR 0.296, p = 0.047). FIGO stage, ECOG score, smoking status, prior narcotic use, prior illicit drug use, parity, prior cervical procedure, Smit sleeve placement, and distance to treatment center were not associated with high opioid dose. CONCLUSION Cervical cancer patients who are younger or have higher BMI receive more narcotic analgesia during HDR brachytherapy whereas Black women received less narcotic analgesia, irrespective of age and BMI. This underscores the immediate need to address how pain is assessed and managed during brachytherapy.

Analysis of Applicator Insertion Related Acute Side Effects for Cervical Cancer Treated With Brachytherapy

Purpose

To report applicator insertion-related acute side effects during brachytherapy (BT) procedure for cervical cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Between November 2017 and December 2019, 407 BT fractions were performed in 125 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Acute side effects recorded comprised anesthesia-related side effects, mechanical-related side effects and infection, whose frequency and degree were recorded. Pain was assessed using numeric rating scale; vaginal bleeding volume was counted by weighing gauze pieces used in packing. The BT procedure comprised eight stages: anesthesia, applicator insertion, image acquisition, transport, waiting for treatment, dose delivery, applicator removal, and removed which denoted 0.5-12.0 h period after removal, with time of each stage recorded. Factors influencing acute side effects were assessed by Spearman correlation and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

The most common acute side effect was pain, followed by vaginal bleeding. The mean scores for pain were highest during removal time, 4.9 ± 1.6 points. The mean vaginal bleeding volume was 44.4 ml during removal time. Mean total procedure time was 218.8 (175-336) min, having positive relationship with frequency of acute side effects. The total procedure time with acute side effects was longer than that without acute side effects. The longest procedure time was waiting time, 113.0 (91.0-132.0) min. More needles generated higher pain scores and larger volume of vaginal bleeding.

Conclusion

Pain and vaginal bleeding were the most common acute side effects, especially during removal time, which physicians should focus on. Shortening patients' waiting time helps to reduce the total procedure time, thus, reduce acute side effects. While meeting dose requirement, less needles are helpful to reduce acute side effects.

Non-anesthetist-administered moderate sedation with midazolam and fentanyl for outpatient MRI-aided hybrid intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in cervix cancer: a single-institution experience

Purpose

The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of interstitial brachytherapy under non-anesthetist-administered moderate sedation, to identify factors influencing the insertion, and the total procedural time.

Material and methods

A total of 47 insertions with hybrid intracavitary and interstitial applicators were performed in 23 patients from March 2017 to March 2020. Moderate sedation was achieved with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl administered by non-anesthetist. Insertion time and procedural time was recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the impact of different factors on insertion and procedural time.

Results

A total of 238 needles (range, 2-8 per insertion) were implanted, with an average insertion depth of 30 mm (range, 20-40 mm). The mean doses for midazolam and fentanyl were 3 mg (standard deviation [SD] = 1) and 53.3 mcg (SD = 23.9) per insertion, respectively. The median insertion time was 30 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] = 22-40), and the median total procedural time was 4.3 hours (IQR = 3.6-5.2). First time insertion, insertions performed before 2019, and higher midazolam dose were associated with significantly longer insertion time, whereas longer insertion time, MRI-based planning, and insertions performed before 2019 were associated with significantly longer total procedural time.

Conclusions

Outpatient interstitial brachytherapy with non-anesthetist-administered sedation is achievable and well-tolerated. This method may significantly lessen the burden on hospital resources and has the potential to be cost-effective.

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, and conventional intravenous opioids for gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy: A single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE Interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies is stressful physically and mentally; however, optimal analgesic methods remain unclear. We investigated the effect of analgesic methods on pain and adverse events during interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies. METHODS The data of 73 patients who underwent interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies between April 2015 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), and conventional intravenous opioid administration were used for analgesia during treatment. We compared the analgesic effects based on a numerical rating scale (NRS), the number of additional analgesics, and the adverse events associated with analgesia. The NRS score was calculated as an average value for every 12 h (NRS1: treatment on the 1st day from 12 to 24 o'clock; NRS2: treatment on the 2nd day from 0 to 12 o'clock; NRS3: treatment on the 2nd day from 12 to 24 o'clock). The mean NRS score differences between the methods were evaluated using mixed models for repeated-measures analyses. RESULTS The NRS score was significantly lower at all times for PCEA (NRS1: p = 0.003; NRS2: p = 0.011; NRS3: p < 0.001). NRS2 and NRS3 were significantly lower for PCIA (NRS2: p = 0.043; NRS3: p < 0.001) than for the conventional method. The NRS scores for PCEA and PCIA were not significantly different. Moreover, additional analgesics and adverse events did not differ between the three treatments. CONCLUSION PCEA and PCIA were superior to conventional intravenous opioids for analgesia in interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies. However, adverse events associated with PCEA and PCIA were not reduced.

Brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A survey of UK provision of care and support

•

91% response rate.

•

Eleven different scheduling regimes identified.

•

Typical duration ranged from three to 52 h.

•

Positive responses about current service provision including support for patients.

•

Respondents made many suggestions for improvements to patient support.

Background and purpose

Gynaecological brachytherapy can cause anxiety, distress and discomfort. It is not known how variation in delivery impacts women’s experiences. To inform future research an online survey was carried out to identify variations in brachytherapy and support available to women receiving treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).

Materials and methods

An online survey was sent to 44 UK brachytherapy centres using the Qualtrics® survey platform. It included questions about brachytherapy scheduling, inpatient/day case treatment, anaesthetic/analgesia, non-pharmacological support and health professionals’ opinions regarding holistic care. A mixture of closed questions with pre-specified options and open questions were employed. Descriptive statistics were generated to identify variance in UK practice. Free text responses were analysed using inductive content analysis.

Results

Responses were received from 39/43 eligible centres (91% response rate). Brachytherapy was predominantly given on an inpatient basis at 65% and day case at 35% of centres. Eleven scheduling regimes were reported with typical duration of brachytherapy ranging from three to 52 h. The main categories identified in response to what worked well were: ‘consistency of staff’; ‘good information provision’ and ‘experienced/skilled/senior staff’. The main categories identified as needing improvement were: ‘training of different staff groups’ and ‘follow up and support’ with many suggestions for service improvements.

Conclusion

The survey provided a comprehensive overview of brachytherapy services for LACC demonstrating wide variability in scheduling regimes, duration of treatment and holistic care. The findings support the need to explore women’s experiences with a range of treatment regimes and anaesthesia and analgesia techniques to inform improvements to future clinical care.

Complications of intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers and their management: A comprehensive review

Intracavitary gynecologic brachytherapy in the form of tandem-based brachytherapy and vaginal cylinder-based brachytherapy represents a fundamental component of the treatment of women with cervical or uterine cancer due to the ability to deliver a therapeutic dose of radiation with sharp dose falloff. This results in highly effective treatment in terms of oncologic outcomes with an overall favorable toxicity profile. Still, complications and side effects of brachytherapy do exist. While advances in brachytherapy techniques have led to a significant decrease in the rates of toxicity, a thorough understanding of the potential complications is crucial to ensuring optimal outcomes for women with gynecologic cancer undergoing brachytherapy. Use of equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) models has allowed incorporation of external beam radiotherapy dose to the brachytherapy dose leading to development of consolidated dose constraints for organs-at-risk in the modern era. This manuscript offers a comprehensive review of potential complications associated with intracavitary brachytherapy for gynecologic cancer including predictive factors, mitigation tactics, and management strategies.

Hypnosedation for endocavitary uterovaginal applications: A pilot study

PURPOSE

Implantations for uterovaginal brachytherapy are usually performed under general or spinal anesthesia, which are not without risk. As it is a rather short procedure and since postoperative pain is minimal, hypnosedation was proposed to selected patients requiring endocavitary applications as part of their routine treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Consecutive patients requiring intracavitary uterovaginal brachytherapy from January to October 2019 were included if they accepted the procedure. A premedication was systematically administered. Hypnosedation was based on an Ericksonian technique. The procedure was immediately interrupted if the patient requested it, in cases of extreme anxiety or pain. Procedure was in that case rescheduled with a "classical" anesthesia technique.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were included. Four patients had to be converted toward a general anesthesia: one because of a fibroma on the probe's way and three young patients with a very anteverted/retroverted uterus that was painful at every mobilization. Mean and maximum pain scores during implant were 2.9/10 and 5.1/10, respectively. The most painful maneuver was cervical dilation for 45% of the patients, followed by mold insertion in 40% of cases. About 85% of the patients declared that hypnosis helped them relax; 90% of the patients would recommend the technique. No procedure-related complication occurred.

CONCLUSION

With a 70% success rate (correct implant with mean pain and anxiety scores < 5), one can conclude that uterovaginal brachytherapy implantation under hypnosedation is feasible and received a high satisfaction rate from the patients. This technique may reduce overall treatment time in a context of difficult access to the OR and to anesthesiologists, while reducing anesthetic drugs resort and postoperative nausea.

Comparative study to evaluate dosimetric differences in patients of locally advanced carcinoma cervix undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy under two different anaesthesia techniques: an audit from a tertiary cancer centre in India

BACKGROUND

Carcinoma cervix is amongst the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in women population worldwide. High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) post external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care in managing locally advanced stage cervical cancer patients. HDR-ICBT is generally performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in operation theatre (OT), but due to logistic reasons, sometimes, it becomes difficult to accommodate all patients under GA. Since prolonged overall treatment time (OTT) makes the results inferior, taking patients in day care setup under procedural sedation (PS) can be an effective alternative. In this audit, we tried to retrospectively analyse the dosimetric difference, if any, in patients who underwent ICBT at our centre, under either GA in OT or PS in day care.

RESULTS

Thirty five patients were analysed 16/35 (45.71%) patients underwent HDR-ICBT under GA while 19/35 (54.28%) patients under PS. In both groups, a statistically significant difference was observed between the dose received by 0.1 cc as well as 2 cc of rectum (p < 0.05), while the bladder and sigmoid colon had comparable dosages.

CONCLUSION

Though our dosimetric analysis highlighted better rectal sparing in patients undergoing HDR-ICBT under GA when compared to patients under PS, PS can still be considered an effective alternative, especially in centres dealing with significant patient load. Further studies are required for firm conclusion.

Pain relief procedures before high-dose-rate brachytherapy for non-surgical treatment of cervix cancer

Cervical cancer (CC) is a neoplasm with great potential for prevention, but it is still an important public health problem in most developing countries. No significant difference is found in the literature between intracavitary high-dose-rate (HDR) and low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, when considering overall, disease specific, and recurrence-free survivals. Cervical dilatation is mandatory for the insertion of intra-uterine tandems for CC intracavitary brachytherapy. Pain and discomfort may eventually be the limiting factors of the procedure, sometimes leading to unsatisfactory results in terms of adequate position of the applicator set. In this paper, we critically reviewed the current sedation and anesthetic options for comfort and safety procedures when performing intracavitary brachytherapy.

The experiences of women receiving brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

To determine women's experiences of brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

KEY FINDINGS

Nineteen studies were included for data extraction/synthesis. Twelve studies focussed on psychological issues, seven on pharmacological aspects of women's experiences. Themes of anxiety, distress, pain, informational needs and non-pharmacological interventions were found. Nine out of ten psychological studies described brachytherapy as a distressing experience causing anxiety and distress for most women. Non-pharmacological interventions were found to be effective and inexpensive adjuncts. Peri and post-operative pharmacological management was variable, but duration of procedure was an important factor.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy for gynaecological cancer causes varying levels of pain, anxiety and distress. To improve women's experiences there needs to be better pain management, patient information and the development of non-pharmacological interventions. Future recommendations are to develop clinical support guidelines, audit the quality of services and develop effective interventions to improve women's experiences of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Comparison of efficacy of meperidine and fentanyl in terms of pain management and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer receiving intracavitary brachytherapy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two sedative regimens, a benzodiazepine with either meperidine or fentanyl, in relieving pain in patients with cervical cancer undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy in terms of pain score and quality of life.

METHODS

Forty unselected outpatients undergoing brachytherapy (160 fractions) were enrolled with informed consent and randomized to receive a benzodiazepine with either meperidine or fentanyl. The perceived pain score according to a standard 10-item numeric rating scale was collected every 15 min during the procedure, and the perceived quality of life was determined at the end of each procedure using the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire. The patients and medical staff members directly involved with the procedure were blinded to the medication used.

RESULTS

The patients' pain levels were mild in both analgesic groups. Meperidine appeared to be slightly more effective than fentanyl, although the differences in the average pain score and quality of life were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Both meperidine and fentanyl in combination with benzodiazepine were effective in relieving pain and discomfort in patients undergoing brachytherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02684942, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Caudal epidural anesthesia during intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer

It has been suggested that pain control during intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer is insufficient in most hospitals in Japan. Our hospital began using caudal epidural anesthesia during high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy in 2011. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the effects of caudal epidural anesthesia during HDR intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer patients. Caudal epidural anesthesia for 34 cervical cancer patients was performed during HDR intracavitary brachytherapy between October 2011 and August 2013. We used the patients' self-reported Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score at the first session of HDR intracavitary brachytherapy as a subjective evaluation of pain. We compared NRS scores of the patients with anesthesia with those of 30 patients who underwent HDR intracavitary brachytherapy without sacral epidural anesthesia at our hospital between May 2010 and August 2011. Caudal epidural anesthesia succeeded in 33 patients (97%), and the NRS score was recorded in 30 patients. The mean NRS score of the anesthesia group was 5.17 ± 2.97, significantly lower than that of the control group's 6.80 ± 2.59 (P = 0.035). The caudal epidural block resulted in no side-effects. Caudal epidural anesthesia is an effective and safe anesthesia option during HDR intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Comparison of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy dosimetry with and without anesthesia in patients with cervical carcinoma

This study compares the dosimetry of high‐dose‐rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR‐ICBT) performed with and without general anesthesia/spinal anesthesia (GA/SA) in patients with cervical carcinoma. We retrospectively retrieved the records of 138 HDR‐ICBT applicator insertions performed in 46 patients: 69 performed with GA/SA (anesthesia group known as AG) in 23 patients, and 69 performed without GA/SA (nonanesthesia group known as NAG) in 23 patients. The intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) application was done with central tandem and two vaginal ovoids. For each ICBT plan, a high‐dose‐rate (HDR) dose of 7 Gy was prescribed to point A. From each plan, the doses to Point B right (BR), Point B left (BL), bladder and rectal reference points (Bladderref and Rectalref) were recorded and compared in the two groups. Student's t‐test was applied to find out the significance of difference. The two groups were comparable in terms of demography and clinical characteristics. Mean Point BL doses in AG and NAG were 1.89 Gy (27% of Point A dose) and 1.82 Gy (26% of Point A dose), respectively. Mean Point BR doses in AG and NAG were 1.91 Gy (27% of Point A dose) and 1.85 Gy (26% of point A), respectively (p‐value 0.7). The mean dose to Bladderref in AG and NAG was 5.03 Gy and 4.90 Gy, respectively (p‐value 0.6). The mean dose to Rectalref was significantly higher in AG than NAG (5.09 Gy vs. 4.49 Gy, p‐value 0.01). Although based on conventional 2D dosimetry planning, our study has demonstrated that avoiding GA/SA does not result in inferior HDR‐ICBT dosimetry.

PACS number: 87.53.Jw, 87.50.cm