1
|
Plotkin A, Olkhov-Mitsel E, Nofech-Mozes S, Djordjevic B, Mirkovic J, Fitzpatrick M, Krizova A, Look Hong NJ. Budget impact analysis of molecular subtype profiling in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 178:54-59. [PMID: 37793305 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the costs associated with four approaches to classifying endometrial cancer (EC), including histomorphological, histomorphological with ancillary immunohistochemical assays, histomolecular and selective molecular classification. METHODS Direct costs were determined per EC sample from the hospital's perspective. A budget impact analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to estimate the mean, minimum and maximum costs per sample and annual institutional costs in adjusted 2022 Canadian dollars. A provincial cost forecast was projected based on expected 2022 EC biopsies. RESULTS In 2018, our institution performed 190 EC biopsies. The mean cost per biopsy was $158 ($156-$212) for histomorphological classification, $384 ($360-$514) for histomorphological classification with immunohistochemistry and $1297 ($1265-1833) for histomolecular classification. Total annual institutional cost for histomorphological classification was $29,980 and $72,950 with immunohistochemistry. For histomolecular classification, the first year cost was $246,521, accounting for initial educational learning curve, and $233,461 thereafter, assuming a consistent number of biopsies per year. Targeted implementation of histomolecular classification among high-grade, p53 abnormal and/or MMR-deficient ECs (56% of cases) cost $169,688 in the first year and $162,418 annually thereafter. With a projected 3400 EC biopsies in Ontario in 2022, histomorphological classification would annually cost $537,078 and $1,305,677 with immunohistochemistry. Histomolecular classification would cost $4,410,203 in the first year and $4,176,737 annually once established. Selective molecular classification would lead to a cost of $3,044,178 in the first year and $2,913,443 thereafter. CONCLUSIONS The study highlights the need for informed decision-making when implementing molecular classification in clinical practice, given the substantial incremental healthcare costs associated with these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Plotkin
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bojana Djordjevic
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jelena Mirkovic
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Madeline Fitzpatrick
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adriana Krizova
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole J Look Hong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Law W, Look Hong N, Ravi A, Day L, Somani Y, Wright FC, Nofech-Mozes S, Tran WT, Curpen B. Budget Impact Analysis of Preoperative Radioactive Seed Localization. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:1370-1378. [PMID: 32875462 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09071-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study models costs in implementing a radioactive seed localization (RSL) program for nonpalpable breast lesions at a large Canadian tertiary hospital to replace existing wire-guided localization (WGL). METHODS All direct and indirect operating costs of localization per lesion from the hospital's perspective were determined by retrospectively reviewing patient data and costs from January 2014 to December 2016. A budget impact analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to calculate the mean cost per lesion, the minimum and maximum cost per lesion, operational costs, and initial costs. RESULTS There were 265 WGL lesions in 2014 and 170 RSL lesions in 2016 included in cost calculation. The mean cost per localization was $185 CAD for WGL ($148-$311) and $283 CAD ($245-$517) for RSL using preloaded seeds, adjusted to 2016 Canadian dollars. The annual operational expenditure including all localizations and overhead costs was $49,835 for WGL and $80,803 for RSL. Initial costs for RSL were $22,000, including external training and new equipment purchases. CONCLUSIONS Our budget impact analysis shows that RSL using preloaded radioactive seeds was more expensive than WGL when considering per-lesion localization costs and specific costs related to radiation safety. Manually loading radioactive seed could be a cost-saving alternative to purchasing preloaded seeds. Our breakdown of costs can provide a framework for other centres to determine which localization method best suit their departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wyanne Law
- Postgraduate Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Nicole Look Hong
- Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Odette Cancer Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Brachytherapy, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Day
- Breast Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yasmin Somani
- Nuclear Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Frances C Wright
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William T Tran
- Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Belinda Curpen
- Breast Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|