Development and pre-testing of a rehabilitation planning consultation for head-and-neck cancer

Fulfillment of patients' information needs during oral cancer treatment and its association with posttherapeutic quality of life

PURPOSE

Surgical therapy for oral cancer can lead to severe physical and psychological disorders that negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between fulfillment of patients' information needs during oral cancer treatment and patients' perception of posttherapeutic disorders influencing QoL.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1359 patients who were surgically treated for oral cancer using questionnaires administered during the multicenter rehabilitation study by the German-Austrian-Swiss Cooperative Group on Tumors of the Maxillofacial Region (DÖSAK). Patients and medical practitioners completed questionnaires following cancer treatment.

RESULTS

Approximately 37% of patients felt inadequately informed about possible physical and psychological consequences of surgery. In contrast, only 16% of patients felt they were given inadequate information about the operative procedure and possible complications, and with regard to tumor diagnosis and cancer disease, only 15% of patients. Significant correlations were found between lacking information and increased perception of posttherapeutic disorders, whereas correlations with tumor-specific and operation-related parameters were markedly lower. The patients with superior QoL after treatment stated more frequently, nearly independent of individual patient characteristics, that the information that they were given prior to therapy was adequate. Information concerning possible physical and psychological consequences of an operation, however, was frequently stated to be inadequate, independent of QoL.

CONCLUSION

Patients whose information needs concerning the diagnosis and treatment of oral cancer are adequately fulfilled may benefit in terms of their therapeutic outcome, experiencing less perception of posttherapeutic physical and psychological disorders and a superior QoL.

Engaging stakeholders in the co-development of programs or interventions using Intervention Mapping: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Health care innovations tailored to stakeholder context are more readily adopted. This study aimed to describe how Intervention Mapping (IM) was used to design health care innovations and how stakeholders were involved.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Science Citation Index were searched from 2008 to November 2017. English language studies that used or cited Intervention Mapping were eligible. Screening and data extraction were done in triplicate. Summary statistics were used to describe study characteristics, IM steps employed, and stakeholder involvement.

RESULTS

A total of 852 studies were identified, 449 were unique, and 333 were excluded based on title and abstracts, 116 full-text articles were considered and 61 articles representing 60 studies from 13 countries for a variety of clinical issues were included. The number of studies published per year increased since 2008 and doubled in 2016 and 2017. The majority of studies employed multiple research methods (76.7%) and all 6 IM steps (73.3%). Resulting programs/interventions were single (55.4%) or multifaceted (46.4%), and 60.7% were pilot-tested. Programs or interventions were largely educational material or meetings, and were targeted to patients (70.2%), clinicians (14.0%) or both (15.8%). Studies provided few details about current or planned evaluation. Of the 4 (9.3%) studies that reported impact or outcomes, 3 achieved positive improvements in patient or professional behaviour or patient outcomes. Many studies (28.3%) did not involve stakeholders. Those that did (71.7%) often involved a combination of patients, clinicians, and community organizations. However, less than half (48.8%) described how they were engaged. Most often stakeholders were committee members and provide feedback on program or intervention content or format.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear if use of IM or stakeholder engagement in IM consistently results in effective programs or interventions. Those employing IM should report how stakeholders were involved in each IM step and how involvement influenced program or intervention design. They should also report the details or absence of planned evaluation. Future research should investigate how to optimize stakeholder engagement in IM, and whether use of IM itself or stakeholder engagement in IM are positively associated with effective programs or interventions.

Content analysis of rehabilitation goals for patients following non-surgical head and neck cancer treatment

PURPOSE

Following head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, individuals experience an array of side effects which can impact on physical, emotional, and practical aspects of their lives. Responsive, supportive rehabilitation services are therefore essential to address ongoing survivorship needs. This study examined the nature of patient-reported goals from acute to long-term post-treatment, to inform design/delivery of future rehabilitation services.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional cohort design, 91 patients between 2 weeks and 5 years of post non-surgical HNC treatment (acute n = 29; sub-acute n = 28; long-term n = 34), provided their top four rehabilitation goals considering any aspect of their lives. Content analysis was used to categorise responses at each time point.

RESULTS

Three core categories of patient goals were identified relating to: (1) treatment side effects (TSE), (2) overall health (OH), and (3) living life (LL). TSE goals were a priority during the acute and sub-acute phases, with less focus long-term. LL goals were prevalent across all time points, though increased in the long-term. Approximately a third of all goals at each time point related to OH.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of rehabilitation goals were identified, and the focus shifted over time. These data highlight the importance of changing the focus of rehabilitation as patients' priorities vary over time. Early multidisciplinary care from allied health services is crucial to provide support with managing side effects and returning to daily activities. In the long-term, greater input from services to address health, nutrition, leisure, and fitness goals may be more beneficial.